RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bleeding is an important and common complication of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). One of the common causes of gastrointestinal bleeding is arteriovenous malformations. However, the source of bleeding is often hard to identify. Thalidomide is efficacious in treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in non-LVAD patients. We report our experience of the use of thalidomide in the treatment of GI bleeding in four patients with LVAD. METHOD AND RESULTS: Four patients who had recurrent GI bleeding from May 2009 to December 2014 were started on thalidomide. All of them responded to treatment and had no further gastrointestinal bleeding while on thalidomide. One patient developed constipation, requiring thalidomide to be stopped. Another patient developed symptomatic neuropathy, that resolved with reduction of dosage. CONCLUSION: Thalidomide appears safe and efficacious in LVAD patients with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding.
Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías/cirugía , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Salud Pública/tendencias , COVID-19/prevención & control , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Salud Pública/normas , SingapurRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hypertension is the most prevalent risk factor in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and plays a key role in the disease. The continued lack of effective therapies to improve outcomes in HFpEF underscores the knowledge gaps regarding the pathophysiology of HFpEF. This review builds on fundamental concepts in pressure overload-induced left ventricular modeling, and summarizes recent knowledge gained regarding the mechanisms underlying the transition from hypertensive heart disease to HFpEF. RECENT FINDINGS: The pathophysiology of hypertensive HFpEF extends beyond the development of left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction to myocardial contractile dysfunction, beyond left atrial structural dilatation to left atrial functional decline, beyond macrovascular stiffening to microvascular dysfunction, beyond central cardiac triggers to systemic endothelial inflammation, beyond fibrosis to titin changes, and beyond collagen deposition to qualitative changes in collagen. The central paradigm involves a systemic proinflammatory state triggering a downstream cascade of cardiac microvascular endothelial activation, oxidative stress, and abnormal myocardial cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling, leading to microvascular rarefaction, chronic ischemia, fibrosis and progression to HFpEF. SUMMARY: Recent advances have provided insights into the pathophysiology of HFpEF in hypertension. Such knowledge provides novel opportunities for therapeutic strategies in the treatment of hypertensive HFpEF.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Humanos , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda , MiocardioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There have been conflicting data regarding the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in Asian population with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We aim to study mortality outcome and its risk predictors in patients with reduced LVEF who declined an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation and assess whether current ICD guidelines for primary prevention are applicable to the population in Singapore. METHODS: This prospective observational study involved 240 consecutive patients who fulfilled the ACC/AHA/HRS criteria for ICD implantation for primary prevention of SCD but declined ICD implantation. Baseline characteristics and mortality outcomes through May 2017 were collected via case-note review after a mean follow-up of 44.8 ± 16.6 months. RESULTS: Majority of our patients were Chinese (71.3%), followed by Malays (16.2%) and Indians (10.8%). Mean age (±SD) was 61 ± 10 years, and 84% were male. Majority were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes I (46.7%) and II (46.3%). Over a mean follow-up of 44.8 ± 16.6 months, all-cause mortality rate was 34.6%. Diabetes mellitus (HR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.01-2.44; P = 0.047) and chronic kidney disease (CKD; HR = 1.95; 95% CI, 1.17-3.23; P = 0.010) were independent predictors of mortality. Patients in NYHA classes II (HR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.32-3.50; P = 0.002) and III (HR = 2.82; 95% CI, 1.34-5.96; P = 0.007) showed higher risk of death. CONCLUSION: The mortality rate was comparable with major primary prevention trials. ICD guideline recommendations for primary prevention may thus be applicable to our local population. Patients with diabetes, CKD, and poorer NYHA status exhibited higher mortality rates.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Device therapy is efficacious in preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with reduced ejection fraction. However, few who need the device eventually opt to undergo implantation and even fewer reconsider their decisions after deliberation. This is due to many factors, including unresolved patient barriers. This study identified the factors that influenced patients' decision to decline implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, and those that influenced patients who initially declined an implant to reconsider having one. METHODS: A single-centre survey was conducted among 240 patients who had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and met the ICD implantation criteria, but had declined ICD implantation. RESULTS: Participants who refused ICD implantation were mostly male (84%), Chinese (71%), married (72%), currently employed (54%), and had up to primary or secondary education (78%) and monthly income of < SGD 3,000 (51%). Those who were more likely to reconsider their decision were aware that SCD was a consequence of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, knowledgeable of the preventive role of ICDs, currently employed and aware that their doctor strongly recommended the implant. Based on multivariate analysis, knowledge of the role of ICDs for primary prophylaxis was the most important factor influencing patient decision. CONCLUSION: This study identified the demographic and social factors of patients who refused ICD therapy. Knowledge of the role of ICDs in preventing SCD was found to be the strongest marker for reconsidering ICD implantation. Measures to address this information gap may lead to higher rates of ICD implantation.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores Implantables , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Singapur/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Diuretics are the mainstay of therapy for restoring the euvolaemic state in patients with decompensated heart failure. However, diuretic resistance remains a challenge. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine the efficacy and safety of ultrafiltration (UF) in 44 hospitalised patients who had decompensated heart failure and diuretic resistance between October 2011 and July 2013. RESULTS: Among the 44 patients, 18 received UF (i.e. UF group), while 26 received diuretics (i.e. standard care group). After 48 hours, the UF group achieved lower urine output (1,355 mL vs. 3,815 mL, p = 0.0003), greater fluid loss (5,058 mL vs. 1,915 mL, p < 0.0001) and greater weight loss (5.0 kg vs. 1.0 kg, p < 0.0001) than the standard care group. The UF group also had a shorter duration of hospitalisation (5.0 days vs. 9.5 days, p = 0.0010). There were no differences in the incidence of 30-day emergency department visits and rehospitalisations for heart failure between the two groups. At 90 days, the UF group had fewer emergency department visits (0.2 vs. 0.8, p = 0.0500) and fewer rehospitalisations for heart failure (0.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0442). Reduction in EQ-5D™ scores was greater in the UF group, both at discharge (2.7 vs. 1.4, p = 0.0283) and 30 days (2.5 vs. 0.3, p = 0.0033). No adverse events were reported with UF. CONCLUSION: UF is an effective and safe treatment that can improve the health outcomes of Asian patients with decompensated heart failure and diuretic resistance.
Asunto(s)
Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Ultrafiltración , Anciano , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Takayasu arteritis is a chronic inflammatory large vessel vasculitis affecting the aorta and its main branches. It can present in various forms, and thereby may lead to a delay in diagnosis. We present a patient with Takayasu arteritis, diagnosed at our center when she presented with severe aortic regurgitation. We also review the current knowledge base with respect to Takayasu arteritis.