RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: As pressure mounts to reduce the number of costly acute care beds, governments and the literature propose top-down ratios. Is this reasonable and fair to the responsible medical officers who, as the key care providers, will need to admit patients and develop discharge plans in a reduced-beds environment? METHOD: Treating physicians of all acute care inpatients on a given day (n = 212) and all new acute care admissions over a 2-week period (n = 125) completed an adapted version of the Nottingham Acute Beds Use Survey (NABUS) Questionnaire. RESULTS: On a given day, only 62 of 212 inpatients were unsuited for any alternative to acute care hospitalization. A floor ratio of 18 acute care beds per 100,000 inhabitants seems adequate for the catchment area in question, provided that alternatives to hospitalization are fully and efficiently available. Alternatives essentially involve an array of the following: supervised residential settings, day hospitals, and intensive home care (2 to 6 hours weekly). The ratio of intensive home care workers required would be 25 per 100,000 inhabitants.