Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 109
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg ; 279(4): 577-582, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37870249

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We analyze the ethics of sham surgical trials from a utilitarian perspective and explore whether patients can benefit from participating in these trials. BACKGROUND: Sham-controlled randomized trials are an essential tool to evaluate the risks and benefits of some surgical procedures. However, sham trials are controversial because they expose patients to the harms of a sham procedure without the possibility of benefit. We argue that ethical analyses of sham trials have focused only on the harms of sham surgery and neglected to account for the harms of the procedure being studied. METHODS: We develop a theoretical model to estimate the harms and benefits experienced by patients who enter a sham surgery trial, taking into account the harms and benefits of the sham and intervention. RESULTS: When the procedure in question is found to be ineffective, sham trials typically result in a net benefit to participants because some participants are only exposed to the harms of the sham procedure, which are much lower than the harms of the full procedure. When the procedure is found to be beneficial, the primary harm to patients who underwent the sham is not due to the sham itself but because they suffer a delay in receiving an effective intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Patients often benefit from participating in sham surgery trials because the harms of the sham procedure are lower than the harms of the full procedure, which may turn out to be ineffective. Our results call for re-thinking the ethics of sham surgery trials.

3.
JAMA ; 329(9): 756-757, 2023 03 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36795378

RESUMEN

This JAMA Clinical Guidelines Synopsis summarizes the 2021 guidelines from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons on management of type A and type B thoracic aortic dissection.


Asunto(s)
Disección de la Aorta Torácica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Disección de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(2): 270, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33587870
10.
JAMA ; 328(6): 575-576, 2022 08 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35862052
14.
JAMA ; 328(13): 1346-1347, 2022 10 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36107415

RESUMEN

This JAMA Clinical Guidelines Synopsis summarizes the 2022 ACC/AHA/HFSA guidelines for management of heart failure in adults with a diagnosis of or at risk for heart failure.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , American Heart Association , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA