Single centre experience of bilateral gracilis flap perineal reconstruction following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision.

AIM: A variety of tissue flaps have been described for the closure of perineal wounds following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APE) or exenteration for locally advanced/recurrent rectal cancer and salvage surgery for anal cancer. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of the bilateral pedicled gracilis muscle flaps (BPGMFs) as a reconstruction option in these patients. This is of particular benefit when using a laparoscopic approach for the abdominal component of the operation, avoiding disruption of the abdominal wall and risk of herniation with other reconstruction options, e.g. vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. METHOD: This is a retrospective single centre case series of patients who underwent reconstruction of perineal defects using BPGMFs using a novel weave technique, from January 2008 to August 2017. RESULTS: There were 25 patients (16 female), with a median follow-up of 19 months (3-102). The indications for BPGMFs were cancer resection (21) and perineal hernia (4). The median length of stay was 14 days (6-60). All-cause mortality was 36% within the follow-up period. A healed perineal wound was achieved in 72% of patients within 30 days (84% of patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy). The overall donor site complication rate was 20% (including infection, dehiscence, numbness, haematoma and seroma) and 28% for the perineal site (including infection, dehiscence and prolapse). CONCLUSIONS: BPGMFs provide an important option for reconstruction of the perineum particularly with a minimally invasive approach or with two stomas.

Clinical significance of intra-nodal naevi in sentinel node biopsies for malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Intra-nodal naevi (INN) identified during assessment of a sentinel lymph node for melanoma are not an uncommon finding. Little is known about their clinical significance. Patients with INN are treated as sentinel node biopsy (SNB) negative currently. Our aim was to assess the significance of INN in patients who undergo SNB for melanoma. METHODS: 353 melanoma patients who underwent a SNB between November 1999 and June 2012 were retrospectively analysed from a prospectively collected database. The patients were divided into SNB negative, INN, isolated tumour cells (ITC) and SNB positive groups. Outcome measures of nodal recurrence, distal recurrence and survival were used to assess the differences between the groups. RESULTS: 203 patients were SNB negative, 103 were positive of which 13 had ITC, 47 had INN (13%). Overall median follow up was 2.3 years (range 0.1-14.1 years). Our data demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit for patients who had an INN compared to the SNB positive and ITC group. INN patients also had significantly better nodal and regional recurrence compared to SNB positive patients. There was no difference between INN and SNB negative patients. CONCLUSION: We have clinically demonstrated that patients with INN on SNB can be adequately treated as SNB negative patients.