Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Med Res ; 27(1): 196, 2022 Oct 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36209134

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The syndrome of transient Headache and Neurological Deficits with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Lymphocytosis (HaNDL) is classified among secondary headaches attributed to "non-infectious, inflammatory intracranial disease". Despite its classification among secondary headaches, the current definition of HaNDL does not contemplate a causal agent. Thus, the aetiology, as well as the pathogenesis of both the headache and the transient focal deficits, remains unknown. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a 29-year-old healthy male developing episodes of thunderclap headaches associated with recurrence of hemiparesis/hemi-paraesthesia; CSF showed lymphocytosis 200/mm3 and increased albumin; brain MRI revealed widespread leptomeningeal enhancement and a non-enhancing, circular diffusion restriction in the splenium of corpus callosum. Screening for neurotropic pathogens detected Epstein-Barr (EBV) DNA in serum and CSF, interpreted as a primary EBV infection once the seroconversion of EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA) IgM to IgG was proven on follow-up. Transcranial Doppler detected, during headache, increased flow velocity in middle cerebral arteries, possibly indicating vasospasm. Oral nimodipine was administered, with prompt clinical recovery, resolution of CSF/MRI abnormalities, and normalization of flow velocities in middle cerebral arteries. CASE-BASED REVIEW: Although the definition of HaNDL does not contemplate a viral trigger or abnormal brain imaging, we found other literature cases of HaNDL associated with direct or indirect signs of CNS infection. CONCLUSIONS: At least in a proportion of patients, a viral aetiology may have a role in HaNDL. Whatever the aetiology, we suggest that the pathogenic mechanism may rely on the (viral or other) agent ultimately triggering cerebral vasoconstriction, which would explain both focal symptoms and headache. Calcium channel blockers might be a therapeutic option.


Asunto(s)
Linfocitosis , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal , Adulto , Albúminas , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio , Antígenos Nucleares del Virus de Epstein-Barr , Cefalea/complicaciones , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunoglobulina M , Linfocitosis/complicaciones , Linfocitosis/diagnóstico , Masculino , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/diagnóstico , Nimodipina , Síndrome , Vasoconstricción , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal/complicaciones
2.
Brain Behav ; 11(8): e01967, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33615744

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fulminant inflammatory demyelination is a possible presentation of inflammatory demyelinating disorders, thus representing a potential stroke mimic especially in younger patients. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To describe clinical and diagnostic pitfalls in a case of fulminant inflammatory demyelination presenting with stroke-like symptoms in an elderly patient. METHODS: Case report and case-based review of the literature. RESULTS: A 67-year-old woman, who accessed the emergency room as suspect stroke for hyperacute onset of rapidly worsening speech impairment and drowsiness, was later diagnosed with a huge brain inflammatory demyelination. Clinical, laboratory, and neuroimaging tests did not allow to put a more specific diagnosis. Due to the rapidly deteriorating course, she received immunosuppression with benefit. CONCLUSION: This report is meant to highlight the diagnostic challenges connected with fulminant inflammatory demyelination, which sometime can resemble a stroke-in evolution and appear clinically unfitting for inclusion in any specific pathological entities within the broad-spectrum of inflammatory demyelinating disorders.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Desmielinizantes , Encefalitis , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Encéfalo , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Neuroimagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen
3.
JAMA Neurol ; 74(5): 512-518, 2017 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28264095

RESUMEN

Importance: Although sparse observational studies have suggested a link between migraine and cervical artery dissection (CEAD), any association between the 2 disorders is still unconfirmed. This lack of a definitive conclusion might have implications in understanding the pathogenesis of both conditions and the complex relationship between migraine and ischemic stroke (IS). Objective: To investigate whether a history of migraine and its subtypes is associated with the occurrence of CEAD. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort study of consecutive patients aged 18 to 45 years with first-ever acute ischemic stroke enrolled in the multicenter Italian Project on Stroke in Young Adults was conducted between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2015. In a case-control design, the study assessed whether the frequency of migraine and its subtypes (presence or absence of an aura) differs between patients whose IS was due to CEAD (CEAD IS) and those whose IS was due to a cause other than CEAD (non-CEAD IS) and compared the characteristics of patients with CEAD IS with and without migraine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequency of migraine and its subtypes in patients with CEAD IS vs non-CEAD IS. Results: Of the 2485 patients (mean [SD] age, 36.8 [7.1] years; women, 1163 [46.8%]) included in the registry, 334 (13.4%) had CEAD IS and 2151 (86.6%) had non-CEAD IS. Migraine was more common in the CEAD IS group (103 [30.8%] vs 525 [24.4%], P = .01), and the difference was mainly due to migraine without aura (80 [24.0%] vs 335 [15.6%], P < .001). Compared with migraine with aura, migraine without aura was independently associated with CEAD IS (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.30-2.33). The strength of this association was higher in men (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.31-3.04) and in patients 39.0 years or younger (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.22-2.71). The risk factor profile was similar in migrainous and non-migrainous patients with CEAD IS (eg, hypertension, 20 [19.4%] vs 57 [24.7%], P = .29; diabetes, 1 [1.0%] vs 3 [1.3%], P > .99). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with IS aged 18 to 45 years, migraine, especially migraine without aura, is consistently associated with CEAD. This finding suggests common features and warrants further analyses to elucidate the underlying biologic mechanisms.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Enfermedades Arteriales Intracraneales/epidemiología , Migraña con Aura/epidemiología , Migraña sin Aura/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA