Predictors of clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients ≥75 years of age: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy has been shown to benefit selected patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Older patients have been underrepresented in randomized trials. This study was conducted to determine whether predictive factors for cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes differ in patients older and younger than 75 years of age. METHODS: Consecutive patients who received a cardiac resynchronization device cardiac resynchronization therapy between 2013 and 2016 in our center were retrospectively included in this cohort study. The primary endpoint was cardiac resynchronization therapy effectiveness, which was defined as survival for one year with both no heart failure hospitalization and improvement by one or more NYHA class. The secondary endpoints were mortality, complications, and device therapies. RESULTS: Among the 243 patients included, 102 were ≥ 75 years old. Cardiac resynchronization therapy effectiveness was observed in 70 patients (50%) < 75 years old and in 48 patients (47%) ≥75 years old (p = 0.69). NYHA class ≥III (OR = 6.02; CI95% [1.33-18.77], p = 0.002) was a predictive factor for cardiac resynchronization therapy effectiveness only in the ≥75-year-old group, while atrial fibrillation was independently negatively associated with the primary endpoint in the < 75-year-old group (OR = 0.28; CI95% [0.13-0.62], p = 0.001). The one-year mortality rate was 14%, with no difference between age groups. Rescue cardiac resynchronization therapy and atrial fibrillation were independent predictive factors for mortality in both age groups. Eighty-two complications occurred in 45 patients (19%), with no difference between groups. Defibrillator use and QRS duration were independent predictive factors for complications in both age groups. There was no difference between groups considering device therapies. CONCLUSION: At one year, cardiac resynchronization therapy response is not compromised by patient age. In older patients, highly symptomatic individuals with NYHA class ≥III have better outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Usefulness of sleep apnea monitoring by pacemaker sensor in elderly patients with diastolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Automated detection of sleep apnea (SA) by pacemaker (PM) has been proposed and exhibited good agreement with polysomnography to detect severe SA. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of SA monitoring algorithm in elderly patients with diastolic dysfunction. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to the Caen University Hospital for PM implantation between May 2016 and December 2018 presenting isolated diastolic dysfunction were eligible for the study. The respiratory disturbance index (RDI) measured by the PM, and the mean monthly RDI (RDIm), were compared to the apnea hypopnea index (AHI) assessed with portable monitor for severe SA diagnosis. RESULTS: During the study period, 68 patients were recruited, aged of 80.4 ± 8.2 years. 63 patients underwent polygraphy with a portable monitor: 57 presented SA (83.8%), including 16 with severe SA (23.5%). Eight were treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). We found the RDI cutoff value of 22 events/h to predict severe SA, with 71.4% sensitivity and 65.2%, specificity. The RDIm cutoff value to detect severe SA was 19 events/h, with a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 66%. There was a significant reduction in RDI (p = 0.041), RDIm (p = 0.039) and AHI (p = 0.002) after CPAP. Supraventricular arrhythmias were frequent in all patients, regardless of SA severity, considering either episodes occurrence or total burden. CONCLUSION: In a population of elderly patients with PM and diastolic dysfunction, the SA monitoring algorithm was able to detect severe SA, with good diagnostic performance values, but also to provide follow-up data for the patients treated with CPAP.