RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal myofunctional therapy is a multi-component therapy effective to reduce the severity of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, existing protocols are difficult to replicate in the clinical setting. There is a need to isolate the specific effectiveness of each component of the therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a 6 weeks tongue elevation training programme in patients with OSA. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eligible participants were adults diagnosed with moderate OSA who presented low adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy (mean use <4 h per night). The intervention group completed a 6 weeks tongue elevation training protocol that consisted in anterior tongue elevation strength and endurance tasks with the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument. The control group completed a 6 weeks sham training protocol that involved expiratory muscle training at very low intensity. Polygraphy data, tongue force and endurance, and OSA symptoms were evaluated pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome was apneoa-hypopnea index (AHI). RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (55 ± 11 years) were recruited. According to modified intention-to-treat analysis (n = 25), changes in AHI and c did not significantly differ between groups. Daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) and tongue endurance significantly improved in the intervention group compared to the control group (p = .015 and .022, respectively). In the intervention group, 75% of participants had a decrease in daytime sleepiness that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. CONCLUSION: Six weeks of tongue elevation muscle training had no effect on OSA severity.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Terapia Miofuncional , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Lengua , Adulto , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/terapia , Músculos Faciales , Humanos , Terapia Miofuncional/métodos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapiaRESUMEN
The physiotherapy service became an important player in the care of patients with COVID-19 at Pourtalès hospital (Neuchâtel, Switzerland), illustrating its important role in the organization of acute care units. The workforce was increased, and the diaries extended (7/7d, 24/24h). Respiratory physiotherapists were largely involved in the initiation and the adaptation of the respiratory therapy in the units dedicated to Covid-19 patients (emergency, intensive care and pulmonology units), such as oxygen therapy and both invasive and non-invasive ventilation. Rehabilitation was also early initiated in order to limit the risk of intensive care unit-acquired polyneuromyopathy and to prevent physical deconditioning.
Le Service de physiothérapie s'est inscrit comme un acteur important dans la prise en charge des patients Covid-19 à l'Hôpital Pourtalès (Neuchâtel, Suisse), illustrant son rôle important dans l'organigramme des unités de soins aigus. L'effectif a été augmenté et les horaires étendus (7 j/7, 24 h/24). Les physiothérapeutes spécialisés dans le domaine respiratoire ont activement participé à la mise en route des traitements respiratoires et à leur adaptation dans les unités dédiées aux patients Covid-19 (urgences, soins intensifs et pneumologie), tels que l'oxygénothérapie et l'assistance ventilatoire invasive et non invasive. Une réhabilitation a par ailleurs été initiée précocement afin de limiter le risque de polyneuromyopathie acquise aux soins intensifs et de prévenir le déconditionnement physique.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fisioterapeutas , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , SARS-CoV-2 , SuizaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the accepted standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. In the last decades, automatic PAP (APAP) adjustment modes have been increasingly used. Pressure auto adjustment offers better comfort to the patient and represents a valuable help for the clinician to provide optimal treatment. However, device performance differs among manufacturers. Furthermore, the success of the therapy relies greatly on unintentional air leak level for many reasons, hence the importance to investigate the performance of the most common devices. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 3 APAP devices from the most common manufacturers in specific conditions (ie, obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, hypopnea), with and without unintentional air leak. METHODS: This was a bench test study. Performance tests were conducted on a breathing simulator using a Starling resistor, representing the upper airways, and an adjustable unintentional air leak valve. Three APAP devices (AirSense 10, DreamStation, and Prisma 20A) were tested in different scenarios. RESULTS: Without unintentional air leak, performance of the 3 devices was similar to existing literature. However, performance was altered with the addition of unintentional air leak in some scenario. The AirSense 10 was not able to respond correctly to obstructive apnea (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.021, P = .61) and hypopnea (ICC 0.059, P = .26). Prisma 20A lowest performance was seen during simulated obstructive apnea (ICC 0.708, P < .001). DreamStation lowest performance was seen during simulated hypopnea events (ICC 0.755, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: All 3 APAP devices reacted differently to the added unintentional air leak. Performance was altered with some devices, which could affect the therapy success in patients with sleep apnea syndrome. The variability of performance of some APAP devices with unintentional air leak should make clinicians evaluate their use in a home setting.
Asunto(s)
Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño , Apnea Central del Sueño , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Diseño de Equipo , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/terapia , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Apnea Central del Sueño/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 breakout, a global call for low-cost portable ventilators was made following the strong demand for ventilatory support techniques. Among a few development projects, COVIDair non-invasive ventilator was developed and produced in a record time during the critical period of spring 2020. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate COVIDair performance (i.e., inspiratory trigger delay time, TDT, pressurization time and inspiratory to expiratory time ratio, I:E) on a test bench simulating physiological characteristics of breathing. METHOD: Performance tests were conducted on a breathing simulator (ASL 5000, IngMar Medical™) in two different lung mechanics (i.e., normal and severe restrictive). RESULTS: Under normal pulmonary mechanics, the inspiratory TDT is on average between 89.0 (±2.1) and 135.0 (±9.7) ms. In a situation of severe restrictive pulmonary mechanics, the inspiratory TDT is on average between 80 (±3.1) and 99.2 (±5.5) ms. Pressurization time to pre-set inspiratory pressure was on average from 234.6 (±5.5) to 318.6 (±1.9) ms. The absolute difference between the actual I:E cycling measure and the pre-set I:E cycling value ranged from 0.1 to 10.7% on average. CONCLUSION: In normal and severe restrictive pulmonary mechanics scenarios, the performance of COVIDair meets the expected standards for non-invasive ventilators.
RESUMEN
Background: CPAP is the first line treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Recently, the use of added filters has been debated following the field safety notice of Philips Respironics™ on potential health risks due to foam degradation used in their ventilators. However, the added resistance of filters has never been analyzed. Objectives: The primary aim was to investigate the impact of four different filters on APAP mode performance with and without added unintentional air leaks (UIAL) with two simulated respiratory events. The secondary aim was to assess the pressure drop due to the increased filter resistance at different fixed CPAP pressure levels. Method: This is a bench study. Performance tests were performed on a breathing simulator (ASL 5000™) with a DreamStation™ device. To assess the combined effect of UIAL, a controlled valve was added to the setup. Results: Without UIAL, the algorithm was able to detect respiratory events and increase pressure level consequently. In the presence of UIAL, the device's response to simulated events was affected. In fixed CPAP mode, the median measured end-expiratory pressure was 6.2 to 10.0% (p < 0.001) below the set pressure with the additional filters. Additional UIAL severely impacted the delivered pressure with a median reduction up to 28.3% (p < 0.001) to the set pressure. Conclusion: Despite a slight pressure drop, the APAP algorithm still performed with additional filters when UIAL were avoided. However, the combined effect of added filter resistance and UIAL severely impacted APAP performance and effectively delivered set pressure.
RESUMEN
The current gold-standard treatment for COVID-19-related hypoxemic respiratory failure is invasive mechanical ventilation. However, do not intubate orders (DNI), prevent the use of this treatment in some cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate if non-invasive ventilatory supports can provide a good therapeutic alternative to invasive ventilation in patients with severe COVID-19 infection and a DNI. Data were collected from four centres in three European countries. Patients with severe COVID-19 infection were included. We emulated a hypothetical target trial in which outcomes were compared in patients with a DNI order treated exclusively by non-invasive respiratory support with patients who could be intubated if necessary. We set up a propensity score and an inverse probability of treatment weighting to remove confounding by indication. Four-hundred patients were included: 270 were eligible for intubation and 130 had a DNI order. The adjusted risk ratio for death among patients eligible for intubation was 0.81 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.42). The median length of stay in acute care for survivors was similar between groups (18 (10-31) vs. (19 (13-23.5); p = 0.76). The use of non-invasive respiratory support is a good compromise for patients with severe COVID-19 and a do not intubate order.