Ocular side effects of anticancer agents used in the treatment of gynecologic cancers.

The treatment landscape of gynecologic cancers has expanded in recent years to include targeted and immune-based therapies. These therapies often have ocular side effects not seen with conventional chemotherapies, some of which can cause significant visual impairment if not recognized in a timely fashion. Clinicians must know how to appropriately identify, mitigate, and treat these ocular adverse events. Management often involves working with an interdisciplinary team of eye specialists, and it is important to know when to refer patients for specialized care. Proactive identification of eye specialists, especially in rural and community settings where access to care can be limited, may be necessary. Here, we discuss the management of common ocular toxicities seen with novel anticancer agents used to treat gynecologic cancers.

Prostate cancer in transgender women: considerations for screening, diagnosis and management.

Transgender individuals represent 0.55% of the US population, equivalent to 1.4 million transgender adults. In transgender women, feminisation can include a number of medical and surgical interventions. The main goal is to deprive the phenotypically masculine body of androgens and simultaneously provide oestrogen therapy for feminisation. In gender-confirming surgery (GCS) for transgender females, the prostate is usually not removed. Due to limitations of existing cohort studies, the true incidence of prostate cancer in transgender females is unknown but is thought to be less than the incidence among cis-gender males. It is unclear how prostate cancer develops in androgen-deprived conditions in these patients. Six out of eleven case reports in the literature presented with metastatic disease. It is thought that androgen receptor-mediated mechanisms or tumour-promoting effects of oestrogen may be responsible. Due to the low incidence of prostate cancer identified in transgender women, there is little evidence to drive specific screening recommendations in this patient subpopulation. The treatment of early and locally advanced prostate cancer in these patients warrants an individualised thoughtful approach with input from patients' reconstructive surgeons. Both surgical and radiation treatment for prostate cancer in these patients can profoundly impact the patient's quality of life. In this review, we discuss the evidence surrounding screening and treatment of prostate cancer in transgender women and consider the current gaps in our knowledge in providing evidence-based guidance at the molecular, genomic and epidemiological level, for clinical decision-making in the management of these patients.

Outcomes in Premenopausal Patients with HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer and Lymph Node Micrometastasis Based on the 21-Gene Recurrence Score.

BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC) and 21-gene OncotypeDX (ODX) recurrence scores (RS) <26 do not benefit from chemoendocrine therapy ("CET") compared to endocrine monotherapy ("E"), regardless of nodal status. In premenopausal patients, nodal status is significant in interpretation of RS. However, guidelines are not explicit in recommendations for patients with micrometastasis ("pN1mi" staging). METHODS: A cohort of patients aged <50 years with HR+/HER2- EBC who underwent ODX testing was identified within the National Cancer Database 2004-2019 dataset. We confirmed the prognostic value of ODX in pN1mi disease with multivariate Cox regression for overall survival (OS). We explored how patterns of practice differed by nodal status in cases of low RS (<26) with chi-squared testing. Finally, we performed Kaplan-Meier models comparing OS for those with RS <26 receiving E versus CET, controlling for nodal status. RESULTS: Of 72 068 patients aged <50 years with HR+/HER2- EBC, 6.1% (n = 4402) had micrometastasis. Multivariate Cox regression confirmed prognostic value of ODX in this pN1mi cohort (P < .001). In the context of RS <26, CET was used most commonly in patients with 1-3 involved lymph nodes ("pN1a-c" disease), less frequently in pN1mi disease, and least in node-negative ("pN0") disease. A benefit in OS was observed in cases with RS <26 and pN1a-c receiving CET vs. E (P = .017), but not in pN1mi (P = .49) or pN0 (P = .57) disease. CONCLUSION: Our large registry analysis found CET was associated with improved OS in pN1a-c, but not in pN1mi or pN0 disease.

Adherence to NCCN Genetic Testing Guidelines in Pancreatic Cancer and Impact on Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2019 Guidelines recommend universal germline (GL) testing for patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer (PC), given germline mutations (gMut) can occur at a similar rate irrespective of an individual's family history of cancer. Molecular analysis of tumors in those with metastatic disease is also recommended. We aimed to determine rates of genetic testing at our institution, factors associated with testing, and outcomes of those tested. METHODS: Frequency of GL and somatic testing was examined in pts diagnosed with non-endocrine PC, with >2 visits between June 2019 and June 2021 at the Mount Sinai Health System. The clinicopathological variables and treatment outcomes were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 149 pts met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-six pts (44%) underwent GL testing: 42 (28%) at time of diagnosis with the remainder later in treatment. The rate of GL testing increased every year: 33% (2019), 44% (2020), and 61% (2021). A family history of cancer was the only variable associated with the decision to perform GL testing. Eight pts (12% of pts tested) had pathological gMut: BRCA1 (1), BRCA2 (1), ATM (2), PALB2 (2), NTHL1 (1), both CHEK2 and APC (1). Neither gBRCA pt received a PARP inhibitor, all except one received first-line platinum. Ninety-eight pts (65.7%) had molecular tumor testing (66.7% of patients with metastases). Two pts with BRCA2 somatic mut did not have GL testing. Three pts received targeted therapies. CONCLUSION: Genetic testing based on provider discretion results in low rates of GL testing. Early results of genetic testing can have an impact on treatment decisions and trajectory of disease. Initiatives to increase testing are needed but must be feasible in real-world clinic settings.

Targeting DNA damage repair pathways in pancreas cancer.

Pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third most common cause of cancer death in the USA. While other cancers with historically poor prognoses have benefited from new immunotherapies and targeted agents, the 5-year survival rate for PDAC patients has remained static. The accessibility to genomic testing has improved in recent years, and it is now clear that PDAC is a heterogenous disease, with a subset of patients harboring actionable mutations. There are several targeted therapies approved by the Food and Drug administration (FDA) in PDAC: EGFR inhibitor erlotinib (combined with gemcitabine) in unselected patients, TRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib for patients with NTRK fusion mutation, the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab for mismatch repair-deficient patients, and the poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib in patients with germline BRCA mutation as a maintenance therapy. DNA damage repair (DDR) is paramount to genomic integrity and cell survival. The defective repair of DNA damage is one of the hallmarks of cancer, and abnormalities in DDR pathways are closely linked with the development of malignancies and upregulation of these pathways linked with resistance to treatment. The prevalence of somatic and germline mutations in DDR pathways in metastatic PDAC is reported to be approximately 15-25%. Patients with DDR gene alterations benefit from a personalized approach to treatment. Recently, the POLO trial demonstrated a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in metastatic PDAC patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation treated with maintenance olaparib following platinum-based induction chemotherapy. This was the first phase 3 randomized trial to establish a biomarker-driven approach in the treatment of PDAC and establishes a precedent for maintenance therapy in PDAC. The review herein aims to outline the current treatment landscape for PDAC patients with DDR gene-mutated tumors, highlight novel therapeutic approaches focused on surmounting tumor resistance, and explore new strategies which may lead to an expansion in the number of patients who benefit from these targeted treatments.

GLP-1 receptor agonist as an effective treatment for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a case report.

Introduction: Lymphedema is a major public health issue for many women undergoing breast cancer treatment. Although weight loss has been reported to be beneficial in the treatment of lymphedema, no studies to date have examined the use of GLP-1RAs for the treatment of secondary lymphedema. This case report describes a patient who experienced significant resolution of her breast cancer-related lymphedema after initiation of a GLP-1RA for weight loss. Main symptoms and/or important clinical findings: Nine months postoperatively the patient developed arm swelling and disability. While on adjuvant chemo and hormonal therapy, her weight increased dramatically and peaked 4 years later. Corresponding to her weight gain was significant worsening of her symptoms. The main diagnoses therapeutic interventions and outcomes: Due to adjuvant cancer-related weight gain and inability to lose weight with diet and exercise, she was referred for evaluation and diagnosed with lymphedema. The patient started treatment with a Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist and lost 24% of her body weight over the next 13 months. The improvement in her lymphedema mirrored her weight loss. Her limb volume difference dropped from 10.3% down to 3.4% and she no longer required a compression garment. Her imaging demonstrated return of lymphatic pumping and she experienced a significant improvement in quality of life, assessed by a validated lymphedema-specific patient reported outcome (PROM). She remains on hormonal therapy, no longer needs compression and is back to regular exercise without impairment. Conclusions: GLP-1 RAs provide a potential medical option for many patients struggling with weight gain and lymphedema. We have observed by all objective measures a significant reduction in lymphedema and the elimination of compression in the case presented as a direct result of GLP-1 RA. This may also reduce a patient's BMI to the point where they become a good candidate for lymphovenous bypass or vascularized lymph node transplant when indicated.

Optimizing care in early phase cancer trials: The role of palliative care.

Advancements in cancer treatment have led to improved survival rates, with early phase clinical trials (EPCTs) serving as important initial steps in evaluating novel therapies. Recent studies have shown that response rates in these trials have doubled in the last twenty years. Patients who enroll on EPCTs have advanced cancer and heightened symptomatology yet maintain a robust performance status that qualifies them for clinical trial participation. It is well established that many of these patients have needs that can be addressed by palliative care, including symptom management, value assessments, advance care planning, and psychosocial and spiritual support. Several small studies have aimed to identify the most beneficial palliative care intervention for this cohort of patients, ranging from formal clinic-based multidisciplinary palliative care interventions to home-based interventions. While outcomes have trended towards benefit for patients, especially pertaining to psychological well-being, most studies were not powered to detect additional benefits for improved physical symptom management, reduction in care utilization or increased length of time on trial. In this review, we discuss the unique palliative care needs of this population and what we can learn from results of past interventional studies. We advocate for a tailored palliative care approach that acknowledges the time toxicity experienced by patients enrolled in EPCTs and address challenges posed by shortages within the palliative care workforce.

Life-Threatening Myositis in a Patient With EGFR-Mutated NSCLC on Osimertinib: Case Report.

Osimertinib is the standard of care for the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC. We report a case of a 52-year-old woman who developed life-threatening myopathy because of treatment with osimertinib. Limited instances of myositis have been previously reported in the literature; however, none have resulted in life-threatening oropharyngeal and respiratory muscle weakness as seen in this case. Care should be taken in administering osimertinib concurrently with other medications metabolized by the CYP3A4 system, and ongoing work to identify patients at risk for severe reactions is necessary. The use of routine creatinine phosphokinase monitoring should be considered as part of oncologic management.

Does the 21-gene recurrence score have clinical utility in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer?

The 21-gene recurrence score assay has been validated as a predictive biomarker in early-stage HR+ and HER2-breast cancer. It is not indicated for use in HER2+ disease based on national guidelines. In this study, we assessed the value of 21-gene recurrence score (RS), or OncotypeDX (ODX), testing in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. We used the National Cancer Database to identify patients with stages I-II, HR+/HER2+ breast cancer who received multi-gene testing with ODX. We then explored the prognostic and predictive value of this biomarker through various forms of survival modeling. ODX testing was performed in n = 5,280 patients. N = 2,678 patients (50.7%) had a RS < 26, while n = 2,602 (49.3%) had a RS ≥26. In Kaplan-Meier survival modeling for patients with recurrence scores <26, there was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.445) between patients receiving different systemic treatment regimens. However, when recurrence scores were ≥26, there was a statistically-significant difference in overall survival between systemic treatment regimens (p < 0.001). 5-year overall survival was highest (97.4%) for patients receiving triple therapy (anti-HER2 with chemotherapy and endocrine therapy), followed by those receiving dual therapy with endocrine and anti-HER2 (96.7%), and endocrine with chemotherapy (94.9%). Patients receiving endocrine therapy alone exhibited the lowest 5-year overall survival (88.5%). RESULTS: Analysis from this large national cancer registry suggests that multigene testing may have predictive value in treatment selection for patients with early-stage, HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. Prospective trials are warranted to identify subgroups of patients with HR+/HER2+ breast cancer who can be spared anti-HER2 treatments and cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Evaluating the role of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas.

Objectives: Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) are rare, accounting for < 1% of all uterine malignancies. Treatment has been guided by small case series and retrospective studies. Endocrine therapy is used in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are widely used in clinical practice. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of AI use in the largest cohort of patients with LGESS to date. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients with LGESS treated with an AI at our institution from 1/1998-12/2020. Response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. Results: Forty patients were identified. Treatment was well tolerated, with 57.5% experiencing adverse effects. The most common were arthralgias (12 patients, 30%) and hot flashes (9, 22.5%). Two of 11 patients with RECIST-evaluable imaging experienced a partial response to treatment. Median PFS for the entire cohort was 79.2 months (95% CI 39.7 months to NE); the 5-year PFS rate was 59.6% (95% CI 41.8% to 73.6, p = 0.065). Median follow-up for the 29 survivors was 97.9 months (range: 12.6-226.7). The 5-year OS rate was 81.5% (95% CI 64.9-90.7%). One patient who discontinued AI after 10 years of treatment recurred 1 year later. Conclusion: AIs were well tolerated and offered periods of prolonged disease stability, even in the metastatic setting. Our study suggests, however, that response rates may be lower than previously reported. Data on optimal duration of treatment is needed, but the rarity of LGESS is an obstacle to conducting large clinical trials.

A Review of the Pathophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Androgen deprivation therapy or ADT is one of the cornerstones of management of locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer, alongside radiation therapy. However, despite early response, most advanced prostate cancers progress into an androgen unresponsive or castrate resistant state, which hitherto remains an incurable entity and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in men in the US. Recent advances have uncovered multiple complex and intermingled mechanisms underlying this transformation. While most of these mechanisms revolve around androgen receptor (AR) signaling, novel pathways which act independently of the androgen axis are also being discovered. The aim of this article is to review the pathophysiological mechanisms that help bypass the apoptotic effects of ADT to create castrate resistance. The article discusses castrate resistance mechanisms under two categories: 1. Direct AR dependent pathways such as amplification or gain of function mutations in AR, development of functional splice variants, posttranslational regulation, and pro-oncogenic modulation in the expression of coactivators vs corepressors of AR. 2. Ancillary pathways involving RAS/MAP kinase, TGF-beta/SMAD pathway, FGF signaling, JAK/STAT pathway, Wnt-Beta catenin and hedgehog signaling as well as the role of cell adhesion molecules and G-protein coupled receptors. miRNAs are also briefly discussed. Understanding the mechanisms involved in the development and progression of castration-resistant prostate cancer is paramount to the development of targeted agents to overcome these mechanisms. A number of targeted agents are currently in development. As we strive for more personalized treatment across oncology care, treatment regimens will need to be tailored based on the type of CRPC and the underlying mechanism of castration resistance.