Deep image prior cine MR fingerprinting with B1 + spin history correction.

PURPOSE: To develop a deep image prior (DIP) reconstruction for B1 + -corrected 2D cine MR fingerprinting (MRF). METHODS: The proposed method combines low-rank (LR) modeling with a DIP to generate cardiac phase-resolved parameter maps without motion correction, employing self-supervised training to enforce consistency with undersampled spiral k-space data. Two implementations were tested: one approach (DIP) for cine T1 , T2 , and M0 mapping, and a second approach (DIP with effective B1 + estimation [DIP-B1]) that also generated an effective B1 + map to correct for errors due to RF transmit inhomogeneities, through-plane motion, and blood flow. Cine MRF data were acquired in 14 healthy subjects and four reconstructions were compared: LR, low-rank motion-corrected (LRMC), DIP, and DIP-B1. Results were compared to diastolic ECG-triggered MRF, MOLLI, and T2 -prep bSSFP. Additionally, bright-blood and dark-blood images calculated from cine MRF maps were used to quantify ventricular function and compared to reference cine measurements. RESULTS: DIP and DIP-B1 outperformed other cine MRF reconstructions with improved noise suppression and delineation of high-resolution details. Within-segment variability in the myocardium (reported as the coefficient of variation for T1 /T2 ) was lowest for DIP-B1 (2.3/8.3%) followed by DIP (2.7/8.7%), LRMC (3.5/10.5%), and LR (15.3/39.6%). Spatial homogeneity improved with DIP-B1 having the lowest intersegment variability (2.6/4.1%). The mean bias in ejection fraction was -1.1% compared to reference cine scans. CONCLUSION: A DIP reconstruction for 2D cine MRF enabled cardiac phase-resolved mapping of T1 , T2 , M0 , and the effective B1 + with improved noise suppression and precision compared to LR and LRMC.

The future of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: All-in-one vs. real-time (Part 1).

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols can be lengthy and complex, which has driven the research community to develop new technologies to make these protocols more efficient and patient-friendly. Two different approaches to improving CMR have been proposed, specifically "all-in-one" CMR, where several contrasts and/or motion states are acquired simultaneously, and "real-time" CMR, in which the examination is accelerated to avoid the need for breathholding and/or cardiac gating. The goal of this two-part manuscript is to describe these two different types of emerging rapid CMR. To this end, the vision of each is described, along with techniques which have been devised and tested along the pathway of clinical implementation. The pros and cons of the different methods are presented, and the remaining open needs of each are detailed. Part 1 will tackle the "all-in-one" approaches, and Part 2 the "real-time" approaches along with an overall summary of these emerging methods.

MR Fingerprinting for Liver Tissue Characterization: A Histopathologic Correlation Study.

Background Liver MR fingerprinting (MRF) enables simultaneous quantification of T1, T2, T2*, and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps in single breath-hold acquisitions. Histopathologic correlation studies are desired for its clinical use. Purpose To compare liver MRF-derived metrics with separate reference quantitative MRI in participants with diffuse liver disease, evaluate scan-rescan repeatability of liver MRF, and validate MRF-derived measurements for histologic grading of liver biopsies. Materials and Methods This prospective study included participants with diffuse liver disease undergoing MRI from July 2021 to January 2022. Participants underwent two-dimensional single-section liver MRF and separate reference quantitative MRI. Linear regression, Bland-Altman plots, and coefficients of variation were used to assess the bias and repeatability of liver MRF measurements. For participants undergoing liver biopsy, the association between mapping and histologic grading was evaluated by using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Results Fifty-six participants (mean age, 59 years ± 15 [SD]; 32 women) were included to compare mapping techniques and 23 participants were evaluated with liver biopsy (mean age, 52.7 years ± 12.7; 14 women). The linearity of MRF with reference measurements in participants with diffuse liver disease (R2 value) for T1, T2, T2*, and PDFF maps was 0.86, 0.88, 0.54, and 0.99, respectively. The overall coefficients of variation for repeatability in the liver were 3.2%, 5.5%, 7.1%, and 4.6% for T1, T2, T2*, and PDFF maps, respectively. MRF-derived metrics showed high diagnostic performance in differentiating moderate or severe changes from mild or no changes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for fibrosis, inflammation, steatosis, and siderosis: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.52, 0.62], 0.92 [95% CI: 0.88, 0.92], 0.97 [95% CI: 0.96, 0.97], and 0.74 [95% CI: 0.57, 0.74], respectively). Conclusion Liver MR fingerprinting provided repeatable T1, T2, T2*, and proton density fat fraction maps in high agreement with reference quantitative mapping and may correlate with pathologic grades in participants with diffuse liver disease. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Free-running 3D whole-heart T1 and T2 mapping and cine MRI using low-rank reconstruction with non-rigid cardiac motion correction.

PURPOSE: To introduce non-rigid cardiac motion correction into a novel free-running framework for the simultaneous acquisition of 3D whole-heart myocardial T 1 $$ {T}_1 $$ and T 2 $$ {T}_2 $$ maps and cine images, enabling a ∼ $$ \sim $$ 3-min scan. METHODS: Data were acquired using a free-running 3D golden-angle radial readout interleaved with inversion recovery and T 2 $$ {T}_2 $$ -preparation pulses. After correction for translational respiratory motion, non-rigid cardiac-motion-corrected reconstruction with dictionary-based low-rank compression and patch-based regularization enabled 3D whole-heart T 1 $$ {T}_1 $$ and T 2 $$ {T}_2 $$ mapping at any given cardiac phase as well as whole-heart cardiac cine imaging. The framework was validated and compared with established methods in 11 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Good quality 3D T 1 $$ {T}_1 $$ and T 2 $$ {T}_2 $$ maps and cine images were reconstructed for all subjects. Septal T 1 $$ {T}_1 $$ values using the proposed approach ( 1200 ± 50 $$ 1200\pm 50 $$ ms) were higher than those from a 2D MOLLI sequence ( 1063 ± 33 $$ 1063\pm 33 $$ ms), which is known to underestimate T 1 $$ {T}_1 $$ , while T 2 $$ {T}_2 $$ values from the proposed approach ( 51 ± 4 $$ 51\pm 4 $$ ms) were in good agreement with those from a 2D GraSE sequence ( 51 ± 2 $$ 51\pm 2 $$ ms). CONCLUSION: The proposed technique provides 3D T 1 $$ {T}_1 $$ and T 2 $$ {T}_2 $$ maps and cine images with isotropic spatial resolution in a single ∼ $$ \sim $$ 3.3-min scan.

Low-rank motion correction for accelerated free-breathing first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging.

PURPOSE: Develop a novel approach for accelerated 2D free-breathing myocardial perfusion via low-rank motion-corrected (LRMC) reconstructions. METHODS: Myocardial perfusion imaging requires high spatial and temporal resolution, despite scan time constraints. Here, we incorporate LRMC models into the reconstruction-encoding operator, together with high-dimensionality patch-based regularization, to produce high quality, motion-corrected myocardial perfusion series from free-breathing acquisitions. The proposed framework estimates beat-to-beat nonrigid respiratory (and any other incidental) motion and the dynamic contrast subspace from the actual acquired data, which are then incorporated into the proposed LRMC reconstruction. LRMC was compared with iterative SENSitivity Encoding (SENSE) (itSENSE) and low-rank plus sparse (LpS) reconstruction in 10 patients based on image-quality scoring and ranking by two clinical expert readers. RESULTS: LRMC achieved significantly improved results relative to itSENSE and LpS in terms of image sharpness, temporal coefficient of variation, and expert reader evaluation. Left ventricle image sharpness was approximately 75%, 79%, and 86% for itSENSE, LpS and LRMC, respectively, indicating improved image sharpness for the proposed approach. Corresponding temporal coefficient of variation results were 23%, 11% and 7%, demonstrating improved temporal fidelity of the perfusion signal with the proposed LRMC. Corresponding clinical expert reader scores (1-5, from poor to excellent image quality) were 3.3, 3.9 and 4.9, demonstrating improved image quality with the proposed LRMC, in agreement with the automated metrics. CONCLUSION: LRMC produces motion-corrected myocardial perfusion in free-breathing acquisitions with substantially improved image quality when compared with iterative SENSE and LpS reconstructions.

Single-heartbeat cardiac cine imaging via jointly regularized nonrigid motion-corrected reconstruction.

The aim of the current study was to develop a novel approach for 2D breath-hold cardiac cine imaging from a single heartbeat, by combining cardiac motion-corrected reconstructions and nonrigidly aligned patch-based regularization. Conventional cardiac cine imaging is obtained via motion-resolved reconstructions of data acquired over multiple heartbeats. Here, we achieve single-heartbeat cine imaging by incorporating nonrigid cardiac motion correction into the reconstruction of each cardiac phase, in conjunction with a motion-aligned patch-based regularization. The proposed Motion-Corrected CINE (MC-CINE) incorporates all acquired data into the reconstruction of each (motion-corrected) cardiac phase, resulting in a better posed problem than motion-resolved approaches. MC-CINE was compared with iterative sensitivity encoding (itSENSE) and Extra-Dimensional Golden Angle Radial Sparse Parallel (XD-GRASP) in 14 healthy subjects in terms of image sharpness, reader scoring (range: 1-5) and reader ranking (range: 1-9) of image quality, and single-slice left ventricular assessment. MC-CINE was significantly superior to both itSENSE and XD-GRASP using 20 heartbeats, two heartbeats, and one heartbeat. Iterative SENSE, XD-GRASP, and MC-CINE achieved a sharpness of 74%, 74%, and 82% using 20 heartbeats, and 53%, 66%, and 82% with one heartbeat, respectively. The corresponding results for reader scoring were 4.0, 4.7, and 4.9 with 20 heartbeats, and 1.1, 3.0, and 3.9 with one heartbeat. The corresponding results for reader ranking were 5.3, 7.3, and 8.6 with 20 heartbeats, and 1.0, 3.2, and 5.4 with one heartbeat. MC-CINE using a single heartbeat presented nonsignificant differences in image quality to itSENSE with 20 heartbeats. MC-CINE and XD-GRASP at one heartbeat both presented a nonsignificant negative bias of less than 2% in ejection fraction relative to the reference itSENSE. It was concluded that the proposed MC-CINE significantly improves image quality relative to itSENSE and XD-GRASP, enabling 2D cine from a single heartbeat.

Cardiac MR Fingerprinting: Overview, Technical Developments, and Applications.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an established imaging modality with proven utility in assessing cardiovascular diseases. The ability of CMR to characterize myocardial tissue using T1 - and T2 -weighted imaging, parametric mapping, and late gadolinium enhancement has allowed for the non-invasive identification of specific pathologies not previously possible with modalities like echocardiography. However, CMR examinations are lengthy and technically complex, requiring multiple pulse sequences and different anatomical planes to comprehensively assess myocardial structure, function, and tissue composition. To increase the overall impact of this modality, there is a need to simplify and shorten CMR exams to improve access and efficiency, while also providing reproducible quantitative measurements. Multiparametric MRI techniques that measure multiple tissue properties offer one potential solution to this problem. This review provides an in-depth look at one such multiparametric approach, cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF). The article is structured as follows. First, a brief review of single-parametric and (non-Fingerprinting) multiparametric CMR mapping techniques is presented. Second, a general overview of cardiac MRF is provided covering pulse sequence implementation, dictionary generation, fast k-space sampling methods, and pattern recognition. Third, recent technical advances in cardiac MRF are covered spanning a variety of topics, including simultaneous multislice and 3D sampling, motion correction algorithms, cine MRF, synthetic multicontrast imaging, extensions to measure additional clinically important tissue properties (proton density fat fraction, T2 *, and T1ρ ), and deep learning methods for image reconstruction and parameter estimation. The last section will discuss potential clinical applications, concluding with a perspective on how multiparametric techniques like MRF may enable streamlined CMR protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Potential Clinical Applications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) has developed as a technique for rapid, multi-parametric tissue property mapping that has potential to both improve cardiac MRI exam efficiency and expand the information captured. In this review, we describe the cMRF technique, summarize technical developments and in vivo reports, and highlight potential clinical applications. RECENT FINDINGS: Technical developments in cMRF continue to progress rapidly, including motion compensated reconstruction, additional tissue property quantification, signal time course analysis, and synthetic LGE image generation. Such technical developments can enable simplified CMR protocols by combining multiple evaluations into a single protocol and reducing the number of breath-held scans. cMRF continues to be reported for use in a range of pathologies; however barriers to clinical implementation remain. Technical developments are described in this review, followed by a focus on potential clinical applications that they may support. Clinical translation of cMRF could shorten protocols, improve CMR accessibility, and provide additional information as compared to conventional cardiac parametric mapping methods. Current needs for clinical implementation are discussed, as well as how those needs may be met in order to bring cMRF from its current research setting to become a viable tool for patient care.

Simultaneous comprehensive liver T1 , T2 , T2∗ , T1ρ , and fat fraction characterization with MR fingerprinting.

PURPOSE: To develop a novel simultaneous co-registered T1 , T2 , T2∗ , T1ρ , and fat fraction abdominal MR fingerprinting (MRF) approach for fully comprehensive liver-tissue characterization in a single breath-hold scan. METHODS: A gradient-echo liver MRF sequence with low fixed flip angle, multi-echo radial readout, and varying magnetization preparation pulses for multiparametric encoding is performed at 1.5 T. The T2∗ and fat fraction are estimated from a graph/cut water/fat separation method using a six-peak fat model. Water/fat singular images obtained are then matched to an MRF dictionary, estimating water-specific T1 , T2 , and T1ρ . The proposed approach was tested in phantoms and 10 healthy subjects and compared against conventional sequences. RESULTS: For the phantom studies, linear fits show excellent coefficients of determination (r2 > 0.9) for every parametric map. For in vivo studies, the average values measured within regions of interest drawn on liver, spleen, muscle, and fat are statistically different from the reference scans (p < 0.05) for T1 , T2 , and T1⍴ but not for T2∗ and fat fraction, whereas correlation between MRF and reference scans is excellent for each parameter (r2 > 0.92 for every parameter). CONCLUSION: The proposed multi-echo inversion-recovery, T2 , and T1⍴ prepared liver MRF sequence presented in this work allows for quantitative T1 , T2 , T2∗ , T1⍴ , and fat fraction liver-tissue characterization in a single breath-hold scan of 18 seconds. The approach showed good agreement and correlation with respect to reference clinical maps.

Generalized low-rank nonrigid motion-corrected reconstruction for MR fingerprinting.

PURPOSE: Develop a novel low-rank motion-corrected (LRMC) reconstruction for nonrigid motion-corrected MR fingerprinting (MRF). METHODS: Generalized motion-corrected (MC) reconstructions have been developed for steady-state imaging. Here we extend this framework to enable nonrigid MC for transient imaging applications with varying contrast, such as MRF. This is achieved by integrating low-rank dictionary-based compression into the generalized MC model to reconstruct MC singular images, reducing motion artifacts in the resulting parametric maps. The proposed LRMC reconstruction was applied for cardiac motion correction in 2D myocardial MRF (T1 and T2 ) with extended cardiac acquisition window (~450 ms) and for respiratory MC in free-breathing 3D myocardial and 3D liver MRF. Experiments were performed in phantom and 22 healthy subjects. The proposed approach was compared with reference spin echo (phantom) and with 2D electrocardiogram-triggered/breath-hold MOLLI and T2 gradient-and-spin echo conventional maps (in vivo 2D and 3D myocardial MRF). RESULTS: Phantom results were in general agreement with reference spin-echo measurements, presenting relative errors of approximately 5.4% and 5.5% for T1 and short T2 (<100 ms), respectively. The proposed LRMC MRF reduced residual blurring artifacts with respect to no MC for cardiac or respiratory motion in all cases (2D and 3D myocardial, 3D abdominal). In 2D myocardial MRF, left-ventricle T1 values were 1150 ± 41 ms for LRMC MRF and 1010 ± 56 ms for MOLLI; T2 values were 43.8 ± 2.3 ms for LRMC MRF and 49.5 ± 4.5 ms for T2 gradient and spin echo. Corresponding measurements for 3D myocardial MRF were 1085 ± 30 ms and 1062 ± 29 ms for T1 , and 43.5 ± 1.9 ms and 51.7 ± 1.7 ms for T2 . For 3D liver, LRMC MRF measured liver T1 at 565 ± 44 ms and liver T2 at 35.4 ± 2.4 ms. CONCLUSION: The proposed LRMC reconstruction enabled generalized (nonrigid) MC for 2D and 3D MRF, both for cardiac and respiratory motion. The proposed approach reduced motion artifacts in the MRF maps with respect to no motion compensation and achieved good agreement with reference measurements.

Simultaneous T1 , T2 , and T1ρ cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting for contrast agent-free myocardial tissue characterization.

PURPOSE: To develop a simultaneous T1 , T2 , and T1ρ cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) approach to enable comprehensive contrast agent-free myocardial tissue characterization in a single breath-hold scan. METHODS: A 2D gradient-echo electrocardiogram-triggered cardiac MRF sequence with low flip angles, varying magnetization preparation, and spiral trajectory was acquired at 1.5 T to encode T1 , T2 , and T1⍴ simultaneously. The MRF images were reconstructed using low-rank inversion, regularized with a multicontrast patch-based higher-order reconstruction. Parametric maps were generated and matched in the singular value domain to extended phase graph-based dictionaries. The proposed approach was tested in phantoms and 10 healthy subjects and compared against conventional methods in terms of coefficients of determination and best fits for the phantom study, and in terms of Bland-Altman agreement, average values and coefficient of variation of T1 , T2 , and T1⍴ for the healthy subjects study. RESULTS: The T1 , T2 , and T1⍴ MRF values showed excellent correlation with conventional spin-echo and clinical mapping methods in phantom studies (r2 > 0.97). Measured MRF values in myocardial tissue (mean ± SD) were 1133 ± 33 ms, 38.8 ± 3.5 ms, and 52.0 ± 4.0 ms for T1 , T2 and T1⍴ , respectively, against 1053 ± 47 ms, 50.4 ± 3.9 ms, and 55.9 ± 3.3 ms for T1 modified Look-Locker inversion imaging, T2 gradient and spin echo, and T1⍴ turbo field echo, respectively. CONCLUSION: A cardiac MRF approach for simultaneous quantification of myocardial T1 , T2 , and T1ρ in a single breath-hold MR scan of about 16 seconds has been proposed. The approach has been investigated in phantoms and healthy subjects showing good agreement with reference spin echo measurements and conventional clinical maps.

Myocardial T1, T2, T2*, and fat fraction quantification via low-rank motion-corrected cardiac MR fingerprinting.

PURPOSE: Develop a novel 2D cardiac MR fingerprinting (MRF) approach to enable simultaneous T1, T2, T2*, and fat fraction (FF) myocardial tissue characterization in a single breath-hold scan. METHODS: Simultaneous, co-registered, multi-parametric mapping of T1, T2, and FF has been recently achieved with cardiac MRF. Here, we further incorporate T2* quantification within this approach, enabling simultaneous T1, T2, T2*, and FF myocardial tissue characterization in a single breath-hold scan. T2* quantification is achieved with an eight-echo readout that requires a long cardiac acquisition window. A novel low-rank motion-corrected (LRMC) reconstruction is exploited to correct for cardiac motion within the long acquisition window. The proposed T1/T2/T2*/FF cardiac MRF was evaluated in phantom and in 10 healthy subjects in comparison to conventional mapping techniques. RESULTS: The proposed approach achieved high quality parametric mapping of T1, T2, T2*, and FF with corresponding normalized RMS error (RMSE) T1 = 5.9%, T2 = 9.6% (T2 values <100 ms), T2* = 3.3% (T2* values <100 ms), and FF = 0.8% observed in phantom scans. In vivo, the proposed approach produced higher left-ventricular myocardial T1 values than MOLLI (1148 vs 1056 ms), lower T2 values than T2-GraSE (42.8 vs 50.6 ms), lower T2* values than eight-echo gradient echo (GRE) (35.0 vs 39.4 ms), and higher FF values than six-echo GRE (0.8 vs 0.3 %) reference techniques. The proposed approach achieved considerable reduction in motion artifacts compared to cardiac MRF without motion correction, improved spatial uniformity, and statistically higher apparent precision relative to conventional mapping for all parameters. CONCLUSION: The proposed cardiac MRF approach enables simultaneous, co-registered mapping of T1, T2, T2*, and FF in a single breath-hold for comprehensive myocardial tissue characterization, achieving higher apparent precision than conventional methods.

An MR fingerprinting approach for quantitative inhomogeneous magnetization transfer imaging.

PURPOSE: Magnetization transfer (MT) and inhomogeneous MT (ihMT) contrasts are used in MRI to provide information about macromolecular tissue content. In particular, MT is sensitive to macromolecules, and ihMT appears to be specific to myelinated tissue. This study proposes a technique to characterize MT and ihMT properties from a single acquisition, producing both semiquantitative contrast ratios and quantitative parameter maps. THEORY AND METHODS: Building on previous work that uses multiband RF pulses to efficiently generate ihMT contrast, we propose a cyclic steady-state approach that cycles between multiband and single-band pulses to boost the achieved contrast. Resultant time-variable signals are reminiscent of an MR fingerprinting acquisition, except that the signal fluctuations are entirely mediated by MT effects. A dictionary-based low-rank inversion method is used to reconstruct the resulting images and to produce both semiquantitative MT ratio and ihMT ratio maps, as well as quantitative parameter estimates corresponding to an ihMT tissue model. RESULTS: Phantom and in vivo brain data acquired at 1.5 Tesla demonstrate the expected contrast trends, with ihMT ratio maps showing contrast more specific to white matter, as has been reported by others. Quantitative estimation of semisolid fraction and dipolar T1 was also possible and yielded measurements consistent with literature values in the brain. CONCLUSION: By cycling between multiband and single-band pulses, an entirely MT-mediated fingerprinting method was demonstrated. This proof-of-concept approach can be used to generate semiquantitative maps and quantitatively estimate some macromolecular-specific tissue parameters.

End-to-end deep learning nonrigid motion-corrected reconstruction for highly accelerated free-breathing coronary MRA.

PURPOSE: To develop an end-to-end deep learning technique for nonrigid motion-corrected (MoCo) reconstruction of ninefold undersampled free-breathing whole-heart coronary MRA (CMRA). METHODS: A novel deep learning framework was developed consisting of a diffeomorphic registration network and a motion-informed model-based deep learning (MoDL) reconstruction network. The registration network receives as input highly undersampled (~22×) respiratory-resolved images and outputs 3D nonrigid respiratory motion fields between the images. The motion-informed MoDL performs MoCo reconstruction from undersampled data using the predicted motion fields. The whole deep learning framework, termed as MoCo-MoDL, was trained end-to-end in a supervised manner for simultaneous 3D nonrigid motion estimation and MoCo reconstruction. MoCo-MoDL was compared with a state-of-the-art nonrigid MoCo CMRA reconstruction technique in 15 retrospectively undersampled datasets and 9 prospectively undersampled acquisitions. RESULTS: The acquisition time for ninefold accelerated CMRA was ~2.5 min. The reconstruction time was ~22 s for the proposed MoCo-MoDL and ~35 min for the conventional approach. MoCo-MoDL achieved higher peak SNR (27.86 ± 3.00 vs. 26.71 ± 2.79; P < .05) and structural similarity (0.78 ± 0.06 vs. 0.75 ± 0.06; P < .05) than the conventional approach. Similar vessel length and visual image quality score were obtained with the 2 methods, whereas improved vessel sharpness was observed with MoCo-MoDL. CONCLUSION: An end-to-end deep learning approach was introduced for simultaneous nonrigid motion estimation and MoCo reconstruction of highly undersampled free-breathing whole-heart CMRA. The rapid free-breathing CMRA acquisition together with the fast reconstruction of the proposed approach promises easy integration into clinical workflow.

T1, T2, and Fat Fraction Cardiac MR Fingerprinting: Preliminary Clinical Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Dixon cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) has been recently introduced to simultaneously provide water T1 , water T2 , and fat fraction (FF) maps. PURPOSE: To assess Dixon cardiac MRF repeatability in healthy subjects and its clinical feasibility in a cohort of patients with cardiovascular disease. POPULATION: T1MES phantom, water-fat phantom, 11 healthy subjects and 19 patients with suspected cardiovascular disease. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T, inversion recovery spin echo (IRSE), multiecho spin echo (MESE), modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI), T2 gradient spin echo (T2 -GRASE), 6-echo gradient rewound echo (GRE), and Dixon cardiac MRF. ASSESSMENT: Dixon cardiac MRF precision was assessed through repeated scans against conventional MOLLI, T2 -GRASE, and PDFF in phantom and 11 healthy subjects. Dixon cardiac MRF native T1 , T2 , FF, postcontrast T1 and synthetic extracellular volume (ECV) maps were assessed in 19 patients in comparison to conventional sequences. Measurements in patients were performed in the septum and in late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) areas and assessed using mean value distributions, correlation, and Bland-Altman plots. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were assessed by three experts using 5-point scoring scales. STATISTICAL TESTS: Paired Wilcoxon rank signed test and paired t-tests were applied. Statistical significance was indicated by *(P < 0.05). RESULTS: Dixon cardiac MRF showed good overall precision in phantom and in vivo. Septal average repeatability was ~23 msec for T1 , ~2.2 msec for T2 , and ~1% for FF. Biases in healthy subjects/patients were measured at +37 msec*/+60 msec* and -8.8 msec*/-8 msec* when compared to MOLLI and T2 -GRASE, respectively. No statistically significant differences in postcontrast T1 (P = 0.17) and synthetic ECV (P = 0.19) measurements were observed in patients. DATA CONCLUSION: Dixon cardiac MRF attained good overall precision in phantom and healthy subjects, while providing coregistered T1 , T2 , and fat fraction maps in a single breath-hold scan with similar or better image quality than conventional methods in patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Clinical comparison of sub-mm high-resolution non-contrast coronary CMR angiography against coronary CT angiography in patients with low-intermediate risk of coronary artery disease: a single center trial.

BACKGROUND: The widespread clinical application of coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) angiography (CMRA) for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) remains limited due to low scan efficiency leading to prolonged and unpredictable acquisition times; low spatial-resolution; and residual respiratory motion artefacts resulting in limited image quality. To overcome these limitations, we have integrated highly undersampled acquisitions with image-based navigators and non-rigid motion correction to enable high resolution (sub-1 mm3) free-breathing, contrast-free 3D whole-heart coronary CMRA with 100% respiratory scan efficiency in a clinically feasible and predictable acquisition time. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of this coronary CMRA framework against coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected CAD. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 50) with suspected CAD were examined on a 1.5T CMR scanner. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CMRA against coronary CTA for detecting a ≥ 50% reduction in luminal diameter. RESULTS: The 50 recruited patients (55 ± 9 years, 33 male) completed coronary CMRA in 10.7 ± 1.4 min. Twelve (24%) had significant CAD on coronary CTA. Coronary CMRA obtained diagnostic image quality in 95% of all, 97% of proximal, 97% of middle and 90% of distal coronary segments. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were: per patient (100%, 74%, 55%, 100% and 80%), per vessel (81%, 88%, 46%, 97% and 88%) and per segment (76%, 95%, 44%, 99% and 94%) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The high diagnostic image quality and diagnostic performance of coronary CMRA compared against coronary CTA demonstrates the potential of coronary CMRA as a robust and safe non-invasive alternative for excluding significant disease in patients at low-intermediate risk of CAD.

Synergistic multi-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance image reconstruction.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an important tool for the non-invasive diagnosis of a variety of cardiovascular diseases. Parametric mapping with multi-contrast CMR is able to quantify tissue alterations in myocardial disease and promises to improve patient care. However, magnetic resonance imaging is an inherently slow imaging modality, resulting in long acquisition times for parametric mapping which acquires a series of cardiac images with different contrasts for signal fitting or dictionary matching. Furthermore, extra efforts to deal with respiratory and cardiac motion by triggering and gating further increase the scan time. Several techniques have been developed to speed up CMR acquisitions, which usually acquire less data than that required by the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, followed by regularized reconstruction to mitigate undersampling artefacts. Recent advances in CMR parametric mapping speed up CMR by synergistically exploiting spatial-temporal and contrast redundancies. In this article, we will review the recent developments in multi-contrast CMR image reconstruction for parametric mapping with special focus on low-rank and model-based reconstructions. Deep learning-based multi-contrast reconstruction has recently been proposed in other magnetic resonance applications. These developments will be covered to introduce the general methodology. Current technical limitations and potential future directions are discussed. This article is part of the theme issue 'Synergistic tomographic image reconstruction: part 1'.

Whole-heart T1 mapping using a 2D fat image navigator for respiratory motion compensation.

PURPOSE: To combine a 3D saturation-recovery-based myocardial T1 mapping (3D SASHA) sequence with a 2D image navigator with fat excitation (fat-iNAV) to allow 3D T1 maps with 100% respiratory scan efficiency and predictable scan time. METHODS: Data from T1 phantom and 10 subjects were acquired at 1.5T. For respiratory motion compensation, a 2D fat-iNAV was acquired before each 3D SASHA k-space segment to correct for 2D translational motion in a beat-to-beat fashion. The effect of the fat-iNAV on the 3D SASHA T1 estimation was evaluated on the T1 phantom. For 3 representative subjects, the proposed free-breathing 3D SASHA with fat-iNAV was compared to the original implementation with the diaphragmatic navigator. The 3D SASHA with fat-iNAV was compared to the breath-hold 2D SASHA sequence in terms of accuracy and precision. RESULTS: In the phantom study, the Bland-Altman plot shows that the 2D fat-iNAVs does not affect the T1 quantification of the 3D SASHA acquisition (0 ± 12.5 ms). For the in vivo study, the 2D fat-iNAV permits to estimate the respiratory motion of the heart, while allowing for 100% scan efficiency, improving the precision of the T1 measurement compared to non-motion-corrected 3D SASHA. However, the image quality achieved with the proposed 3D SASHA with fat-iNAV is lower compared to the original implementation, with reduced delineation of the myocardial borders and papillary muscles. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility to combine the 3D SASHA T1 mapping imaging sequence with a 2D fat-iNAV for respiratory motion compensation, allowing 100% respiratory scan efficiency and predictable scan time.

Multi-parametric liver tissue characterization using MR fingerprinting: Simultaneous T1 , T2 , T2 *, and fat fraction mapping.

PURPOSE: Quantitative T1 , T2 , T2 *, and fat fraction (FF) maps are promising imaging biomarkers for the assessment of liver disease, however these are usually acquired in sequential scans. Here we propose an extended MR fingerprinting (MRF) framework enabling simultaneous liver T1 , T2 , T2 *, and FF mapping from a single ~14 s breath-hold scan. METHODS: A gradient echo (GRE) liver MRF sequence with nine readouts per TR, low flip angles (5-15°), varying magnetisation preparation and golden angle radial trajectory is acquired at 1.5T to encode T1 , T2 , T2 *, and FF simultaneously. The nine-echo time-series are reconstructed using a low-rank tensor constrained reconstruction and used to fit T2 *, B0 and to separate the water and fat signals. Water- and fat-specific T1 , T2, and M0 are obtained through dictionary matching, whereas FF estimation is extracted from the M0 maps. The framework was evaluated in a standardized T1 /T2 phantom, a water-fat phantom, and 12 subjects in comparison to reference methods. Preliminary clinical feasibility is shown in four patients. RESULTS: The proposed water T1 , water T2 , T2 *, and FF maps in phantoms showed high coefficients of determination (r2 > 0.97) relative to reference methods. Measured liver MRF values in vivo (mean ± SD) for T1 , T2 , T2 *, and FF were 671 ± 60 ms, 43.2 ± 6.8 ms, 29 ± 6.6 ms, and 3.2 ± 2.6% with biases of 92 ms, -7.1 ms, -1.4 ms, and 0.63% when compared to conventional methods. CONCLUSION: A nine-echo liver MRF sequence allows for quantitative multi-parametric liver tissue characterization in a single breath-hold scan of ~14 s. Future work will aim to validate the proposed approach in patients with liver disease.

Water-fat Dixon cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting.

PURPOSE: Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) has been recently introduced to simultaneously provide T1 , T2 , and M0 maps. Here, we develop a 3-point Dixon-cMRF approach to enable simultaneous water specific T1 , T2 , and M0 mapping of the heart and fat fraction (FF) estimation in a single breath-hold scan. METHODS: Dixon-cMRF is achieved by combining cMRF with several innovations that were previously introduced for other applications, including a 3-echo GRE acquisition with golden angle radial readout and a high-dimensional low-rank tensor constrained reconstruction to recover the highly undersampled time series images for each echo. Water-fat separation of the Dixon-cMRF time series is performed to allow for water- and fat-specific T1 , T2 , and M0 estimation, whereas FF estimation is extracted from the M0 maps. Dixon-cMRF was evaluated in a standardized T1 -T2 phantom, in a water-fat phantom, and in healthy subjects in comparison to current clinical standards: MOLLI, SASHA, T2 -GRASE, and 6-point Dixon proton density FF (PDFF) mapping. RESULTS: Dixon-cMRF water T1 and T2 maps showed good agreement with reference T1 and T2 mapping techniques (R2 > 0.99 and maximum normalized RMSE ~5%) in a standardized phantom. Good agreement was also observed between Dixon-cMRF FF and reference PDFF (R2 > 0.99) and between Dixon-cMRF water T1 and T2 and water selective T1 and T2 maps (R2 > 0.99) in a water-fat phantom. In vivo Dixon-cMRF water T1 values were in good agreement with MOLLI and water T2 values were slightly underestimated when compared to T2 -GRASE. Average myocardium septal T1 values were 1129 ± 38 ms, 1026 ± 28 ms, and 1045 ± 32 ms for SASHA, MOLLI, and the proposed water Dixon-cMRF. Average T2 values were 51.7 ± 2.2 ms and 42.8 ± 2.6 ms for T2 -GRASE and water Dixon-cMRF, respectively. Dixon-cMRF FF maps showed good agreement with in vivo PDFF measurements (R2 > 0.98) and average FF in the septum was measured at 1.3%. CONCLUSION: The proposed Dixon-cMRF allows to simultaneously quantify myocardial water T1 , water T2 , and FF in a single breath-hold scan, enabling multi-parametric T1 , T2 , and fat characterization. Moreover, reduced T1 and T2 quantification bias caused by water-fat partial volume was demonstrated in phantom experiments.