Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(6): 3916-3925, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38472677

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Wire localisation (WL) is the "gold standard" localisation technique for wide local excision (WLE) of non-palpable breast lesions but has disadvantages that have led to the development of wireless techniques. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of radar localisation (RL) to WL. METHODS: This was a single-institution study of 110 prospective patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing WLE using RL with the SCOUT® Surgical Guidance System (2021-2023) compared with a cohort of 110 patients using WL. Margin status, re-excision rates, and surgery delays associated with preoperative localisation were compared. Costs from a third-party payer perspective in Australian dollars (AUD$) calculated by using microcosting, break-even point, and cost-utility analyses. RESULTS: A total of 110 WLEs using RL cost a total of AUD$402,281, in addition to the device cost of AUD$77,150. The average additional cost of a surgery delay was AUD$2318. Use of RL reduced the surgery delay rate by 10% (p = 0.029), preventing 11 delays with cost savings of AUD$25,496. No differences were identified in positive margin rates (RL: 11.8% vs. WL: 17.3%, p = 0.25) or re-excision rates (RL: 14.5% vs. WL: 21.8%, p = 0.221). In total, 290 RL cases are needed to break even. The cost of WLE using RL was greater than WL by AUD$567. There was a greater clinical benefit of 1.15 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and an incremental cost-utility ratio of AUD$493 per QALY favouring RL. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of RL was a more cost-effective intervention than WL. Close to 300 RL cases are likely needed to be performed to recover costs of the medical device. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12624000068561.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mastectomía Segmentaria/economía , Mastectomía Segmentaria/métodos , Anciano , Márgenes de Escisión , Pronóstico , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Australia , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/economía , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Adulto
3.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2024(1): rjad738, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38239379

RESUMEN

Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, locally aggressive fibroblastic mesenchymal neoplasm, typically derived from the dermis, with the intramammary subtype being seen infrequently. We present a case of a 40-year-old woman whom was diagnosed with an intramammary DFSP during pregnancy, whom underwent successful surgical management during her second trimester. Our case demonstrates the importance of increased clinical awareness in the diagnosis and treatment of breast DFSP with careful multidisciplinary consideration.

4.
ANZ J Surg ; 94(6): 1090-1095, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456358

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) (Magtrace®) is a non-radioactive liquid tracer that can stay in the sentinel lymph nodes for 30 days. Injection of SPIO at time of primary breast surgery where upfront sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is not immediately indicated allows for a return to theatre if pathology then identifies invasive disease. SLNB is associated with paraesthesia, pain, seroma formation and lymphoedema risk. Hence, our study aims to assess the use of SPIO to avoid upfront SLNB in breast surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and prophylaxis. METHODS: Retrospective single-centre study of consecutive patients who underwent injection of SPIO tracer at time of primary breast surgery to avoid upfront SLNB at Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia over a 10-month period. RESULTS: SPIO was injected 38 times, with 34 at time of mastectomy and four cases at time of wide local excision. The indication for surgery was DCIS in 18 cases, risk reduction in 17 cases and other indications in three patients. Six cases (15.8%) required delayed SLNB (D-SLNB) due to the finding of invasive disease on post-operative histopathology. All patients who underwent D-SLNB had nodes successfully localized with SPIO. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, 84.2% of cases were able to avoid upfront SLNB, and hence avoid the associated complications of SLNB. SPIO injection was successful in localizing the SLN in all cases at time of surgery for D-SLNB. This technique was safe with few associated complications.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/cirugía , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Mastectomía/métodos , Nanopartículas Magnéticas de Óxido de Hierro , Medios de Contraste , Procedimientos Innecesarios , Dextranos/administración & dosificación , Dextranos/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Nanopartículas de Magnetita
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA