Fatty Infiltration, Tear Size, and Retraction Size Are Significant Risk Factors for Retear following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To assess the consistency and quality of risk factor reporting for rotator cuff repair (RCR) retear and identify risk factors most frequently associated with retear. METHODS: A systematic review with PRISMA guidelines was performed. Of the initial 3,158 titles, a total of 31 studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) clinical studies regarding RCR failure, (2) arthroscopic procedures involving RCR, (3) reporting clinical outcomes (4) performed within 5 years (5) and studies investigating pre-operative risk factors for retear. After full-text review, 18 risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: The most consistently significant risk factors were acromiohumeral distance (AHD) (80%), critical shoulder angle (CSA) (67%), tear size (63%), anterior/posterior (AP) dimension (60%), fatty infiltration (FI, 58%), and retraction size (56%). FI was analyzed using different methods between studies with 63% finding significant results and 50% of all studies performing ordinal analysis. Tear size was inconsistently analyzed quantitatively or qualitatively, with 58% finding significant results and 63% of all studies analyzing quantitatively. Risk factors consistently found to be non-significant included age, sex, diabetes mellitus (DM), symptom duration, hand dominance, repair technique, smoking and body mass index (BMI). CONCLUSIONS: Tear size, fatty infiltration, and retraction size were found to be significant risk factors in the majority of included studies evaluating rotator cuff retear. Risk factors less likely reported as predictive included repair technique, age, sex, DM, symptom duration, hand dominance, repair technique, smoking, and BMI. Risk factors that require further investigation include CSA, AHD, and AP tear dimension. Level III, systematic review of Level III-V studies.

Concomitant Treatment of High-Grade Cartilage Lesions Mitigates Risk of Meniscal Allograft Transplant Failure.

PURPOSE: To identify frequently studied significant preoperative risk factors for meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) failure. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used to conduct this systematic review. The database analysis was performed in May of 2022 and included PubMed, Embrace, and Cochrane. Studies between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2021, were reviewed with search terms, including "meniscal," "meniscus," "transplantation," "transplant," and "allograft." Twenty-one full-text manuscripts met inclusion criteria of studies assessing preoperative risk factors for MAT failure defined as either clinical failure (Lysholm <65) or surgical failure (revision, removal, or conversion to knee arthroplasty). RESULTS: In total, 21 studies were included, comprising 47.6% with a Level of Evidence of Level III and 52.4% with Level of Evidence IV. The analysis involved 2,533 patients, and the mean final follow-up ranged from 2.2 to 20.0 years. The presence of high-grade cartilage defects was the only factor found predictive of MAT surgical failure in the majority of studies in which it was analyzed (5/7 studies, 71.4%). Four of the five studies that found high-grade cartilage defects to be a predictor of MAT surgical failure did not treat all cartilage lesions, while the 2 studies that found high-grade cartilage defects an insignificant predictor of MAT surgical failure treated all defects at the time of MAT. For clinical failure, no risk factors were predictive of MAT failure in the majority of studies, although smoking and concomitant ligamentous or realignment procedures were significant in 1 study. CONCLUSION: The presence of untreated high-grade cartilage appears to elevate the risk of surgical MAT failure; however, concomitant treatment of defects may mitigate their detrimental effect. There is no clear risk factor that consistently predicts clinical failure. Age, sex, BMI, knee compartment, time from prior meniscectomy, femorotibial alignment (after correction), concomitant cartilage procedure, and laterality do not routinely impact MAT failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review.

Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair May Result in Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes but Similar Failure Rates Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare failure rates and patient-reported outcomes between transosseus (TO) suture and suture anchor (SA) quadriceps tendon repairs. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, patients who underwent primary repair for quadriceps tendon rupture with TO or SA techniques between January 2009 and August 2018 were identified from an institutional database and retrospectively reviewed. Patients were contacted for satisfaction (1-10 scale), current function (0-100 scale), failure (retear), and revision surgeries; International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) were also collected to achieve a minimum of 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (34 SA, 30 TO) were available by phone or e-mail at a mean of 4.81 ± 2.60 years postoperatively. There were 10 failures, for an overall failure rate of 15.6%. Failure incidence did not significantly differ between treatment groups (P = .83). Twenty-seven patients (47% of nonfailed patients) had completed patient-reported outcomes. The SA group reported higher subjective function (SA: 90 [85-100] vs TO: 85 [60-93], 95% CI of difference: -19.9 to -2.1 × 10-5, P = .042), final IKDC (79.6 [50.0-93.6] vs 62.1 [44.3-65.5], 95% CI of difference: -33.0 to -0.48, P = .048), KOOS Pain (97.2 [84.7-97.2] vs 73.6 [50.7-88.2], 95% CI of difference: -36.1 to -3.6 × 10-5, P = .037), Quality of Life (81.3 [56.3-93.8] vs 50.0 [23.4-56.3], 95% CI of difference: -50.0 to -6.2, P = .026), and Sport (75.0 [52.5-90.0] vs 47.5 [31.3-67.5], 95% CI of the difference: -45.0 to -4.1 × 10-5, P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in failure rate between transosseus and suture anchor repairs for quadriceps tendon ruptures (P = .83). Most failures occur secondary to a traumatic reinjury within the first year postoperatively. Despite the lack of difference in failure rates, at final follow-up, patients who undergo suture anchor repair may report significantly greater subjective function and final IKDC, KOOS Pain, Quality of Life, and Sport scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

HOIL1 Is Essential for the Induction of Type I and III Interferons by MDA5 and Regulates Persistent Murine Norovirus Infection.

The linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC), composed of heme-oxidized IRP2 ubiquitin ligase 1 (HOIL1), HOIL1-interacting protein (HOIP), and SHANK-associated RH domain-interacting protein (SHARPIN), is a crucial regulator of multiple immune signaling pathways. In humans, HOIL1 or HOIP deficiency is associated with an immune disorder involving autoinflammation, immunodeficiency, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-like symptoms. During viral infection, LUBAC is reported to inhibit the induction of interferon (IFN) by the cytosolic RNA sensor retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I). Surprisingly, we found that HOIL1 is essential for the induction of both type I and type III IFNs, as well as the phosphorylation of IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), during murine norovirus (MNoV) infection in cultured dendritic cells. The RIG-I-like receptor, melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5), is also required for IFN induction and IRF3 phosphorylation during MNoV infection. Furthermore, HOIL1 and MDA5 were required for IFN induction after Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus infection and poly(I·C) transfection, but not Sendai virus or vesicular stomatitis virus infection, indicating that HOIL1 and LUBAC are required selectively for MDA5 signaling. Moreover, Hoil1-/- mice exhibited defective control of acute and persistent murine norovirus infection and defective regulation of MNoV persistence by the microbiome as also observed previously for mice deficient in interferon lambda (IFN-λ) receptor, signal transducer and activator of transcription factor 1 (STAT1), and IRF3. These data indicate that LUBAC plays a critical role in IFN induction to control RNA viruses sensed by MDA5.IMPORTANCE Human noroviruses are a leading cause of gastroenteritis throughout the world but are challenging to study in vivo and in vitro Murine norovirus (MNoV) provides a tractable genetic and small-animal model to study norovirus biology and immune responses. Interferons are critical mediators of antiviral immunity, but excessive expression can dysregulate the immune system. IFN-λ plays an important role at mucosal surfaces, including the gastrointestinal tract, and both IFN-λ and commensal enteric bacteria are important modulators of persistent MNoV infection. LUBAC, of which HOIL1 is a component, is reported to inhibit type I IFN induction after RIG-I stimulation. We show, in contrast, that HOIL1 is critical for type I and III IFN induction during infection with MNoV, a virus that preferentially activates MDA5. Moreover, HOIL1 regulates MNoV infection in vivo These data reveal distinct functions for LUBAC in these closely related signaling pathways and in modulation of IFN expression.

Biomechanical Properties and Kinematics of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Background: While the biomechanical properties of the native medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) have been well studied, there is no comprehensive summary of the biomechanics of MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR). An accurate understanding of the kinematic properties and functional behavior of current techniques used in MPFLR is imperative to restoring native biomechanics and improving outcomes. Purpose: To provide a comprehensive review of the biomechanical effects of variations in MPFLR, specifically to determine the effect of graft choice and reconstruction technique. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria: (1) using ≥8 human cadaveric specimens, (2) reporting on a component of MPFLR, and (3) having multiple comparison groups. Results: Gracilis, semitendinosus, and quadriceps grafts demonstrated an ultimate load to failure (N) of 206.2, 102.8, and 190.0 to 205.0 and stiffness (N/mm) of 20.4, 8.5, and 21.4 to 33.6, respectively. Single-bundle and double-bundle techniques produced an ultimate load to failure (N) of 171 and 213 and stiffness (N/mm) of 13.9 and 17.1, respectively. Anchors placed centrally and superomedially in the patella produced the smallest degree of length changes throughout range of motion in contrast to anchors placed more proximally. Sutures, suture anchors, and transosseous tunnels all produced similar ultimate load to failure, stiffness, and elongation data. Femoral tunnel malpositioning resulted in significant increases in contact pressures, patellar translation, tilt, and graft tightening or loosening. Low tension grafts (2 N) most closely restored the patellofemoral contact pressures, translation, and tilt. Graft fixation angles variably and inconsistently altered contact pressures, and patellar translation and tilt. Conclusion: Data demonstrated that placement of the MPFLR femoral tunnel at the Schöttle point is critical to success. Femoral tunnel diameter should be ≥2 mm greater than graft diameter to limit graft advancement and overtensioning. Graft fixation, regardless of graft choice or fixation angle, is optimally performed under minimal tension with patellar fixation at the medial and superomedial patella. However, lower fixation angles may reduce graft strain, and higher fixation angles may exacerbate anisometry and length changes if femoral tunnel placement is nonanatomic.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Risk Factors for the Increased Incidence of Revision Surgery After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 90% of patients who undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) are satisfied with their pain levels and function after surgery. However, a subset of patients experience continued symptoms that warrant revision surgery. Preoperative risk factors for RCR failure requiring revision surgery have not been clearly defined. PURPOSE: To (1) determine the rate of RCR failure requiring revision surgery and (2) identify risk factors for revision surgery, which will help surgeons to determine patients who are at the greatest risk for RCR failure. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were performed. The initial search resulted in 3158 titles, and 533 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 10 studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) human clinical studies, (2) arthroscopic RCR, (3) original clinical research, and (4) evaluation of preoperative risk factors for revision. RESULTS: After a full-text review, a total of 16 risk factors were recorded and analyzed across 10 studies. Corticosteroid injection was the most consistent risk factor for revision surgery, reaching statistical significance in 4 of 4 studies, followed by workers' compensation status (2/3 studies). Patients with corticosteroid injections had a pooled increased risk of revision surgery by 47% (odds ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.36-1.52]). Patients with workers' compensation had a pooled increased risk of revision surgery by 133% (odds ratio, 2.33 [95% CI, 2.09-2.60]). Age, smoking status, diabetes, and obesity were found to be risk factors in half of the analyzed studies. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid injections, regardless of the frequency of injections, and workers' compensation status were found to be significant risk factors across the literature based on qualitative analysis and pooled analysis. Surgeons should determine ideal candidates for arthroscopic RCR by accounting for corticosteroid injection history, regardless of the frequency, and insurance status of the patient.

Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in MM Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has attracted increasing attention as a tool for the detection and management of several medical conditions. Multiple myeloma (MM), a malignancy characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of plasma cells, is one of the most common hematologic malignancies, which relies on imaging for diagnosis and management. We aimed to review the current literature and trends in AI research of MM imaging. This study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Three main concepts were used in the search algorithm, including "artificial intelligence" in "radiologic examinations" of patients with "multiple myeloma". The algorithm was used to search the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Articles were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the end, we used the checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) criteria to evaluate the manuscripts. We provided the percentage of studies that were compliant with each criterion as a measure of the quality of AI research on MM. The initial search yielded 977 results. After reviewing them, 14 final studies were selected. The studies used a wide array of imaging modalities. Radiomics analysis and segmentation tasks were the most popular studies (10/14 studies). The common purposes of radiomics studies included the differentiation of MM bone lesions from other lesions and the prediction of relapse. The goal of the segmentation studies was to develop algorithms for the automatic segmentation of important structures in MM. Dice score was the most common assessment tool in segmentation studies, which ranged from 0.80 to 0.97. These studies show that imaging is a valuable data source for medical AI models and plays an even greater role in the management of MM.