Gene electrotransfer of IL-2 and IL-12 plasmids effectively eradicated murine B16.F10 melanoma.

Gene therapy has become an important approach for treating cancer, and electroporation represents a technology for introducing therapeutic genes into a cell. An example of cancer gene therapy relying on gene electrotransfer is the use of immunomodulatory cytokines, such as interleukin 2 (IL-2) and 12 (IL-12), which directly stimulate immune cells at the tumour site. The aim of our study was to determine the effects of gene electrotransfer with two plasmids encoding IL-2 and IL-12 in vitro and in vivo. Two different pulse protocols, known as EP1 (600 V/cm, 5 ms, 1 Hz, 8 pulses) and EP2 (1300 V/cm, 100 µs, 1 Hz, 8 pulses), were assessed in vitro for application in subsequent in vivo experiments. In the in vivo experiment, gene electrotransfer of pIL-2 and pIL-12 using the EP1 protocol was performed in B16.F10 murine melanoma. Combined treatment of tumours using pIL2 and pIL12 induced significant tumour growth delay and 71% complete tumour regression. Furthermore, in tumours coexpressing IL-2 and IL-12, increased accumulation of dendritic cells and M1 macrophages was obtained along with the activation of proinflammatory signals, resulting in CD4 + and CD8 + T-lymphocyte recruitment and immune memory development in the mice. In conclusion, we demonstrated high antitumour efficacy of combined IL-2 and IL-12 gene electrotransfer protocols in low-immunogenicity murine B16.F10 melanoma.

Use of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin for Induction Therapy in Cardiac Transplantation: A Review.

The most common causes of death after heart transplantation (HTx) include acute rejection and multi-organ failure in the early period and malignancy and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in the late period. Polyclonal antibody preparations such as rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) may reduce early acute rejection and the later occurrence of CAV after HTx. ATG therapy depletes T cells, modulates adhesion and cell-signaling molecules, interferes with dendritic cell function, and induces B-cell apoptosis and regulatory and natural killer T-cell expansion. Evidence from animal studies and from retrospective clinical studies in humans indicates that ATG can be used to delay calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure after HTx, thus benefiting renal function, and to reduce the incidence of CAV and ischemia-reperfusion injury in the transplanted heart. ATG may reduce de novo antibody production after HTx. ATG does not appear to increase cytomegalovirus infection rates with longer prophylaxis (6-12 months). In addition, ATG may reduce the risk of lymphoproliferative disease and does not appear to confer an additive effect on acquiring lymphoma after HTx. Randomized, controlled trials may provide stronger evidence of ATG association with patient survival, graft rejection, renal protection through delayed CNI initiation, as well as other benefits. It can also help establish optimal dosing and patient criteria to maximize treatment benefits.

Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation: A 23-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: We report clinical experience with combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKTx) over a 23-year time period. METHODS: From June 1992 to August 2015, we performed 83 combined HKTx procedures at our institution. We compared the more recent cohort of 53 HKTx recipients (group 2, March 2009 to August 2015) with the initial 30 previously reported HKTx recipients (group 1, June 1992 to February 2009). Pre-operative patient characteristics, peri-operative factors, and post-operative outcomes including survival were examined. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar, except for a lower incidence of ethanol use and higher pre-operative left-ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac output, and cardiac index in group 2 when compared with group 1 (P = .007, .046, .037, respectively). The pump time was longer in group 2 compared with group 1 (153.30 ± 38.68 vs 129.60 ± 37.60 minutes; P = .007), whereas the graft ischemic time was not significantly different between the groups, with a trend to a longer graft ischemic time in group 2 versus group 1 (195.17 ± 45.06 vs 178.07 ± 52.77 minutes; P = .056, respectively). The lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay were similar between the groups (P = .083 and .39, respectively). In addition, pre-operative and post-operative creatinine levels at peak, discharge, 1 year, and 5 years and the number of people on post-operative dialysis were similar between the groups (P = .37, .75, .54, .87, .56, and P = .139, respectively). Overall survival was not significantly different between groups 2 and 1 for the first 5 years after transplant, with a trend toward higher survival in group 2 (P = .054). CONCLUSIONS: The most recent cohort of combined heart and kidney transplant recipients had similar ICU and hospital lengths of stay and post-operative creatinine levels at peak, discharge, and 1 and 5 years and a similar number of patients on post-operative dialysis when compared with the initial cohort. Overall survival was not significantly different between the later and earlier groups, with a trend toward higher overall survival at 5 years in the more recent cohort of patients. In selected patients with co-existing heart and kidney failure, combined heart and kidney transplantation is safe to perform and has excellent outcomes.

Leading Efforts to Increase Organ Donation Through Professionalization of Organ Procurement Organizations and Establishment of Organ and Tissue Donor Registries.

OBJECTIVE: The influence of new donor registrations through the California Organ and Tissue Donor Registry on the local OneLegacy Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) was examined during a 6-year period. METHODS: Publicly available data from Donate Life America for California were examined for the 6 calendar years of 2009-2014. Performance data from OneLegacy for the same 6 years for organ donors and number of transplants were also examined. The donor designation rate (DDR) was defined as the rate at which new individuals joined the state donor registry as a percentage of all driver licenses and ID cards issued within a calendar year. The total donor designation (TDD) was defined as the sum of the new and existing people who were registered organ donors. Donor designation share (DDS) was the total number of designated donors as a percentage of all residents of the state who were ≥18 years old. The business practices and educational efforts of the OneLegacy OPO were examined as well. RESULTS: In California, from 2009 through 2014, the DDR was 25.5%-28%. When added to the existing donor registrations, the TDD and DDS increased each year from 2009 through 2014. With the current level of growth, it is projected that California will be able to reach a DDS of 50% by 2017. For the OneLegacy OPO, designated donors from the California Organ and Tissue Donor Registry made up 15% of the total donations in 2009, and 39% of the total donations in 2014, increasing by ∼5% each year since 2009. By increasing professionalization and transparency, and widening its educational and training efforts, OneLegacy was able to take advantage of an increasing percentage of donors who were designated donors and to increase the overall number of donors and organs transplanted, becoming one of the largest OPOs in the nation. CONCLUSIONS: This can be a model for OPOs in other donor service areas, and it may set the stage for the United States to serve as an example to the global community in the practice of organ donation.

Total Artificial Heart as Bridge to Heart Transplantation in Chagas Cardiomyopathy: Case Report.

Chagas disease (CD) is becoming an increasingly recognized cause of dilated cardiomyopathy outside of Latin America, where it is endemic, due to population shifts and migration. Heart transplantation (HTx) is a therapeutic option for end-stage cardiomyopathy due to CD, but may be considered a relative contraindication due to potential reactivation of the causative organism with immunosuppression therapy. The total artificial heart (TAH) can provide mechanical circulatory support in decompensated patients with severe biventricular dysfunction until the time of HTx, while avoiding immunosuppressive therapy and removing the organ most affected by the causative organism. We report herein a patient with CD and severe biventricular dysfunction, who had mechanical circulatory support with a TAH for more than 6 months, followed by successful orthotopic HTx and treatment with benznidazole for 3 months. The patient had no evidence of recurrent disease in the transplanted heart based on endomyocardial biopsy up to 1 year post-transplantation, and remains alive more than 30 months after insertion of a TAH and 24 months after HTx.

Similar Mortality and Morbidity of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation for Patients 70 Years of Age and Older Compared With Younger Patients.

BACKGROUND: The upper age limit of heart transplantation remains controversial. The goal of the present study was to investigate the mortality and morbidity of orthotopic heart transplantation (HT) for recipients ≥70 compared with those <70 years of age. METHODS: Of 704 adults who underwent HT from December 1988 to June 2012 at our institution, 45 were ≥70 years old (older group) and 659 were <70 years old (younger group). Survival, intraoperative blood product usage, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, and frequency of reoperation for chest bleeding, dialysis, and >48 hours ventilation were examined after HT. RESULTS: The older group had 100% 30-day and 60-day survival compared with 96.8 ± 0.7% 30-day and 95.9 ± 0.8% 60-day survival rates in the younger group. The older and younger groups had similar 1-year (93.0 ± 3.9% vs 92.1 ± 1.1%; P = .79), 5-year (84.2 ± 6.0% vs 73.4 ± 1.9%; P = .18), and 10-year (51.2 ± 10.7% vs 50.2 ± 2.5%; P = .43) survival rates. Recipients in the older group had higher preoperative creatinine levels, frequency of coronary artery disease, and more United Network for Organ Sharing status 2 and fewer status 1 designations than recipients in the younger group (P < .05 for all). Pump time and intraoperative blood usage were similar between the 2 groups (P = NS); however, donor-heart ischemia time was higher in the older group (P = .002). Older recipients had higher postoperative creatinine levels at peak (P = .003) and at discharge (P = .007). Frequency of postoperative complications, including reoperation for chest bleeding, dialysis, >48 hours ventilation, pneumonia, pneumothorax, sepsis, in-hospital and post-discharge infections, were similar between groups (P = NS for all comparisons). ICU and hospital length of stays were similar between groups (P = .35 and P = .87, respectively). In Cox analysis, recipient age ≥70 years was not identified as a predictor of lower long-term survival after HT. CONCLUSIONS: HT recipients ≥70 years old had similar 1, 5, and 10-year survival rates compared with younger recipients. Both patient groups had similar intra- and postoperative blood utilization and frequencies of many postoperative complications. Older and younger patients had similar morbidity and mortality rates following HT. Carefully selected older patients (≥70 years) can safely undergo HT and should not be excluded from HT consideration based solely on age.

Adult Heart Transplantation Following Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Early and Late Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The impact of prior implantation of a ventricular assist device (VAD) on short- and long-term postoperative outcomes of adult heart transplantation (HTx) was investigated. METHODS: Of the 359 adults with prior cardiac surgery who underwent HTx from December 1988 to June 2012 at our institution, 90 had prior VAD and 269 had other (non-VAD) prior cardiac surgery. RESULTS: The VAD group had a lower 60-day survival when compared with the Non-VAD group (91.1% ± 3.0% vs 96.6% ± 1.1%; P = .03). However, the VAD and Non-VAD groups had similar survivals at 1 year (87.4% ± 3.6% vs 90.5% ± 1.8%; P = .33), 2 years (83.2% ± 4.2% vs 88.1% ± 2.0%; P = .21), 5 years (75.7% ± 5.6% vs 74.6% ± 2.9%; P = .63), 10 years (38.5% ± 10.8% vs 47.6% ± 3.9%; P = .33), and 12 years (28.9% ± 11.6% vs 39.0% ± 4.0%; P = .36). The VAD group had longer pump time and more intraoperative blood use when compared with the Non-VAD group (P < .0001 for both). Postoperatively, VAD patients had higher frequencies of >48-hour ventilation and in-hospital infections (P = .0007 and .002, respectively). In addition, more VAD patients had sternal wound infections when compared with Non-VAD patients (8/90 [8.9%] vs 5/269 [1.9%]; P = .005). Both groups had similar lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays and no differences in the frequencies of reoperation for chest bleeding, dialysis, and postdischarge infections (P = .19, .70, .34, .67, and .21, respectively). Postoperative creatinine levels at peak and at discharge did not differ between the 2 groups (P = .51 and P = .098, respectively). In a Cox model, only preoperative creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL (P = .006) and intraoperative pump time ≥210 minutes (P = .022) were individually considered as significant predictors of mortality within 12 years post-HTx. Adjusting for both, pre-HTx VAD implantation was not a predictor of mortality within 12 years post-HTx (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.97; P = .38). However, pre-HTx VAD implantation was a risk factor for 60-day mortality (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.07-7.62; P = .036) along with preoperative creatinine level ≥2 mg/dL (P = .0006). CONCLUSIONS: HTx patients with prior VAD had lower 60-day survival, higher intraoperative blood use, and greater frequency of postoperative in-hospital infections when compared with HTx patients with prior Non-VAD cardiac surgery. VAD implantation prior to HTx did not have an additional negative impact on long-term morbidity and survival following HTx. Long-term (1-, 2-, 5-, 10-, and 12-year) survival did not differ significantly in HTx patients with prior VAD or non-VAD cardiac surgery.

Combined Heart and Liver Transplantation: The Cedars-Sinai Experience.

PURPOSE: Combined heart-liver transplantation is an increasingly accepted treatment for select patients with heart and liver disease. Despite growing optimism, heart-liver transplantation remains an infrequent operation. We report our institutional experience with heart-liver transplantation. METHODS: All combined heart-liver transplantations at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center from 1998-2014 were analyzed. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival and secondary outcomes included rejection, infection, reoperation, length of stay, and readmission. RESULTS: There were 7 heart-liver transplants: 6 simultaneous (single donor) and 1 staged (2 donors). Median follow-up was 22.1 (IQR 13.2-48.4) months. Mean recipient age was 50.8 ± 19.5 years. Heart failure etiologies included familial amyloidosis, congenital heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, and dilated cardiomyopathy. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction averaged 32.3 ± 12.9%. Five (71.4%) patients required preoperative inotropic support; 1 required mechanical circulatory support. The most common indications for liver transplant were amyloidosis and cardiac cirrhosis. Median Model for End-stage Liver Disease score was 10.0 (9.3-13.8). Six-month and 1-year actuarial survivals were 100% and 83.3%, with mean survival exceeding 4 years. No patient experienced cardiac allograft rejection, 1 experienced transient liver allograft rejection, and 1 developed progressive liver dysfunction resulting in death. Five developed postoperative infections and 3 (42.9%) required reoperation. Median ICU and hospital stays were 7.0 (7.0-11.5) and 17.0 (13.8-40.5) days. There were 4 (57.1%) readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: For carefully selected patients with coexisting heart and liver disease, combined heart and liver transplantation offers acceptable patient and graft survival.

Total Artificial Heart Bridge to Transplantation for a Patient With Occult Intracardiac Malignancy: Case Report.

Malignancy is the leading cause of long-term morbidity and mortality after heart and other solid organ transplantation; therefore, great emphasis is placed on pre- and post-transplantation cancer screening. Even with meticulous screening during evaluation for heart transplant candidacy, an occult cancer may not be apparent. Here, we share the case of a 51-year-old man with refractory heart failure who underwent total artificial heart implantation as a bridge to transplantation with the surprise finding of an isolated deposit of metastatic carcinoid tumor nested within a left ventricular papillary muscle in his explanted heart. The primary ileal carcinoid tumor was identified and resected completely. After remaining cancer-free for 14 months, he was listed for heart transplantation and was transplanted 2 months later. He is currently 3.5 months out from heart transplantation and doing well, without evidence of recurring malignancy.

Prior sternotomy increases the mortality and morbidity of adult heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effect of prior sternotomy (PS) on the postoperative mortality and morbidity after orthotopic heart transplantation (HTx). METHODS: Of 704 adults who underwent HTx from December 1988 to June 2012 at a single institution, 345 had no PS (NPS group) and 359 had ≥ 1 PS (PS group). Survival, intraoperative use of blood products, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, frequency of reoperation for bleeding, dialysis, and >48-hour ventilation were examined. RESULTS: The NPS and PS groups had similar 60-day survival rates (97.1 ± 0.9% vs 95.3 ± 1.1%; P = .20). However, the 1-year survival was higher in the NPS group (94.7 ± 1.2% vs 89.7 ± 1.6%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.12-3.49; P = .016). The PS group had longer pump time and more intraoperative blood use (P < .0001 for both). Postoperatively, the PS group had longer ICU and hospital stays, and higher frequencies of reoperation for bleeding and >48-hour ventilation (P < .05 for all comparisons). Patients with 1 PS (1PS group) had a higher 60-day survival rate than those with ≥ 2 PS (2+PS group; 96.7 ± 1.1% vs 91.1 ± 3.0%; HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.04-7.01; P = .033). The 2+PS group had longer pump time and higher frequency of postoperative dialysis (P < .05 for both). Patients with prior VAD had lower 60-day (91.1 ± 3.0% vs 97.1 ± 0.9%; P = .010) and 1-year (87.4 ± 3.6% vs 94.7 ± 1.2%; P = .012) survival rates than NPS group patients. Patients with prior CABG had a lower 1-year survival than NPS group patients (89.0 ± 2.3% vs 94.7 ± 1.2%; P = .018). CONCLUSION: The PS group had lower 1-year survival and higher intraoperative blood use, postoperative length of ICU and hospital stays, and frequency of reoperation for bleeding than the NPS group. Prior sternotomy increases morbidity and mortality after HTx.

Right atrial tamponade complicating cardiac operation: clinical, hemodynamic, and scintigraphic correlates.

Persistent bleeding into the pericardial space in the early hours after cardiac operation not uncommonly results in cardiac tamponade. Single chamber tamponade also might be expected, since in this setting the pericardium frequently contains firm blood clots localized to the area of active bleeding. However, this complication has received very little attention in the surgical literature. We are therefore providing documentation that isolated right atrial tamponade can occur as a complication of cardiac operation and that there exists a potential for misdiagnosis and hence incorrect treatment of this condition. Right atrial tamponade may be recognized by a combination of low cardiac output, low blood pressure, prominent neck veins, right atrial pressure in excess of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and right ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and a poor response to plasma volume expansion. Findings on chest roentgenogram and gated wall motion scintigraphy may be highly suggestive. This review should serve to increase awareness of this complication and to provide some helpful diagnostic clues.

Reduction in sudden late death by concomitant revascularization with aortic valve replacement.

To determine the impact of coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial revascularization on survival after aortic valve replacement, we reviewed our experience with single aortic valve replacement between 1969 and 1984. Of 474 patients (mean age 62 +/- 13 years), 185 (39%) had no associated coronary artery disease, 233 (49%) had coronary artery bypass grafting, and 56 (12%) had unbypassed coronary artery disease. Early (30-day) mortality rates were 2.2%, 8.2%, and 7.1%, respectively (p less than 0.01, coronary disease absent versus present). Actuarial survival rates at 10 years were 77% +/- 4%, 41% +/- 6%, and 26% +/- 11% (p less than 0.001, coronary disease absent versus present), with 1 to 177 months of follow-up (mean 56 +/- 40). Preoperative angina (39%) did not predict the presence of coronary artery disease (61%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that early deaths were associated with advanced preoperative New York Heart Association functional class (p less than 0.001), advanced age (p less than 0.05), more extensive coronary artery disease (p less than 0.05), and lack of cardioplegic myocardial protection (p less than 0.05). Complete revascularization did not increase operative risk when coronary artery disease was present (early mortality 6.8%, p = not significant). Late deaths were strongly associated with the presence of coronary artery disease (p less than 0.001) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (less than or equal to 55%, p less than 0.01). Late cardiac mortality was most commonly attributable to sudden death (30/71, 42%), especially in the unbypassed coronary disease cohort (9/14, 64%). The actuarial rate of freedom from sudden death at 10 years was 52% +/- 17% in the unbypassed coronary artery disease group (p = 0.009), compared with 90% +/- 3% and 91% +/- 3% in the revascularized and no coronary disease patients, respectively. Thus, coexistent coronary atherosclerosis has a detrimental impact on early and late survival after aortic valve replacement. Revascularization does not increase operative risk when associated coronary artery disease is present and significantly reduces the occurrence of late sudden death. Strategies that minimize operative risk when associated coronary artery disease is present include use of cardioplegia and complete revascularization.

Heart transplantation with and without prior sternotomy: analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with history of prior sternotomy may have poorer outcomes after heart transplantation. Quantitation of risk from prior sternotomy has not been well established. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was analyzed to assess early and late survival and predictors of outcome in adult heart transplant recipients with and without prior sternotomy. METHODS: Of 11,266 adults with first heart-only transplantation from 1997 to 2011, recipients were divided into 2 groups: those without prior sternotomy (first sternotomy group; n = 6006 or 53.3%) and those with at least 1 prior sternotomy (redo sternotomy group; n = 5260 or 46.7%). A multivariable Cox model was used to identify predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Survival was lower in the redo group at 60 days (92.6% vs 95.9%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-2.15; P < .001). Conditional 5-year survival in 60-day survivors was similar in the 2 groups (HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.12, P = .90). During the first 60 days post-transplant, the redo group had more cardiac reoperations (12.3% vs 8.8%, P = .0008), a higher frequency of dialysis (8.9% vs 5.2%, P < .0001), a greater percentage of drug-treated infections (23.2% vs 19%, P = .003), and a higher percentage of strokes (2.5% vs 1.4%, P = .0001). A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model identified prior sternotomy as a significant independent predictor of mortality, in addition to age, female gender, congenital cardiomyopathy, need for ventilation, mechanical circulatory support, dialysis prior to transplant, pretransplant serum bilirubin (≥ 3 mg/dL), and preoperative serum creatinine (≥ 2 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS: Prior sternotomy is associated with an excess 3.3% mortality and higher morbidity within the first 60 days after heart transplantation, as measured by frequency of dialysis, drug-treated infections, and strokes. Conditional 5-year survival after 60 days is unaffected by prior sternotomy. These findings should be taken into account for risk assessment of patients undergoing heart transplantation.

Concomitant dual intravascular and subcutaneous microsurgical implantation of xenograft tissue in a rodent model for evaluation of structural degeneration.

INTRODUCTION: An economical animal model to study xenograft tissue degeneration and calcification and the durability of biological vascular patch material and bioprosthetic valve leaflets is desirable. OBJECTIVE: A cost-effective model to analyze xenograft degeneration, calcification, immunologic reaction, and anticalcification treatment was developed. Furthermore, a technique for implant into the vascular lumen of the abdominal aorta in rats is presented. METHODS: Twelve Lewis rats were used as recipients. The microsurgical procedure was performed using a high-definition optical system. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane inhalation. The suprarenal and infrarenal portion of the abdominal aorta was isolated, the abdominal aorta was cross-clamped, and a 4-mm square portion of the abdominal aorta was removed. Subsequently, a complementary-sized piece of porcine or bovine glutaraldehyde-fixed bioprosthetic valve leaflet tissue was sutured as a patch in the abdominal aorta. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 45 ± 10 minutes and the mean ischemic time was 25 ± 5 minutes. Early and 3-month survivals were 100%. One rat had intraoperative bleeding. No paralysis or thrombosis was observed. CONCLUSION: Feasibility and reproducibility of removing a portion of the abdominal aorta and replacing it with a patch of xenograft tissue was demonstrated in a rodent model with 100% survival at 3 months. Concomitant dual intravascular and subcutaneous microsurgical implantation of xenograft tissue in a small-animal (rat) model is a cost-effective approach for investigation of xenograft tissue degeneration.

Antithymocyte globulin induction therapy adjusted for immunologic risk after heart transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction in the therapy of immunologically low- and high-risk patients after heart transplantation is not known. METHODS: All patients who received ATG induction from January 2000 through January 2010 were divided into two groups based on the risk of rejection. A higher-risk group (age younger than 60 years, multiparous females, African Americans, panel-reactive antibody >10%, or positive cross-match) received ATG (1.5 mg/kg) for 7 days (ATG7), and the remaining lower-risk group received ATG for 5 days (ATG5), all followed by calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate, and prednisone. Endomyocardial biopsies were performed based a standard protocol for up to 3 years after heart transplantation, and for suspected rejection. RESULTS: Of 253 heart transplant recipients, 87 received ATG5 and 166 ATG7. Absolute lymphocyte count <200 per microliter was achieved within 10 days in 88% of ATG5 and 86% of ATG7. Baseline creatinine was 1.3 ± 0.8 pre-transplantation, 1.8 ± 0.9 post-transplantation, and 1.0 ± 0.4 mg/dL at discharge (mean ± standard deviation [SD]; P < .001, compared with pre-transplantation). Of 3667 biopsies, 33 (0.90%) had ≥3A/2R cellular rejection (CR). Of 3599 biopsies, 16 (0.44%) had definite antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). At 5 years, freedom from ≥3A/2R CR (94% ± 2.8% vs 83% ± 7.7%; P = .31) and freedom from AMR (95% ± 2.4% vs 90% ± 6.4%; P = .98) were similar between ATG5 and ATG7, respectively. Survival for ATG5 and ATG7 was comparable at one year (94% ± 2.5% vs 93% ± 2.0%), and at 8 years (61% ± 6.9% and 61% ± 4.7%; P = .88). At 5 years, ATG5 and ATG7 were similar in freedom from cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (92.3% vs 94.3%; P = not significant [NS]), freedom from pneumonia (83.8% vs 82.1%; P = NS), and in rate of malignancy (excluding skin cancer; 8.0% vs 6.0%; P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: ATG induction therapy (prospectively dose-adjusted for immunologic risk) in low- and high-risk patients results in excellent and equivalent short- and long-term survival rates, with a low incidence of CR and AMR. The use of ATG does not increase rates of CMV infection with appropriate prophylaxis. ATG may benefit renal function by delaying calcineurin inhibitor exposure, and may have a role in the prevention of AMR.

Aortic valve replacement or heart transplantation in patients with aortic stenosis and severe left ventricular dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: The decision to perform aortic valve replacement (AVR) or heart transplantation (HTx) for aortic stenosis (AS) with severe left ventricular dysfunction is difficult and may be affected by prior myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Patients who underwent AVR from 1988 to 2001 with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30% and severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA] < 1.0 cm(2); n = 51) were assessed for operative mortality, late survival, and predictors of outcome, and were compared with HTx. Subsequently, 131 patients with LVEF ≤ 35% who underwent AVR for critical AS (AVA < 0.8 cm(2)) were evaluated. RESULTS: In the first 51 patients, 3-year survival was 100% ± 0% with no CAD, and 45% ± 10% with CAD (P < .05); 3-year survival was 88% ± 12% with no bypass, 73% ± 12% with one to two grafts, and 18% ± 11% with three grafts (P < .01). Survival with HTx was 78% at 3 years. In the subsequent analysis of 131 patients, 90-day survivors were followed for a mean 4.6 ± 3.5 years. Advanced age (P = .001) was the only predictor of long-term mortality. LVEF improved from 28.5% ± 5.2% before AVR to 45.4% ± 13.2% at 1-month postoperatively (P < .0001). New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV decreased from 94.2% pre-AVR to 12.8% at 1 year (P < .0001). Predictors of LVEF recovery were no previous MI (P = .007) and higher AS gradient (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In severe AS and LVEF <30% with no concomitant CAD or with CAD requiring one to two bypass grafts, AVR has a survival equal to or exceeding that of HTx. In patients with CAD requiring more than two bypass grafts, survival is significantly reduced, and HTx can be considered.

Prolonged cold ischemic times and less donor-recipient histocompatibility accelerate graft vascular disease.

INTRODUCTION: The long-term success of cardiac transplantation is limited by graft atherosclerosis, also known as graft vascular disease (GVD). GVD is currently the leading cause of late allograft failure in cardiac transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of cold ischemic preservation time (CIPT) and degree of donor-recipient histocompatibility on GVD using a rat heterotopic cardiac transplantation model. METHODS: ACI-Lewis (n=9), Lewis-F344 (n=9), and Lewis-Lewis (n=9) donor-recipient rat strain combinations were subjected to variable durations of CIPT (0, 4, and 24 hours in University of Wisconsin solution at 4°C) prior to transplantation (n=81 total). The ACI-Lewis allografts differed in both major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II antigens, the Lewis-F344 allograft combination differed in multiple non-MHC antigens, and the Lewis-Lewis isograft combination was syngeneic. Grafts were harvested at 90 days. Intimal area ratio (IAR), intimal thickness score (ITS), and rejection score (RS) were determined for each specimen. RESULTS: The Lewis-Lewis transplant group had a significantly higher mean RS (P=.036) with 24 hours than with 0 hours of CIPT in this rat heterotopic transplantation model at 90 days. The Lewis-F344 group had a significantly higher IAR (P=.035), ITS (P=.030), and RS (P=.017) with 24 hours than with 0 hours of CIPT. The ACI-Lewis group had high levels of GVD with all durations of CIPT (0, 4, and 24 hours); as a consequence, there were no significant differences in the ITS, IAR, or RS. With 0 hours of CIPT, the ACI-Lewis transplantation group yielded a significantly higher mean IAR (P=.029), ITS (P=.003), and RS (P=5.02×10(-5)) than the Lewis-Lewis group. The Lewis-F344 group had a significantly higher mean RS (P=.003) than the Lewis-Lewis (syngeneic) group. The ACI-Lewis transplantation group had a significantly higher mean IAR (P=.035), and trended toward a higher ITS (P=.058) than the Lewis-F344 group. CONCLUSION: Longer cold ischemic preservation time and less donor-recipient histocompatibility were associated with more advanced GVD in a rat heterotopic transplantation model, especially when there were multiple MHC mismatches as in ACI-Lewis allografts, but also occurred when there were differences in multiple non-MHC antigens as in the Lewis-F344 allografts. There was a lesser effect of longer cold ischemic time on GVD in the Lewis-Lewis syngeneic (isograft) group, suggesting that greater histocompatibility can mitigate the adverse effects of longer ischemic times.

Prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease in mismatched patients after heart transplantation using combined antiviral and immunoglobulin therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of infection and morbidity after heart transplantation. Seronegative recipients (R-) of seropositive donor hearts (D+) are at high risk for CMV disease. We compared three different CMV prophylaxis regimens using combined antiviral and immunoglobulin therapy. METHODS: In 99 patients who survived more than 30 days after heart transplant, all received induction with antilymphocytic therapy and triple-drug therapy. In group A, D+R- patients received one dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) followed by one dose of CMV-specific immunoglobulin (CMV-IVIG), and intravenous ganciclovir (GCV) for 4 weeks followed by 11 months of oral acyclovir (ACV). In group B, D+R- patients received one dose IVIG followed by five doses of CMV-IVIG and intravenous GCV for 14 weeks followed by 9 months of oral ACV. In group C, D+R- patients were treated with the same regimen as for group B, except oral ACV was replaced with oral GCV. RESULTS: The actuarial freedom from CMV disease for D+R- patients at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years after transplantation in group A was 100%, 25% ± 15%, and 25% ± 15%, respectively; group B was 100%, 67% ± 27%, and 67% ± 27%; group C was 100%, 83% ± 15%, and 83% ± 15% (P < .01, groups B and C vs group A). By comparison, the actuarial freedom from CMV disease for seropositive recipients (D-R+ or D+R+) at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years in group A was 100%, 87% ± 7%, and 82% ± 8%, respectively; group B was 100%, 88% ± 8%, and 75% ± 11%; group C was 100%, 72% ± 9%, and 72% ± 9% (P = NS among groups). Rejection rates did not differ among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: A longer course of intravenous GCV with multiple doses of CMV-IVIG was a more effective prophylaxis regimen against CMV disease for the high-risk group of seronegative recipients of seropositive donor hearts.

Heart transplantation in patients aged 70 years and older: a two-decade experience.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced age has been viewed as a contraindication to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). We analyzed the outcome of OHT in patients who were aged 70 years or older and compared the results with those in younger patients during a two-decade period. METHODS: A total of 519 patients underwent first-time single-organ OHT at our institution from 1988 to 2009. Patients were divided into three groups by age: ≥70-years old (group 1, n=37), 60 to 69-years old (group 2, n=206), and ≤60-years old (group 3, n=276). Primary endpoints were 30-days, and 1-, 5-, and 10-years survival. Secondary outcomes included re-operation for bleeding, postoperative need for dialysis, and length of postoperative intubation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in survival between the greater than or equal to 70-year-old group and the two younger age groups for the first 10 years after OHT. Survival rates at 30 days, and 1-, 5-, and 10-years, and median survival in group 1 recipients were 100%, 94.6%, 83.2%, 51.7%, and 10.9 years (CI 7.1-11.0), respectively; in group 2 those numbers were 97.6%, 92.7%, 73.8%, 47.7%, and 9.1 years (CI 6.7-10.9), respectively; and in group 3 those numbers were 96.4%, 92.0%, 74.7%, 57.1%, and 12.2 years (CI 10.7-15.4; P=NS), respectively. There was no significant difference in secondary outcomes of re-operation for bleeding, postoperative need for dialysis, and prolonged intubation among the three age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are aged 70 years and older can undergo heart transplantation with similar morbidity and mortality when compared with younger recipients. Advanced heart failure patients who are aged 70 years and older should not be excluded from transplant consideration based solely on an age criterion. Stringent patient selection, however, is necessary.

Survival and allograft rejection rates after combined heart and kidney transplantation in comparison with heart transplantation alone.

BACKGROUND: The role of solid multiorgan transplantation remains to be determined. We compared our experience with combined heart-kidney transplantation (HKT) and heart transplant alone (HT), and assessed patient survival rates and freedom from allograft rejection in these two patient groups. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing HKT (n=30) or HT (n=440) between June 1992 and March 2009. Baseline patient characteristics, perioperative factors, incidence of rejection, and survival were examined. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups for age, gender, etiology of heart disease, functional class, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic diameter, cardiac output, or transplant waitlist status. Patients with HKT had a higher serum creatinine level (P<.001) and a greater incidence of hypertension (P=.04). No differences were found in cardiac allograft ischemic times, including cardiopulmonary bypass or cross-clamp times. Kidney allograft ischemic time was 14.6±9 hours (mean±SD; range, 4 hours to 49 hours). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were similar for the HKT and HT groups at 30 days (93%±4.6% versus 98%±0.7%), 1 year (87%±6.2% versus 93%±1.2%), 5 years (68%±9.0% versus 76%±2.1%), and 10 years (51%±11% versus 53%±3.0%; P=.54 for all comparisons). Follow-up serum creatinine levels were similar after HKT and HT at 30 days (1.6±1.8 mg/dL versus 1.1±0.4 mg/dL), 1 year (1.4±0.6 mg/dL versus 1.5±0.6 mg/dL), and 5 years (1.8±1.8 mg/dL versus 1.8±1.2 mg/dL; P>.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: HKT offers excellent survival and similar renal function when compared with HT alone. Patients with end-stage cardiac and renal failure can be considered for HKT.