RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the ideal implantation site for selective tongue neurostimulation in obstructive sleep apnea, anatomy of the distal branching of the hypoglossal nerve (HGN) was revisited. METHODS: The HGN distal course and intramuscular distribution to the tongue muscles were studied in 17 embalmed and 5 fresh heads (age 60-98, BMI 20-35). Medial branches supplying selectively the genioglossus (GG) muscle were identified. Then, the distinct bundles entering the oblique (GGo) and horizontal (GGh) parts of the GG were located. Morphometric data were compared to similar measurements made on MRI sections from 12 patients (age 43-71, BMI 18-47). RESULTS: The key facts relevant to optimize stimulation and electrode design are the following: the mean width of both GG muscles in embalmed and fresh cadavers was 20.7 ± 2.9 and 21.4 ± 5 mm, respectively; it is significantly (p < 0.05) superior to the MRI value of 18.26 ± 2.0 mm. Selective nervous branches for GGh and GGo were located at 52 ± 8% of hyoid bone-mandibular symphysis distance and at 5.8 ± 1.1 mm from the inferior border of the GG muscle. The surface of stimulation is a 4.4 ± 1.1 × 6.9 ± 3.8 mm ellipse. CONCLUSIONS: According to our observations, the optimal selective or supra-selective stimulation of the tongue protractor muscles can be performed on the lateral surface of the GG at roughly equal distance between the mandibular symphysis and the hyoid bone, at a depth of about 0.6 cm above the GG lower border.
Asunto(s)
Nervio Hipogloso/anatomía & histología , Músculo Esquelético/inervación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cadáver , Femenino , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantables , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapiaRESUMEN
Introduction: Etelcalcetide is an i.v. calcimimetic agent, effectively reducing parathyroid hormone levels in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The clinical impact of discontinuing etelcalcetide at the time of kidney transplantation is unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients on HD meeting predefined criteria who received a kidney transplant at our institution between January 1, 2015, and December 12, 2022. The incidence of parathyroidectomy and the evolution of calcium, phosphate, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels after transplantation was analyzed according to the type of calcimimetic treatment before transplantation (cinacalcet vs. etelcalcetide vs. none). Results: Overall, 372 patients (aged 53 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 42-62 years) were included. At the time of transplantation, 35, 75, and 262 patients were under etelcalcetide, cinacalcet, or no calcimimetic, respectively. After 1064 (IQR: 367-1658) days, the incidences of parathyroidectomy in the etelcalcetide, cinacalcet, no calcimimetic groups were 29%, 12%, and 1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Etelcalcetide was associated with an increased incidence of parathyroidectomy after adjustment for age, sex, and HD vintage (hazard ratio [HR]: 97.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.1-493.9, P < 0.001). The incidence of parathyroidectomy was related to etelcalcetide dosage (6/11 [54.6%] in patients with ≥ 10 mg vs. 4/24 [16.7%] in patients with < 10 mg, P = 0.02). Moreover, peak calcium levels were higher (P < 0.001) and parathyroidectomy was performed earlier (median 80 vs. 480 days, P < 0.001) in the etelcalcetide compared with the cinacalcet group. Long-term graft function, graft loss, and mortality were similar. Conclusion: Etelcalcetide use during maintenance HD is associated with an increased incidence of early parathyroidectomy after transplantation compared to cinacalcet or no calcimimetic.