Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 149, 2022 Feb 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35152885

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a multi-system infection with emerging evidence-based antiviral and anti-inflammatory therapies to improve disease prognosis. However, a subset of patients with COVID-19 signs and symptoms have repeatedly negative RT-PCR tests, leading to treatment hesitancy. We used comparative serology early in the COVID-19 pandemic when background seroprevalence was low to estimate the likelihood of COVID-19 infection among RT-PCR negative patients with clinical signs and/or symptoms compatible with COVID-19. METHODS: Between April and October 2020, we conducted serologic testing of patients with (i) signs and symptoms of COVID-19 who were repeatedly negative by RT-PCR ('Probables'; N = 20), (ii) signs and symptoms of COVID-19 but with a potential alternative diagnosis ('Suspects'; N = 15), (iii) no signs and symptoms of COVID-19 ('Non-suspects'; N = 43), (iv) RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients (N = 40), and (v) pre-pandemic samples (N = 55). RESULTS: Probables had similar seropositivity and levels of IgG and IgM antibodies as propensity-score matched RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients (60.0% vs 80.0% for IgG, p-value = 0.13; 50.0% vs 72.5% for IgM, p-value = 0.10), but multi-fold higher seropositivity rates than Suspects and matched Non-suspects (60.0% vs 13.3% and 11.6% for IgG; 50.0% vs 0% and 4.7% for IgM respectively; p-values < 0.01). However, Probables were half as likely to receive COVID-19 treatment than the RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients with similar disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study indicate a high likelihood of acute COVID-19 among RT-PCR negative with typical signs/symptoms, but a common omission of COVID-19 therapies among these patients. Clinically diagnosed COVID-19, independent of RT-PCR positivity, thus has a potential vital role in guiding treatment decisions.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina M , Pandemias , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos
2.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 35(4): 249-57, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24642536

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the maternal serum concentrations of placental growth factor (PlGF)-1 and PlGF-2 in the first, second and third trimesters in normal pregnancies and in those complicated by pre-eclampsia (PE) or the delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) neonates after 37 weeks. METHODS: Serum PlGF-1 and PlGF-2 were measured at 11-13, 20-24 and 30-34 weeks' gestation in 50 cases of PE, 99 cases of SGA and 298 controls. The values of PlGF-1 and PlGF-2 at 11-13 weeks were expressed as multiples of the median (MoM) after adjustment for maternal characteristics. The distributions of PlGF-1 and PlGF-2 in cases and controls at 20-24 and 30-34 weeks were converted to MoM of the values at 11-13 weeks and compared. RESULTS: Serum PlGF-1 and PlGF-2 levels were highly correlated and both increased with gestational age. At 30-34 weeks, the median MoM values for PlGF-1 and PlGF-2 in the late PE (4.2 and 4.3) and late SGA (7.2 and 6.0) groups were significantly lower than in the controls (12.8 and 9.9). Combining the two isoforms did not improve the prediction of late PE and late SGA provided by PlGF-1 alone. CONCLUSIONS: The performances of serum PlGF-1 and PlGF-2 in the prediction of late PE and late SGA are similar.


Asunto(s)
Preeclampsia/sangre , Proteínas Gestacionales/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Factor de Crecimiento Placentario , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo/sangre , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo/sangre , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo/sangre , Isoformas de Proteínas/sangre
3.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 36(2): 106-16, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24457972

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the maternal serum concentration of placental growth factor-1 (PlGF-1) and PlGF-2 at 11-13 weeks' gestation in normal pregnancies and in those complicated by preeclampsia (PE), delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) neonates and fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13. METHODS: Serum PlGF-1 and PlGF-2 were measured in 270 pathological pregnancies (PE, n = 80; SGA, n = 80; trisomy 21, n = 44; trisomy 18, n = 38; trisomy 13, n = 28) and 590 normal controls. The values were expressed as multiple of the median (MoM) after adjustment for maternal characteristics and corrected for adverse pregnancy outcomes and the median MoM values in each pathological pregnancy were compared to the normal group. RESULTS: There were significant contributions to PlGF-1 and PlGF-2 from gestational age, smoking and racial origin. In addition, there were significant contributions to PlGF-1 from parity and method of conception. The median MoM of PlGF-1 and PlGF-2 was significantly decreased in PE (0.783 and 0.916 MoM), SGA (0.891 and 0.851 MoM), trisomy 21 (0.609 and 0.749 MoM), trisomy 18 (0.529 and 0.730 MoM) and trisomy 13 (0.373 and 0.699 MoM). CONCLUSIONS: In pathological pregnancies, except SGA, the decrease in serum PlGF-1 at 11-13 weeks' gestation is more marked than the decrease in PlGF-2.


Asunto(s)
Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/sangre , Preeclampsia/sangre , Proteínas Gestacionales/sangre , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo/sangre , Isoformas de Proteínas/sangre , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Trastornos de los Cromosomas/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Factor de Crecimiento Placentario , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 110(1): 116303, 2024 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838460

RESUMEN

This study evaluated the diagnostic and analytical performances of the Access anti-HBc Total assay on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay System (Beckman Coulter Inc.). The multicenter study involved both prospective and retrospective sample collection from non-selected blood donors, hospitalized patients, or presumed anti-HBc Total positive individuals. Fresh/previously-frozen samples were tested with the Access and comparator assays to determine concordance; discrepant samples were tested with a second CE-marked assay. Among the 5983 non-selected fresh blood donor samples deemed anti-HBc Total negative, clinical specificity of the Access assay was 99.58% (95%CI: 99.38-99.72%). Clinical specificity was 99.27% (97.37-99.80%) among 273 anti-HBc Total negative hospitalized patient samples. Clinical sensitivity on 450 anti-HBc Total positive samples was 99.78% (98.75-99.96%). Evaluation in seroconversion panels revealed an average 1.4-day earlier detection versus a comparator assay. The Access assay demonstrated excellent clinical and analytical performances comparable to existing CE-marked anti-HBc Total assays. NCT04904835.

5.
Clin Biochem ; 49(16-17): 1267-1273, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27542330

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurement is useful as an aid in the evaluation of ovarian reserve. In the past, its conventional use was restricted by the low-throughput and variability of existing manual AMH assays. We developed the automated Access AMH assay for the quantitative determination of AMH levels on the Access family of immunoassay systems. The analytical performance of this new assay was evaluated. DESIGN AND METHODS: Sensitivity, dilution linearity, assay imprecision, AMH sample stability, lot-to-lot comparison and correlation with AMH Gen II assay (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) were evaluated. Reference intervals for Access AMH were established in healthy females, males, newborns (≤60days) and pediatric males classified by Tanner stages. RESULTS: The limit of blank and limit of detection were below 0.0077 and 0.0098ng/mL, respectively. The limit of quantitation was 0.010ng/mL. The total imprecision ranged from 2.4 to 5.2%. Linearity was observed up to 24ng/mL. Sample storage at room temperature up to 48h, at 2-8°C up to 7days and at -20°C up to 15months had no impact on measured AMH. The correlation study gave a coefficient between 0.99 and 1 and a regression slope between 0.89 and 0.92. Excellent lot-to-lot comparability was observed on controls and patient samples with a maximum bias of 3.7% between 2.81 and 15.03ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The fully automated Access AMH immunoassay demonstrates excellent analytical performance. As a consequence, the availability of this assay will represent a robust, fast and precise alternative to manual AMH assay testing.


Asunto(s)
Hormona Antimülleriana/sangre , Reserva Ovárica , Femenino , Humanos , Límite de Detección , Masculino , Estándares de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA