Additional value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI to conventional extracellular gadolinium-enhanced MRI for the surgical management of colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Liver resection being the only potentially curative treatment for patients with liver metastasis, it is critical to select the appropriate preoperative imaging modality. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI compared to a conventional extracellular gadolinium-enhanced MRI on the surgical management of colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastasis. METHODS: We included 110 patients who underwent both a gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (hepatospecific contrast) and conventional extracellular gadolinium for the evaluation of colorectal or neuroendocrine liver metastases, from January 2012 to December 2015 at the CHU de Québec - Université Laval. When the number of lesions differed, a hepatobiliary surgeon evaluated if the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI modified the surgical management. RESULTS: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI found new lesions in 25 patients (22.7%), excluded lesions in 18 patients (16.4%) and identified the same number in 67 patients (60.9%). The addition of the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI directly altered the surgical management in 19 patients overall (17.3% (95% CI [10.73-25.65])). CONCLUSION: Despite the additional cost associated with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI compared to conventional extracellular gadolinium-enhanced MRI, the use of this contrast agent has a significant impact on the surgical management of patients with liver metastases.

Lymphoepithelial cysts of the pancreas. Can preoperative imaging distinguish this benign lesion from malignant or pre-malignant cystic pancreatic lesions?

CONTEXT: Lymphoepithelial cysts of the pancreas are rare true benign cystic tumors of the pancreas of uncertain etiology. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas present a significant diagnostic dilemma in differentiating benign from premalignant or malignant variants. Since the first description of lymphoepithelial cysts in 1985, 109 cases have been reported in the literature. We describe 6 cases of this rare tumor, the preoperative imaging results, and a review the literature. PATIENTS: Five males and one female ranging in age from 47 to 76 years underwent resection for lymphoepithelial cysts. Five patients presented with abdominal pain related to the lesion and in one patient the lesion was discovered incidentally. Four patients had elevated serum CA 19-9 levels. Pre-operative imaging with a CT scan and MRI of the abdomen typically revealed a well defined hypodense mass with Hounsfield units (HU) in the range of 15 to 20. One patient had papillary projections into the lesion. The mean size was 3.3 cm (ranging from 1.8 cm to 4 cm). All lesions were exophytic off the pancreatic parenchyma (1 cyst was located in the head of the pancreas, 2 were in the body, and 3 were in the tail region). Pre-operative EUS-guided/CT-guided needle aspiration, when performed, was not diagnostic. All patients underwent resection (one pancreaticoduodenectomy, five left pancreatectomies) to remove these cystic neoplasms. Pathology revealed a cyst lined by non-dysplastic squamous cells surrounded by sheets of benign lymphocytes. No evidence of malignancy was found. CONCLUSION: Lymphoepithelial cysts of the pancreas are rare and are characteristically seen in men. While a hypodense mass (less than 20 HU) with papillary projections should be considered suspicious for lymphoepithelial cyst, a definitive diagnosis cannot be made solely based on preoperative imaging. EUS-guided biopsy coupled with biochemical/tumor marker studies are increasingly being used as a diagnostic tool to help differentiate between the various types of cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Imaging findings of lymphoepithelial cysts are non-specific and hence surgical resection is often required to rule out the presence of a malignant or pre-malignant cystic pancreatic lesion. In true lymphoepithelial cysts, malignant transformation is not seen and patients who have these cysts are not at increased risk of developing a pancreatic malignancy.

Prolonged survival of initially unresectable hepatic colorectal cancer patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin followed by radical surgery of metastases.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of oxaliplatin with systemic 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin on patients with isolated unresectable liver metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 87 patients treated in our hospital with HAI of oxaliplatin with systemic 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin for isolated unresectable colorectal liver metastases from May 1999 to May 2007 were extracted from a prospective database and analyzed. The resectability rate, perioperative findings, postoperative outcomes, and long-term follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: HAI was delivered after failure of previous systemic chemotherapy in 69 patients (79%). The main criterion for unresectability was massive liver involvement (86% of patients). Most patients had synchronous (85%), bilateral metastases (89%). The median number of HAI courses was 8 (0-25). About 31 patients experienced technical catheter-related problems, which were responsible for withdrawal of HAI in only 7 patients (8%). Finally, a total of 23 patients (26%) were operated on, and resection or radiofrequency ablation was performed in 21 patients (24%). No postoperative mortality was observed and the morbidity rate was 35%. Five-year overall survival was 56% in the surgery group versus none in the nonsurgery group (P < 0.0001). After a median follow-up of 63 months, intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 10 patients among the 23 operated patients. CONCLUSIONS: HAI of oxaliplatin with systemic 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin offers a second chance to remove initially unresectable isolated colorectal liver metastases in 24% of patients, and appears to be more efficient when performed as first-line therapy. Long-term overall survival can be obtained with this approach.

Quality of life assessment in postoperative patients with upper GI malignancies.

BACKGROUND: By current estimates there are more than 10.8 million cancer survivors in the United States. Increasingly, oncologists are realizing that despite the "success" of cancer therapies, cancer survivors are facing previously unrecognized psychosocial issues related to cancer survivorship. In GI cancers, the medical and surgical oncologists charged with the care of the patient are not well-equipped to deal with these issues. At our institution's GI Cancer Survivorship Clinic, we utilize a multi-disciplinary model, led by surgical oncologists, that includes psychologic and pastoral support as a priority. The goal of this study was to assess our patients' quality of life (QOL) in order to better understand their survivorship needs and to optimize survivor care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with upper GI malignancies undergoing post-treatment evaluation completed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spirituality Scale (FACIT-Sp) questionnaire that includes five domains of QOL: physical well being; social/family well being; emotional well being; functional well being; and spiritual well being. RESULTS: The results of our evaluation of health related QOL in a sample of 99 patients revealed higher self-reported QOL than those seen in a normative sample of cancer patients. Social/family well being was strongly associated with total QOL scores, and married patients reported higher social/family well being, as well as higher overall QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional evaluation of health related QOL in our patients revealed higher self-reported QOL than those seen in a normative sample of general cancer patients. Despite aggressive surgical and medical treatment for malignancies with a generally poor prognosis, the results of our pilot study suggest that cancer survivors treated and followed in a multidisciplinary setting can experience acceptable health-related QOL.

Antiangiogenic agents and late anastomotic complications.

Anticancer agents targeting circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (e.g., bevacizumab and aflibercept) are strong angiogenesis inhibitors. As such, they may hamper the healing process, notably in the early postoperative period. Whether antiangiogenic agents may be associated with late postoperative healing complications is less known. We reviewed three cases of patients with anastomotic complications under antiangiogenic treatment occurring more than 1 year after initial surgery and we conducted a review of the literature. We report the first case of delayed anastomotic leakage which occurred under aflibercept therapy 13 months after a bilioenteric anastomosis and two cases of delayed rectal anastomotic complications associated with bevacizumab treatment 18 and 78 months after surgery. Fifteen similar cases of late gastrointestinal anastomotic complications were found in the English literature. Antiangiogenic agents are probably not deleterious to a healed wound. However, they appear to be associated with an increased risk of complications in a subgroup of patients. According to the 18 cases reported, the main risk factors appear to be low anterior resection for rectal cancer, perioperative radiotherapy, and early postoperative leak which heals through the formation of abundant and hypervascularized granulation tissue.

Indications and approach to surgical resection of lung metastases.

Pulmonary metastasectomy is a curative option for selected patients with cancer spread to the lungs. Complete surgical removal of pulmonary metastases can improve survival and is recommended under certain criteria. Specific issues that require consideration in a multidisciplinary setting when planning pulmonary metastasectomy include: adherence to established indications for resection, the surgical strategy including the use of minimally invasive techniques, pulmonary parenchyma preservation, and the role of lymphadenectomy.

Factors associated with upgrading to malignancy at surgery of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy.

Previous studies have shown that 4-54% of breast lesions reported on core biopsies as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) are upgraded on further excision to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma. We evaluated the rate of upgrading ADH to carcinoma at surgery for ADH diagnosed by percutaneous biopsy, and examined characteristics associated with malignancy. We identified 13,488 consecutive biopsies conducted at one center over a nine-year period. A total of 422 biopsies with ADH in 415 patients were included. DCIS or invasive carcinoma was found in 132 cases (31.3% upgrading). Multivariate model revealed that ipsilateral breast symptoms, mammographic lesion other than microcalcifications alone, 14G core needle biopsy, papilloma co-diagnosis, severe ADH and pathologists with lower volume of ADH diagnosis were factors statistically associated with malignancy. However, no subgroups were identified for safe clinical-only follow-up. Surgery is recommended in all cases of ADH diagnosed by percutaneous breast biopsy.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) recurrence following surgery: review of the clinical utility of imatinib treatment.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgery with complete removal of the tumor is the primary treatment for resectable GIST and the only chance of cure. However, recurrence after surgery is common. The 2 main prognostic factors are the mitotic activity and the size of the tumor. Tumor rupture is also a risk factor for postoperative recurrence, and extra care should be taken while manipulating this soft and friable tumor. Imatinib mesylate (IM, Gleevec(®), Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and was first studied in the palliative setting for metastatic GIST patients in the year 2000. It is now the cornerstone of metastatic GIST treatment. IM also plays an important role as an adjuvant treatment for resectable GIST and has been shown to increase the recurrence-free survival in phase III studies. However, some points remain to be clarified. Notably, the ideal duration of adjuvant IM after surgery is still unclear. It is also difficult to determine the exact place of surgery in metastatic or recurrent GIST patients in the IM era. A multidisciplinary approach is, therefore, mandatory to offer GIST patients the best treatment available.