Malpractice Claims Following Major Liver and Pancreatic Surgeries: What Can we Learn?

INTRODUCTION: General surgery is a highly litigious specialty. Lawsuits can be a source of emotional distress and burnout for surgeons. Major hepatic and pancreatic surgeries are technically challenging general surgical oncology procedures associated with an increased risk of complications and mortality. It is unclear whether these operations are associated with an increased risk of lawsuits. The objective of the present study was to summarize the medical malpractice claims surrounding pancreatic and hepatic surgeries from publicly available court records. METHODS: The Westlaw legal database was searched and analyzed for relevant malpractice claims from the last two decades. RESULTS: Of 165 search results, 30 (18.2%) cases were eligible for inclusion. Appellant cases comprised 53.3% of them. Half involved a patient death. Including co-defendants, a majority (n = 21, 70%) named surgeons as defendants, whereas several claims (n = 13, 43%) also named non-surgeons. The most common cause of alleged malpractice was a delay in diagnosis (n = 12, 40%). In eight of these, surgery could not be performed. The second most common were claims alleging the follow-up surgery was due to negligence (n = 6). Collectively, 20 claims were found in favor of the defendant. Seven verdicts (23.3%) returned in favor of the plaintiff, two of which resulted in monetary awards (totaling $1,608,325 and $424,933.85). Three cases went to trial or delayed motion for summary judgment. There were no settlements. CONCLUSIONS: A defendant verdict was reached in two-thirds of malpractice cases involving major hepatic or pancreatic surgery. A delay in diagnosis was the most cited claim in hepatopancreaticobiliary lawsuits, and defendants may often practice in nonsurgical specialties. While rulings favoring plaintiffs are less frequent, the payouts may be substantial.

An update on the global trends in the burden of primary liver cancers.

Liver cancer (LC) remains one of the major causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The Incidence, mortality, and prevalence associated with primary LCs were analyzed over the past decade, using GLOBOCAN 2012 and 2020, to understand the trends related to geographic and socioeconomic factors. While total cases of primary LCs continue to rise, global rates of LC incidence and mortality are slowing, mostly driven by changes seen in historically endemic regions.

Long-Term Outcomes for Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 and Duodenopancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Liver metastasis from duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (DP-NENs) is a major cause of mortality in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients, yet much of their natural history is unknown. METHODS: This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study analyzed all MEN1 patients with imageable functional (F) and nonfunctional (NF) DP-NENs (1990-2021) for liver metastasis-free survival (LMFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 138 patients, 85 (61.6%) had imageable DP-NENs (28 F, 57 NF), and the mean largest tumor size was 1.8 ± 1.4 cm. Multifocality was present in 32 patients (37.7%). Surgery was performed for 49 patients (57.7%). During an 11-year median follow-up period (IQR, 6-17 years), 23 (27.1%) of the patients had liver metastasis, and 19 (22.4%) patients died. Death was attributed to liver metastasis in 60% of cases. The patients with F-DP-NENs versus NF-DP-NENs more often had liver metastasis (46.4% vs. 15.8%; p = 0.002) but had similar 10-year LMFS (80.9 vs. 87.0%; p = 0.44) and OS (82.7 vs. 94.3%; p = 0.69). The patients with NF-DP-NENs had surgery when their tumors were larger (p < 0.001). Tumor size was not associated with liver metastasis (p = 0.89). The average growth rate was 0.04 cm/year (SE, 0.02 cm/year; p = 0.01) during active surveillance for NF-DP-NENs (n = 38). Liver metastasis developed in four patients with tumors smaller than 2 cm. The risk of liver metastasis was independent of surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.93; p = 0.72) and death (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.08-3.06; p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Although the observed outcomes in this study were better than historical data, small NF-DP-NENs still developed liver metastasis and liver metastasis remains a major cause of death. These results suggest that size as a sole criterion for surgery may be insufficient to predict tumor behavior.

Liver resection after Y-90 radioembolization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Data on morbidity and mortality following liver resection after radioembolization (Y90) are limited and controversial. Therefore, the perioperative morbidity and mortality of liver resections after Y90 treatment were investigated with systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted to identify studies of liver resection after previous Y90 treatment. Systematic review and meta-analysis for perioperative morbidity and mortality were perfomed using the 2009 PRISMA guidelines and STATA 16.1 software. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies reporting on 276 patients who underwent liver resection after Y90 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of 30-day mortality rates yielded pooled mortality of 0.5% (95% CI 0.0-3.2%). Six studies (155 patients) reported a pooled 90-day mortality of 3.0% (95% CI 0.3-7.4%). The median time to resection after Y90 ranged from 2 to 12.5 months in various studies. In all studies where the median resection was undertaken eight or more months after Y90, zero 30-day mortality was reported. A meta-analysis of overall grade 3 or higher morbidity noted a rate of 26% (95% CI 16-37%). CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection after Y90 may be safe in very well selected patients. Delaying resection after Y90 may further decrease mortality.

Preoperative nomogram to predict posthepatectomy liver failure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, it is often difficult to predict the risk of PHLF in an individual patient. We aimed to develop a preoperative nomogram to predict PHLF and allow better risk stratification before surgery. METHODS: Data for patients undergoing a partial or major hepatectomy were extracted from the hepatectomy-specific NSQIP database for years 2014-2016. Data set from 2017 was used for validation. Patients with Grade B/C liver failure were compared with patients with no liver failure. RESULTS: A total of 10 808 patients from 2014-2016 data set were included. Of these, 316 patients (2.9%) developed Grade B/C PHLF. In the multivariable model consisting of preoperative variables, the following were predictive of Grade B/C PHLF (all p < 0.05): male gender, biliary stent, neoadjuvant therapy, viral hepatitis B or C, concurrent resections, biliary reconstruction, low sodium, and low albumin (model c statistic-0.78). This model was used to construct a nomogram. In the 2017 validation cohort of 4367 patients the nomogram again demonstrated good c-statistic (0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Our nomogram provides patient-specific probabilities for PHLF, and is easy to use. This is a valuable tool that can be utilized for preoperative patient counseling and selection.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of recurrence in patients with Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence rates and predictors of recurrence in patients with Solid Pseudopapillary tumors (SPT) are unclear, which makes it challenging to determine the duration of follow-up. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the recurrence rates and pathologic factors associated with recurrence in patients with SPT. METHODS: A PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science search was conducted to identify studies of SPT published during the last 15 years: (09/2002-09/2017). Studies reporting on patients with SPT and follow-up of >5 years were included. The search strategy was conducted per 2009 PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 103 studies reporting on 2599 non-metastatic SPT patients were identified. Sixty-nine patients (2.6%) developed recurrence during follow-up. Pooled estimates from studies with a sample size >20 (N = 33) noted an overall recurrence rate of 2% (95% CI 1-2%). Male gender (OR 1.960), positive lymph nodes (OR 11.9), R1 margins (OR 11.1), and LVI (OR 5.5), were associated with a significantly (all p < 0.05) increased risk of recurrence. CONCLUSION: Current meta-analysis suggests that only 2% of patients with SPT experience recurrence after resection. These data will guide the treating physicians and patients regarding recurrence rates and help identify patients at increased risk of recurrence during follow-up.

Review and Update on the Role of Peritoneal Cytology in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Positive peritoneal cytology (Cyt+) even in the absence of macroscopic disease is associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer and deemed as M1 disease. Recent years have seen advancements in the evaluation strategies for peritoneal washings and management of patients with Cyt+. The aim of this review was to describe the newest paradigms in the management of patients with gastric cancer who have Cyt+ without macroscopic peritoneal metastases. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify studies on the management of gastric cancer and thereby to summarize relevant information on the accuracy of various diagnostic tests and controversies involved in the treatment of patients with Cyt+. RESULTS: Although conventional cytology remains the standard technique for assessment of peritoneal washings, it is limited by low sensitivity. The role of immunohistochemistry and molecular techniques for the assessment of peritoneal washings is evolving. Although systemic chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with Cyt+ disease, the role of gastrectomy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, extensive intraperitoneal saline lavage, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is being evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical decision-making in patients with Cyt+ remains controversial given the seemingly technical resectable albeit biologically unresectable or aggressive disease that portends an overall poor prognosis. Current management strategies are evolving, and further studies are needed to develop an optimal treatment strategy for these patients.

Outcomes of Adrenal Venous Sampling in Patients with Bilateral Adrenal Masses and ACTH-Independent Cushing's Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with bilateral adrenal masses and ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome (AICS) is challenging, as bilateral adrenalectomy can lead to steroid dependence and lifelong risk of adrenal crisis. Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) has been previously reported to facilitate lateralization for guiding adrenalectomy. The aim of the current study was to investigate the utility of AVS using protocol from study by Young et al. in the management of patients with bilateral adrenal masses and AICS. METHODS AND DESIGN: A retrospective review of all patients with bilateral adrenal masses and AICS who underwent AVS from 2008 to 2016 was performed. AVS for cortisol and epinephrine was performed with dexamethasone suppression. The adrenal vein to peripheral vein cortisol ratios and side-to-side cortisol lateralization ratios were calculated. RESULTS: AVS was successful in 8 of 9 patients. All 8 patients had AVS results indicating bilateral cortisol hypersecretion. Six patients underwent adrenalectomy: 3 had unilateral adrenalectomy of the larger size mass, 2 had bilateral adrenalectomy (both sides >4 cm.) and 1 had stepwise bilateral adrenalectomy. Final pathology revealed macronodular adrenal hyperplasia in all 6 patients that underwent surgery. CONCLUSION: AVS was useful in excluding a unilateral adenoma as the source of AICS in this study of patients with bilateral adrenal masses and AICS. However, adrenal mass size influenced surgical decision making more than AVS results. More data are needed before AVS can be advocated as essential for management of patients with bilateral adrenal masses and AICS.

FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Both FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G-nP) are used increasingly in the neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). This study aimed to compare neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and G-nP in the treatment of resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) head PDA. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of R and BR patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy after NAT with FOLFIRINOX or G-nP was performed. Comparative analysis was performed using inverse-probability-weighted (IPW) estimators. The end points of the study were overall survival (OS) and an 80% reduction in CA19-9 with NAT. RESULTS: In this study, 193 patients were analyzed, with 73 patients receiving FOLFIRINOX and 120 patients receiving G-nP. The median OS was 38.7 months for FOLFIRINOX versus 28.6 months for G-nP (p = 0.214). The patients who received FOLFIRINOX were younger and had fewer comorbidities, more BR disease, and larger tumors than those treated with G-nP (all p < 0.05). The two regimens were equally effective in achieving an 80% decline in CA19-9 (p = 0.8). The R0 resection rates were similar (80%), but FOLFIRINOX was associated with a reduction in pN1 disease (56% vs. 72%; p = 0.028). The receipt of adjuvant therapy was similar (74 vs. 75%; p = 0.79). In the Cox regression analysis with adjustment for baseline and treatment-related variables (FOLFIRINOX vs. G-nP, age, gender, computed tomography (CT) tumor size, BR vs. R, pre-NAT CA19-9), regimen type was not associated with a survival benefit. In the IPW analysis of 166 patients, however, the average treatment effect of FOLFIRINOX was to increase OS by 4.9 months compared with G-nP (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Both FOLFIRINOX and G-nP are viable options for neoadjuvant treatment of PDA. In this study, neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with a 4.9-month improvement in survival compared with G-nP after adjustment for covariates.

Effectiveness of Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) Versus Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (Y90) for Pretreated Isolated Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases (IU-CRCLM).

BACKGROUND: In the era of modern effective systemic chemotherapy, the comparative effectiveness of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) versus selective internal radiation therapy (yttrium-90 [Y90]) for pretreated patients with isolated unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (IU-CRCLM) remains unknown. This study sought to compare the overall survival (OS) after HAI versus Y90 for IU-CRCLM patients treated with modern chemotherapy and to perform a cost analysis of both regional methods. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed patients receiving HAI or Y90 in combination with modern chemotherapy as second-line therapy for IU-CRCLM. Overall survival was calculated from the time of IU-CRCLM diagnosis. Uni- and multivariate models were constructed to identify independent predictors of survival. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 97 patients (48 HAI patients and 49 Y90 patients). Both groups were similar in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), synchronous disease, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), liver tumor burden, and chemotherapy-related characteristics including use of biologics and lines of chemotherapy (all p > 0.05). The HAI group had a better OS than the Y90 group (31.2 vs. 16.3 months; p < 0.001). A trend toward reduced cost favored the HAI group (median, $29,479 vs. $39,092; p = 0.296). The multivariate analysis showed that receipt of HAI (hazard ratio 0.465) and number of chemotherapy lines (HR 0.797) were associated with improved OS from the date of IU-CRCLM diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of HAI versus Y90 in the era of modern chemotherapy, and the findings suggests that HAI is associated with better survival than Y90 for patients with pretreated IU-CRCLM.

Clinical Predictors of Malignancy in Patients with Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Factors associated with malignancy in patients with pheochromocytoma (adrenal tumors, Pheo) and paraganglioma (extra-adrenal, PGL) are not well-defined and all patients require lifelong surveillance. The primary aim of our study was to determine genetic and clinical variables associated with malignancy in patients with Pheo/PGL. METHODS: Single institution retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent surgery (1/95-1/15) for Pheo/PGL. Malignancy was defined as histology-confirmed distant metastasis, lymph nodal involvement, or tumor bed recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 157 Pheo/PGL patients (44 malignant, 113 benign) with mean follow-up of 87 months were included. Compared with patients with benign Pheo/PGL, patients with malignant Pheo/PGL were younger (median 42 vs 50 years, p = 0.014), had larger tumors (median 6.5 vs 4 cm, p < 0.001) and had PGL (63.6 vs 4.4%, p < 0.001). Genetic testing was performed in 60 patients and was positive in 38 (63%). Although positive genetic results were equally likely in malignant vs benign Pheo/PGL (76 vs 54%, p = 0.1), all 11 patients with germline SDHB mutations had malignant disease. In multivariable analysis, younger age, larger tumor size, and PGL were associated with malignancy (p < 0.05). Pheo patients with negative genetic testing and negative family history who developed metachronous metastases all had primary tumors ≥4 cm in size. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are young, have larger tumors, positive genetic testing (especially SDHB) or have PGL require long-term follow-up. Patients with negative genetic testing or family history and Pheo <4 cm have a lower risk of malignancy, and de-escalated long-term surveillance may be appropriate follow-up.

Initial Treatment of Unresectable Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases with Transarterial Chemoembolization using Streptozotocin: A 20-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NELM) present with multifocal disease and are not surgical candidates. We present our 20-year experience with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using streptozotocin (STZ) in patients with initially unresectable NELM. METHODS: Patients with unresectable NELM treated with TACE using STZ at a single institution from 1995 to 2015 were identified after institutional board approval. Imaging was independently reviewed by a radiologist to evaluate for RECIST 1.1 responses. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients with NELM who underwent 474 TACE treatments during the past 20 years were identified. Median age was 62 years, and 54 % of the patients were females. Median number of TACE treatments per patient was four (range 1-22). TACE treatment with STZ was very well tolerated with 10.3 % of treatments being associated with side effects, predominantly transient, including hyper/hypotension, bradycardia, or postembolization syndrome. Median overall survival from the start of TACE was 44 months (5-year OS from TACE 40.8 % and 5-year PFS 20.3 %), and 54 % of the patients who had carcinoid syndrome reported improved symptoms after TACE treatments. Age, grade, liver tumor burden, and ability to undergo multiple TACE treatments were independent predictors of overall survival in multivariable analysis. Chromogranin A levels >115 ng/ml were associated with worse overall survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unresectable NELM, TACE with STZ is well tolerated with minimal toxicity and can lead to diminished carcinoid syndrome and long-term survival. This is a novel, conservative approach for the initial treatment of unresectable NELM.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion in Adolescent and Young Adults with Peritoneal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Several studies suggest that young patients may derive less oncologic benefit from surgical resection of cancers compared with older patients. We hypothesized that young patients may have worse outcomes following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (CRS/HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases. METHODS: Perioperative and oncologic outcomes in adolescent and young adults (AYA), defined as younger than age 40 years (n = 135), undergoing CRS/HIPEC between 2001 and 2015 were reviewed and compared with middle-aged adults, defined as aged 40-65 years (n = 684). RESULTS: The two groups were similar with regards to perioperative characteristics except that AYA were more likely to be symptomatic at presentation (65.2 vs. 50.9%, p = 0.003), had lower Charleson comorbidity index (median 6 vs. 8, p < 0.001), were less likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (32.8 vs. 42.5%, p = 0.042), and had longer operative times (median 543 vs. 493 min, p = 0.010). Postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4 morbidity was lower in AYA (17 vs. 26%, p = 0.029), and they required fewer reoperations for complications (3.7 vs. 10.4%, p = 0.014). AYA had longer median overall survival (103.6 vs. 73.2 months, p = 0.053). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, age was an independent predictor of improved overall survival [hazard ratio 0.705; 0.516-0.963, p = 0.028]. CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with peritoneal metastases derive similar benefits from CRS/HIPEC as middle-aged patients. Young age should not be a deterrent to consideration of CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal metastases.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion in Combination with Modern Systemic Chemotherapy is Associated with Improved Survival Compared with Modern Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Patients with Isolated Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: In the era of effective modern systemic chemotherapy (CT), the role of hepatic arterial infusion of fluoxuridine (HAI-FUDR) in the treatment of isolated unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (IU-CRCLM) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) of HAI-FUDR in combination with modern systemic CT versus modern systemic CT alone in patients with IU-CRCLM. METHODS: This was a case-control study of IU-CRCLM patients who underwent HAI + modern systemic CT or modern systemic CT alone. Modern systemic CT was defined as the use of multidrug regimens containing oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan ± biologics. RESULTS: Overall, 86 patients met the inclusion criteria (n = 40 for the HAI + CT group, and n = 46 for the CT-alone group). Both groups were similar in demographics, primary and stage IV tumor characteristics, and treatment-related variables (carcinoembryonic antigen, use of biologic agents, total number of lines of systemic CT administered) (all p > 0.05). Additionally, both groups were comparable with respect to liver tumor burden [median number of lesions (13.5 vs. 15), percentage of liver tumor replacement (37.5 vs. 40 %), and size of largest lesion] (all p > 0.05). Median OS in the HAI + CT group was 32.8 months compared with 15.3 months in the CT-alone group (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed HAI + CT (hazard ratio 0.4, 95 % confidence interval 0.21-0.72; p = 0.003), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, and receipt of increasing number of lines of systemic CT to be independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this case-control study of patients with IU-CRCLM, HAI in combination with CT was associated with improved OS when compared with modern systemic CT alone.

Neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5520 patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent years have seen standardization of the anatomic definitions of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and increasing utilization of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). The aim of the current review was to summarize the evidence for NAT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma since 2009, when consensus criteria for resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), and locally advanced (LA) disease were endorsed. METHODS: PubMed search was undertaken along with extensive backward search of the references of published articles to identify studies utilizing NAT for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Abstracts from ASCO-GI 2014 and 2015 were also searched. RESULTS: A total of 96 studies including 5520 patients were included in the final quantitative synthesis. Pooled estimates revealed 36% grade ≥ 3 toxicities, 5% biliary complications, 21% hospitalization rate and low mortality (0%, range 0-16%) during NAT. The majority of patients (59%) had stable disease. On an intention-to-treat basis, R0-resection rates varied from 63% among R patients to 23% among LA patients. R0 rates were > 80% among all patients who were resected after NAT. Among R and BR patients who underwent resection after NAT, median OS was 30 and 27.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current study summarizes the recent literature for NAT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and demonstrates improving outcomes after NAT compared to those historically associated with a surgery-first approach for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

A Review and Update of Treatment Options and Controversies in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To review the current management, outline recent advances and address controversies in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment of HCC is multidisciplinary involving hepatologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, interventional radiologists, and other disciplines. Each of these disciplines brings its unique perspective and differing opinions that add to controversies in the management of HCC. METHODS: A focused literature review was performed to identify recent studies on the management of HCC and thereby summarize relevant information on the various therapeutic modalities and controversies involved in the treatment of HCC. RESULTS: The main treatment algorithms continue to rely on hepatic resection or transplantation with controversies involving patients harboring early stage disease and borderline hepatic function. The other treatment strategies include locoregional therapies, radiation, and systemic therapy used alone or in combination with other treatment modalities. Recent advances in locoregional therapies, radiation, and systemic therapies have provided better therapeutic options with curative intent potential for some locoregional therapies. Further refinements in combination therapies such as algorithms consisting of locoregional therapies and systemic or radiation therapies are likely to add additional options and improve survival. CONCLUSIONS: The management of HCC has witnessed significant strides with advances in existing options and introduction of several new treatment modalities of various combinations. Further refinements in these treatment options combined with enrollment in clinical trials are essential to improve the management and outcomes of patients with HCC.

Robotic-Assisted Placement of an Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump and Catheter for Regional Chemotherapy of the Liver.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) chemotherapy is an effective regional therapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (U-CRLM).1 , 2 One of its limitations is the need for a laparotomy, which can delay the use of systemic therapy.3 Here, we describe a purely robotic technique for placement of an HAI pump (Fig 1). PATIENT: A 62-year-old male presented with a symptomatic ascending colon cancer and multiple bilobar unresectable liver metastases. He underwent laparoscopic right colectomy followed by six cycles of FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab with stable disease by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria, and also underwent robotic HAI pump placement. TECHNIQUE: The patient was placed supine on a split-leg table, and four robotic and two laparoscopic assistant ports were placed as shown. Use of the robot allowed for precise dissection of the common hepatic artery (CHA) and gastroduodenal artery (GDA), as well as a portal lymphadenectomy. A standard cholecystectomy was performed and the GDA was dissected for a distance of 2-3 cm from its takeoff from the CHA. The robotic scissors were used to create a precise transverse GDA arteriotomy, and the HAI pump catheter tip was advanced to the CHA/GDA junction and secured with two silk ties. Finally, a methylene blue dye injection test was performed to ensure uniform distribution within the liver. Operative time was 147 min, estimated blood loss was 20 ml, and the postoperative course was uneventful. The first dose of HAI with floxuridine was administered on postoperative day 4 (day of discharge) and systemic chemotherapy was administered 2 weeks later. CONCLUSION: The robotic platform allows for minimally invasive HAI pump placement. Fig. 1 Port placement for robotic-assisted hepatic artery infusion pump placement using the DaVinci Si platform. Illustration depicts a 12 mm periumbilical port for the robotic camera (upper green port), three 8 mm (purple) robotic working ports (the left MCL, right MCL, and right AAL for robotic arms R1, R2, and R3, respectively), and 12 mm (lower green) and 5 mm (red) laparoscopic assistant ports in the right and left lower quadrants, respectively. The pump pocket is created in the left lower quadrant just below the 5 mm (red) port site.