RESUMEN
High-dose melphalan (HDM) and transplantation are recommended for eligible patients with multiple myeloma. No other conditioning regimen has proven to be more effective and/or safer. We previously reported in a phase 2 study that bortezomib can safely and effectively be combined with HDM (Bor-HDM), with a 32% complete response (CR) rate after transplantation. These data supported a randomized phase 3 trial. Randomization was stratified according to risk and response to induction: 300 patients were enrolled, and 154 were allocated to the experimental arm (ie, arm A) with bortezomib (1 mg/m2 intravenously [IV]) on days -6, -3, +1, and +4 and melphalan (200 mg/m2 IV) on day -2. The control arm (ie, arm B) consisted of HDM alone (200 mg/m2 IV). There were no differences in stringent CR + CR rates at day 60 posttransplant (primary end point): 22.1% in arm A vs 20.5% in arm B (P = .844). There were also no differences in undetectable minimum residual disease rates: 41.3% vs 39.4% (P = .864). Median progression-free survival was 34.0 months for arm A vs 29.6 months for arm B (adjusted HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61-1.13; P = .244). The estimated 3-year overall survival was 89.5% in both arms (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.62-2.64; P = .374). Sixty-nine serious adverse events occurred in 18.7% of Bor-HDM-treated patients (vs 13.1% in HDM-treated patients). The proportion of grade 3/4 AEs was similar within the 2 groups (72.0% vs 73.1%), mainly (as expected) blood and gastrointestinal disorders; 4% of patients reported grade 3/4 or painful peripheral neuropathy in arm A (vs 1.5% in arm B). In this randomized phase 3 study, a conditioning regimen with Bor-HDM did not improve efficacy end points or outcomes compared with HDM alone. The original trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02197221.
Asunto(s)
Melfalán , Mieloma Múltiple , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Humanos , Melfalán/efectos adversos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/etiología , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
Despite tremendous improvements in the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma in the past decade, high-risk patients have not benefited from the approval of novel drugs. The most important prognostic factor is the loss of parts of the short arm of chromosome 17, known as deletion 17p (del(17p)). A recent publication (on a small number of patients) suggested that these patients are at very high-risk only if del(17p) is associated with TP53 mutations, the so-called "double-hit" population. To validate this finding, we designed a much larger study on 121 patients presenting del(17p) in > 55% of their plasma cells, and homogeneously treated by an intensive approach. For these 121 patients, we performed deep next generation sequencing targeted on TP53. The outcome was then compared with a large control population (2505 patients lacking del(17p)). Our results confirmed that the "double hit" situation is the worst (median survival = 36 months), but that del(17p) alone also confers a poor outcome compared with the control cohort (median survival = 52.8 months vs 152.2 months, respectively). In conclusion, our study clearly confirms the extremely poor outcome of patients displaying "double hit," but also that del(17p) alone is still a very high-risk feature, confirming its value as a prognostic indicator for poor outcome.
Asunto(s)
Deleción Cromosómica , Cromosomas Humanos Par 17/genética , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mutación , Pronóstico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In the era of personalized treatment in multiple myeloma, high-risk patients must be accurately identified. The International Myeloma Working Group recommends using the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) to pick out high-risk patients. The main purpose of our work was to explore the heterogeneity of outcome among R-ISS stage II patients assessing the impact of International Staging System (ISS) stage, chromosomal abnormalities and lactate dehydrogenase level in this subgroup. Data were collected from 1,343 patients up to 65 years old with newly diagnosed myeloma, enrolled in three clinical trials implemented by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. All patients were eligible for intensive treatment. Patients in R-ISS stage II but ISS stage I had 1.6 times higher risk of death than patients in R-ISS stage I (adjusted hazard ratio=1.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.2; P=0.01) and patients in R-ISS stage II but with ISS stage III had a better overall survival than patients in R-ISS stage III (adjusted hazard ratio=0.7; 95% confidence interval: 0.4-0.9, P=0.02). However, among patients classified in R-ISS II, ISS stage and chromosomal abnormalities (del[17p] and t[4;14]) were still relevant prognostic factors for death. Dividing R-ISS stage II into three subgroups: ISS I with standard-risk chromosomal abnormalities, ISS II or III with standard-risk chromosomal abnormalities and patients with high-risk chromosomal abnormalities, median overall survival times were, respectively, not reached, 112 months and 71 months (P<0.001). In conclusion, stratification of patients in the R-ISS stage II group can be improved by taking into account chromosomal abnormalities and ISS. However, this does not improve predictive performance of survival models.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Aberraciones CromosómicasRESUMEN
The introduction of novel agents has led to major improvements in clinical outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma. To shorten evaluation times for new treatments, health agencies are currently examining minimal residual disease (MRD) as a surrogate end point in clinical trials. We assessed the prognostic value of MRD, measured during maintenance therapy by next-generation sequencing (NGS). MRD negativity was defined as the absence of tumor plasma cell within 1 000 000 bone marrow cells (<10-6). Data were analyzed from a recent clinical trial that evaluated the role of transplantation in newly diagnosed myeloma patients treated with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD). MRD negativity was achieved at least once during maintenance in 127 patients (25%). At the start of maintenance therapy, MRD was a strong prognostic factor for both progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.34; P < .001) and overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.54; P = .001). Patients who were MRD negative had a higher probability of prolonged progression-free survival than patients with detectable residual disease, regardless of treatment group (RVD vs transplant), cytogenetic risk profile, or International Staging System disease stage at diagnosis. These results were similar after completion of maintenance therapy. Our findings confirm the value of MRD status, as determined by NGS, as a prognostic biomarker in multiple myeloma, and suggest that this approach could be used to adapt treatment strategies in future clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Mieloma Múltiple/metabolismo , Anciano , Médula Ósea/metabolismo , Médula Ósea/patología , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Neoplasia Residual , Células Plasmáticas/metabolismo , Células Plasmáticas/patología , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome conducted a randomized trial to compare bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) with bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) as induction before high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Overall, a total of 340 patients were centrally randomly assigned to receive VTD or VCD. After 4 cycles, on an intent-to-treat basis, 66.3% of the patients in the VTD arm achieved at least a very good partial response (primary end point) vs 56.2% in the VCD arm (P = .05). In addition, the overall response rate was significantly higher in the VTD arm (92.3% vs 83.4% in the VCD arm; P = .01). Hematologic toxicity was higher in the VCD arm, with significantly increased rates of grade 3 and 4 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. On the other hand, the rate of peripheral neuropathy (PN) was significantly higher in the VTD arm. With the exception of hematologic adverse events and PN, other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were rare, with no significant differences between the VTD and VCD arms. Our data support the preferential use of VTD rather than VCD in preparation for ASCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01564537 and at EudraCT as #2013-003174-27.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anemia/inducido químicamente , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Estudios Prospectivos , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
Guidelines for monitoring multiple myeloma (MM) patients expressing light chains only (light-chain MM [LCMM]) rely on measurements of monoclonal protein in urine. Alternatively, serum free light chain (sFLC) measurements have better sensitivity over urine methods, however, demonstration that improved sensitivity provides any clinical benefit is lacking. Here, we compared performance of serum and urine measurements in 113 (72κ, 41λ) newly diagnosed LCMM patients enrolled in the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) 2009 trial. All diagnostic samples (100%) had an abnormal κ:λ sFLC ratio, and involved (monoclonal) FLC (iFLC) expressed at levels deemed measurable for monitoring (≥100 mg/L). By contrast, only 64% patients had measurable levels of monoclonal protein (≥200 mg per 24 hours) in urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP). After 1 and 3 treatment cycles, iFLC remained elevated in 71% and 46% of patients, respectively, whereas UPEP reported a positive result in 37% and 18%; all of the patients with positive UPEP at cycle 3 also had elevated iFLC levels. Importantly, elevated iFLC or an abnormal κ:λ sFLC ratio after 3 treatment cycles associated with poorer progression-free survival (P = .006 and P < .0001, respectively), whereas positive UPEP or urine immunofixation electrophoresis (uIFE) did not. In addition, patients with an abnormal κ:λ sFLC ratio had poorer overall survival (P = .022). Finally, early normalization of κ:λ sFLC ratio but not negative uIFE predicted achieving negative minimal residual disease, as determined by flow cytometry, after consolidation therapy (100% positive predictive value). We conclude that improved sensitivity and prognostic value of serum over urine measurements provide a strong basis for recommending the former for monitoring LCMM patients.
Asunto(s)
Cadenas Ligeras de Inmunoglobulina/sangre , Cadenas Ligeras de Inmunoglobulina/orina , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/orina , Adulto , Quimioterapia de Consolidación , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estándares de Referencia , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The combination of pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Pom-Dex) has proved effective and safe in patients with end-stage relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), otherwise characterized by a very poor outcome. MM remains an incurable disease with unavoidable relapses, and the outcome after pomalidomide is still dismal. However, some patients demonstrate prolonged survival even beyond pomalidomide therapy.We sought to analyze the treatment of RRMM patients following Pom-Dex therapy and the response and survival after this next treatment line.We studied 134 patients treated with Pom-Dex until progression across two IFM studies. Seventy percent of these patients received further therapy after Pom-Dex. Among the treated patients, one third responded and one third maintained stable disease. The median OS for treated patients was 12 months (6.5;17), with 22 and 12.5% of patients surviving beyond 2 and 3 years, respectively. The factors associated with a better outcome were exposure to a triplet-based regimen containing a novel agent, response to therapy, absence of adverse cytogenetic, and a longer time from diagnosis to post pomalidomide therapy.This study suggests that patients relapsing after Pom-Dex therapy can still benefit from a further line of treatment. A subset of these treated patients even displayed a prolonged OS, while the prognosis remained very poor without treatment. An active approach could therefore be recommended even in this adverse situation, however guided by the patients' prognosis factors.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Terapia Recuperativa/tendencias , Talidomida/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
The combination of pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Pom-Dex) can be safely administered to patients with end-stage relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, we observed a shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these patients when characterized with adverse cytogenetics (deletion 17p and translocation [4;14]) in the Intergroupe Francophone Myélome (IFM) 2009-02 trial. We then sought to determine whether MM with adverse cytogenetics would benefit more from Pom-Dex if exposed earlier in the multicenter IFM 2010-02 trial. The intention-to-treat population included 50 patients, with a median age of 63 years (38% were ≥65 years). Interestingly, there was a striking difference in time to progression (TTP), duration of response, and overall response rate (ORR) according to the presence of del(17p) compared with t(4;14) (TTP, 7.3 vs 2.8 months; duration of response, 8.3 vs 2.4 months; and ORR, 32% vs 15%). OS was prolonged after Pom-Dex, particularly in t(4;14), given the short TTP, suggesting that patients were rescued at relapse with further lines of therapy. Pom-Dex, a doublet immunomodulatory drug-based regimen, is active and well tolerated in adverse cytogenetic patients with early RRMM, particularly in those with del(17p), who are characterized by a high and rapid development of a refractoriness state and known for their poor prognosis. Future studies will determine the underlying mechanisms of Pom-Dex activity in del(17p). This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01745640.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Cromosomas Humanos Par 14/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 17/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 4/genética , Eliminación de Gen , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Translocación Genética/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/análogos & derivadosRESUMEN
Renal impairment is associated with poor prognosis in myeloma. This analysis of the pivotal phase 3 FIRST trial examined the impact of renally adapted dosing of lenalidomide and dexamethasone on outcomes of patients with different degrees of renal impairment. Transplant-ineligible patients not requiring dialysis were randomized 1:1:1 to receive continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone until disease progression (n=535) or for 18 cycles (72 weeks; n=541), or melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide for 12 cycles (72 weeks; n=547). Follow-up is ongoing. Patients were grouped by baseline creatinine clearance into no (≥ 80 mL/min [n=389]), mild (≥ 50 to < 80 mL/min [n=715]), moderate (≥ 30 to < 50 mL/min [n=372]), and severe impairment (< 30 mL/min [n=147]) subgroups. Continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone therapy reduced the risk of progression or death in no, mild, and moderate renal impairment subgroups vs. melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide therapy (HR = 0.67, 0.70, and 0.65, respectively). Overall survival benefits were observed with continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone treatment vs. melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide treatment in no or mild renal impairment subgroups. Renal function improved from baseline in 52.6% of lenalidomide and dexamethasone-treated patients. The safety profile of continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone was consistent across renal subgroups, except for grade 3/4 anemia and rash, which increased with increasing severity of renal impairment. Continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone treatment, with renally adapted lenalidomide dosing, was effective for most transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma and renal impairment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00689936); EudraCT (2007-004823-39). Funding: Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome and the Celgene Corporation.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Renal/tratamiento farmacológico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Creatinina/sangre , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Melfalán/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Insuficiencia Renal/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Age is a strong prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. The overall survival is shorter in patients older than 66 years, and even shorter in those older than 75 years. Whether age is also a prognostic parameter in patients younger than 66 years treated homogeneously with intensive approaches is unknown. To address this issue, we retrospectively analyzed a series of 2316 patients treated homogeneously with 3-4 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by a high-dose melphalan course, without any consolidation or maintenance. We show that patients older than 60 years have a statistically significant shorter overall survival. The analysis of prognostic parameters did not show a higher incidence of high-risk cytogenetics, but a higher incidence of International Staging System (ISS) stages 2 and 3, mainly due to higher ß2-microglobulin levels. This study is the first to demonstrate the impact of age in the outcome of 'young' patients with multiple myeloma, and suggests that this parameter should be included in the stratification factors for future prospective clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
CD38-targeting immunotherapy is approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) that are transplant ineligible (TI) and is considered the best standard of care (SOC). To improve current SOC, we evaluated the added value of weekly bortezomib (V) to isatuximab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IsaRd versus Isa-VRd). This Intergroupe Francophone of Myeloma phase 3 study randomized 270 patients with NDMM that were TI, aged 65-79 years, to IsaRd versus Isa-VRd arms. The primary endpoint was a minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate at 10-5 by next-generation sequencing at 18 months from randomization. Key secondary endpoints included response rates, MRD assessment rates, survival and safety. The 18-month MRD negativity rates at 10-5 were reported in 35 patients (26%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 19-34) in IsaRd versus 71 (53%, 95% CI 44-61) in Isa-VRd (odds ratio for MRD negativity 3.16, 95% CI 1.89-5.28, P < 0.0001). The MRD benefit was consistent across subgroups at 10-5 and 10-6, and was already observed at month 12. The proportion of patients with complete response or better at 18 months was higher with Isa-VRd (58% versus 33%; P < 0.0001), as was the proportion of MRD negativity and complete response or better (37% versus 17%; P = 0.0003). At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, no difference was observed for survival times (immature data). The addition of weekly bortezomib did not significantly affect the relative dose intensity of IsaRd. Isa-VRd significantly increased MRD endpoints, including the 18-month negativity rate at 10-5, the primary endpoint, compared with IsaRd. This study proposes Isa-VRd as a new SOC for patients with NDMM that are TI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04751877 .
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Neoplasia Residual , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In the 2005-01 trial, we have demonstrated that bortezomib-dexamethasone as induction therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation was superior to vincristine-adriamycin-dexamethasone. We conducted a post-hoc analysis to assess the prognostic impact of initial characteristics as well as response to therapy in patients enrolled in this study. Multivariate analysis showed that ISS stages 2 and 3 and achievement of response less than very good partial response (VGPR) both after induction therapy and after autologous stem cell transplantation were adverse prognostic factors for progression-free survival, the most important one being achievement of response less than VGPR after induction. Progression-free survival was significantly improved with bortezomib-dexamethasone induction therapy in patients with poor-risk cytogenetics and ISS stages 2 and 3 compared with vincristine-adriamycin-dexamethasone. In these 2 groups of patients, achievement of at least VGPR after induction was of major importance. This study is registered with EudraCT (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu; EUDRACT 2005-000537-38) and http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00200681).
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome conducted a randomized trial to compare bortezomib-dexamethasone (VD) as induction before high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to a combination consisting of reduced doses of bortezomib and thalidomide plus dexamethasone (vtD) in patients with multiple myeloma. Overall, a total of 199 patients were centrally randomly assigned to receive VD or vtD. After 4 cycles, the complete response (CR) rate was the same in both groups (13% in the vtD arm, 12% in the VD arm, P = .74). However, the CR plus very good partial response (VGPR) rate was significantly higher in the vtD arm (49% vs 36%, P = .05). After ASCT, the CR plus VGPR rate was significantly higher in the vtD arm (74% vs 58%, P = .02). The reduced doses of bortezomib and thalidomide translated into a reduced incidence of peripheral neuropathy (PN): grade ≥ 2 PN were reported in 34% in the VD arm versus 14% in the vtD arm (P = .001). vtD, including reduced doses of bortezomib and thalidomide, yields higher VGPR rates compared with VD and can be considered a new effective triplet combination before HDT/ASCT.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Células Madre , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos/efectos adversos , Bortezomib , Terapia Combinada , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Pirazinas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre/métodos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagoscopía , Gastroscopía , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/complicaciones , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/patología , Masculino , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Rituximab , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Vincristina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
This multicentre prospective randomised trial compared the efficacy and safety of two doses of thalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma. The study was designed to test the non-inferior efficacy and to confirm the better tolerability of low-dose thalidomide as compared to a higher dose. Four hundred patients were randomly assigned to receive either 100 or 400 mg/day of thalidomide. Dexamethasone treatment was added in both arms for patients with stable disease or treatment failure at 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS). Thalidomide 100 mg/day was better tolerated than 400 mg/day with less high-grade somnolence, constipation, nausea/vomiting and peripheral neuropathy (P < 0.001, P = 0.007, P = 0.03 and P = 0.007, respectively). In the per-protocol population (PP), the estimated 1-year OS rates were of 74.5% (n = 149) and 67.3% (n = 156) in the 400 and 100 groups, respectively. The upper limit of the difference between these rates was of 15.6% higher than the non-inferiority acceptable limit of 12.75%, and the hypothesis of non-inferiority of 100 could not be established (P = 0.14). On the other hand, when intent-to-treat (ITT) population was analysed, the non-inferiority was demonstrated because the 1-year OS rates were of 72.8% (n = 195) and 68.8% (n = 205) in the same groups, leading to an upper limit of the difference of 11.49% lower than the non-inferiority acceptable limit. In addition, in patients alive 12 weeks postrandomisation and those who received thalidomide plus dexamethasone, there were no significant differences in response rates, time to progression, progression-free survival and OS between the two groups. Collectively, low-dose thalidomide 100 mg/day has significant activity in advanced myeloma with an improved safety profile and can be a good salvage therapy in combination with dexamethasone.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Clasificación del Tumor , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Compuestos de Mostaza Nitrogenada/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In part 1 of the two-part CASSIOPEIA study, treatment before and after autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) with daratumumab plus bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-VTd) significantly improved rates of stringent complete response and progression-free survival versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. METHODS: CASSIOPEIA is an ongoing randomised, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial done at 111 academic and community practice centres in Europe. Transplantation-eligible adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were randomly assigned (1:1) to D-VTd or VTd. Treatment consisted of four 28-day cycles of induction therapy before autologous HSCT and two 28-day cycles of consolidation therapy after. In this prespecified secondary analysis, patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire-core 30-item (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EuroQol 5-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire at baseline, after induction (cycle 4, day 28), and after consolidation (day 100 after autologous HSCT). The analysis was done in all patients in the intention-to-treat population with a baseline and at least one post-baseline patient-reported outcome assessment. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02541383). FINDINGS: Between Sept 22, 2015, and Aug 1, 2017, 1085 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned D-VTd (n=543) or VTd (n=542). Questionnaire completion rates were high at baseline (511 [94%] of 543 in the D-VTd group vs 510 [94%] of 542 in the VTd group). Compliance rates (calculated from the number of completed surveys as a proportion of the predicted number of participants still on study treatment) were high at post-induction (431 [84%] of 513 vs 405 [80%] of 509) and post-consolidation (414 [90%] of 460 vs 386 [88%] of 438) assessments and were similar between treatment groups. Mean changes in global health status scores from baseline to post-induction were not different between the D-VTd group (3·8 [95% CI 1·6 to 6·0]) and VTd group (2·9 [0·7 to 5·1]; p=0·43), or from baseline to post-consolidation between the two groups (D-VTd group, 9·7 (95% CI 7·4 to 11·9) vs VTd group, 8·7 (6·5 to 11·0; p=0·45). Improvements from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status and EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale scores were observed in post-consolidation scores in both groups. Post-consolidation scores showed significantly greater mean decreases in pain (-23·3 [95% CI -26·6 to -20·0] in the D-VTd group vs -19·7 [-23·0 to -16·3] in the VTd group; p=0·042), significantly smaller reductions in cognitive functioning (-5·0 [-7·6 to -2·4] vs -7·9 [-10·6 to -5·3]; p=0·036), and significantly greater improvements in emotional functioning (13·0 [10·4 to 15·5] vs 9·5 [6·9 to 12·1]; p=0·013) and in constipation (-3·2 [-7·3 to 0·9] vs 1·8 [-2·4 to 6·0]; p=0·025) with D-VTd versus VTd. Between-group differences in change from baseline for all other scales were not significant. INTERPRETATION: D-VTd and VTd were associated with on-treatment health-related quality of life improvements from baseline in transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The significantly greater reductions in pain, less deterioration of cognitive functioning, and greater emotional functioning improvements complement the clinical benefits observed with D-VTd versus VTd, and support the addition of daratumumab to standard regimens in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. FUNDING: Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome, The Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology Oncology, and Janssen Research and Development.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib/farmacología , Dexametasona/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Talidomida/farmacologíaRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to find histological clues for reliable differentiation between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and myeloma when clinical parameters are controversial. Differential appearance of dendritic cells and osteoclasts, two cell types developing from the monocytic lineage upon distinct cytokine activation profile, might be a useful approach. Bone and bone-marrow biopsies performed in 105 patients were studied using histomorphometry after identification of osteoclasts (by histochemical identification of tartrate resistant acid phosphatase) and dendritic cells (by immunohistochemical detection of the S-100 protein). Patients were classified by the World Health Organization criteria but histopathological criteria were more adapted to identify MGUS (53 cases), myeloma (46), B-cell lymphoma (six) since six myeloma were not correctly classified. Histomorphometry was compared to 15 control cases. The number of marrow dendritic cell was significantly increased with B-cell lymphoma >MGUS >myeloma > controls. Dendritic cell were often mixed with lymphoma cells. Myeloma had increased bone resorption with a high osteoclast number and moderate increase in dendritic cells. B-cell lymphomas had a considerable increase in dendritic cell but presented mononucleated osteoclasts. These findings can help in the classification of MGUS in the early stages of the disease and could help to propose preventive treatments.
Asunto(s)
Médula Ósea/patología , Células Dendríticas/patología , Osteoclastos/patología , Paraproteinemias/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Médula Ósea/metabolismo , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B/metabolismo , Linfoma de Células B/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/metabolismo , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Osteoclastos/metabolismo , Paraproteinemias/metabolismo , PronósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The wide heterogeneity in multiple myeloma (MM) outcome is driven mainly by cytogenetic abnormalities. The current definition of high-risk profile is restrictive and oversimplified. To adapt MM treatment to risk, we need to better define a cytogenetic risk classification. To address this issue, we simultaneously examined the prognostic impact of del(17p); t(4;14); del(1p32); 1q21 gain; and trisomies 3, 5, and 21 in a cohort of newly diagnosed patients with MM. METHODS: Data were obtained from 1,635 patients enrolled in four trials implemented by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. The oldest collection of data were used for model development and internal validation. For external validation, one of the two independent data sets was used to assess the performance of the model in patients treated with more current regimens. Six cytogenetic abnormalities were identified as clinically relevant, and a prognostic index (PI) that was based on the parameter estimates of the multivariable Cox model was computed for all patients. RESULTS: In all data sets, a higher PI was consistently associated with a poor survival outcome. Dependent on the validation cohorts used, hazard ratios for patients in the high-risk category for death were between six and 15 times higher than those of patients in the low-risk category. Among patients with t(4;14) or del(17p), we observed a worse survival in those classified in the high-risk category than in those in the intermediate-risk category. The PI showed good performance for discriminating between patients who died and those who survived (Harrell's concordance index greater than 70%). CONCLUSION: The cytogenetic PI improves the classification of newly diagnosed patients with MM in the high-risk group compared with current classifications. These findings may facilitate the development of risk-adapted treatment strategies.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Citogenético/métodos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Anciano , Cromosomas Humanos Par 21/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 3/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 5/genética , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Eliminación de Gen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Análisis Multivariante , Medición de Riesgo , Translocación Genética , TrisomíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In multiple myeloma, combination chemotherapy with melphalan plus prednisone is still regarded as the standard of care in elderly patients. We assessed whether the addition of thalidomide to this combination, or reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation, would improve survival. METHODS: Between May 22, 2000, and Aug 8, 2005, 447 previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma, who were aged between 65 and 75 years, were randomly assigned to receive either melphalan and prednisone (MP; n=196), melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide (MPT; n=125), or reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation using melphalan 100 mg/m2 (MEL100; n=126). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00367185. FINDINGS: After a median follow-up of 51.5 months (IQR 34.4-63.2), median overall survival times were 33.2 months (13.8-54.8) for MP, 51.6 months (26.6-not reached) for MPT, and 38.3 months (13.0-61.6) for MEL100. The MPT regimen was associated with a significantly better overall survival than was the MP regimen (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.81, p=0.0006) or MEL100 regimen (0.69, 0.49-0.96, p=0.027). No difference was seen for MEL100 versus MP (0.86, 0.65-1.15, p=0.32). INTERPRETATION: The results of our trial provide strong evidence to indicate that the use of thalidomide in combination with melphalan and prednisone should, at present, be the reference treatment for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma.