Symptom Association for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease by pH Monitoring After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy.

INTRODUCTION: There are limited data correlating symptoms with reflux episodes during pH studies after peroral endoscopic myotomy. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent POEM followed up ≥6 months later by 48-hour ambulatory wireless pH testing off antisecretory therapy were identified. Reflux symptom association was defined as symptom association probability >95%. RESULTS: The most frequent symptoms of heartburn (47.2%), cough (45.1%), and chest pain (39.6%) were associated with a positive reflux symptom association (symptom association probability >95%) in 20.9%, 17.1%, and 19.4%, respectively. DISCUSSION: There is poor correlation between reported symptoms and esophageal acid exposure during pH testing after POEM.

Comparison of functional lumen imaging probe and high-resolution manometry to assess response after peroral endoscopic myotomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Outcomes after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are assessed clinically by the Eckardt score (ES) or objectively by high-resolution manometry (HRM) and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP). This study compared HRM and FLIP to evaluate clinical response after POEM. METHODS: This was a single tertiary center retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent POEM for treatment-naive achalasia and with ≥6 months of follow-up. Baseline and follow-up testing in all patients included ES, HRM, and FLIP of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). A normal post-POEM (or normalized) EGJ distensibility index (EGJ-DI) >2.8 mm2/mm Hg, maximum EGJ diameter (MxEGJD) ≥14 mm, and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) <15 mm Hg were compared with a clinical response, defined as ES ≤3. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients (58% men, mean age 51 ± 17 years) were included. Overall clinical response by ES, IRP, MxEGJD, and EGJ-DI were 97.7%, 86.2%, 75.9%, and 92.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of a normal IRP (87.1% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 78.0-93.4]) was similar to the sensitivity of a normal MxEGJD (75.3% [95% CI, 64.7-84.0], P = .053) and normal EGJ-DI (91.8% [95% CI, 83.8%-96.6%], P = .39) after POEM to predict clinical response. However, the sensitivity of a normal post-POEM EGJ-DI was superior to a normal post-POEM MxEGJD (P = .001) to predict clinical response. There was no difference in the area under the curve of a normal MxEGJD or EGJ-DI to predict a normal IRP (P = .956) after POEM. CONCLUSIONS: Normal FLIP metrics ≥6 months after POEM for achalasia show good to excellent sensitivity but are equivalent to a normalized IRP by HRM to predict clinical response by ESs. FLIP may be used as an alternative to HRM to assess lower esophageal sphincter response to POEM in these patients. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02770859.).

Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: a prospective single-center experience with mid-term follow-up (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastroparesis (GP) is a multifactorial disease associated with a large burden on the health care systems. Pyloric-directed therapies including gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) can be effective in improving patient quality of life and symptom severity. We report on the safety and efficacy of G-POEM and its impact on the quality of life of patients managed at a large referral center. METHODS: Consecutive patients with confirmed GP referred for G-POEM due to failure of medical therapy were included. All patients were assessed at baseline and then at 1, 3, 6, and 12 and 24 months after G-POEM using validated symptom and quality of life instruments, including the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM), and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Patients were evaluated before and 6 months after the procedure with EGD, 4-hour scintigraphy, and pyloric EndoFLIP. Technical success was defined as the ability to perform full-thickness pyloromyotomy. Clinical response was defined as an improvement of ≥1 point on GCSI. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (median age, 48 years; range, 25-80 years, 88% female) underwent G-POEM between February 2018 and September 2020 for the following phenotypes: vomiting-predominant (n=30), dyspepsia-predominant (n=16), and regurgitation-predominant (n=6) GP. The technical success rate was 100%. Adverse events were noted in 3 of 52 patients (5.77%), and were all managed successfully endoscopically. Clinical response was achieved in 68%, 58%, and 48% of patients at 1-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up (P < .001, P < .001, and P < .01, respectively). When classified by the cause of GP, the clinical response rates were diabetic GP 64% (11 of 17), postsurgical GP 67% (6 of 9), and idiopathic GP 72% (13 of 18). A statistically significant improvement in PAGI-SYM scores was observed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, in addition to significant improvement in several domains of SF-36. Mean 4-hour gastric emptying was reduced 6 months after G-POEM (10.2%) compared with baseline (36.5%, P < .001). We report a significant reduction in the number of emergency department visits and days spent in the hospital up to 24 months after G-POEM. CONCLUSIONS: G-POEM appears to be a safe and feasible treatment alternative for refractory GP with significant short-term and mid-term improvements in overall symptoms, quality of life scores, and health care utilization.