Immunogenicity and Safety of a Purified Vero Rabies Vaccine-Serum Free, Compared With 2 Licensed Vaccines, in a Simulated Rabies Post-Exposure Regimen in Healthy Adults in France: A Randomized, Controlled, Phase 3 Trial.

BACKGROUND: A next-generation Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV-NG2) was developed using the same Pitman-Moore strain as in the licensed purified Vero cell vaccine (PVRV; Verorab) and the human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV; Imovax Rabies®). METHODS: This dual-center, modified, double-blind, phase 3 study evaluated the immunogenic non-inferiority and safety of PVRV-NG2 with and without concomitant intramuscular human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG) versus PVRV + HRIG and HDCV + HRIG in a simulated post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimen. Healthy adults ≥18 years old (N = 640) were randomized 3:1:1:1 to PVRV-NG2 + HRIG, PVRV + HRIG, HDCV + HRIG, or PVRV-NG2 alone (administered as single vaccine injections on days [D] 0, D3, D7, D14, and 28, with HRIG on D0 in applicable groups). Rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA) titers were assessed pre- (D0) and post-vaccination (D14, D28, and D42) using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. Non-inferiority, based on the proportion of participants achieving RVNA titers ≥0.5 IU/mL (primary objective), was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 95% CI of the difference in proportions between PVRV-NG2 + HRIG and PVRV + HRIG/HDCV + HRIG was >-5% at D28. Safety was assessed up to 6 months after the last injection. RESULTS: Non-inferiority of PVRV-NG2 + HRIG compared with PVRV + HRIG and HDCV + HRIG was demonstrated. Nearly all participants (99.6%, PVRV-NG2 + HRIG; 100%, PVRV + HRIG; 98.7%, HDCV + HRIG; 100%, PVRV-NG2 alone) achieved RVNA titers ≥0.5 IU/mL at D28. Geometric mean titers were similar between groups with concomitant HRIG administration at all time points. Safety profiles were similar between PVRV-NG2 and comparator vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: In a simulated PEP setting, PVRV-NG2 + HRIG showed comparable immunogenicity and safety to current standard-of-care vaccines. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03965962.

Bioavailability and cardiovascular effects of adrenaline administered by Anapen 500 µg auto-injector in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: Anaphylaxis guidelines recommend intramuscular adrenaline, commonly 300 µg administered using an auto-injector device. However, overweight/obese patients may require a higher adrenaline dose for adequate cardiovascular (CV) response. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) CV profiles after a single 500 µg adrenaline injection via Anapen auto-injector in healthy normal weight males and otherwise healthy, overweight or obese females. METHODS: In this exploratory open-label, single-centre study, 54 healthy volunteers aged 18-50 years received a single 500 µg adrenaline injection (Anapen auto-injector) in the thigh (antero-lateral middle third [18 males] or antero-inferior third [36 females]). Assessments included depot depth (ultrasonography), plasma adrenaline levels (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) and heart rate (HR; ECG Holter monitor). RESULTS: Ultrasonography showed that 82.4% of normal weight males received intramuscular injections; all overweight and obese females received subcutaneous injections. Anapen injection produced rapid increases in circulating adrenaline levels and significant increases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and HR. Second peak plasma adrenaline concentrations (Cmax2 ) were reduced, and time to Cmax2 increased in overweight and obese females compared with males with normal body mass index; area under the curve (0-240 min) (AUC(0-240) ) was increased in overweight and obese females. Obese females had reduced maximal SBP values compared with normal weight males or overweight females; overweight and obese females had markedly different HR time courses compared with normal weight males. CONCLUSION: A 500 µg adrenaline injection via Anapen produced rapid PK/PD changes in normal weight, overweight and obese subjects, irrespective of intramuscular or subcutaneous injection, and was well tolerated.

A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study between selexipag and midazolam, a CYP3A4 substrate, in healthy male subjects.

PURPOSE: In vitro data showed that selexipag and its active metabolite (ACT-333679) have an inductive effect on CYP3A4, CYP2B6, and CYP2C9 at concentrations approximately 100-fold higher than the maximum plasma concentration (C max) measured under steady-state conditions. In order to confirm in vivo the lack of induction at the enterocyte level, we assessed the effect of selexipag on midazolam, a substrate of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A4. METHODS: This study was conducted according to an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover design. A total of 20 subjects received a single oral dose of 7.5 mg midazolam alone (treatment A) or on top of steady-state selexipag (treatment B). Selexipag was administered twice daily using an up-titration scheme consisting of three steps: 400, 600, 1000, and 1600 µg with increments every fourth day. A 24-h pharmacokinetic profile was performed following midazolam administration, and bioequivalence criteria were investigated on an exploratory basis. RESULTS: The C max of midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam was decreased by approximately 20 and 14%, respectively, following treatment B compared to A. The time to reach C max for midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam was similar between treatments. The terminal half-life was reduced in treatment B compared to A for both midazolam (16%) and 1-hydroxymidazolam (20%). Exposure (area under the curve) to midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam was similar between treatments, and the 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios were within the bioequivalence interval. Treatment with midazolam, selexipag, and the combination was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Exposure to midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam was not affected by treatment with selexipag.

Pain relief of sore throat with a new anti-inflammatory throat lozenge, ibuprofen 25 mg: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international phase III study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a new oromucosal ibuprofen form, ibuprofen 25 mg lozenge, in single and repeat dosing for up to 4 days, to the matched placebo, in the treatment of acute sore throat pain in adults. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adult patients with non-streptococcal sore throat and signs of moderate-to-severe associated pain (≥5 on the objective Tonsillo-Pharyngitis Assessment 21-point scale and ≥60 mm on the subjective 0-100 mm visual analogue Sore Throat Pain Intensity Scale [STPIS]) were assigned ibuprofen 25 mg (n=194) or matching placebo (n=191) lozenge treatment. Efficacy was assessed (at the investigating centre up to 2 hours after first dosing, then on an ambulatory basis) by parameters derived from patient's scores on scales of pain relief, pain intensity, and global efficacy assessment. The primary efficacy end-point was the time-weighted TOTal PAin Relief (TOTPAR) over 2 hours after first dosing using the Sore Throat Relief Scale (STRS). Safety and local tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: Ibuprofen 25 mg was superior to placebo on numerous pain relief parameters; TOTPAR was significantly higher with ibuprofen 25 mg over 2 hours after first dosing (P<.05), the effect being apparent from the first evaluation at 15 minutes (P<.05). The STPIS reduction in favour of ibuprofen 25 mg was not significant vs placebo. Mean STRS scores and patient's global efficacy assessment both reflected a higher efficacy of ibuprofen 25 mg over the 4-day treatment period with tests of statistical significance up to day 1 evening (P<.05), and, in patients with still clinically significant pain (n=128), after an average 4 days (P<.01). Ibuprofen 25 mg lozenge was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to placebo. CONCLUSION: Low-dose ibuprofen 25 mg lozenge in repeat dosing provides in adults more efficacious and rapid relief of sore throat pain and is as well tolerated as placebo. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01785862.

Changes in Activated Thrombin-Activatable Fibrinolysis Inhibitor Levels Following Thrombolytic Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Patients Correlate with Clinical Outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) activation following thrombolysis may affect thrombolysis effectiveness in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). To support this hypothesis, we propose to study the relationship between TAFI consumption, activated/inactivated TAFI (TAFIa/ai) and stroke severity and outcome in 2 groups of AIS patients, one treated and one untreated with intravenous recombinant tissue type plasminogen activator (rt-PA). METHODS: In this prospective, longitudinal, multicenter, observational study, we aimed to study the association between TAFIa/ai and stroke outcome. TAFI levels were sequentially measured in patients treated with intravenous rt-PA thrombolysis (T), and in patients not given any thrombolytic therapy (NT). Baseline reference values were established in healthy subjects matched for age and gender. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score assessed at baseline and on day 2 was dichotomized into 2 severity groups (0-7 vs. >7). The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at day 90 was dichotomized for favorable (0-1) and unfavorable (2-6) outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included, with 41 receiving rt-PA. At admission, patients had higher TAFIa/ai levels than reference. A significant increase in TAFIa/ai levels was observed at the end of thrombolysis (mean change from baseline of 963%) and lasted up to 4 h (191%). Higher TAFIa/ai levels were associated with a more severe day 2 NIHSS score (p = 0.0098 at T2h post thrombolysis) and an unfavorable mRS score from T48h (p = 0.0417) to day 90 (p = 0.0046). In NT patients, higher TAFIa/ai levels at admission were associated with a more severe stroke, as assessed by day 2 NIHSS score (p = 0.0026) and mRS score (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate a consistent relationship between TAFI levels and early clinical severity during rt-PA treatment.

First-in-humans study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ACT-451840, a new chemical entity with antimalarial activity.

Emerging resistance to antimalarial agents raises the need for new drugs. ACT-451840 is a new compound with potent activity against sensitive and resistant Plasmodium falciparum strains. This was a first-in-humans single-ascending-dose study to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ACT-451840 across doses of 10, 50, 200, and 500 mg in healthy male subjects. In the 200- and 500-mg dose groups, the effect of food was investigated, and antimalarial activity was assessed using an ex vivo bioassay with P. falciparum. No (serious) adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported. At the highest dose level, the peak drug concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity of ACT-451840 under fasted conditions reached 11.9 ng/ml and 100.6 ng·h/ml, respectively, and these were approximately 13-fold higher under fed conditions. Food did not affect the half-life (approximately 34 h) of the drug, while the Cmax was attained 2.0 and 3.5 h postdose under fasted and fed conditions, respectively. The plasma concentrations estimated by the bioassay were approximately 4-fold higher than those measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Several potentially active metabolites were also identified. ACT-451840 was well tolerated across all doses. Exposure to ACT-451840 significantly increased with food. The bioassay indicated the presence of circulating active metabolites. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02186002.).

Digestive Symptoms in Healthy People and Subjects With Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Validation of Symptom Frequency Questionnaire.

GOALS: The aim of this study was to validate the ability of symptom frequency questionnaire to differentiate between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients and healthy subjects. BACKGROUND: A digestive symptom frequency questionnaire (DSFQ) was previously used in a food efficacy trial in a non-IBS population with mild gastrointestinal symptoms. STUDY: We compared 2 well-defined populations: 100 IBS patients fulfilling Rome III criteria (mean age 32 y; range, 18 to 59 y), and 100 sex-matched and age-matched healthy subjects. Frequency of individual digestive symptoms (abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating, flatulence, borborygmi) was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (from none to everyday of the week) and the IBS severity with the IBS-SSS questionnaire. Health-Related Quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed with the Food and Benefits Assessment (FBA) and Functional Digestive Disorders Quality of Life (FDDQL) questionnaires. The digestive (dis)comfort dimension of these questionnaires was considered as the main dimension for HRQoL. RESULTS: The DSFQ discriminated IBS from healthy subjects with a significant difference (P<0.001) between groups (estimated mean difference=5.58; 95% CI, 4.91-6.28). On the basis of the ROC curve (AUC=0.9479), a cutoff value of 5 gives a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 84%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 5.75. Composite score of symptoms correlated strongly (P<0.0001) with digestive discomfort measured by FDDQL (-0.816), digestive comfort measured by FBA (-0.789), and the IBS-SSS score (0.762). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of digestive symptom frequency by means of the DSFQ can differentiate IBS from healthy subjects, and shows a good correlation with other validated questionnaires (clinical trial #NCT01457378).

Translation of TRO40303 from myocardial infarction models to demonstration of safety and tolerance in a randomized Phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: Although reperfusion injury has been shown to be responsible for cardiomyocytes death after an acute myocardial infarction, there is currently no drug on the market that reduces this type of injury. TRO40303 is a new cardioprotective compound that was shown to inhibit the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and reduce infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion in a rat model of cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury. METHODS: In the rat model, the therapeutic window and the dose effect relationship were investigated in order to select the proper dose and design for clinical investigations. To evaluate post-ischemic functional recovery, TRO40303 was tested in a model of isolated rat heart. Additionally, TRO40303 was investigated in a Phase I randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single intravenous ascending doses of the compound (0.5 to 13 mg/kg) in 72 healthy male, post-menopausal and hysterectomized female subjects at flow rates from 0.04 to 35 mL/min (EudraCT number: 2010-021453-39). This work was supported in part by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche. RESULTS: In the vivo model, TRO40303 reduced infarct size by 40% at 1 mg/kg and by 50% at 3 and 10 mg/kg given by intravenous bolus and was only active when administered before reperfusion. Additionally, TRO40303 provided functional recovery and reduced oxidative stress in the isolated rat heart model.These results, together with pharmacokinetic based allometry to human and non-clinical toxicology data, were used to design the Phase I trial. All the tested doses and flow rates were well tolerated clinically. There were no serious adverse events reported. No relevant changes in vital signs, electrocardiogram parameters, laboratory tests or physical examinations were observed at any time in any dose group. Pharmacokinetics was linear up to 6 mg/kg and slightly ~1.5-fold, hyper-proportional from 6 to 13 mg/kg. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrated that TRO40303 can be safely administered by the intravenous route in humans at doses expected to be pharmacologically active. These results allowed evaluating the expected active dose in human at 6 mg/kg, used in a Phase II proof-of-concept study currently ongoing.

Evaluation of the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of agomelatine on the QT/QTc interval: a phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and positive-controlled, crossover thorough QT/QTc study conducted in healthy volunteers.

: The effects of the antidepressant agomelatine up to a supratherapeutic dose (400 mg, single dose) on the QT corrected (QTc) interval were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled, crossover thorough QT/QTc study in young healthy volunteers (29 males and 31 females). The primary criterion was the study of male or female population-derived QT-corrected interval (QTcP). The main analysis on the QTcP demonstrated that among the 10 postdose measurement times planned, the largest 1-sided 95% confidence interval upper bound of the difference between agomelatine 50 mg and placebo-adjusted means, and 1 of the differences between agomelatine 400 mg and placebo-adjusted means were both strictly inferior to the 10 millisecond upper-bound threshold of regulatory concern. The assay sensitivity was established with the positive control moxifloxacin (400 mg) and detected an effect on the mean QTcP interval that is around the threshold of regulatory concern (5 milliseconds). No relationship between QTcP and plasma concentrations of agomelatine was observed. In conclusion, agomelatine up to 400 mg has no effect on the QTc interval as demonstrated in the present regulatory thorough QT/QTc study.

Effect on blood lipids of two daily servings of Camembert cheese. An intervention trial in mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects.

As a concentrated source of saturated fat, cheese consumption is considered to be associated with increased cholesterolemia and generally forbidden in dietary guidelines for adults with hypercholesterolemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of saturated fatty acids on lipid parameters and blood pressure with regards to different types of dairy products: Camembert and full-fat yoghurt. One-hundred and fifty-nine moderate hypercholesterolemic subjects without treatment were instructed to consume two full-fat yoghurts (2 × 125 g) per day for 3 weeks (run-in period) and then for a further period of 5 weeks, either two full-fat yoghurts or two 30 g servings of Camembert cheese per day. We observed that over the 5-week daily consumption of two servings of Camembert cheese, blood pressure and serum lipids did not change in moderate hypercholesterolemic subjects. These results suggest that fermented cheese such as Camembert could be consumed daily without affecting serum lipids or blood pressure.

Relative bioavailability of a newly developed pediatric formulation of bosentan vs. the adult formulation.

WHAT IS KNOWN: Bosentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Since bosentan is frequently used to treat pediatric PAH patients, a pediatric formulation was developed. AIM: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties of bosentan and its active metabolite, Ro 48-5033, of the quadrisected, dispersible pediatric vs. the adult tablet after single-dose administration to healthy subjects. Secondary objectives of the study were to compare the pharmacokinetics of two inactive metabolites and the safety of both formulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this open-label, two-way crossover study, subjects (20 - 43 years) were randomized to receive single oral doses of 62.5 mg of bosentan as 1 adult tablet and 64 mg as 2 pediatric tablets of 32 mg. Blood samples were drawn over a 48-hour period to measure bosentan and its metabolites. RESULTS: 16 subjects were enrolled and completed the study. Following treatment with the pediatric formulation, values for Cmax and AUC0-∞ of bosentan were lower than with the adult formulation with geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of 0.82 (0.65, 1.04) and 0.87 (0.78, 0.97), respectively. Similar results were obtained for the primary active metabolite Ro 48-5033. Both treatments were well tolerated. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Although the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0-∞ were not entirely within the conventional bioequivalence range (0.80 - 1.25), no clinically relevant effect of formulation on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan and Ro 48-5033 was detected. Both formulations were well tolerated.

Determination of the Optimal Single Dose Treatment for Acoziborole, a Novel Drug for the Treatment of Human African Trypanosomiasis: First-in-Human Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acoziborole is a novel boron-containing candidate developed as an oral drug for the treatment of human African trypanosomiasis (HAT). Results from preclinical studies allowed progression to Phase 1 trials. We aimed to determine the best dose regimen for all stages of HAT. METHODS: Acoziborole was assessed in 128 healthy adult males of sub-Saharan African origin living in France. The study included a single oral administration of a 20- to 1200-mg dose in a randomised double-blind study in cohorts of 8 (6 active, 2 placebo) to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. In three additional open cohorts of 6 participants, the effect of activated charcoal was evaluated, bioequivalence of capsules versus tablets was assessed, and safety in the 960-mg tablet cohorts was monitored. RESULTS: Acoziborole was well tolerated at all doses tested; no dose-related adverse events were observed. The drug appeared rapidly in plasma (at 1 h), reached tmax between 24 and 72 h, and remained stable for up to 96 h, after which a slow decrease was quantifiable until 14 weeks after dosing. Charcoal had little impact on the enterohepatic recirculation effect, except for the 20-mg dose. Bioequivalence between capsule and tablet formulations was demonstrated. The therapeutic single dose for administration under fasted conditions was fixed to 960 mg. The maximum administered dose was 1200 mg. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that acoziborole could be safely assessed in patients as a potential single-dose oral cure for both stages of gambiense HAT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01533961.

Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bi-07 supports lactose digestion in vitro and in randomized, placebo- and lactase-controlled clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Probiotics may alleviate lactose maldigestion. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to select a probiotic with high lactase activity and compare it with lactase and placebo in clinical trials. METHODS: Bacterial cultures were screened for lactase activity in a model of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bi-07 (Bi-07) counts were adjusted in subsequent experiments to correspond to 4500 Food Chemicals Codex (FCC) units of lactase, the amount in the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)-approved health claim. Two crossover clinical trials, Booster Alpha and Booster Omega, were performed in participants with lactose intolerance, where 2 × 1012 CFUs Bi-07, 4662 FCC lactase, or placebo was consumed simultaneously with a lactose challenge, with 1-wk washouts between challenges. The trial designs were identical except for the source of lactose. Breath hydrogen concentration (BHC) was measured to assess the effect of the investigational products on lactose digestion, for which incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was the primary outcome. Peak BHC, cumulative BHC, and GI symptoms were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Bi-07 was superior to placebo in reducing BHC [iAUC, parts per million (ppm) ∙ h] in both trials (Booster Alpha: geometric least square mean ratio: 0.462; 95% CI: 0.249, 0.859; P = 0.016; Booster Omega: 0.227; 95% CI: 0.095, 0.543; P = 0.001). Lactase was superior to placebo in Booster Alpha (0.190; 95% CI: 0.102, 0.365; P < 0.001) but not Booster Omega (0.493; 95% CI: 0.210, 1.156; P = 0.102). Noninferiority of Bi-07 compared with lactase was observed in Booster Omega (0.460; 95% CI: 0.193, 1.096; P = 0.079; CI upper limit < 1.25 noninferiority margin). Odds of abdominal pain (compared with placebo: 0.32, P = 0.036) and flatulence (compared with placebo: 0.25, P = 0.007) were lower with lactase in Booster Alpha. Increased odds of nausea were seen with Bi-07 (compared with placebo: 4.0, P = 0.005) in Booster Omega. CONCLUSIONS: Bi-07 has high lactase activity, and in 2 clinical trials, it supported lactose digestion in individuals with lactose intolerance.These trials were registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03659747 (Booster Alpha) and NCT03814668 (Booster Omega).

Absence of psychostimulant effects of a supratherapeutic dose of tianeptine: a placebo-controlled study versus methylphenidate in young healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the present study was to assess the potential psychostimulant effect of a single oral supratherapeutic dose of tianeptine (75 mg in 1 shot) in young healthy volunteers compared with methylphenidate (40 mg) and placebo. METHOD: Eighteen healthy young male and female volunteers with no history of psychostimulant abuse completed this balanced, crossover, placebo-controlled study. Subjective and behavioral effects were assessed before treatment and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 hours after drug intake. Subjective effects of the drugs were recorded using self-questionnaire Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI 49). In addition, the Profile of Mood Scale, Visual Analog Scale, and attention/vigilance tests (choice reaction time and critical flicker fusion test) were used to evaluate mood state, subjective feeling, and sustained attention, respectively. RESULTS: Analysis on changes from baseline, from 1 to 8 hours, showed statistically significant differences between treatment groups for 2 of the 5 ARCI subscales: amphetamine and morphine benzedrine scales. A trend to significance was observed for Lysergic Acid Diethylamide scale. Indeed, although tianeptine did not significantly change any ARCI scores, methylphenidate significantly increased amphetamine and morphine benzedrine scores of the ARCI compared with placebo. No significant treatment effect was observed on the Profile of Mood Scale and the visual analog scale. Analyses of attention and vigilance tests showed a psychostimulant effect for methylphenidate on choice reaction time (decrease of recognition time) and critical flicker fusion test (higher frequency). CONCLUSIONS: A single administration of a supratherapeutic dose of tianeptine does not induce psychostimulant effect in young healthy volunteers in contrast to methylphenidate at a therapeutic dose. These findings suggest an absence of psychostimulant liability of tianeptine in a therapeutic situation.

A safety grading scale to support dose escalation and define stopping rules for healthy subject first-entry-into-man studies: some points to consider from the French Club Phase I working group.

AIM: To propose a relevant grading scale for clinical adverse events or laboratory results, electrocardiogram (ECG) and vital sign findings supporting both dose escalation and stopping decisions in first-entry-into-man (FIM) studies conducted in young healthy subjects. METHODS: A three-level scale was used for the proposed grading system. The grading is directly derived from the observed severity of discontinuous variables, as are most of clinical adverse events. A 'combined method' based on normal ranges and spontaneous variation is suggested for grading the findings which are continuous variables mainly numerical in nature. One grade, at the subject level, and one algorithm, at the cohort level, support the proposed decision rules. This work was managed by a Club Phase I working group. RESULTS: Examples of grade 1, 2 and 3 limits are given for the most frequent clinical adverse events and laboratory tests, ECG and vital sign findings. When available, the proposed NIH and FDA limits are also provided. The safety recommendation is to use the grade 2 at least as an alert for caution and the grade 3 as a maximum for stopping, applying the algorithm at the cohort level. CONCLUSIONS: This paper proposes a safety grading system based on relevant criteria which might be used by investigators and sponsors to support and rationalize dose escalation decisions in healthy young subject FIM studies. These proposals are designed not to be a guideline but some 'points to consider' helping the dose escalation process. This paper supports the recent reinforcement of the safety requirements for FIM studies by European authorities.

Similar immunogenicity of the A/H1N1 2009 pandemic influenza strain when used as a monovalent or a trivalent vaccine.

BACKGROUND: The WHO recommended including the A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic strain in the influenza vaccines for use in the 2010-2011 northern hemisphere (NH) influenza season. The immunogenicity and safety of the trivalent split inactivated vaccine (Vaxigrip®) NH 2010-2011 formulation was compared to that observed for the corresponding non-adjuvanted monovalent A (H1N1) pandemic vaccine (Panenza®), when tested in similar populations of adult and elderly volunteers. METHODS: The monovalent vaccine was evaluated in two clinical trials, conducted respectively in both adult and elderly subjects and in a population of adults. The trivalent vaccine was evaluated in a clinical study that enrolled both adult and elderly subjects. Antibody titers were measured in serum samples drawn at day 0 (before vaccination) and 21 days after one vaccine injection using the same hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay method. The occurrence of adverse events was reported up to 21 days after vaccination. RESULTS: Before immunization in the three studies, most of the volunteers had antibody titers below seroprotective levels against the pandemic A(H1N1) 2009 virus. After vaccination, in each trial and in each age group, high seroprotection rates, GMT ratios and seroconversion rates were observed. Seroprotection rates after administration of the monovalent vaccine reached 93% and 98% in the adult groups, and 83.7% in the elderly group. After administration of the trivalent vaccine, seroprotection rates of 92.2% and 81.3% were obtained respectively in the adult and the elderly groups. No related serious adverse events and no safety signals were detected either with the monovalent or trivalent vaccine. CONCLUSION: Comparable immunogenicity profiles were observed in three clinical trials of the pandemic A(H1N1) 2009 strain when formulated either as a monovalent or as a component of a seasonal trivalent vaccine.

Pharmacokinetic assessment of a five-probe cocktail for CYPs 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Numerous cocktails using concurrent administration of several cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoform-selective probe drugs have been reported to investigate drug-drug interactions in vivo. * This approach has several advantages: characterize the inhibitory or induction potential of compounds in development toward the CYP enzymes identified in vitro in an in vivo situation, assess several enzymes in the same trial, and have complete in vivo information about potential CYP-based drug interactions. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * This study describes a new cocktail containing five probe drugs that has never been published. * This cocktail can be used to test the effects of a new chemical entity on multiple CYP isoforms in a single clinical study: CYP1A2 (caffeine), CYP2C9 (warfarin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), CYP2D6 (metoprolol), and CYP3A (midazolam) and was designed to overcome potential liabilities of other reported cocktails. AIMS: To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of selective substrates of CYP1A2 (caffeine), CYP2C9 (S-warfarin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), CYP2D6 (metoprolol) and CYP3A (midazolam) when administered orally and concurrently as a cocktail relative to the drugs administered alone. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-dose, randomized, six-treatment six-period six-sequence William's design study with a wash-out of 7 or 14 days. Thirty healthy male subjects received 100 mg caffeine, 100 mg metoprolol, 0.03 mg kg(-1) midazolam, 20 mg omeprazole and 10 mg warfarin individually and in combination (cocktail). Poor metabolizers of CYP2C9, 2C19 and 2D6 were excluded. Plasma samples were obtained up to 48 h for caffeine, metoprolol and omeprazole, 12 h for midazolam, 312 h for warfarin and the cocktail. Three different validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods were used. Noncompartmental PK parameters were calculated. Log-transformed C(max), AUC(last) and AUC for each analyte were analysed with a linear mixed effects model with fixed term for treatment, sequence and period, and random term for subject within sequence. Point estimates (90% CI) for treatment ratios (individual/cocktail) were computed for each analyte C(max), AUC(last) and AUC. RESULTS: There was no PK interaction between the probe drugs when administered in combination as a cocktail, relative to the probes administered alone, as the 90% CI of the PK parameters was within the prespecified bioequivalence limits of 0.80, 1.25. CONCLUSION: The lack of interaction between probes indicates that this cocktail could be used to evaluate the potential for multiple drug-drug interactions in vivo.

Supplementation of the diet with the functional fiber PolyGlycoplex is well tolerated by healthy subjects in a clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The relationship of dietary fiber to overall health is of great importance, as beneficial effects have been demonstrated with the use of fiber from diverse sources, some traditional, other novel. PolyGlycopleX (PGX) is a unique proprietary product composed of three water-soluble polysaccharides, that when processed using novel technology give rise to a final product - a soluble, highly viscous functional fiber. METHODS: Because of its potential use in food and dietary supplements, a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical study was conducted to evaluate the tolerance to PGX ingestion for 21 days, to a maximum dose level of 10 g per day, in healthy male and female volunteers. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the overall gastrointestinal (GI) tolerance, while secondary objectives were to evaluate possible changes in hematological, biochemical, urinary and fecal parameters. RESULTS: Results show that PGX is well tolerated as part of a regular diet with only mild to moderate adverse effects, similar to those seen with a moderate intake of dietary fiber in general, and fruits and vegetables. Because PGX is a highly viscous, functional fiber, it also demonstrates several physiological responses including, but not limited to maintaining healthy total and LDL cholesterol and uric acid levels.

The New First-in-Human EMA Guideline: Disruptive or Constructive? Outcomes From the First EUFEMED Discussion Forum.

The European Federation for Exploratory Medicines Development (EUFEMED) organized a meeting in Leuven, Belgium entitled 'The new FIH EMA guideline: Disruptive or constructive?' to provide a forum for stakeholders to discuss the guideline's operational impact. The revised EMA Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human (FIH) and early clinical trials with investigational products was published on 20 July 2017. The revision gave guidance on sentinel dosing/staggering of subjects within a multiple-ascending dose (MAD) clinical trial, permissible maximum exposure/investigation of supra-therapeutic doses and dose escalations above the no-observed adverse effect level. As the guidelines came into operation on 1 February, 2018 it was assumed that by the date of the meeting many early phase stakeholders had gathered sufficient first-hand experience of working within the guideline to discuss their thoughts on its impact. The concluding part of the meeting focused on the possible differences between European countries in handling the revised FIH guideline and ways of achieving harmonization. Information on current industry practice was gathered by online polling during the meeting, where perception of the revised guideline as either 'disruptive' or 'constructive' was explored at the start and at the end of the Forum along with recommendations on reducing future regulatory discordance. It was generally agreed that the necessary changes encompassed by new guidelines included both constructive and disruptive aspects. The final vote on whether the new FIH guideline is disruptive or constructive was taken by 69 delegates: 51% stated that it was both constructive and disruptive, 48% decided on constructive, none on disruptive and 1% were still undecided. It was generally accepted that stakeholders need to continue in a process of stakeholder engagement and discussion, particularly on critical safety issues. Such an approach allows partners to adopt a proactive approach to sharing best practice. For example, attendees agreed that a 'Question and Answer' document harmonized between the European agencies is required for the sentinel approach and for the selection of supratherapeutic doses.