Healthcare utilization of patients with hereditary angioedema treated with lanadelumab and subcutaneous C1-inhibitor concentrate.

Background: New hereditary angioedema (HAE) treatments have become available in recent years for the treatment of HAE due to C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency, including two subcutaneous (SC) options: a monoclonal antibody (lanadelumab) and a plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate (SC-C1-INH). Limited real-world data on these therapies have been reported. Objective: The objective was to describe new users of lanadelumab and SC-C1-INH, including demographics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), costs, and treatment patterns before and after beginning treatment. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that used an administrative claims data base. Two mutually exclusive cohorts of adult (ages ≥18 years) new users of lanadelumab or SC-C1-INH with ≥180 days of continuous use were identified. HCRU, costs, and treatment patterns were assessed in the 180-day period before the index date (new treatment use) and up to 365 days after the index date. HCRU and costs were calculated as annualized rates. Results: Forty-seven patients who used lanadelumab and 38 patients who used SC-C1-INH were identified. The most frequently used on-demand HAE treatments at baseline were the same for both cohorts: bradykinin B2 antagonists (48.9% of the patients on lanadelumab, 52.6% of the patients on SC-C1-INH) and C1-INHs (40.4% of the patients on lanadelumab, 57.9% of the patients on SC-C1-INH). More than 33% of the patients continued to fill on-demand medications after treatment initiation. Annualized angioedema-associated emergency department visits and hospitalizations decreased after initiation of treatment, from 1.8 to 0.6 for the patients on lanadelumab and from 1.3 to 0.5 for the patients on SC-C1-INH. Annualized total healthcare costs after treatment initiation in the database were $866,639 and $734,460 for the lanadelumab and SC-C1-INH cohorts, respectively. Pharmacy costs accounted for >95% of these total costs. Conclusion: Although HCRU decreased after the initiation of treatment, angioedema-associated emergency department visits and hospitalizations and on-demand treatment fills were not completely eliminated. This indicates ongoing disease and treatment burden despite use of modern HAE medicines.

Findings from the Morquio A Registry Study (MARS) after 6 years: Long-term outcomes of MPS IVA patients treated with elosulfase alfa.

BACKGROUND: The Morquio A Registry Study (MARS) is an ongoing, multinational, observational study of patients with MPS IVA. Key objectives of MARS are to characterize the heterogeneity and natural history of disease and to evaluate long-term effectiveness and safety of elosulfase alfa enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Enrollment began in September 2014; data on medical history, clinical outcomes, and safety assessments are collected as part of routine care. RESULTS: As of February 2021, 381 subjects from 17 countries had enrolled in MARS: 58 ERT-naïve subjects and 323 ERT-treated subjects (≥1 infusion), with a mean ERT exposure of 5.5 years (SD 2.8) and median age at first ERT treatment of 9.8 years. ERT-treated subjects were younger at diagnosis (median 3.4 vs 6.5 years) relative to ERT-naïve subjects. Among ERT-treated subjects, urinary keratan sulfate (uKS) levels declined from pre-ERT baseline to last follow-up on treatment (mean % change [95% confidence interval]: -52.5% [-57.5%, -47.4%]; n = 115) and 6-min walk test distance remained stable (mean change: -6.1 [-27.6, 15.5] m; n = 131) over a mean follow-up of 5.5 years. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) increased in subjects who were < 18 years of age at ERT initiation (mean change: +0.3 [0.1, 0.4] L and + 0.4 [0.3, 0.5] L; mean follow-up: ∼6 years; n = 82) and were stable in subjects ≥18 years (mean change: 0.0 [-0.0, 0.1] L and 0.0 [-0.1, 0.1] L; mean follow-up: 4.6 years; n = 38). Overall, 148 (47.1%) ERT-treated subjects experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE) and 110 subjects (35%) reported ≥1 serious AE. Drug-related AEs were reported in 39 (12.4%) subjects; the most common were hypersensitivity (9 subjects [2.9%]), urticaria (8 subjects [2.5%]), and pyrexia (7 subjects [2.2%]). CONCLUSIONS: MARS is the longest and largest observational study of MPS IVA patients to date, with a heterogenous population that is representative of the MPS IVA population overall. Data collected over the first 6 years of MARS provide real-world evidence for long-term stabilization of endurance and respiratory function among ERT-treated patients, with no new safety concerns identified.