Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg ; 278(5): e912-e921, 2023 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37389552

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional low-temperature storage of transplant donor livers [static cold storage (SCS)] with storage of the organs at physiological body temperature [normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)]. BACKGROUND: The high success rate of liver transplantation is constrained by the shortage of transplantable organs (eg, waiting list mortality >20% in many centers). NMP maintains the liver in a functioning state to improve preservation quality and enable testing of the organ before transplantation. This is of greatest potential value with organs from brain-dead donor organs (DBD) with risk factors (age and comorbidities), and those from donors declared dead by cardiovascular criteria (donation after circulatory death). METHODS: Three hundred eighty-three donor organs were randomized by 15 US liver transplant centers to undergo NMP (n = 192) or SCS (n = 191). Two hundred sixty-six donor livers proceeded to transplantation (NMP: n = 136; SCS: n = 130). The primary endpoint of the study was "early allograft dysfunction" (EAD), a marker of early posttransplant liver injury and function. RESULTS: The difference in the incidence of EAD did not achieve significance, with 20.6% (NMP) versus 23.7% (SCS). Using exploratory, "as-treated" rather than "intent-to-treat," subgroup analyses, there was a greater effect size in donation after circulatory death donor livers (22.8% NMP vs 44.6% SCS) and in organs in the highest risk quartile by donor risk (19.2% NMP vs 33.3% SCS). The incidence of acute cardiovascular decompensation at organ reperfusion, "postreperfusion syndrome," as a secondary outcome was reduced in the NMP arm (5.9% vs 14.6%). CONCLUSIONS: NMP did not lower EAD, perhaps related to the inclusion of lower-risk liver donors, as higher-risk donor livers seemed to benefit more. The technology is safe in standard organ recovery and seems to have the greatest benefit for marginal donors.

2.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 74(6): 750-756, 2022 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35442235

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We characterized recent outcomes in US pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) subjects listed for liver transplantation (LT) using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database. METHODS: Pediatric subjects listed for LT from 2002 to 2015 were assigned to the "PALF" group based on status 1/1A listing, INR >2, no hepatic artery thrombosis, and no primary graft nonfunction (N = 397). Subjects were assigned to the "non-PALF" group if listed with any status other than 1/1A (N = 4509). RESULTS: The PALF group had more infants <3 months of age and males at listing for LT compared to the non-PALF group. Two-thirds of PALF subjects had an indeterminate etiology. LT waitlist survival was significantly worse in the PALF group compared to the non-PALF group. Likelihood of removal from the LT waitlist for being "too sick" was higher, while that of removal for "spontaneous recovery" was lower in PALF subjects. Post-LT short-term (30 days) and long-term (60 months) outcomes were also significantly worse in PALF versus non-PALF subjects. PALF subjects who underwent living-donor-liver-transplant (LDLT) had similar LT waitlist times and post-LT survival compared to those undergoing deceased-donor-liver-transplant (DDLT). Over the study period, we observed a decreased number of liver transplants, and increase in LT waitlist- and short-term post-LT-survival in PALF subjects. CONCLUSION: LT waitlist and post-LT outcomes are worse in PALF subjects compared to non-PALF subjects. PALF subjects who undergo LDLT have similar waitlist times and post-LT outcomes compared to those undergoing DDLT.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Hepático Agudo , Trasplante de Hígado , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Fallo Hepático Agudo/cirugía , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Listas de Espera
3.
Surg Endosc ; 36(5): 3100-3109, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34235587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about what factors predict better outcomes for patients who undergo minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). We hypothesized that patients with dilated pancreatic ducts have improved postoperative outcomes with MIPD compared to OPD. METHODS: All patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were prospectively followed over a time period of 47 months, and perioperative and pathologic covariates and outcomes were compared. Ideal outcome after PD was defined as follows: (1) no complications, (2) postoperative length of stay < 7 days, and (3) negative (R0) margins on pathology. Patients with dilated pancreatic ducts (≥ 3 mm) who underwent MIPD were 1:3 propensity score-matched to patients with dilated ducts who underwent OPD and outcomes compared. Likewise, patients with non-dilated pancreatic ducts (< 3 mm) who underwent MIPD were 1:3 propensity score-matched to patients with non-dilated ducts who underwent OPD and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: 371 patients underwent PD-74 (19.9%) MIPD and 297 (80.1%) underwent OPD. Overall, patients who underwent MIPD had significantly less intraoperative blood loss. After 1:3 propensity score matching, patients with dilated pancreatic ducts who underwent MIPD (n = 45) had significantly lower overall complication and 90-day readmission rates compared to matched OPD patients (n = 135) with dilated ducts. Patients with dilated duct who underwent MIPD were more likely to have an ideal outcome than patients with OPD (29 vs 15%, p = 0.035). There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes among propensity score-matched patients with non-dilated pancreatic ducts who underwent MIPD (n = 29) compared to matched patients undergoing OPD (n = 87) with non-dilated ducts. CONCLUSIONS: MIPD is safe with comparable perioperative outcomes to OPD. Patients with pancreatic ducts ≥ 3 mm appear to derive the most benefit from MIPD in terms of fewer complications, lower readmission rates, and higher likelihood of ideal outcome.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Conductos Pancreáticos/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 32(6): 732-739, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35174581

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Given the complex nature of liver transplant surgery, adult centers typically use a dedicated liver transplant anesthesia team, which has improved patient outcomes. AIMS: Our goal was to determine whether a dedicated pediatric liver transplant anesthesia team was associated with improved patient outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who underwent liver transplantation from April 2013 to September 2020 at St. Louis Children's Hospital. The general group (April 2013-December 2016) was compared with the liver group (January 2017-September 2020). Outcomes measured included cases per anesthesiologist, early extubation, ventilator days, fluid and blood administration, postoperative events, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Patients in both groups had similar demographics. The average number of cases/anesthesiologist/year was 2.9 times higher in the liver group (mean (SD) general 0.7 (0.5), liver 2.0 (0.6), and difference in mean [95% CI] 1.3 [0.8, 1.8]). The rate of extubation in the operating room was higher for patients in the liver group (general 56%, liver 80%, and difference in proportion [95% CI] 24.7 [7.0, 42.4]), while the number of ventilator days was lower (mean (SD) general 2.1 (4.4), liver 1.1 (3.6), and difference in proportion [95%CI] -0.9 [-2.6, 0.7]). Colloid administration was higher in the liver group (mean (SD) general 23.9 (14.5) ml/kg, liver 48.4 (37.7) ml/kg, and difference in mean [95% CI] 24.6 [12.7, 36.4]), while fresh frozen plasma administration was lower in the liver group (mean (SD) general 15.3 (23.9) ml/kg, liver 6.2 (14) ml/kg, and difference in mean [95% CI] -9.0 [-16.8, -1.3]). There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative events including blood product transfusions, vasopressor use, and thromboses, or in the intensive care unit and hospital LOS. CONCLUSIONS: The liver group was associated with increased early extubations, decreased ventilator days, and decreased fresh frozen plasma use.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Trasplante de Hígado , Adulto , Extubación Traqueal , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 217(3): 633-643, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33025806

RESUMEN

Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy is a locoregional treatment strategy for hepatic malignancy involving placement of a surgically implanted pump or percutaneous port-catheter device into a branch of the hepatic artery. HAI has been used for metastatic colorectal cancer for decades but has recently attracted new attention because of its potential impact on survival, when combined with systemic therapy, in patients presenting with unresectable hepatic disease. Although various HAI device-related complications have been described, little attention has been given to their appearance on imaging. Radiologists are uniquely positioned to identify these complications given that patients receiving HAI therapy typically undergo frequent imaging and may have complications that are delayed or clinically unsuspected. Therefore, this article reviews the multimodality imaging considerations of surgically implanted HAI devices. The role of imaging in routine perioperative assessment, including the normal postoperative appearance of the device, is described. The imaging findings of potential complications, including pump pocket complications, catheter or arterial complications, and toxic or ischemic complications, are presented, with a focus on CT. Familiarity with the device and its complications will aid radiologists in playing an important role in the treatment of patients undergoing HAI therapy.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Bombas de Infusión Implantables , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Radiografía
6.
HPB (Oxford) ; 23(1): 127-133, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32561177

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Portal vein aneurysms (PVAs) are rare, though clinically challenging with post-operative mortality approaching 20% and no evidence-based treatment guidelines. We aim to describe our experience with PVAs and recommend optimum management strategies. METHODS: Demographics and clinical details of patients with PVAs admitted to our institution from 1984 to 2019 were reviewed. Clinical presentation, management and outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: PVAs were identified in 18 patients (median age 56 years, range 20-101 years; 13 female); 10 were incidental and 8 diagnosed during abdominal pain work-up. Median aneurysm diameter at diagnosis was 3.4 cm (1.8-5.5 cm), remaining unchanged at 3.5 cm (1.9-4.8 cm) during a 3.2-year follow-up (4 months-31 years). Aneurysm sites were the main portal vein (n = 12), porto-splenic-junction (n = 3), splenic-SMV-junction (n = 2) and right portal vein (n = 1). Thrombosis occurred in 4 patients; 3 developed clinically insignificant cavernous transformation. Two patients underwent surgery for abdominal pain. Postoperatively, one developed PV thrombosis and PVA recurrence occurred in the second. No aneurysm ruptures or mortalities occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSION: PVAs follow a clinically indolent course with structural stability and minimal complications over time. Non-operative management is feasible for most patients. Abdominal pain, large size or thrombosis don't appear to confer additional risks and should not, in isolation, merit surgical intervention.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma , Trombosis , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Porta/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
7.
Am J Transplant ; 19(5): 1296-1304, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30247814

RESUMEN

Abdominal organ transplantation faces several challenges: burnout, limited pipeline of future surgeons, changes in liver allocation potentially impacting organ procurement travel, and travel safety. The organ procurement center (OPC) model may be one way to mitigate these issues. Liver transplants from 2009 to 2016 were reviewed. There were 755 liver transplants performed with 525 OPC and 230 in-hospital procurements. The majority of transplants (87.4%) were started during daytime hours (5 am-7 pm). Transplants with any portion occurring after-hours were more likely to have procurements in-hospital (P < .001). Daytime cases (n = 400) had more OPC procured livers and hepatitis C recipients and were less likely to have a donation after circulatory death donor (all P < .05). In adjusted analyses, daytime cases were independently associated with extubation in the operating room and less postoperative transfusion. There were no significant differences in short- or long-term postoperative outcomes. For exported livers, 54.3% were procured by a local team, saving 137 flights (151 559 miles). The OPC resulted in optimally timed liver transplants and decreased resource utilization with no negative impact on patient outcomes. It allows for ease in exporting organs procured by local surgeons, and potentially addresses provider burnout, the transplant surgery pipeline, and surgeon travel.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Trasplante de Hígado/estadística & datos numéricos , Asignación de Recursos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Adulto , Citas y Horarios , Niño , Isquemia Fría , Supervivencia de Injerto , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Hospitales , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/educación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Preservación de Órganos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Seguridad del Paciente , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Calidad de Vida , Estudiantes de Medicina , Cirujanos , Donantes de Tejidos , Viaje
8.
Ann Surg ; 267(5): 797-805, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29064885

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of type of surgery (transplant vs resection) on overall survival (OS) in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (H-CCA). BACKGROUND: Outcomes after resection for H-CCA are poor, yet transplantation is currently only reserved for well-selected patients with unresectable disease. METHODS: All patients with H-CCA who underwent resection from 2000 to 2015 at 10 institutions were included. Three institutions additionally had active H-CCA transplant protocols with similar selection criteria over similar time periods. RESULTS: Of 304 patients with suspected H-CCA, 234 underwent attempted resection and 70 were enrolled in a transplant protocol. Excluding incomplete/R2 resections (n = 43), patients who were enrolled, but did not undergo transplant (n = 24), and transplants without confirmed H-CCA diagnoses (n = 5), 191 patients underwent curative-intent resection and 41 curative-intent transplant. Compared with resection, transplant patients were younger (52 vs 65 years; P < 0.001), and more frequently had primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC; 61% vs 2%; P < 0.001) and received chemotherapy and/or radiation (98% vs 57%; P < 0.001). Groups were otherwise similar in demographics and comorbidities. Patients who underwent transplant for confirmed H-CCA diagnosis had improved OS compared with resection (3-year: 72% vs 33%; 5-year: 64% vs 18%; P < 0.001). Among patients who underwent resection for tumors <3 cm with lymph-node negative disease, and excluding PSC patients, transplant was still associated with improved OS (3-year: 54% vs 44%; 5-year: 54% vs 29%; P = 0.03). Transplant remained associated with improved survival on intention-to-treat analysis, even after accounting for tumor size, lymph node status, and PSC (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma that meets criteria for transplantation (<3 cm, lymph-node negative disease) is associated with substantially decreased survival compared to transplant for the same criteria with unresectable disease. Prospective trials are needed and justified.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Tumor de Klatskin/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tumor de Klatskin/diagnóstico , Tumor de Klatskin/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 16(11): 1834-1835, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29505906

RESUMEN

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma recurrence after surgery (PARaS) is associated with poor outcomes. PARaS is locoregional in 50%-80%, effecting the resection bed and adjacent lymphatics.1-3 Detection of PARaS via endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is challenging because recurrent malignancy is difficult to distinguish from normal postoperative changes. Diagnosing PARaS is important, because salvage chemotherapy/radiation improves survival.4,5 The purpose of this investigation is to determine the clinical utility of EUS fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in patients with suspected PARaS.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia
10.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 16(10): 1193-1199, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30323089

RESUMEN

Background: Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma tumors (cHCC-CCA) are a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies that have no established optimal treatment. Patients and Methods: We identified patients with cHCC-CCA treated at a tertiary center and retrospectively examined their histology, interventions, and outcomes. We calculated disease control rate (DCR), disease progression, overall survival, and progression-free survival (PFS) between treatment subgroups. Results: A total of 123 patients were evaluable. Interventions included resection, locoregional therapy, transplant, chemotherapy, and targeted agents. Ultimately, 68 patients received systemic treatment-57 with gemcitabine plus either 5-fluoropyrimidine (5-FU) or a platinum combination. Disease progression was more common in the gemcitabine/5-FU group versus gemcitabine/platinum (P=.028), whereas DCR favored gemcitabine/platinum (78.4% vs 38.5%; P=.0143). Median PFS from time of initial diagnosis favored the gemcitabine/platinum group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Targeted agents had minimal to no effect on survival metrics. Conclusions: Gemcitabine/platinum seems to be a superior regimen for patients with cHCC-CCA who require systemic treatment. Further studies are needed to clarify the regimen's efficacy and applicability in patient subgroups.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Colangiocarcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/complicaciones , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Conductos Biliares/patología , Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Colangiocarcinoma/complicaciones , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidad , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Hígado/patología , Hígado/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven , Gemcitabina
11.
J Surg Oncol ; 117(3): 363-371, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29284072

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Curative-intent treatment for localized hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) requires surgical resection. However, the effect of adjuvant therapy (AT) on survival is unclear. We analyzed the impact of AT on overall (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) in patients undergoing curative resection. METHODS: We reviewed patients with resected HC between 2000 and 2015 from the ten institutions participating in the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium. We analyzed the impact of AT on RFS and OS. The probability of RFS and OS were calculated in the method of Kaplan and Meier and analyzed using multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 249 patients underwent curative resection for HC. Patients who received AT and those who did not had similar demographic and preoperative features. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, AT conferred a significant protective effect on OS (HR 0.58, P = 0.013), and this was maintained in a propensity matched analysis (HR 0.66, P = 0.033). The protective effect of AT remained significant when node negative patients were excluded (HR 0.28, P = 0.001), while it disappeared (HR 0.76, P = 0.260) when node positive patients were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: AT should be strongly considered after curative-intent resection for HC, particularly in patients with node positive disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/terapia , Colangiocarcinoma/terapia , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
12.
Surg Endosc ; 32(12): 4841-4849, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29770887

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic perforations related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are rare events, carrying with it a mortality of up to 8%. Given the rarity of this adverse event, there remains limited data and continued uncertainties when choosing therapeutic strategies. Our aims were to evaluate the management of ERCP-related perforations and compare outcomes based on timing of recognition. METHODS: The endoscopic databases of two tertiary care centers were interrogated to identify consecutive adult patients who sustained ERCP-related perforation over a 10-year period from 2006 to 2016. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract demographic data, perforation type, management strategies, clinical data, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: 14,045 ERCP's were performed during our 10-year study period. Sixty-three patients (average age 62.3 ± 2.38 years, 76% female) with ERCP-related perforations were included. Stapfer I perforations were found in 14 (22.2%) patients, Stapfer II in 24 (38.1%), and Stapfer III and IV perforations were identified in 16 (25.4%) and 9 (14.28%), respectively. Forty-seven (74.6%) perforations were recognized immediately during the ERCP, whereas 16 (25.4%) were recognized late. Endoscopic therapy was attempted in 35 patients in whom perforations were identified immediately, and was technically successful in 33 (94.3%). In all, 4 (1 immediate/ 3 delayed) patients required percutaneous drainage and 9 (5 immediate/ 4 delayed) surgery. Length of hospital stay, ICU admission were significantly shorter and incidence of SIRS was significantly lower when perforation was recognized immediately. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate recognition of ERCP-related perforations leads to more favorable patient outcomes; with lower incidence of SIRS, less need for ICU level care, and shorter hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Diagnóstico Tardío , Perforación Intestinal/diagnóstico , Drenaje , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Perforación Intestinal/clasificación , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/terapia , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/etiología
13.
HPB (Oxford) ; 20(4): 332-339, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29169904

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative-intent therapy for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC). The role of vascular resection (VR) in the treatment of HC in western centres is not well defined. METHODS: Utilizing data from the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium, patients were grouped into those who underwent resection for HC based on VR status: no VR, portal vein resection (PVR), or hepatic artery resection (HAR). Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2015, 201 patients underwent resection for HC, of which 31 (15%) underwent VR: 19 patients (9%) underwent PVR alone and 12 patients (6%) underwent HAR either with (n = 2) or without PVR (n = 10). Patients selected for VR tended to be younger with higher stage disease. Rates of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality were similar when stratified by vascular resection status. On multivariate analysis, receipt of PVR or HAR did not significantly affect OS or RFS. CONCLUSION: In a modern, multi-institutional cohort of patients undergoing curative-intent resection for HC, VR appears to be a safe procedure in a highly selected subset, although long-term survival outcomes appear equivalent. VR should be considered only in select patients based on tumor and patient characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Colecistectomía , Hepatectomía , Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Tumor de Klatskin/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Vena Porta/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Arteria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Hepática/patología , Humanos , Tumor de Klatskin/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumor de Klatskin/mortalidad , Tumor de Klatskin/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/mortalidad , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Porta/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad
14.
Ann Surg ; 266(4): 693-701, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28650354

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to validate a previously reported recurrence clinical risk score (CRS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Salvage transplantation after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resection is limited to patients who recur within Milan criteria (MC). Predicting recurrence patterns may guide treatment recommendations. METHODS: An international, multicenter cohort of R0 resected HCC patients were categorized by MC status at presentation. CRS was calculated by assigning 1 point each for initial disease beyond MC, multinodularity, and microvascular invasion. Recurrence incidences were estimated using competing risks methodology, and conditional recurrence probabilities were estimated using the Bayes theorem. RESULTS: From 1992 to 2015, 1023 patients were identified, of whom 613 (60%) recurred at a median follow-up of 50 months. CRS was well validated in that all 3 factors remained independent predictors of recurrence beyond MC (hazard ratio 1.5-2.1, all P < 0.001) and accurately stratified recurrence risk beyond MC, ranging from 19% (CRS 0) to 67% (CRS 3) at 5 years. Among patients with CRS 0, no other factors were significantly associated with recurrence beyond MC. The majority recurred within 2 years. After 2 years of recurrence-free survival, the cumulative risk of recurrence beyond MC within the next 5 years for all patients was 14%. This risk was 12% for patients with initial disease within MC and 17% for patients with initial disease beyond MC. CONCLUSIONS: CRS accurately predicted HCC recurrence beyond MC in this international validation. Although the risk of recurrence beyond MC decreased over time, it never reached zero.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Invasividad Neoplásica , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Clin Transplant ; 31(10)2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28772351

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Duration of functional warm ischemia (f-WIT) is thought to have a causal effect on outcomes in controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at five centers. Data were extracted on donor and recipient characteristics, with attention to parameters recorded during withdrawal of life support to in situ cold perfusion. F-WIT was the time elapsed from any of the hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters to the start of in situ cold perfusion. Parameters were as follows: MAP ≤ 50 mm Hg; SBP ≤ 50 mm Hg; and SPO2 ≤ 60%. The primary endpoint was a composite of disseminated ischemic cholangiopathy (IC), primary non-function (PNF), and early graft failure. RESULTS: 35 patients (14%) developed one or more of the primary outcomes. On univariate analysis, older donors and longer WITs were associated with greater likelihood of complications. Of the f-WIT variations analyzed, only f-WIT with SpO2 ≤ 60% was longer among patients with complications. On multivariate analysis, only donor age was a significant predictor of complications. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that, of the f-WITs, f-WIT with SpO2 ≤ 60% is most predictive of post-DCD complications. However, results suggest that there may be an alternate etiology for poor outcomes, and that donor age plays a key role.


Asunto(s)
Muerte , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Donantes de Tejidos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Isquemia Tibia/efectos adversos , Adulto , Selección de Donante , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/patología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
16.
Ann Surg ; 264(4): 650-8, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27433910

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess survival after liver resection and transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond Milan criteria. BACKGROUND: The role of liver resection and transplantation remains controversial for patients with HCC beyond Milan criteria. Resection of advanced tumors and transplantation using extended-criteria are pursued at select high-volume center. METHODS: Patients from 5 liver cancer centers in the United States who had liver resection or transplantation for HCC beyond Milan criteria between 1990 and 2011 were included in the study. Multivariable and propensity-matching analyses estimated the effects of clinical factors and operative selection on survival. RESULTS: Of 608 patients beyond Milan without vascular invasion, 480 (79%) patients underwent resection and 128 (21%) underwent transplantation. Clinicopathologic profiles between resection and transplant patients differed significantly. Hepatitis C and cirrhosis were more prevalent in transplantation group (P < 0.001). Resection patients had larger tumors [median 9 cm, interquartile range (IQR): 6.5-12.9 cm vs. median 4.1, IQR: 3.4-5.3 cm, P < 0.001]; transplant patients were more likely to have multiple tumors (78% vs 28%, P < 0.001).Overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were both greater after tumor downstaging and transplantation than resection (all P < 0.001). OS did not differ between liver transplant recipients who were not pretreated or pretreated and failed to downstage compared with propensity-matched liver resection patients (P ≥ 0.176); DFS in this propensity matched cohort was greater after liver transplantation (P ≤ 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection and transplantation provide curative options for patients with HCC beyond Milan criteria. Further treatment strategies aimed at the efficiency and durability of tumor downstaging and expansion of the role of transplantation among suitable candidates could improve outcomes in patients with large or multifocal HCC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
17.
Ann Surg ; 263(6): 1112-25, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26813914

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review the current management, outline recent advances and address controversies in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment of HCC is multidisciplinary involving hepatologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, interventional radiologists, and other disciplines. Each of these disciplines brings its unique perspective and differing opinions that add to controversies in the management of HCC. METHODS: A focused literature review was performed to identify recent studies on the management of HCC and thereby summarize relevant information on the various therapeutic modalities and controversies involved in the treatment of HCC. RESULTS: The main treatment algorithms continue to rely on hepatic resection or transplantation with controversies involving patients harboring early stage disease and borderline hepatic function. The other treatment strategies include locoregional therapies, radiation, and systemic therapy used alone or in combination with other treatment modalities. Recent advances in locoregional therapies, radiation, and systemic therapies have provided better therapeutic options with curative intent potential for some locoregional therapies. Further refinements in combination therapies such as algorithms consisting of locoregional therapies and systemic or radiation therapies are likely to add additional options and improve survival. CONCLUSIONS: The management of HCC has witnessed significant strides with advances in existing options and introduction of several new treatment modalities of various combinations. Further refinements in these treatment options combined with enrollment in clinical trials are essential to improve the management and outcomes of patients with HCC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Algoritmos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Análisis de Supervivencia
18.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 207(1): 25-31, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26866746

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency with which biphenotypic primary liver carcinoma (also called hepatocholangiocarcinoma) may be misclassified as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) when only Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) major features are used and after consideration of ancillary features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of all pathologically proven biphenotypic primary liver carcinomas diagnosed at one institution from 2006 to 2014 was performed. Two subspecialized abdominal imagers independently reviewed cases using LI-RADS version 2014 and assigned major features, ancillary features, and additional findings. The number of lesions meeting imaging criteria for HCC was determined after assessment of major features alone and after the addition of ancillary features. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (30 men, 31 women; mean age, 62 years; range, 22-89 years) with biphenotypic primary liver carcinomas who underwent pretreatment multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI (48 patients) or CT (13 patients) were included. According to LI-RADS major features alone, 33 (54.1%) lesions met criteria for HCC and therefore might have been misclassified. Thirteen had arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout, and a capsule. Twenty had arterial phase hyperenhancement with either washout (15 lesions) or a capsule (five lesions). After evaluation of ancillary features, 29 of these potential mimics exhibited at least one ancillary feature favoring non-HCC malignancy, possibly leading to appropriate reclassification. Of the four carcinomas that met criteria for HCC by major features and did not have ancillary features favoring non-HCC malignancy, two (3.3% of all tumors) fell within the Milan criteria. CONCLUSION: Most biphenotypic primary liver carcinomas have features of non-HCC malignancy and can be correctly categorized as such. Addition of ancillary features to major features may improve diagnostic accuracy over systems in which only major features are used.


Asunto(s)
Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Medios de Contraste , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenotipo
19.
HPB (Oxford) ; 18(3): 296-303, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27017170

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hepatobiliary contrast enhanced MRI is known to be the most sensitive imaging modality for detection of colorectal hepatic metastasis. To date no study has investigated the rate of disappearing lesions with gadoxetic acid MR (Eovist/Primovist), or characterized the pathologic response of lesions which disappear on gadoxetic acid MR. METHODS: Retrospective review of hepatic resections for colorectal metastases between 01/2008 and 01/2014 was performed to evaluated the rate of disappearance of lesions on gadoxetic acid MR and the rate of complete pathologic response in the lesions that disappear. "Disappearing lesions" were lesions on baseline imaging that were not identifiable on pre-operative Eovist MRI. Complete pathologic response was defined as no viable tumor on pathology or by lack of recurrence within 1 year. RESULTS: In 23 patients, 200 colorectal metastases were identified on baseline imaging. On pre-operative Eovist MR 77 of the 200 lesions (38.5%) were "disappearing" lesions. At surgical pathology or 1 year follow-up imaging, 42 of 77 lesions (55%) demonstrated viable tumor (21) or recurrence (21). Thirty of 77 lesions (39%) were nonviable at pathology (10) or without evidence of recurrence at 1 year (20). 5 lesions were indeterminate. DISCUSSION: Despite disappearance on Eovist MR imaging (the most sensitive available imaging modality), 38.5% of all colorectal metastases disappeared and of those, 55% were viable.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Gadolinio DTPA/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Adulto , Anciano , Supervivencia Celular , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasia Residual , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Radiographics ; 35(2): 387-99, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25763724

RESUMEN

Gallbladder polyps are seen on as many as 7% of gallbladder ultrasonographic images. The differential diagnosis for a polypoid gallbladder mass is wide and includes pseudotumors, as well as benign and malignant tumors. Tumefactive sludge may be mistaken for a gallbladder polyp. Pseudotumors include cholesterol polyps, adenomyomatosis, and inflammatory polyps, and they occur in that order of frequency. The most common benign and malignant tumors are adenomas and primary adenocarcinoma, respectively. Polyp size, shape, and other ancillary imaging findings, such as a wide base, wall thickening, and coexistent gallstones, are pertinent items to report when gallbladder polyps are discovered. These findings, as well as patient age and risk factors for gallbladder cancer, guide clinical decision making. Symptomatic polyps without other cause for symptoms, an age over 50 years, and the presence of gallstones are generally considered indications for cholecystectomy. Incidentally noted pedunculated polyps smaller than 5 mm generally do not require follow-up. Polyps that are 6-10 mm require follow-up, although neither the frequency nor the length of follow-up has been established. Polyps that are larger than 10 mm are typically excised, although lower size thresholds for cholecystectomy may be considered for patients with increased risk for gallbladder carcinoma, such as patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Pólipos/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Femenino , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA