Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Genet Med ; 25(10): 100915, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37326029

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether deep prenatal phenotyping of fetal brain abnormalities (FBAs) increases diagnostic yield of trio-exome sequencing (ES) compared with standard phenotyping. METHODS: Retrospective exploratory analysis of a multicenter prenatal ES study. Participants were eligible if an FBA was diagnosed and subsequently found to have a normal microarray. Deep phenotyping was defined as phenotype based on targeted ultrasound plus prenatal/postnatal magnetic resonance imaging, autopsy, and/or known phenotypes of other affected family members. Standard phenotyping was based on targeted ultrasound alone. FBAs were categorized by major brain findings on prenatal ultrasound. Cases with positive ES results were compared with those that have negative results by available phenotyping, as well as diagnosed FBAs. RESULTS: A total of 76 trios with FBAs were identified, of which 25 (33%) cases had positive ES results and 51 (67%) had negative results. Individual modalities of deep phenotyping were not associated with diagnostic ES results. The most common FBAs identified were posterior fossa anomalies and midline defects. Neural tube defects were significantly associated with receipt of a negative ES result (0% vs 22%, P = .01). CONCLUSION: Deep phenotyping was not associated with increased diagnostic yield of ES for FBA in this small cohort. Neural tube defects were associated with negative ES results.


Asunto(s)
Encefalopatías , Defectos del Tubo Neural , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Secuenciación del Exoma , Feto/anomalías , Encefalopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Encefalopatías/genética , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Defectos del Tubo Neural/patología , Ultrasonografía Prenatal
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 4(2): 100542, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34864269

RESUMEN

Intimate partner violence is defined as any behavior within an intimate relationship that causes physical, psychological, or sexual harm to those in the relationship. Globally, women are disproportionately victims of intimate partner violence. The risk increases during pregnancy, with estimated rates of as high as 20% among pregnant persons. Intimate partner violence is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, including perinatal and maternal death. Given that pregnancy is a period of frequent interaction with the healthcare system, it is an opportune time to screen and intervene for intimate partner violence. Universal screening at the first prenatal visit and subsequently every trimester is recommended, with either written or verbal validated tools. Pregnant persons experiencing intimate partner violence need nonjudgmental, compassionate, confidential, and trauma-informed care. The goal of this review is to outline pregnancy-specific care considerations.


Asunto(s)
Violencia de Pareja , Femenino , Humanos , Violencia de Pareja/prevención & control , Violencia de Pareja/psicología , Tamizaje Masivo , Parto , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Parejas Sexuales/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA