Maintenance of effect of duloxetine in Chinese patients with pain due to osteoarthritis: 13-week open-label extension data.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to assess the maintenance of effect of duloxetine 60 mg once-daily (QD) in Chinese patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip and to provide additional long-term safety data. METHODS: This was an open-label, extension phase of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients were outpatients who met the American College of Rheumatology clinical and radiographic criteria for OA with a rating ≥4 on Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) 24-h average pain. After completing the 13-week placebo-controlled phase, patients originally assigned to placebo were titrated to duloxetine 60 mg QD (PLA_DLX), whereas patients originally assigned to duloxetine 60 mg QD remained on the same dose of duloxetine (DLX_DLX) for another 13 weeks. The maintenance effect of duloxetine 60 mg QD during the extension phase was evaluated by a 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) of the baseline-to-endpoint change in the extension phase for patients who took duloxetine and reported ≥30% reduction in BPI average pain at the end of placebo-controlled phase (placebo-controlled phase duloxetine responders). Other BPI severity and interference items, as well as safety and tolerability, were assessed. RESULTS: Of 342 patients entering the extension phase, 162 (97.6%) DLX_DLX-treated patients and 157 (89.2%) PLA_DLX-treated patients completed this phase. Most patients (76.0%) were female. Mean age was 60.6 years. Mean BPI average pain was 5.5 at baseline of the placebo-controlled phase. Among 113 placebo-controlled phase duloxetine responders, mean change in BPI average pain during the extension phase was - 0.59 (from 2.47 to 1.88); the upper bound of the 1-sided 97.5% CI was - 0.31 and less than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of a 1.5-point increase (p < 0.001). Significant within-group improvements in all BPI items were observed for both PLA_DLX and DLX_DLX groups during the extension phase (all p < 0.01). No deaths or suicide-related events occurred. Seven (4.0%) PLA_DLX-treated patients and no DLX_DLX-treated patients discontinued due to an adverse event. CONCLUSION: The analgesic effect of duloxetine 60 mg QD among treatment responders was maintained for the entire duration of the extension phase. Duloxetine 60 mg QD was well tolerated during the extension phase. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identification number NCT01931475 . Registered 29 August 2013.

Monoclonal antibodies for chronic pain: a practical review of mechanisms and clinical applications.

Context: Monoclonal antibodies are being investigated for chronic pain to overcome the shortcomings of current treatment options. Objective: To provide a practical overview of monoclonal antibodies in clinical development for use in chronic pain conditions, with a focus on mechanisms of action and relevance to specific classes. Methods: Qualitative review using a systematic strategy to search for randomized controlled trials, systematic and nonsystematic (narrative) reviews, observational studies, nonclinical studies, and case reports for inclusion. Studies were identified via relevant search terms using an electronic search of MEDLINE via PubMed (1990 to June 2017) in addition to hand-searching reference lists of retrieved systematic and nonsystematic reviews. Results: Monoclonal antibodies targeting nerve growth factor, calcitonin gene-related peptide pathways, various ion channels, tumor necrosis factor-α, and epidermal growth factor receptor are in different stages of development. Mechanisms of action are dependent on specific signaling pathways, which commonly involve those related to peripheral neurogenic inflammation. In clinical studies, there has been a mixed response to different monoclonal antibodies in several chronic pain conditions, including migraine, neuropathic pain conditions (e.g., diabetic peripheral neuropathy), osteoarthritis, chronic back pain, ankylosing spondylitis, and cancer. Adverse events observed to date have generally been mild, although further studies are needed to ensure safety of monoclonal antibodies in early stages of development, especially where there is an overlap with non-pain-related pathways. High acquisition cost remains another treatment limitation. Conclusion: Monoclonal antibodies for chronic pain have the potential to overcome the limitations of current treatment options, but strategies to ensure their appropriate use need to be determined.

Functional Impairment and Painful Physical Symptoms in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Treated with Antidepressants: Real-World Evidence from the Middle East.

BACKGROUND: The Global Burden of Disease 2010 study reported the relative size of major depressive disorder (MDD) burden to be greater in the Middle East and North Africa than anywhere else. However, little research has been carried out to examine the comparative effectiveness of antidepressants in this region. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare functioning levels in Middle Eastern patients with MDD treated with either duloxetine or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), and to examine the impacts of depression-related pain on functioning by the type of treatment. METHOD: This post-hoc analysis, which focused on Middle Eastern patients, used data from a 6-month prospective observational study that included 1,549 MDD patients without sexual dysfunction. Levels of functional impairment and depression-related pain were assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and the modified Somatic Symptom Inventory, respectively. A mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) was employed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 37.3 (SD=8.4) years, and 34.6% were female. Patient functioning was, on average, moderately impaired at baseline, but improved substantially during follow-up in both the duloxetine (n=152) and the SSRI (n=123) cohorts. The MMRM results showed a lower level of functional impairment at 24 weeks in the duloxetine cohort than in the SSRI cohort (p<0.001). Pain severity at baseline was positively associated with functional impairment during follow-up only in the SSRI cohort (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Duloxetine-treated MDD patients achieved better functioning than SSRI-treated patients. This treatment difference was partly driven by depression-related pain.

Caregiving for patients with Alzheimer's disease or dementia and its association with psychiatric and clinical comorbidities and other health outcomes in Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: Individuals with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease often receive care from family members who experience associated burden. This study provides the first broad, population-based account of caregiving-related health outcome burden in Brazil. METHODS: Data were analyzed from the 2012 National Health and Wellness Survey in Brazil (n = 12,000), an Internet-based survey of adults (aged 18+ years), using stratified sampling by sex and age to ensure demographic representation of Brazil's adult population. Caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease or dementia were compared with non-caregivers on comorbidities, productivity impairment, health-related quality of life, resource utilization, sociodemographic/health characteristics and behaviors, and Charlson comorbidity index scores. Regression models assessed outcomes associated with caregiving, adjusting for potential confounds. RESULTS: Among 10,853 respondents, caregivers' (n = 209) average age was 42.1 years, 53% were female, and 52% were married/living with a partner. Caregivers versus non-caregivers (n = 10,644) were more frequently obese, smokers, insured, employed, college-educated, and wealthier and had higher Charlson comorbidity index, all p < 0.05. Adjusting for covariates, caregiving was associated with significantly increased risk of depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR] = 2.008), major depressive disorder (OR = 1.483), anxiety (OR = 1.714), insomnia (OR = 1.644), hypertension (OR = 1.584), pain (OR = 1.704), and diabetes (OR = 2.103), all p < 0.015. Caregiving was also associated with lower health utilities (-0.024 points) and mental health status (-1.70 points), higher rates of presenteeism-related impairment (32.7% greater) and overall work impairment (35.9% greater), and higher traditional provider visit rates (28.7% greater), all p < 0.035. CONCLUSIONS: Caregiver status was found to be a factor associated with worse health outcomes and psychiatric and clinical disorders.

Assessment of functional outcomes by Sheehan Disability Scale in patients with major depressive disorder treated with duloxetine versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: We compared functional impairment outcomes assessed with Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) after treatment with duloxetine versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in patients with major depressive disorder. METHODS: Data were pooled from four randomized studies comparing treatment with duloxetine and SSRIs (three double blind and one open label). Analysis of covariance, with last-observation-carried-forward approach for missing data, explored treatment differences between duloxetine and SSRIs on SDS changes during 8 to 12 weeks of acute treatment for the intent-to-treat population. Logistic regression analysis examined the predictive capacity of baseline patient characteristics for remission in functional impairment (SDS total score ≤ 6 and SDS item scores ≤ 2) at endpoint. RESULTS: Included were 2193 patients (duloxetine n = 1029; SSRIs n = 835; placebo n = 329). Treatment with duloxetine and SSRIs resulted in significantly (p < 0.01) greater improvements in the SDS total score versus treatment with placebo. Higher SDS (p < 0.0001) or 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale baseline scores (p < 0.01) predicted lower probability of functional improvement after treatment with duloxetine or SSRIs. Female gender (p ≤ 0.05) predicted higher probability of functional improvement after treatment with duloxetine or SSRIs. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with SSRIs and duloxetine improved functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorder. Higher SDS or 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale baseline scores predicted less probability of SDS improvement; female gender predicted better improvement in functional impairment at endpoint.

Should Unexplained Painful Physical Symptoms be Considered within the Spectrum of Depressive Symptoms?

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether painful physical symptoms (PPS) can be considered within the spectrum of depressive symptoms. METHODS: Data for this post-hoc analysis were taken from a 6-month observational study mostly conducted in East Asia, Mexico, and the Middle East of 1,549 depressed patients without sexual dysfunction at baseline. Both explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) were performed on the combined items of the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report and the Somatic Symptom Inventory (seven pain-related items only). An additional second-order CFA was also conducted to examine an association between retained factors and the overall "depressive symptoms" factor. In addition, Spearman's correlation was used to assess levels of correlation between retained factors and depression severity as well as quality of life. RESULTS: Both EFA and CFA suggested and validated a four-factor solution, which included a pain factor. The other three factors identified were a mood/cognitive factor, a sleep disturbance factor, and an appetite/weight disturbance factor. All four factors were significantly associated with the overall factor of depression. They were also highly correlated to depression severity and quality of life (p<0.001 for all). The levels of correlations with the pain factor were generally greater than those with the appetite/weight factor and similar to those with the sleep factor. CONCLUSION: It may be reasonable to consider PPS within a broad spectrum of depressive symptoms. At least, they should be routinely assessed in patients with depression. Further research is warranted to validate these preliminary findings.

Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in the treatment of older adult patients with generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This was a flexible-dosed study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duloxetine 30-120 mg once daily in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in older adult patients. METHODS: Patients with GAD, who were at least 65 years of age, were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either duloxetine (N = 151) or placebo (N = 140). The primary efficacy measure was the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total score, and the primary endpoint was at week 10. Global functioning was assessed by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Safety and tolerability was assessed by the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, laboratory analyses, and vital signs. Analyses were conducted on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: The overall baseline mean HAM-A total score was 24, and SDS global score was 14. Completion rates were 75% for placebo and 76% for duloxetine. At week 10, duloxetine was superior to placebo on mean changes from baseline in HAM-A total scores (-15.9 vs. -11.7, p < 0.001) and in SDS global scores (-8.6 vs. -5.4, p < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in ≥5% of duloxetine-treated patients and twice the rate than with placebo including constipation (9% vs. 4%, p = 0.06), dry mouth (7% vs. 1%, p = 0.02), and somnolence (6% vs. 2%, p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Duloxetine treatment was efficacious in the improvement of anxiety and functioning in older adult patients with GAD, and the safety profile was consistent with previous GAD studies.

The role of descending inhibitory pathways on chronic pain modulation and clinical implications.

The treatment and management of chronic pain is a major challenge for clinicians. Chronic pain is often underdiagnosed and undertreated, and there is a lack of awareness of the pathophysiologic mechanisms that contribute to chronic pain. Chronic pain involves peripheral and central sensitization, as well as the alteration of the pain modulatory pathways. Imbalance between the descending facilitatory systems and the descending inhibitory systems is believed to be involved in chronic pain in pathological conditions. A pharmacological treatment that could restore the balance between these 2 pathways by diminishing the descending facilitatory pain pathways and enhancing the descending inhibitory pain pathways would be a valuable therapeutic option for patients with chronic pain. Due to the lack of evidence for pharmacological options that act on descending facilitation pathways, in this review we summarize the role of the descending inhibitory pain pathways in pain perception. This review will focus primarily on monoaminergic descending inhibitory pain pathways and their contribution to the mechanism of chronic pain and several pharmacological treatment options that enhance these pathways to reduce chronic pain. We describe anatomical structures and neurotransmitters of the descending inhibitory pain pathways that are activated in response to nociceptive pain and altered in response to sustained and persistent pain which leads to chronic pain in various pathological conditions.

The integral inventory for depression, a new, self-rated clinimetric instrument for the emotional and painful dimensions in major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) scale using post hoc analyses of data from a multi-country study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00561509) of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Patients (N = 1629) completed the IID (comprising two separate dimensions for emotional and physically painful symptoms; maximum score of 65) and a reference scale (16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report) at baseline and at follow-up (8 and 24 weeks). Physicians rated MDD symptoms using the Clinical Global Impressions of Severity scale at each visit. Inter-item correlation, internal consistency, external validity, factor structure, and exploratory analysis of an optimal severity cut-off point were assessed. RESULTS: The IID displayed two distinct dimensions (i.e. painful and emotional) with little item redundancy and good internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.83 at each visit). The IID displayed good external validity (Pearson's correlations coefficients >0.60 at each visit) and statistically significant agreement (McNemar's test; P < 0.001 at follow-up) with the reference scale. Results suggest that a cut-off score of ≤24 had adequate precision (>80%) to identify patients with and without moderate MDD. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the IID may be a reliable and valid tool for assessing emotional and painful symptoms of MDD.

Frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction and treatment effectiveness during SSRI or duloxetine therapy: 8-week data from a 6-month observational study.

BACKGROUND: In randomised controlled trials, the frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) at week 8 was lower with duloxetine than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy. METHODS: This 6-month, prospective, observational study compared the frequency of TESD (using the Arizona Sexual Experience [ASEX] scale) in MDD patients treated with duloxetine or SSRI monotherapy in the first 8 weeks in normal clinical practice. RESULTS: Physician-assessed TESD frequency at week 8 was comparable with duloxetine and SSRI monotherapy (23.9 and 26.2%, respectively; P = 0.545). Improvements in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-Report) (QIDS-SR(16)), Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) total scores and remission rates were statistically significantly greater with duloxetine than SSRI monotherapy (P < 0.001, 0.010, <0.001, and 0.002, respectively), but TESD attenuated improvements in quality of life measures (EuroQoL questionnaire-5 dimensions [EQ-5D] and Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS] scores: ≤0.012). Several factors were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with TESD at week 8 in this study. CONCLUSIONS: TESD rates with duloxetine and SSRIs at week 8 were comparable, however, significant differences in effectiveness were observed in favour of duloxetine. Antidepressant tolerability with respect to TESD must be managed to maximize remission of depressed patients.

Treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction with SSRIs and duloxetine: effectiveness and functional outcomes over a 6-month observational period.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate frequencies of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) treated with duloxetine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) monotherapy for up to 6 months in a prospective, observational study. METHODS: Sexually active MDD patients without sexual dysfunction at entry were enrolled from twelve countries (N = 1,647). TESD was assessed over the study period using the Arizona sexual experience (ASEX) scale. A priori-specified secondary 6-month clinical endpoints were also examined. RESULTS: The frequency of TESD at 6 months with duloxetine was comparable to that with SSRI monotherapy (23.4 and 28.7%, respectively; P = 0.087). Improvements in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR(16)), Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) total scores, remission and sustained remission rates were statistically significantly greater with duloxetine than SSRI monotherapy at 6 months (P < 0.001 for each), but TESD attenuated improvements in quality of life measures. Four factors were consistently significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with TESD at week 8 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Six-month TESD rates were comparable between duloxetine and SSRIs, with greater MDD effectiveness in favour of duloxetine. Improved recognition and management of TESD may improve quality of life for MDD patients in usual clinical practice.

[Myopia prevalence among school-age children in a suburban population]. / Prevalencia de miopía en escolares de una zona suburbana.

OBJECTIVE: an epidemiological study was carried out to assess the prevalence of myopia among school age children of suburban population. METHODS: a cross sectional and descriptive study was applied, we stratified a randomized clusters of samples, using a representative proportion of the population. There were 1138 students enrolled, including 612 boys and 524 girls. Visual acuity with Snellen card was assessed; the refractive status and corneal radius of each student were measured with an autorefractometer which did not include cycloplegic refraction. All status refractive values were confirmed by another optometrist. Specific questionnaires were used in order to collect data on the refractive condition of students. The criterion for classifying the myopia status was > or = 0.5 diopters. RESULTS: the mean age was 10.2 + or - 2.43 years; lower prevalence rates were found significatively in male subjects. CONCLUSIONS: the myopia prevalence was 33.0 %, and the probability of myopia increases with age, sex, parental history of myopia, and history of premature children and low birth weight.

Clinical meaningfulness of duloxetine's effect in Chinese patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis: post hoc analyses of a phase 3 randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the analgesic effect of duloxetine in Chinese patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee/hip at individual patient level and report the relationship between pain intensity reduction, overall improvement, and physical functioning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post hoc analysis of 13-week, phase 3, parallel-group, randomized, placebo-controlled study of duloxetine in Chinese patients with OA pain. Patients were randomized (1:1, computer-generated, interactive web-response system) to duloxetine (60 mg once daily, n=202) or placebo (n=207). Patients, investigators, and study staff were blinded throughout the study. Duloxetine's efficacy was evaluated using the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) and the Osteoarthritis Research Society International and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OARSI-OMERACT) responder criteria. Analyses were conducted on all randomized patients with a baseline and at least one post-baseline observation. RESULTS: At study endpoint, the percentage of patients experiencing ≥30% pain intensity reduction (30% responders) was significantly higher in the duloxetine group than in the placebo group (63.4% vs 49.7%; P=0.008). The percentage of patients experiencing ≥50% pain intensity reduction (50% responders) in the duloxetine group was numerically higher than in the placebo group (42.8% vs 34.5%; P=0.098). Most of the 30% and 50% responders to duloxetine treatment felt either "very much improved" or "much improved" on the Patient Global Impression-Improvement at endpoint. The 30% and 50% responders to duloxetine treatment also experienced greater improvements in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index physical function scores at endpoint compared with non-responders. The overall percentage of OARSI-OMERACT responders was significantly higher in the duloxetine group vs the placebo group (70.1% vs 54.9%; P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Based on IMMPACT and OARSI-OMERACT criteria, the analgesic effect of duloxetine was associated with clinically relevant benefits in Chinese patients with OA of the knee/hip. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01931475.

Safety and Effectiveness of Once-Daily Tadalafil (5 mg) Therapy in Korean Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia/Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in a Real-World Clinical Setting: Results from a Post-Marketing Surveillance Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of tadalafil 5 mg once daily (quaque die [everyday], QD) among Korean men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)/lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in a real-world clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-country, prospective, observational cohort study in which patients newly prescribed tadalafil 5 mg QD for the treatment of BPH/LUTS were followed-up for 12±2 or 24±2 weeks, or to the last treatment, during post-marketing surveillance. Safety was evaluated in terms of the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Effectiveness was assessed by changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) from baseline to each endpoint. RESULTS: All patients receiving ≥1 dose of tadalafil 5 mg QD (N=637) were included in the safety population. Two percent of patients (n=13) experienced 15 TEAEs of mild (n=10; 66.7%) or moderate (n=5; 33.3%) severity. No severe TEAEs and no SAEs were reported. Effectiveness evaluations included all patients receiving tadalafil who had both baseline and endpoint observations (12-week, N=265; 24-week, N=44). Compared with baseline, the mean IPSS total score (±standard error) significantly improved by 4.7±0.3 and 6.4±0.7 points at the 12- and 24-week endpoints, respectively (p<0.0001), with significant improvements also observed on the storage, voiding, and quality of life subscores. In total, 69.1% of the patients had a clinically meaningful ≥3-point improvement in the IPSS total score. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil 5 mg QD was well tolerated and effective in Korean men with BPH/LUTS in a real-world clinical setting.

Recovery in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD): results of a 6-month, multinational, observational study.

Not all individuals treated for major depressive disorder (MDD) achieve recovery. This observational study examined the recovery rates in MDD patients and the patient characteristics associated with achieving recovery in a naturalistic clinical setting. Recovery was defined as having both clinical and functional remission. Data for this post hoc analysis were taken from a 24-week prospective, observational study that involved 1,549 MDD patients. Clinical remission was assessed using the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report and functional remission through the Sheehan Disability Scale and no days of reduced productivity in the previous week. Generalized estimating equation regression models were used to examine the baseline factors associated with recovery during follow-up. Clinical and functional remission was achieved in 70.6% and 56.1% of the MDD patients, respectively. MDD patients who achieved recovery (52.1%) were significantly less likely to have impaired levels of functioning, concurrent medical or psychiatric conditions, low levels of education, or nonadherence to therapy at follow-up. The level of functioning during the index episode seems to be a better predictor of recovery than symptom severity. Therefore, the level of functioning should be considered while determining recovery from depression.

Lost in transition: A review of the unmet need of patients with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder transitioning to adulthood.

This review discusses the unmet needs of patients with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who are transitioning into adulthood. Although awareness and recognition of ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults have improved in recent years, there is often an interruption in management of the disorder when adolescent patients transition to adult health care services. This review has the following objectives: (1) to identify key issues patients with ADHD (with or without an early diagnosis) face during transition into adulthood; (2) to review the current clinical practice and country-specific approaches to the management of the transition into adulthood for patients with ADHD; (3) to discuss challenges facing clinicians and their patients when drug treatment for ADHD is initiated; (4) to review current ADHD guidelines on transition management in Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, Turkey, and Africa; and (5) to examine economic consequences associated with ADHD. The review suggests that the transition period to adult ADHD may be an underresearched and underserved area. The transition period plays an important role regarding how ADHD symptoms may be perceived and acted upon by adult psychiatrists. Further studies are needed to explore the characteristics of the transition period. If only a fraction of adolescents go on to have mental disorders during adulthood, especially ADHD, it is crucial to identify their characteristics to target appropriate interventions at the beginning of the course of illness. There continues to be low recognition of adult ADHD and a severe lack of medical services equipped to diagnose and care for patients with ADHD transitioning from child to adult services.

Real-world outcomes in patients with depression treated with duloxetine or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in East Asia.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared treatment outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder treated with either duloxetine with a daily dose of ≤60 mg or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) as monotherapy for up to 6 months in a naturalistic setting in East Asia. In addition, this study examined the impact of painful physical symptoms (PPS) on the effects of these treatments. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of data from a 6-month prospective observational study involving 1,549 major depressive disorder patients without sexual dysfunction focused on a subgroup of patients from East Asia (n = 587). Depression severity was measured using the Clinical Global Impression of Severity and the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR16 ), whereas quality of life (QoL) was measured using EuroQoL instruments. PPS were rated using the modified Somatic Symptom Inventory. Multiple regression analyses were performed to compare the treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Duloxetine-treated patients had higher odds of achieving remission (odds ratio = 2.578, P < 0.001) and response (odds ratio = 2.704, P < 0.001) during follow-up, compared with SSRI-treated patients. They also had lower levels of disease severity and higher levels of QoL during follow-up. A similar pattern was observed in each subgroup of patients with and without PPS at baseline, but the effects of duloxetine relative to SSRIs were in general greater in patients with PPS. DISCUSSION: Patients treated with duloxetine had better treatment outcomes in terms of remission, response, depressive symptoms, and QoL, compared with SSRIs. Treatment with duloxetine may have additional advantages for patients with concurrent PPS.

Functioning in patients with major depression treated with duloxetine or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in East Asia.

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the levels of functioning in patients with major depressive disorder treated with either duloxetine with a daily dose of ≤60 mg or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) as monotherapy for up to 6 months in a naturalistic setting in East Asia. In addition, this study examined the impact of painful physical symptoms (PPS) on the effects of these treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for this post hoc analysis were taken from a 6-month prospective observational study involving 1,549 patients with major depressive disorder without sexual dysfunction. The present analysis focused on a subgroup of patients from East Asia (n=587). Functioning was measured using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Depression severity was assessed using the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report. PPS were rated using the modified Somatic Symptom Inventory. A mixed model with repeated measures was fitted to compare the levels of functioning between duloxetine-treated (n=227) and SSRI-treated (n=225) patients, adjusting for baseline patient characteristics. RESULTS: The mean SDS total score was similar between the two treatment cohorts (15.46 [standard deviation =6.11] in the duloxetine cohort and 16.36 [standard deviation =6.53] in the SSRI cohort, P=0.077) at baseline. Both descriptive and regression analyses confirmed improvement in functioning in both groups during follow-up, but duloxetine-treated patients achieved better functioning. At 24 weeks, the estimated mean SDS total score was 4.48 (standard error =0.80) in the duloxetine cohort, which was statistically significantly lower (ie, better functioning) than that of 6.76 (standard error =0.77) in the SSRI cohort (P<0.001). This treatment difference was more apparent in the subgroup of patients with PPS at baseline. Similar patterns were also observed for SDS subscores (work, social life, and family life). CONCLUSION: Depressed patients treated with duloxetine achieved better functioning compared to those treated with SSRIs. This treatment difference was mostly driven by patients with PPS at baseline.

Major depressive disorder in Latin America: the relationship between depression severity, painful somatic symptoms, and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: We report on two multi-center, prospective, observational studies (H6U-BC-LRAG and H6U-BL-LRAH) to determine the clinical profile of Latin American outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and the relationship between depression severity, painful somatic symptoms, and quality of life. METHOD: Patients (n = 989) with MDD were classified according to the presence (SS+) or absence (SS-) of painful somatic symptoms using the Somatic Symptom Inventory (SSI). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) quantified pain severity, HAMD17 and CGI-S determined depression severity, while the Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) quantified subjective well-being. RESULTS: At baseline, patients had an average CGI score of 4.5 (+/- 0.8) and HAMD17 score of 24.9 (+/- 7.2). Of the patients studied, 72.6% reported painful somatic symptoms (95% CI: 69.8, 75.4), with women 2.7 times more likely to be SS+ than men (p < 0.0001). Adjusted mean HAMD17 (26.79) and CGI-S (4.53) scores for SS+ patients were significantly (p < 0.0001) higher than for SS- patients (HAMD(17): 22.87; CGI-S: 4.28). SS+ patients had greater severity of pain across all VAS measures (p < 0.0001). The presence of somatic symptoms had a significantly deleterious effect on quality of life (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Greater severity of painful somatic symptoms was associated with increased depression severity and reduced quality of life. We concluded that both emotional and physical manifestations of MDD must be addressed for successful treatment.

Health-related quality of life in patients with depression treated with duloxetine or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in a naturalistic outpatient setting.

PURPOSE: To assess the levels of quality of life (QoL) in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients treated with either duloxetine or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) as monotherapy for up to 6 months in a naturalistic clinical setting mostly in the Middle East, East Asia, and Mexico. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for this post hoc analysis were taken from a 6-month prospective observational study involving 1,549 MDD patients without sexual dysfunction. QoL was measured using the EQ-5D instrument. Depression severity was measured using the Clinical Global Impression of Severity and the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR16), while pain severity was measured using the pain items of the Somatic Symptom Inventory. Regression analyses were performed to compare the levels of QoL between duloxetine-treated (n=556) and SSRI-treated (n=776) patients, adjusting for baseline patient characteristics. RESULTS: These MDD patients, on average, had moderately impaired QoL at baseline, and the level of QoL impairment was similar between the duloxetine and SSRI groups (EQ-5D score of 0.46 [SD =0.32] in the former and 0.47 [SD =0.33] in the latter, P=0.066). Both descriptive and regression analyses confirmed QoL improvements in both groups during follow-up, but duloxetine-treated patients achieved higher QoL. At 24 weeks, the estimated mean EQ-5D score was 0.90 in the duloxetine cohort, which was statistically significantly higher than that of 0.83 in the SSRI cohort (P<0.001). Notably, pain severity at baseline was also statistically significantly associated with poorer QoL during follow-up (P<0.001). In addition, this association was observed in the subgroup of SSRI-treated patients (P<0.001), but not in that of duloxetine-treated patients (P=0.479). CONCLUSION: Depressed patients treated with duloxetine achieved higher QoL, compared to those treated with SSRIs, possibly in part due to its moderating effect on the link between pain and poorer QoL.