RESUMEN
Despite guidelines recommending annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer, uptake remains low due to the perceived complexity of initiating and maintaining a clinical program-problems that likely magnify in underserved populations. We conducted a survey of community providers at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in Santa Clara County, California, to evaluate provider-related factors that affect adherence. We then compared these findings to academic providers' (APs) LDCT screening knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes at an academic referral center in the same county. The 4 FQHCs enrolled care for 80 000 patients largely of minority descent and insured by Medi-Cal. Of the 75 FQHC providers (FQHCPs), 36 (48%) completed the survey. Of the 36 providers, 8 (22%) knew screening criteria. Fifteen (42%) FQHCPs discussed LDCT screening with patients. Compared to 36 APs, FQHCPs were more concerned about harms, false positives, discussion time, patient apathy, insurance coverage, and a lack of expertise for screening and follow-up. Yet, more FQHCPs thought screening was effective (27 [75%] of 36) compared to APs ( P = .0003). In conclusion, provider knowledge gaps are greater and barriers are different for community clinics caring for underserved populations compared to their academic counterparts, but practical and scalable solutions exist to enhance adoption.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , California , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/efectos adversos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/efectos de la radiación , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided bronchoscopic sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) is associated with superior diagnostic outcomes. However, the added value of a robotic-assisted bronchoscopy platform in CBCT-guided diagnostic procedures is unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 100 consecutive PPLs sampled using conventional flexible bronchoscopy under CBCT guidance (FB-CBCT) and 100 consecutive PPLs sampled using an electromagnetic navigation-guided robotic-assisted bronchoscopy platform under CBCT guidance (RB-CBCT). Patient demographics, PPL features, procedural characteristics, and procedural outcomes were compared between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS: Patient and PPL characteristics were similar between the FB-CBCT and RB-CBCT cohorts, and there were no significant differences in diagnostic yield (88% vs. 90% for RB-CBCT, P=0.822) or incidence of complications between the 2 groups. As compared with FB-CBCT cases, RB-CBCT cases were significantly shorter (median 58 min vs. 92 min, P<0.0001) and used significantly less diagnostic radiation (median dose area product 5114 µGyâ¢m2 vs. 8755 µGyâ¢m2, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: CBCT-guided bronchoscopy with or without a robotic-assisted bronchoscopy platform is a safe and effective method for sampling PPLs, although the integration of a robotic-assisted platform was associated with significantly shorter procedure times and significantly less radiation exposure.
Asunto(s)
Broncoscopía , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Broncoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Robótica/instrumentación , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of pneumothorax after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using Zephyr (Pulmonx Corporation) endobronchial valves is ~26%. Many patients who develop a postprocedural pneumothorax require chest tube placement. If a persistent airleak is present, patients tolerating waterseal can be discharged home with a mini-atrium with a low risk of empyema. METHODS: Data were collected on patients from the Epic (Epic System Corporation) electronic medical record between July 2019 and November 2022. Our retrospective study reviewed a total of 102 BLVR procedures. Twenty-six of these procedures were complicated by a pneumothorax post-BLVR (25%). After 24 procedures, patients were discharged home with a chest tube after a persistent airleak. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of intrapleural infection in this population. The secondary endpoint was the average length of time the chest tube was in place until outpatient removal. RESULTS: Out of the 24 discharge events, 2 events (8.3%) were complicated by an intrapleural infection before chest tube removal. The average number of days requiring a chest tube until outpatient removal was 16.9 days, which is similar to the duration observed in patients discharged home with a chest tube after lung volume reduction surgery. CONCLUSION: Discharging patients home with a chest tube after BLVR therapy is safe and may reduce hospital length of stay. Our study shows the incidence of intrapleural infection after home discharge with a chest tube after BLVR is low.
Asunto(s)
Neumonectomía , Neumotórax , Humanos , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Neumonectomía/métodos , Neumotórax/epidemiología , Neumotórax/etiología , Tubos Torácicos/efectos adversos , Alta del Paciente , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The aggregation of mutant polyglutamine (polyQ) proteins has sparked interest in the role of protein quality-control pathways in Huntington's disease (HD) and related polyQ disorders. Employing a novel knock-in HD mouse model, we provide in vivo evidence of early, sustained alterations of autophagy in response to mutant huntingtin (mhtt). The HdhQ200 knock-in model, derived from the selective breeding of HdhQ150 knock-in mice, manifests an accelerated and more robust phenotype than the parent line. Heterozygous HdhQ200 mice accumulate htt aggregates as cytoplasmic aggregation foci (AF) as early as 9 weeks of age and striatal neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NIIs) by 20 weeks. By 40 weeks, striatal AF are perinuclear and immunoreactive for ubiquitin and the autophagosome marker LC3. Striatal NIIs accumulate earlier in HdhQ200 mice than in HdhQ150 mice. The earlier appearance of aggregate pathology in HdhQ200 mice is paralleled by earlier and more rapidly progressive motor deficits: progressive imbalance and decreased motor coordination by 50 weeks, gait deficits by 60 weeks and gross motor impairment by 80 weeks of age. At 80 weeks, heterozygous HdhQ200 mice exhibit striatal and cortical astrogliosis and a approximately 50% reduction in striatal dopamine receptor binding. Increased LC3-II protein expression, which is noted early and sustained throughout the disease course, is paralleled by increased expression of the autophagy-related protein, p62. Early and sustained expression of autophagy-related proteins in this genetically precise mouse model of HD suggests that the alteration of autophagic flux is an important and early component of the neuronal response to mhtt.
Asunto(s)
Autofagia , Técnicas de Sustitución del Gen , Enfermedad de Huntington/genética , Enfermedad de Huntington/patología , Animales , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía/metabolismo , Salud , Heterocigoto , Enfermedad de Huntington/fisiopatología , Ratones , Proteínas Asociadas a Microtúbulos/metabolismo , Actividad Motora , Mutación/genética , Neostriado/patología , Neostriado/fisiopatología , Neostriado/ultraestructura , Neuronas/patología , Neuronas/ultraestructura , Estructura Cuaternaria de Proteína , Transporte de Proteínas , Receptores Dopaminérgicos/metabolismo , Proteínas de Transporte de Serotonina en la Membrana Plasmática/química , Proteínas de Transporte de Serotonina en la Membrana Plasmática/genética , Ubiquitina/metabolismoRESUMEN
Low dose CT (LDCT) for lung cancer screening is an evidence-based, guideline recommended, and Medicare approved test but uptake requires further study. We therefore conducted patient and provider surveys to elucidate factors associated with utilization. Patients referred for LDCT at an academic medical center were questioned about their attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs on lung cancer screening. Adherent patients were defined as those who met screening eligibility criteria and completed a LDCT. Referring primary care providers within this same medical system were surveyed in parallel about their practice patterns, attitudes, knowledge and beliefs about screening. Eighty patients responded (36%), 48 of whom were adherent. Among responders, non-Hispanic patients (p = 0.04) were more adherent. Adherent respondents believed that CT technology is accurate and early detection is useful, and they trusted their providers. A majority of non-adherent patients (79%) self-reported an intention to obtain a LDCT in the future. Of 36 of 87 (41%) responding providers, only 31% knew the correct lung cancer screening eligibility criteria, which led to a 37% inappropriate referral rate from 2013 to 2015. Yet, 75% had initiated lung cancer screening discussions, 64% thought screening was at least moderately effective, and 82% were interested in learning more of the 33 providers responding to these questions. Overall, patients were motivated and providers engaged to screen for lung cancer by LDCT. Non-adherent patient "procrastinators" were motivated to undergo screening in the future. Additional follow through on non-adherence may enhance screening uptake, and raising awareness for screening eligibility through provider education may reduce inappropriate referrals.