Moderate or intensive management of the active phase of second-stage labor and risk of urinary and anal incontinence: results of the PASST randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Incontinence occurs frequently in the postpartum period. Several theoretical pathophysiological models may underlie the hypothesis that different types of management of the active phase of the second stage of labor have different effects on pelvic floor muscles and thus perhaps affect urinary and anal continence. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of "moderate pushing" on the occurrence of urinary or anal incontinence compared with "intensive pushing," and to determine the factors associated with incontinence at 6 months postpartum. STUDY DESIGN: This was a planned analysis of secondary objectives of the PASST (Phase Active du Second STade) trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial. PASST included nulliparous women with singleton term pregnancies and epidural analgesia, who were randomly assigned at 8 cm of dilatation to either the intervention group that used "moderate" pushing (pushing only twice during each contraction, resting regularly for 1 contraction in 5 without pushing, and no time limit on pushing) or the control group following the usual management of "intensive" pushing (pushing 3 times during each contraction, with no contractions without pushing, with an obstetrician called to discuss operative delivery after 30 minutes of pushing). Data about continence were collected with validated self-assessment questionnaires at 6 months postpartum. Urinary incontinence was defined by an ICIQ-UI SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form) score ≥1 and anal incontinence by a Wexner score ≥2. A separate analysis was also performed among the more severely affected women (ICIQ-UI SF ≥6 and Wexner ≥5). Factors associated with incontinence were assessed with univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Among 1618 women initially randomized, 890 (55%) returned the complete questionnaire at 6 months. The rate of urinary incontinence was 36.6% in the "moderate" pushing group vs 38.5% in the "intensive" pushing group (relative risk, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.13), whereas the rate of anal incontinence was 32.2% vs 34.6% (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.12). None of the obstetrical factors studied related to the second stage of labor influenced the occurrence of urinary or anal incontinence, except operative vaginal delivery, which increased the risk of anal incontinence (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.15). CONCLUSION: The results of the PASST trial indicate that neither moderate nor intensive pushing efforts affect the risk of urinary or anal incontinence at 6 months postpartum among women who gave birth under epidural analgesia.

[Update on the management modalities of expulsive efforts during childbirth]. / Mise au point sur les modalités de gestion des efforts expulsifs lors de l'accouchement.

The second stage of labour includes both the passive and active stages, involving expulsive efforts. The management of this phase of labour aims to minimise the maternal and neonatal complications that could be associated with a prolonged active2nd stage, but also to limit medical interventions. On the maternal side, prolonged duration of expulsive effort appears to be correlated with increased postpartum haemorrhage, perineal injury and, in the long term, urinary and anal incontinence. From a neonatal viewpoint, expulsive efforts carry risks of neonatal acidosis, asphyxia, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and trauma. Optimal management of expulsive efforts involves several strategies. Various aspects need to be addressed in order to optimise this management, including the timing of the start of expulsive efforts, comparing immediate pushing with delayed pushing, and the duration of expulsive efforts. In addition, it is important to examine the different pushing modalities, whether intense or moderate, using open or closed-glottis pushing, as well as the maternal position during pushing. According to the current literature, no specific technique or predefined duration appears to reduce the risk of neonatal or maternal complications. It therefore seems essential to adopt an individualised approach for each woman, placing her at the centre of the care and decision-making process, in order to take account of her preferences during childbirth.

The sFLT-1/PlGF Ratio for the Prediction of Preeclampsia-Related Adverse Fetal and Maternal Outcomes in Women with Preexisting Diabetes.

To evaluate the predictive value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for the prediction of preeclampsia in women with preexisting diabetes mellitus. This is a monocentric retrospective observational study conducted between January 2018 and December 2020. All singleton pregnancies with preexisting diabetes mellitus, who had a dosage of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio between 30 and 34 + 6 weeks of gestation were included. The principal outcome was preeclampsia. The secondary outcomes were preterm preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, placental abruption, intrauterine fetal death, IUGR, small for gestational age and a composite outcome named "hypertensive disorder of pregnancy" including gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count). Of 63 patients, 22% presented preeclampsia. The area under the curve of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96) for the prediction of preeclampsia. The receiver operator characteristic analysis suggested that the optimal sFlt-1/PlGF cutoff to predict preeclampsia was 29, with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI: 60.1-96.0) and a specificity of 92% (95% CI: 80.8-96.8). A cut-off of 38 provided a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI: 45.4-88.3), a specificity of 92% (95% CI: 80.8-96.8). Further analysis using multivariable methods revealed nephropathy was significantly associated with PE (p = 0.014). The use of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio during the third trimester of pregnancy seems to be of interest as a prognostic tool to improve multidisciplinary management of patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus.

[Uterine rupture during medical termination of pregnancy or intrauterine death: A risk management study]. / Rupture utérine sur interruption médicale de grossesse ou mort fœtale in utero : une étude de gestion du risque.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze a series of uterine ruptures (UR) that occurred in the context of medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) or intrauterine death (IUD) from a risk management perspective. METHODS: French retrospective descriptive observational study of all cases of UR occurring during induction for IUD or MTP, reported between 2011 and 2021 by Gynerisq. Cases were recorded on a basis of voluntary reports using targeted questionnaires. RESULTS: Between November 27, 2011, and August 22, 2021, 12 cases of UR occurring during an induction for IUD or MTP were recorded. 50 % of the patients had never given birth by cesarean section. The term of delivery varied from 17+3 days to 41+2 days. The clinical signs found were pain (n=6), ascending fetal presentation (n=5) and bleeding (n=4). All patients were managed by laparotomy, 5 were transfused. One vascular ligation and one hysterectomy were required. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of surgical history is involved in the prevention of UR. The signs of detection are pain, ascending presentation and bleeding. The speed of management and good teamwork allow a reduction of maternal complications. The findings of the morbidity and mortality reviews show that prevention and mitigation barriers can be established.

Impact of COVID-19-Related Lockdown on Delivery and Perinatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The magnitude and direction of effects on pregnancy outcomes of the lockdown imposed during COVID-19 have been uncertain and debated. Therefore, we aimed to quantify delivery and perinatal outcomes during the first nationwide lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the same durations of time for the pre- and post-lockdown periods. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of six university hospital maternity units distributed across France, each of which serves as the obstetric care referral unit within its respective perinatal network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between the lockdown period and same-duration (i.e., 55-day) periods before and after the 2020 lockdown (pre-lockdown: 22 January-16 March; lockdown: 17 March-10 May; post-lockdown: 11 May-4 July). We compared the overall rates of Caesarean delivery (CD), pre-labor CD, labor induction, operative vaginal delivery, severe postpartum hemorrhage (≥1 L), severe perineal tear, maternal transfusion, and neonatal mortality and morbidity (1- and 5-min Apgar scores < 7), hypoxia and anoxia (umbilical arterial pH < 7.20 or <7.10, respectively), and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit before discharge. Adjusted odds ratios were estimated using logistic regression, controlling for region of birth, maternal age category, multiparity, multiple pregnancies, diabetes, and hypertensive disorders. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 11,929 women who delivered consecutively at one of the six maternity units studied (4093 pre-lockdown, 3829 during lockdown, and 4007 post-lockdown) and their 12,179 neonates (4169 pre-lockdown, 3905 during lockdown, and 4105 post-lockdown). The maternal and obstetric characteristics of the women delivering during the lockdown period were alike those delivering pre- and post-lockdown on maternal age, parity, body mass index, rate of complication by hypertensive disorders or insulin-treated diabetes, and gestational age at delivery. Overall CD rates were similar during the three periods (23.6%, 24.8%, and 24.3% pre-lockdown, lockdown, and post-lockdown, respectively) and no outcome differed significantly during lockdown compared to pre- and post-lockdown. These findings were consistent across maternity units. CONCLUSION: The maternal and perinatal outcomes are reassuring regarding the performance of the health-care system during the COVID-19 lockdown studied. Such information is crucial, because additional COVID-19-related lockdowns might still be needed. They are also instructive regarding potential future pandemics.

Spontaneous pregnancy rate following surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis in infertile women: The impact of the learning curve.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the surgical learning curve impact the spontaneous pregnancy rate in infertile patients undergoing removal of deep infiltrating endometriosis MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single center retrospective study including the first 50 consecutive infertile women suffering from deep infiltrating endometriosis and referred to a single surgeon. All patients underwent laparoscopic removal of deep endometriosis lesions. The study population was stratified in two subgroups, namely the early group (including the first 25 cases) and the late group (comprising the 25 subsequent cases). Pregnancy and live birth rates, surgical morbidity and clinical recurrence rate were compared between study groups. RESULTS: Overall, spontaneous pregnancy rate (40 % in the early group versus 56 % in the late group, p = 0.25), live birth rate (40 % versus 44 %, p = 0.77) and clinical recurrence rate (16 % versus 4%, p = 0.16) did not significantly differ between the study groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that ASRM stage, EFI score, and body mass index were the only significant prognostic factors of postoperative spontaneous fertility. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis in infertile women is associated with high spontaneous pregnancy and live birth rates. The surgeon's learning curve does not impact postoperative fertility outcomes.

Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Preterm Births, Low Birthweights and Stillbirths: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of lockdowns during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on pregnancy outcomes remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the association between the COVID-19-related lockdown and pregnancy outcomes in maternity hospitals in France. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study from six tertiary referral hospitals in different regions of France. Three 55-day periods were compared: pre-lockdown from 22 January 2020, lockdown from 17 March 2020, and post-lockdown from 11 May 2020 to 4 July 2020. We included all women who delivered singleton or multiple pregnancies, who delivered at ≥24 weeks of gestation and with birthweights ≥500 g. We documented gestational ages at the delivery of liveborn and stillborn infants ('stillbirths'). These were categorized as having a very low birthweight (VLBW, <1500 g), or a low birthweight (LBW, <2500 g). Adjustments were made for place of birth, maternal age, parity and diabetes, and hypertensive disorders, as well as for multiple pregnancies. RESULTS: In total, 11,929 women delivered in the six selected centers. This figure is constituted of 4093, 3829, and 4007 deliveries in the pre-lockdown (1), peri-lockdown (2), and post-lockdown (3) periods, respectively. There were no differences in pregnancy outcomes between these three periods. Overall, birth rates <27+6 weeks, between weeks 28+0 and 31+6, and between 32+0 and weeks 36+6 were 1.0%, 1.9%, and 4.4%, respectively. After adjustment, these rates were stable between periods 1 and 2 (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 0.90; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.69-1.19) and between periods 2 and 3 (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 0.80-1.36). Although more VLBW neonates were born during lockdown (3.5% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.03), this difference did not persist after adjustment (aOR 0.84, CI 95% 0.64-1.10). The LBW rates were similar during the three periods at 12.5% overall. The stillbirth rate was unaffected by the lockdown. CONCLUSION: The pregnancy outcomes (preterm birth, LBW, VLBW, and stillbirth rates) were not modified by the COVID-19 lockdown in our cohort study in France. Considering the discrepancies in results and methodological issues in previous published studies, there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that such lockdowns have any impact on perinatal outcomes.