Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 13: 111, 2013 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23448529

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Published models predicting nasal colonization with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among hospital admissions predominantly focus on separation of carriers from non-carriers and are frequently evaluated using measures of discrimination. In contrast, accurate estimation of carriage probability, which may inform decisions regarding treatment and infection control, is rarely assessed. Furthermore, no published models adjust for MRSA prevalence. METHODS: Using logistic regression, a scoring system (values from 0 to 200) predicting nasal carriage of MRSA was created using a derivation cohort of 3091 individuals admitted to a European tertiary referral center between July 2007 and March 2008. The expected positive predictive value of a rapid diagnostic test (GeneOhm, Becton & Dickinson Co.) was modeled using non-linear regression according to score. Models were validated on a second cohort from the same hospital consisting of 2043 patients admitted between August 2008 and January 2012. Our suggested correction score for prevalence was proportional to the log-transformed odds ratio between cohorts. Calibration before and after correction, i.e. accurate classification into arbitrary strata, was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow-Test. RESULTS: Treating culture as reference, the rapid diagnostic test had positive predictive values of 64.8% and 54.0% in derivation and internal validation corhorts with prevalences of 2.3% and 1.7%, respectively. In addition to low prevalence, low positive predictive values were due to high proportion (> 66%) of mecA-negative Staphylococcus aureus among false positive results. Age, nursing home residence, admission through the medical emergency department, and ICD-10-GM admission diagnoses starting with "A" or "J" were associated with MRSA carriage and were thus included in the scoring system, which showed good calibration in predicting probability of carriage and the rapid diagnostic test's expected positive predictive value. Calibration for both probability of carriage and expected positive predictive value in the internal validation cohort was improved by applying the correction score. CONCLUSIONS: Given a set of patient parameters, the presented models accurately predict a) probability of nasal carriage of MRSA and b) a rapid diagnostic test's expected positive predictive value. While the former can inform decisions regarding empiric antibiotic treatment and infection control, the latter can influence choice of screening method.


Asunto(s)
Portador Sano/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Modelos Biológicos , Cavidad Nasal/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Calibración , Portador Sano/diagnóstico , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dinámicas no Lineales , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA