Accuracy and Precision of an Accelerometer-Based Smartphone App Designed to Monitor and Record Angular Movement over Time.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic exercise is a central component in the management of many common conditions. It is imperative, therefore, that clinicians monitor and correct patient performance to facilitate the use of proper form both in the clinic and during home exercise programs. Although clinicians are trained to prescribe exercise and analyze form, there are many subtleties that may be missed by relying on visual assessment. This study investigated the accuracy and precision of a novel, exercise-training smartphone application (app), running on an iPhone(®) (Apple, Cupertino, CA) 4 and using its LIS331DLH accelerometer to dynamically measure and record movement during exercise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The iPhone, running the app, was mounted to the movement arm of a Biodex™ isokinetic dynamometer System 4 (Biodex Corp., Shirley, NY). Angle and time measurements taken by the app were compared with the dynamometer (gold standard) while rotating at 30°/s, 60°/s, 90°/s, 120°/s, and 150°/s. Accuracy was assessed using limits of agreement and fast Fourier transform analyses. Precision was assessed using the coefficient of variation. RESULTS: The mean difference between the app and the Biodex recordings was less than 1°/s for all test velocities. The coefficient of variation was less than 3% at velocities from 30°/s to 120°/s and less than 7% at 150°/s. CONCLUSIONS: The app was highly accurate and precise. The validation of apps designed for motion tracking is a vital prerequisite to clinical implementation. The app described in this article is clinically identical to the Biodex dynamometer in its ability to accurately and precisely read angular movement over time.

Shoulder Strength and Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test Performance in Division III Collegiate Baseball and Softball Players.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder strength measured with a handheld dynamometer (HHD) and the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) are clinical tools that have been used to measure athlete's performance and track their progress. PURPOSE: The specific aims of this study were to describe baseball (BB) and softball (SB) players isometric strength measures and their performance on the CKCUEST; examine the relationships between strength and the CKCUEST; compare isometric strength measures of the throwing and non-throwing arms; and compare the strength and the CKCUEST measures between BB and SB players. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. METHODS: Participants included 50 DIII BB and 24 DIII SB players. Shoulder strength for the internal and external rotators were measured using a HHD and the CKCUEST was performed. The CKCUEST score and power were calculated. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests were used to compare throwing and non-throwing shoulder strength. Independent t-test was used to compare BB and SB players shoulder strength and the CKCUEST measures. RESULTS: The BB players demonstrated significant strength differences between the throwing and non-throwing shoulders and the internal rotators were significantly stronger than the external rotators (p < 0.05), while the strength ratio of the internal and external rotators was not different between arms (p=0.87). The SB players demonstrated no significant strength differences between the throwing and non-throwing shoulders for the internal and external rotators or the strength ratio of the rotators (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the strength of the internal and external rotators of the non-throwing shoulder (p=0.075) or the throwing shoulder (p=0.096). The BB players throwing and non-throwing shoulders produced significantly more internal and external force than the SB players (p < 0.001), however, the internal/external rotators strength ratio were similar (p=0.32, p=0.30). The CKCUEST power had inverse and significant correlations (p=0.006, p=0.003) with SB players internal and external rotators, respectively. The CKCUEST power was significantly different between BB and SB players (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study presented shoulder rotator strength and CKCUEST reference values for DIII BB and SB players. BB players demonstrated more strength but overall, less symmetry compared to SB players. CKCUEST power may be considered for the evaluation of athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

SHOULDER RANGE OF MOTION CHARACTERISTICS IN DIVISION III COLLEGIATE SOFTBALL AND BASEBALL PLAYERS.

BACKGROUND: Adaptive changes may occur to the throwing shoulder of overhead athletes that can influence range-of-motion (ROM). Shoulder ROM characteristics of Division III softball (SB) and baseball (BB) players are unique. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: To report the passive ROM characteristics of Division III SB and BB players and identify similarities and differences between these two populations. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive, observational research on measurement. METHODS: Participants included healthy Division III BB (n = 50) and SB (n = 24) players. Passive shoulder internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) ROM were measured in the supine position with the arm in 90 ° of abduction and the scapula stabilized. Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions were used to describe ROM. Paired and independent t-tests were also used to compare throwing and non-throwing shoulder ROM for athletes of each sport and to compare the shoulder ROM of SB and BB players, respectively. RESULTS: The IR and ER ROM for BB players throwing shoulders (IR 54.1 ± 10.9 °; ER 94.1 ± 9.1 °) were significantly different (p < 0.001) from their non-throwing shoulders (IR 63.3 ± 11.1 °; ER 87.6 ± 9.2 °) while SB players were not (p = .06 & .08, respectively). Compared to the BB players, the throwing shoulder of SB players demonstrated statistically significantly higher IR ROM (p < .001, mean difference = 11.8 °, 95% CI: 6.4-17.2 °) as well as higher total range of motion (TRM) (p < .001, mean difference = 14.4 °, 95% CI: 8.6-20.2 °) when compared to BB players. Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) was significantly higher in BB players when compared to SB players (p = .042, 95% CI: .2-10.8 °). There were no significant differences in IR, ER, TRM, GIRD and ER gain between SB or BB pitchers and all other field positions (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: SB players have more ROM and bilateral symmetry when compared to BB players. TRMD occurred more often than GIRD in BB players, indicating that they did not adaptively gain the same amount of ER while losing IR. The throwing shoulder ROM characteristics of both SB and BB players in this study were not influenced by the player's position (pitcher vs. field player). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Improving Exercise Performance with an Accelerometer-Based Smartphone App: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Proper exercise form is critical for the safety and efficacy of therapeutic exercise. This research examines if a novel smartphone application, designed to monitor and provide real-time corrections during resistance training, can reduce performance errors and elicit a motor learning response. DESIGN: Forty-two participants aged 18 to 65 years were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. Both groups were tested for the number of movement errors made during a 10-repetition set completed at baseline, immediately after, and 1 to 2 weeks after a single training session of knee extensions. The treatment group trained with real-time, smartphone-generated feedback, whereas the control subjects did not. Group performance (number of errors) was compared across test sets using a 2-factor mixed-model analysis of variance. RESULTS: No differences were observed between groups for age, sex, or resistance training experience. There was a significant interaction between test set and group. The treatment group demonstrated fewer errors on posttests 1 and 2 compared with pretest (P < 0.05). There was no reduction in the number of errors on any posttest for control subjects. CONCLUSION: Smartphone apps, such as the one used in this study, may enhance patient supervision, safety, and exercise efficacy across rehabilitation settings. A single training session with the app promoted motor learning and improved exercise performance.

Measurement of distance walked and physiologic responses to a 6-minute walk test on level ground and on a treadmill: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is commonly used to test the functional capacity of individuals. However, in many practice settings, the long corridor needed to administer the test may not be available. Review of current literature revealed limited evidence regarding the use of a treadmill as an alternate method of performing a 6MWT. PURPOSE: This study compared the distance walked and the heart rate (HR) response during a 6MWT on level ground (LG) and on a treadmill. METHODS: A total of 35 healthy adults were in 1 of 3 age groups (45-54, 55-64, and 65-75 years old). Each participant performed level ground (LG) and Treadmill (TM) 6MWT on consecutive test days. Participants completed each test condition twice on the same day. Data from the second trial were used for the analysis. A mixed- model, multivariate analysis of variance was used with 2 factors: age group and test condition. Dependent variables included distance walked and HR response as a proportion of HR reserve. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the 3 age groups in the distance walked or the HR response during the 6MWT (P = .40, .17, .80) or between the test conditions (TM and LG) (P = .87 and .06). CONCLUSION: Among healthy adults from middle to old age, a TM 6MWT is an appropriate test of functional and aerobic capacity as determined by measurement of the distance walked and HR response.