Asthma control and concordance of opinions between patients and pulmonologists.

UNLABELLED: Patient-physician opinion concordance could play a key role in asthma control. There have been no studies evaluating this association in large samples of patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine opinion concordance between asthma patients and their pulmonologists on the impact of the disease and to correlate concordance to asthma control. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional multicentre study including 1160 patients and 300 pulmonologists. Patient-physician concordance rates were assessed by two semi-structured qualitative questionnaires: (1) impact of the disease and (2) treatment satisfaction. Subsequently, participating pulmonologists determined the concordance between their perceptions and their patient's. Sociodemographic and clinical data were recorded for all patients. RESULTS: In 53.6% of cases, asthma was controlled. The rate of patient-pulmonologist concordance on disease impact on patient daily life was 57%, with physicians underestimating the impact (compared to patients) in 26% of cases. Concordance on satisfaction with treatment was 56%, with physicians underestimating satisfaction in 26% of cases. Patient-physician discordance rates were significantly lower among patients with controlled asthma (29 and 32.1%) than those with poor control (73.7 and 73.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-pulmonologist concordance on perceptions of disease impact is low, particularly in uncontrolled asthma. This poor concordance should be addressed in education programmes, particularly for patients with uncontrolled symptoms.

Omalizumab therapy in severe asthma: experience from the Spanish registry--some new approaches.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of omalizumab in severe asthma has been widely demonstrated. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of omalizumab in a real-life setting in Spain, particularly in those patients with immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels out of range. METHODS: Totally 266 uncontrolled severe asthma patients receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) plus long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) were recruited. Main efficacy outcomes were asthma exacerbation rate (AER), asthma control test (ACT), and global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE). RESULTS: AER was reduced from 3.6 (3.6) in previous year to 0.67 (1.2) at 4 months (p < .05) and to 1.04 (1.8) at 2 years (p < .05). ACT increased significantly from 14.3 (4.7) at baseline to 18.4 (4.4) at 4 months (p < .05) and to 20.3 (4.0) (p < .05) at 2 years. After 4 months, 74.6% of patients had reached a good or excellent rate on the GETE scale (p < .05). This rate continued increasing up to 81.6% at 2 years. These efficacy results were similar for patients with "off-label" IgE > 700 IU/ml. At follow-up, maintenance treatment with oral steroids was discontinued in a considerable number of patients: from 89 to 19 (p < .05). Omalizumab was discontinued because of lack of efficacy only in 28/266 (10.5%) patients. Overall, 30 patients (11.4%) reported adverse events. Severe adverse events were not observed. CONCLUSION: This real-life study confirms that omalizumab is very efficacious and very well tolerated in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. Results did not vary in the subgroup of patients with IgE levels >700 IU/ml.

What pulmonologists think about the asthma-COPD overlap syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with COPD may share characteristics of asthma; this is the so-called asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS). There are no universally accepted criteria for ACOS, and most treatments for asthma and COPD have not been adequately tested in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a survey among pulmonology specialists in asthma and COPD aimed at collecting their opinions about ACOS and their attitudes in regard to some case scenarios of ACOS patients. The participants answered a structured questionnaire and attended a face-to-face meeting with the Metaplan methodology to discuss different aspects of ACOS. RESULTS: A total of 26 pulmonologists with a mean age of 49.7 years participated in the survey (13 specialists in asthma and 13 in COPD). Among these, 84.6% recognized the existence of ACOS and stated that a mean of 12.6% of their patients might have this syndrome. In addition, 80.8% agreed that the diagnostic criteria for ACOS are not yet well defined. The most frequently mentioned characteristics of ACOS were a history of asthma (88.5%), significant smoking exposure (73.1%), and postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity <0.7 (69.2%). The most accepted diagnostic criteria were eosinophilia in sputum (80.8%), a very positive bronchodilator test (69.2%), and a history of asthma before 40 years of age (65.4%). Up to 96.2% agreed that first-line treatment for ACOS was the combination of a long-acting ß2-agonist and inhaled steroid, with a long-acting antimuscarinic agent (triple therapy) for severe ACOS. CONCLUSION: Most Spanish specialists in asthma and COPD agree that ACOS exists, but the diagnostic criteria are not yet well defined. A previous history of asthma, smoking, and not fully reversible airflow limitation are considered the main characteristics of ACOS, with the most accepted first-line treatment being long-acting ß2-agonist/inhaled corticosteroids.