Donor Heart Preservation with Hydrogen Sulfide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Preclinical studies have shown that postconditioning with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) exerts cardioprotective effects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). The aim of this study was to appraise the current evidence of the cardioprotective effects of H2S against IRI in order to explore the future implementation of H2S in clinical cardiac transplantation. The current literature on H2S postconditioning in the setting of global myocardial ischemia was systematically reviewed and analyzed, performing meta-analyses. A literature search of the electronic databases Medline, Embase and Cinahl identified 1835 studies that were subjected to our pre-defined inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies were considered eligible for inclusion. Postconditioning with H2S showed significant robust effects with regard to limiting infarct size (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -4.12, 95% CI [-5.53--2.71], p < 0.00001). Furthermore, H2S postconditioning consistently resulted in a significantly lower release of cardiac injury markers, lower levels of oxidative stress and improved cardiac function. Postconditioning with slow-releasing H2S donors offers a valuable opportunity for novel therapies within cardiac preservation for transplantation. Before clinical implication, studies evaluating the long-term effects of H2S treatment and effects of H2S treatment in large animal studies are warranted.

Ex-situ oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion in donation after circulatory death heart transplantation following either direct procurement or in-situ normothermic regional perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation in donation after circulatory death (DCD) relies on warm perfusion using either in situ normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) or ex situ normothermic machine perfusion. In this study, we explore an alternative: oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) using a novel clinically applicable perfusion system, which is compared to NRP with static cold storage (SCS). METHODS: In a porcine model, a DCD setting was simulated, followed by either (1) NRP and SCS (2) NRP and HMP with the XVIVO Heart preservation system or (3) direct procurement (DPP) and HMP. After preservation, heart transplantation (HTX) was performed. After weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), biventricular function was assessed by admittance and Swan-Ganz catheters. RESULTS: Only transplanted hearts in the HMP groups showed significantly increased biventricular contractility (end-systole elastance) 2 hour post-CPB (left ventricle absolute change: NRP HMP: +1.8 ± 0.56, p = 0.047, DPP HMP: +1.5 ± 0.43, p = 0.045 and NRP SCS: +0.97 ± 0.47 mmHg/ml, p = 0.21; right ventricle absolute change: NRP HMP: +0.50 ± 0.12, p = 0.025, DPP HMP: +0.82 ± 0.23, p = 0.039 and NRP SCS: +0.28 ± 0.26, p = 0.52) while receiving significantly less dobutamine to maintain a cardiac output >4l/min compared to SCS. Diastolic function was preserved in all groups. Post-HTX, both HMP groups showed significantly less increments in plasma troponin T compared to SCS. CONCLUSION: In DCD HTX, increased biventricular contractility post-HTX was only observed in hearts preserved with HMP. In addition, the need for inotropic support and signs of myocardial damage were lower in the HMP groups. DCD HTX can be successfully performed using DPP followed by preservation with HMP in a preclinical setting.

Ex Situ Perfusion of Hearts Donated After Euthanasia: A Promising Contribution to Heart Transplantation.

Organ donation after euthanasia is performed in an increasing number of countries. In this donation after circulatory death procedure, it has not been possible to donate the heart. Recent literature, however, reports positive results of heart donation after circulatory death. Therefore, patients who donate organs following euthanasia might be suitable candidates for heart donation. We want to confirm this assumption by sharing the results of 2 cases of heart donation following euthanasia with ex situ subnormothermic heart preservation. Our aim is to raise awareness of the potential of heart donation following euthanasia for both clinical transplantation and research. METHODS: The data of 2 consecutive heart donations following euthanasia were collected prospectively. Informed consent was obtained from the patients themselves for heart donation for research purposes. An acellular oxygenated subnormothermic machine perfusion strategy was used to preserve both donor hearts. Subsequently, the hearts were evaluated on a normothermic perfusion machine using a balloon in the left ventricle. RESULTS: Heart donation following euthanasia was feasible without significant changes in existing retrieval protocols. Duration of machine perfusion preservation was 408 and 432 minutes, for heart 1 and 2, respectively. For heart 1, developed pressure (Pdev) was 119 mm Hg, maximal rate of pressure rise (dP/dtmax), and fall (dP/dtmin) were 1524 mm Hg/s and -1057 mm Hg/s, respectively. For heart 2, Pdev was 142 mm Hg, dP/dtmax was 1098 mm Hg/s, and dP/dtmin was -802 mm Hg/s. CONCLUSIONS: Hearts donated following euthanasia are highly valuable for research purposes and can have sufficient quality to be transplanted. With the implementation of ex situ heart perfusion, patients who are to donate their organs following euthanasia should also be able to donate their hearts. The complex combination of euthanasia and heart donation is ethically sound and surgically feasible and can contribute to shortening the heart transplant waiting list.