Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 147(6): 570-580, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37020420

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder. Despite several treatment options, a subgroup of patients will not respond to the commonly used antidepressant treatments and thus express treatment resistance (TRD). TRD can be quantified with the Dutch Measure for Treatment Resistance in Depression (DM-TRD). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for MDD, also in TRD. Yet, the position of ECT as "treatment-of-last-resort" may decrease the likelihood of beneficial outcome. Our aim was to investigate the association between treatment resistance and outcome and course of ECT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter cohort study with 440 patients of which data was retrieved from patient records as collected in the Dutch ECT Cohort database. Linear and logistic regression models were used to explore the association between level of treatment resistance and outcome of ECT. Median split was used to explore the differences between high and low level of TRD and course of treatment. RESULTS: A higher DM-TRD score was associated with significantly smaller reduction of depression symptoms (R2 = 0.160; ß = -2.968; p < 0.001) and lower chance of response (OR = 0.821 [95 CI: 0.760-0.888]; ß = -0.197; p < 0.001). Low level TRD patients underwent fewer ECT sessions (mean 13 ± 6 SD vs. 16 ± 7 SD; p < 0.001) and fewer switches from right unilateral tot bifrontotemporal electrode placement (29% vs. 40%; p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Reserving ECT as "treatment-of-last-resort" in the treatment algorithm for MDD seems questionable, because in our study lower level of treatment resistance predicted more beneficial ECT-outcome. Moreover, providing ECT in less treatment resistant patients showed fewer needed ECT-sessions and less switches to BL electrode placement, which may decrease the risk for cognitive side-effects.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento , Terapia Electroconvulsiva , Humanos , Terapia Electroconvulsiva/efectos adversos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 65(6): 347-353, 2023.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37434573

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Persistent symptoms after COVID-19 are a global problem, and it is becoming increasingly clear that they include neuropsychiatric symptoms. AIM: To provide an overview of current knowledge on clinical presentation, risk factors, prevention and treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms and disorders after COVID-19. METHOD: PRISMA literature search. RESULTS: Anxiety, depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms are common after COVID-19. Cognitive symptoms are also very common and appear to be persistent, while data on risk factors to develop these symptoms is scarce. Women and patients after ICU admission, delirium or with somatic comorbidities have a higher risk of developing post COVID psychiatric symptoms. Vaccination may have a protective effect. Furthermore, there is a lack of evidence on effective treatment strategies for COVID-19-related neurocognitive symptoms. CONCLUSION: More research on risk factors, identification and especially effective treatment options for neuropsychiatric symptoms after COVID-19 is needed. In the meantime, guidelines on disorders with a similar clinical presentation could potentially play a role in the diagnosis and treatment of persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms after COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/complicaciones , Ansiedad , Trastornos de Ansiedad , Hospitalización
3.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 64(9): 558-565, 2022.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36349850

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric disorders are associated with a more severe course of COVID-19. COVID-19 can also lead to psychiatric symptoms. AIM: To gain insight into vulnerabilities and protective factors for the course of COVID-19 in a Dutch (neuro)psychiatric population. METHOD: Patients were divided into three groups: patients with pre-existent mental disorders without and with new (neuro)psychiatric symptoms (NPS) during COVID-19 and patients without pre-existent mental disorders who developed de novo NPS during COVID-19. We summarize the characteristics of each group and compare the subgroups with inferential statistics. RESULTS: 186 patients were included in the case register. Patients with NPS showed a more severe course of COVID-19. Mortality in patients with NPS was higher in patients with pre-existent mental disorders compared to patients without pre-existent mental disorders. The most frequently reported de novo psychiatric symptoms during COVID-19 were delirium (46-70%), anxiety (53-54%) and insomnia (18-42%). CONCLUSION: NPS might be an expression of a more severe COVID-19 episode. In patients who developed NPS during COVID-19 we found evidence for a higher mortality risk in patients with pre-existent mental disorders. Extra vigilance for neuropsychiatric symptoms during COVID-19 is warranted.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos Mentales , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad
4.
Eur J Neurol ; 28(2): 647-659, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32978841

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rhabdomyolysis is a medical emergency characterized by acute skeletal muscle breakdown with a sudden rise and subsequent fall of serum creatine kinase (CK) levels. Rhabdomyolysis events are provoked by exposure to external triggers, possibly in combination with an increased genetic susceptibility. We aimed to describe comprehensively the external triggers and potentially pathogenic genetic variants possibly implicated in increased rhabdomyolysis susceptibility. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center study, including a total of 1302 patients with an acute CK level exceeding 2000 IU/l. RESULTS: Anoxia was the most frequently reported trigger (40%). A subset of 193 patients were clinically suspected of an underlying genetic disorder (recurrent episodes, a positive family history, very high or persistently increased CK levels). In 72 of these patients, an unequivocal genetic defect was identified. A total of 22 genes with pathogenic variants were identified, including 52 different variants. Of those, 11 genes have been previously associated with rhabdomyolysis (ACADVL, ANO5, CPT2, DMD, DYSF, FKRP, HADHA, PGM1, LPIN1, PYGM, RYR1). Eleven genes are probably implicated in increased susceptibility (including AGL, CAPN3, CNBP, DMPK, MAGT1, ACADM, SCN4A, SGCA, SGCG, SMPD1, TANGO2). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the spectrum of genetic susceptibility for rhabdomyolysis has not yet been completely clarified. With the increasing availability of next-generation sequencing in a diagnostic setting, we expect that in more cases a genetic defect will be identified.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculares , Rabdomiólisis , Anoctaminas , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Músculo Esquelético , Canal de Sodio Activado por Voltaje NAV1.4 , Pentosiltransferasa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rabdomiólisis/genética
5.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 63(7): 514-521, 2021.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34523701

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the end of 2019, COVID-19 and its consequences are present everywhere. Dutch professionals are concerned about the mental consequences, and in particular that during and after hospitalization little attention is paid to psychological problems. AIM: To monitor the short-term course and severity of (neuro)psychiatric symptoms after hospitalization for COVID-19. To make a recommendation regarding whether or not to follow-up these patients psychiatrically to optimize care. METHOD: In an observational cohort-study screening questions and additional questionnaires were used during two follow-up contacts to monitor cognition (MoCA), affective symptoms (HADS and IES) and overall functioning. RESULTS: More than half of the 29 included patients showed (neuro)psychiatric problems at both follow-up moments. Two weeks after discharge, we mainly saw symptoms related to anxiety and depression. Except for complaints related to the traumatic experience of the COVID-19, these seemed to have a favorable natural course. A negative time effect was seen for complaints consistent with post-traumatic stress disorder. Two months after discharge limitations in cognition and overall functioning appeared to be the main complaints after COVID-19. CONCLUSION: (Neuro)psychiatric symptoms after a COVID-19 are common. The natural course for affective complaints is more favorable than for cognitive functions. Specialist follow-up of patients with post-COVID psychological problems is recommended.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Ansiedad , Depresión , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA