Validation of the Seizure-Related Impact Assessment Scale (SERIAS): a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to validate the Seizure-Related Impact Assessment Scale (SERIAS). This novel patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) compares the 'trade-off' between seizures and treatment-related adverse effects, and measures epilepsy disability qualitatively and quantitively. It fills an important gap in PROMs for epilepsy clinical trials and practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adults with epileptologist-confirmed epilepsy from two Australian Epilepsy Centres are being recruited. People with functional seizures, or who are unable to self-complete English-language validated instruments are excluded. Participants providing informed consent are invited to complete questionnaires at baseline, 3 and 6 months later. SERIAS includes five questions that ask about the number of days per month that seizures or treatment-related adverse effects partially or fully impact work/home/school and family/social/non-work activities, as well as a visual analogue scale regarding epilepsy-related disability. SERIAS is completed alongside seven internationally validated instruments measuring treatment-related adverse effects, mood disorders and quality of life. Target recruitment is n=100, ensuring>50 people complete all questionnaires at all timepoints. Comprehensive psychometric analysis will be performed. Convergent validity will be investigated using bivariate correlations with relevant measures. Reliability will be investigated using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega and test-retest correlation coefficients. SERIAS will be a novel PROM for epilepsy clinical trials and practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Multisite ethics approval was granted by the Alfred Health Ethics Committee (HREC 17/23). Results of this study will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12623000599673.

Posttraumatic craniofacial reconstruction using combined resorbable and nonresorbable fixation systems.

The facial skeleton consists of high-stress-bearing buttresses and low-stress-bearing curved surfaces. The buttresses are like trusses made of beams, struts, and columns. They resist tensile, compressive, and shear loading. The thin, curved, planar surfaces provide for the support and partitioning of the soft tissue. The trusses are strong and one-dimensional whereas the planes are weak and two-dimensional. Ideally, strong one-dimensional fixation systems should be used for the former; weaker, two-dimensional systems should be used for the latter. The authors report their clinical experience of using such combined approaches to the treatment of facial fractures using rigid, titanium mini-plates and screws for the buttresses and polymeric resorbable meshes for the curved planes. For an 11-month period (August 2000 to June 2001), nine patients (7 males and 2 females) with a mean age of 33.7 years were treated in this fashion. The resorbable meshes were deployed for the reconstitution of the orbital walls and the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. No enophthalmos, globe dystopia, or diplopia occurred during the short mean follow-up of 10 months (4-17 months). There were no infections or sterile abscess formations. This type of combined use of fixation systems appears to be safe and effective. More patients and more extensive follow-ups are obviously needed.