Efficacy of a synbiotic in the management of adults with Attention-Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder and/or Borderline Personality Disorder and high levels of irritability: Results from a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, "basket" trial.

Irritability worsens prognosis and increases mortality in individuals with Attention-Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and/or Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). However, treatment options are still insufficient. The aim of this randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate the superiority of a synbiotic over placebo in the management of adults with ADHD and/or BPD and high levels of irritability. The study was conducted between February 2019 and October 2020 at three European clinical centers located in Hungary, Spain and Germany. Included were patients aged 18-65 years old diagnosed with ADHD and/or BPD and high levels of irritability (i.e., an Affectivity Reactivity Index (ARI-S) ≥ 5, plus a Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) score ≥ 4). Subjects were randomized 1(synbiotic):1(placebo); the agent was administered each day, for 10 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome measure was end-of-treatment response (i.e., a reduction ≥ 30 % in the ARI-S total score compared to baseline, plus a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) total score of < 3 (very much, or much improved) at week 10). Between-treatment differences in secondary outcomes, as well as safety were also investigated. Of the 231 included participants, 180 (90:90) were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat-analyses. Of these, 117 (65 %) were females, the mean age was 38 years, ADHD was diagnosed in 113 (63 %), BPD in 44 (24 %), both in 23 (13 %). The synbiotic was well tolerated. At week 10, patients allocated to the synbiotic experienced a significantly higher response rate compared to those allocated to placebo (OR: 0.2, 95 % CI:0.1 to 0.7; P = 0.01). These findings suggest that that (add-on) treatment with a synbiotic may be associated with a clinically meaningful improvement in irritability in, at least, a subgroup of adults with ADHD and/or BPD. A superiority of the synbiotic over placebo in the management of emotional dysregulation (-3.6, 95 % CI:-6.8 to -0.3; P = 0.03), emotional symptoms (-0.6, 95 % CI:-1.2 to -0.05; P = 0.03), inattention (-1.8, 95 % CI: -3.2 to -0.4; P = 0.01), functioning (-2.7, 95 % CI: -5.2 to -0.2; P = 0.03) and perceived stress levels (-0.6, 95 % CI: -1.2 to -0.05; P = 0.03) was also suggested. Higher baseline RANK-L protein levels were associated with a significantly lower response rate, but only in the synbiotic group (OR: 0.1, 95 % CI: -4.3 to - 0.3, P = 0.02). In the placebo group, higher IL-17A levels at baseline were significantly associated with a higher improvement in in particular, emotional dysregulation (P = 0.04), opening a door for new (targeted) drug intervention. However, larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03495375.

ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS): Validation in Spanish in adult population according to the DSM-5.

INTRODUCTION: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common childhood neurodevelopmental disorder, with an estimated prevalence in adulthood of 2.5-3.4%. The Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) is an 18-item self-administered scale that assesses attention deficit and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms of ADHD in adults. This study aims to validate the ADHD-RS in Spanish according to the diagnostic criteria established by the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 441 adult patients (mean age 33.34±11.37 years) was included, 396 subjects were diagnosed with ADHD (mean age 33.17±11.18 years), and 45 were controls (mean age 35.40±12.33 years). The clinical diagnosis of ADHD was established according to the DSM-5 criteria. The ADHD-RS was subsequently administered to all participants. A logistic regression study evaluated the model in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure was performed to assess the adequacy of the data set, and to determine whether factor analysis was applicable, Bartlett's sphericity test was performed. Principal component analysis was used, using the Varimax orthogonal rotation method, which minimizes the number of variables with high loads on each factor, obtaining two factors and thus, simplifying their interpretation. RESULTS: The cut-off point that best discriminates the combined presentation of ADHD was 24 points, with a sensitivity of 94.78%, a specificity of 84.79%, a PPV (positive predictive value) of 93.74%, and an NPV (negative predictive value) of 78.33, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, and a kappa coefficient of 0.86. Regarding inattentive ADHD, the cut-off point that best discriminates was 21 points, with a sensitivity of 92.56%, a specificity of 76.26%, a PPV of 92.01%, an NPV of 78.33%, an AUC of 0.90, and a kappa coefficient of 0.87. Different cut-off values in the two subgroups suggests that a differentiated cut-off point for the inattentive and combined presentations may be an adequate assessment strategy for ADHD in adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the ADHD-RS is a valid instrument to evaluate ADHD in adults according to the diagnostic criteria established by the DSM-5. Differentiated cut-off points for the inattentive and combined presentations discriminate more accurately than a single cut-off point.

Inflammatory biotype of ADHD is linked to chronic stress: a data-driven analysis of the inflammatory proteome.

The association between Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and low-grade inflammation has been explored in children but rarely in adults. Inflammation is characteristic of some, but not all, patients with ADHD and might be influenced by ADHD medication but also lifestyle factors including nutrition, smoking, and stress. It is also still unclear if any specific symptoms are related to inflammation. Therefore, we assessed 96 inflammatory proteins in a deeply phenotyped cohort of 126 adult ADHD participants with a stable medication status using OLINK technology. A data-based, unsupervised hierarchical clustering method could identify two distinct biotypes within the 126 ADHD participants based on their inflammatory profile: a higher inflammatory potential (HIP) and a lower inflammatory protein potential (LIP) group. Biological processes that differed strongest between groups were related to the NF-κB pathway, chemokine signaling, IL-17 signaling, metabolic alterations, and chemokine attraction. A comparison of sample characteristics revealed that the HIP group was more likely to have higher levels of chronic stress (p < 0.001), a higher clinical global impression scale score (p = 0.030), and a higher risk for suicide (p = 0.032). Medication status did not influence protein levels significantly (p ≥ 0.074), but psychotropic co-medication (p ≤ 0.009) did. In conclusion, our data suggest the presence of two distinct biotypes in adults with ADHD. Higher levels of inflammatory proteins in ADHD are linked to higher levels of chronic perceived stress in a linear fashion. Further research on inflammation in adults with ADHD should take stress levels into account.

Factores asociados a la incapacidad laboral temporal en peritajes psiquiátricos / Risk factors for temporary work disability

Introducción. La relación entre dificultades laborales y trastornos psiquiátricos es estrecha y bidireccional. Sin embargo, los datos disponibles sobre patología psiquiátrica en los procesos de incapacidad laboral temporal (ILT) en España no son concluyentes. Por dicho motivo, los objetivos del presente trabajo son describir el porcentaje de decisión de revocar una ILT, tras un peritaje psiquiátrico de trabajadores de Cataluña, y comparar las características sociodemográficas, clínicas y terapéuticas en función de la decisión de revocar la ILT. Metodología. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo en pacientes en situación de ILT por trastorno mental peritados durante un año, que acudían a valoración psiquiátrica tras un período acumulado de ILT (media de 5 meses). Los peritos psiquiatras debían valorar la capacidad laboral en función de la interferencia de los síntomas psiquiátricos del diagnóstico psiquiátrico principal que motivó el inicio de la baja laboral. Resultados. Se incluyeron 380 pacientes (66,8% mujeres, 42±10,9 años). El 87,9% recibió el alta laboral. No existieron factores sociodemográficos y terapéuticos asociados a la continuidad de ILT. El diagnóstico mayoritario de los pacientes que recibían el alta laboral fue el trastorno adaptativo (66,2% vs 13%, p=0,001) y el de los pacientes con continuidad de ILT el trastorno depresivo mayor (45,7% vs 3,9%, p=0,001). Conclusiones. Existe un elevado porcentaje de pacientes que reciben el alta laboral tras un peritaje psiquiátrico. El trastorno depresivo mayor es el diagnóstico que más se asocia con la continuidad de ILT

Introduction. The relationship among labor difficulties and psychiatric disorders is important and bidirectional. However, current information about the influence of psychiatric disorders in temporary work disability in Spain is inconclusive. For this reason, we aimed to describe the prevalence of the conclusions of psychiatric expert’s reports including maintain o revoke the temporary disability (TD). We also aimed to compare sociodemographic, clinical and therapeutic variables according with the decision of maintain or revoke this condition. Methodology. A descriptive study was conducted in psychiatric patients that were examined by psychiatric experts during one year. At the examination time, the patients had a sick leave mean of 5 months. The psychiatric experts assessed their ability to work according to the interference of the psychiatric symptoms. Results. A total of 380 patients were included (66.8% women, 42±10.9 years), 87.9% had a result of revoke the temporary work disability. No sociodemographic or therapeutic factors were associated with the continuity of sick leave. The most common diagnosis of patients who obtained a revoked temporary work disability was adjustment disorder (66.2% vs 13%, p=0.001) and patients who maintained the temporary work disability was major depressive disorder (45.7% vs 3.9%, p=0.001). Conclusions. After a psychiatric expert’s examination the most of the results suggest to revoke the temporary work disability. Major depressive disorder is the most commonly diagnostic associated to continue sick leave