A practical guide to real-world implementation of pre-emptive therapy for Cytomegalovirus disease prevention in high-risk seronegative liver transplant recipients with seropositive donors.

The Comparison of Antiviral Preventative Strategies In Liver Transplant (CAPSIL) study showed pre-emptive therapy (PET) to be superior to antiviral prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease prevention in high-risk CMV seronegative liver transplant recipients (LTRs) with seropositive donors (D+R-). Despite the statistical superiority of PET over prophylaxis in research settings, PET is perceived as a logistically more complex strategy that requires careful coordination of weekly CMV PCR testing, prompt initiation of CMV antivirals upon viremia detection, and timely cessation of antivirals following viremia resolution. Transplant centers may be hesitant to use PET for CMV disease prevention in D+R- LTRs out of concern that PET coordination is not feasible in clinical practice. We recently described our experience using PET in CMV D+R- LTRs in a real-world setting, and found it to be as effective for CMV disease prevention as PET performed as part of a clinical trial. Here, we describe a systematic approach for PET implementation in real-world settings and provide practical tools to address anticipated challenges. This framework can support transplant programs in overcoming logistical barriers to PET and incorporating an evidence-based and cost-effective CMV prevention strategy into routine care for high-risk CMV D+R- LTRs.

Evaluation of the Tasso+ blood self-collection device for quantitation of plasma cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia in adult solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr).

Quantitative monitoring of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia in venous blood is standard in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) but is limited by the need for phlebotomy facilities and personnel. The aim of the study was to evaluate the Tasso+ capillary blood (CB) self-collection device for quantitation of plasma CMV DNAemia. Thirty adult SOTr with suspected CMV DNAemia were enrolled to have a supervised Tasso+ CB sample collection within 24 h of a venous sample. CMV DNA was quantitated in paired samples by using the Abbott M2000 Real-Time qPCR instrument. The participants were provided with a study-specific survey that measured patient acceptability of the Tasso+ device compared with venipuncture. A Tasso + CB sample was successfully collected in 28/30 (93%) patients, and 44 paired samples were analyzed. Concordance for detection of CMV DNAemia above the limit of detection (LOD) was 91% (42/44), and the Tasso + CB sample was estimated to be 95% sensitive at a viral load (VL) of 308 IU/mL. Among samples with a quantifiable DNAemia result with both methods (N = 31), there was excellent correlation between methods (Spearman R2 = 0.99). The difference in CMV VL between venous and Tasso+ CB samples was not dependent on time (P > 0.1). Of 12 who completed the survey, 11 (92%) expressed a preference for Tasso+ CB collection over venipuncture. Collection of CB with the Tasso+ device is feasible, patient-acceptable, and yields generally comparable CMV DNAemia load to standard venous samples, but with lower sensitivity. Future studies to optimize and evaluate this methodology for patient self-collected samples are warranted. IMPORTANCE: We evaluate an FDA-cleared blood self-collection device (Tasso+) and demonstrate that it is patient-acceptable and yields a liquid blood sample with quantitative CMV DNAemia results comparable to those of standard venipuncture samples. This opens up possibilities for self-blood collection to monitor for CMV and potentially other viruses in transplant and other at-risk populations.