Same day discharge following non-elective PCI for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Timing of discharge after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a crucial aspect of procedural safety and patient turnover. We examined predictors and outcomes of same-day discharge (SDD) after non-elective PCI for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) in comparison with next-day discharge (NDD). METHODS: Baseline demographic, clinical, and procedural data were collected as were in-hospital outcomes and post-PCI length of stay (LOS) for all patients undergoing non-elective PCI for NSTE-ACS between 2011 and 2014 at a central tertiary care center. Thirty day and 1-year mortality and bleeding as well as 30-day readmission rates were determined from social security record and medical chart review. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of SDD, and propensity-matched analysis was done to examine the differences in outcomes between NDD and SDD. RESULTS: Out of 2,529 patients who underwent non-elective PCI for NSTE-ACS from 2011 to 2014, 1,385 met the inclusion criteria (mean age = 63 years; 26% women) and were discharged either the same day of (N = 300) or the day after (N = 1,085) PCI. Thirty-day and one-year mortality and major bleeding rates were similar between the 2 groups. Logistic regression identified male sex, radial access, negative troponin biomarker status, and procedure start time as predictors of SDD. In propensity-matched analyses, there was no difference in 30-day mortality and readmission between SDD and NDD groups. CONCLUSIONS: SDD after non-elective PCI for NSTE-ACS may be a reasonable alternative to NDD for selected low-risk patients with comparable mortality, bleeding, and readmission rates.

Outcomes of multivessel vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Evidence from an updated meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This updated meta-analysis evaluated outcomes with multi-vessel (MV-PCI) vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (CL-PCI), in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS). BACKGROUND: There is considerable debate regarding the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with AMI and CS, particularly regarding management of non-culprit lesions. METHODS: Databases were searched for studies comparing MV-PCI and CL-PCI in patients with AMI and CS. The primary outcome of interest was short-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included long-term mortality, repeat revascularization and myocardial reinfarction. Safety outcomes were stroke, acute renal failure and major bleeding. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis consisting of 14 studies (13 observational, 1 RCT) involving 8,552 patients showed that in comparison to CL-PCI, MV-PCI was associated with similar short-term mortality (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.9-1.43), as well as similar long-term mortality (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.68-1.28). There was no significant difference in the risk of myocardial reinfarction (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.76-1.86), or repeat revascularization (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.41-1.55) between the two groups. Compared to CL-PCI, MV-PCI was associated with a similar risk of bleeding (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.91-1.40) and stroke (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.84-1.96), but a higher risk of developing renal failure (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.05-1.65). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that there is a higher risk of renal failure with no additional benefit in efficacy outcomes with MV-PCI, compared to CL-PCI in patients with AMI and CS.

Angled Microcatheter Assisted Antegrade Dissection Re-Entry Technique for Tortuous Totally Occluded Coronary Arteries.

BACKGROUND: Subacute total occlusion in the setting of a tortuous vessel can be a therapeutic challenge. we demonstrate a safe and successful approach to deploy drug eluting stent of this complex lesion by using angled microcatheter. CASE PRESENTATION: A 61-year-old male with multiple atherosclerotic risk factors diagnosed with NSTEMI secondary to subacute total occlusion of the mid right coronary artery (RCA) with collaterals filling from septal perforators arising from mid left anterior descending artery. Due to severe tortuosity of RCA, the wire inside of Corsair microcatheter kept directing away from the lumen. Therefore, Corsair was exchanged for 90-degree SuperCross™ angled microcatheter that was rotated to direct its opening towards the lumen. A Confianza pro 12 wire was used to puncture into the lumen from the subinitimal position. SuperCross™ microcatheter was advanced over the wire into the lumen and eventually drug eluting stents were deployed successfully. CONCLUSION: While facing subacute total occlusion with proximal end in a tortuous artery, SuperCross™ microcatheter assisted dissection reentry could be attempted after failure of antegrade wire escalation technique. LEARNING OBJECTIVE: Facilitate the use of SuperCross™ microcatheter assisted dissection reentry as a successful approach for subacute total occlusion in tortuous vessels.

Recent Trends in Oral Anticoagulant Use and Post-Discharge Complications Among Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).The CHA2DS2VAScand CHADS2risk scoresare used to identifypatients with AF at risk for strokeand to guide oral anticoagulants (OAC) use, including patients with AMI. However, the epidemiology of AF, further stratifiedaccording to patients' risk of stroke, has not been wellcharacterized among those hospitalized for AMI. METHODS: We examined trends in the frequency of AF, rates of discharge OAC use, and post-discharge outcomes among 6,627 residents of the Worcester, Massachusetts area who survived hospitalization for AMI at 11 medical centers between 1997 and 2011. RESULTS: A total of 1,050AMI patients had AF (16%) andthe majority (91%)had a CHA2DS2VAScscore >2.AF rates were highest among patients in the highest stroke risk group.In comparison to patients without AF, patients with AMI and AF in the highest stroke risk category had higher rates of post-discharge complications, including higher 30-day re-hospitalization [27 % vs. 17 %], 30-day post-discharge death [10 % vs. 5%], and 1-year post-discharge death [46 % vs. 18 %] (p < 0.001 for all). Notably, fewerthan half of guideline-eligible AF patientsreceived an OACprescription at discharge. Usage rates for other evidence-based therapiessuch as statins and beta-blockers,lagged in comparison to AMI patients free from AF. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the need to enhance efforts towards stroke prevention among AMI survivors with AF.

Renal artery stenosis: when to intervene?

Indications and timing of revascularization for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis are topics of considerable controversy. Labile hypertension, progressive renal failure, and flash pulmonary edema may be strong indications for revascularization, yet revascularization may carry significant morbidity and mortality risks. Medical therapy alone, however, may also risk deterioration of renal function with worsening morbidity and mortality. We report a case of renal artery stenosis illustrating some of the complexities of decision-making, the limitations of angiography, and the importance of physiologic testing.

Operator and institutional experience reduces room-to-balloon times for transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Transradial (TR) access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is becoming accepted as the preferred approach but has not gained widespread adoption due to technical challenges that may limit procedural success and delay time to revascularization, particularly among patients treated by inexperienced operators. We report our experience over the first 2 years of our TR primary PCI program and determined the impact of TR access on clinical and procedural outcomes. METHODS: Clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes were collected prospectively from 488 patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and compared according to whether patients underwent primary PCI via the TR or transfemoral (TF) approach. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was very low in both groups (1.1% [TR] vs 2.6% [TF]; P=.23). Access-site intended procedural success for primary PCI was equivalent (98.4% for TR vs 98.6% for TF; P=.85). Catheterization room-to-balloon (RTB) times were significantly lower among patients undergoing TR primary PCI as compared with those in the TF group (20:33 ± 06:41 [TR] vs 25:11 ± 08:22 [TF]; P<.001). TR patients treated by operators who had performed >50 TR PCIs had lower RTB times (20:03 ± 06:12 vs 24:26 ± 10:01; P<.06) and lower doses of radiation exposure (1812 ± 1007 mGy vs 2827 ± 954 mGy; P<.01) than patients treated by less experienced operators. Dual-purpose guide catheter usage was also associated with lower RTB times (18:38 ± 5:42 vs 25:15 ± 8:20; P<.001) and radiation exposure (1824 ± 6205 mGy vs 2407 ± 1389 mGy; P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: TR primary PCI may be performed rapidly and successfully despite only modest operator and institutional experience.