Improved approach for evaluating saturated surface infiltration capacity of interlocking-block permeable pavements.

Different infiltration tests of permeable pavements provide different measurements of the infiltration capacity. These measurements often do not represent the fundamental flow properties, and hence cannot be directly compared. This presents an undesirable obstacle to the sharing of experience and to obtaining a better understanding of the infiltration performances of different permeable pavements. This problem is especially acute in the case of interlocking-block permeable pavements (IBPPs), owing to the presence of joints and the different sizes, shapes, and laying patterns of paving blocks. To overcome this problem, the present study proposed a new approach for evaluating the infiltration capacity of an IBPP while retaining the same measuring devices in use today. This approach makes use of a finite-volume computational fluid dynamic method to develop a simulation model for an infiltration test. Once calibrated to define the hydraulic parameters of the IBPP being tested, the model can be applied to calculate the saturated infiltration capacity of the IBPP under actual rainfall conditions. The model also permits the calculation of a conventional infiltration capacity measurement, such as the average infiltration rate in mm/h as measured by a particular infiltration test, or the time required to drain the tested water depth. Thus, the proposed approach provides a meaningful common basis for comparing the infiltration capacities of different permeable pavements, including porous asphalt, pervious concrete, and IBPPs.

Evaluation of surface infiltration performance of permeable pavements.

Many different test methods are used in practice to evaluate the surface infiltration performance of permeable pavements. This has led to inconsistency in reporting of test results. This study recognizes the differences in nature between a soil infiltration study and the surface infiltration evaluation of permeable pavements, and identifies the main issues associated with the current practice of surface infiltration testing. It proposes that hydraulic conductivity be adopted as the flow property for measurement and reporting instead of the commonly used infiltration rate. The advantages of measuring hydraulic conductivity are elaborated from both theoretical and practical implementation points of view. The theoretical merits of providing a consistent and integrated treatment of surface infiltration performance of a permeable pavement during the design, construction and maintenance phases are presented. The practical benefits are addressed from the following aspects: consistency between laboratory and field testing, uniformity in reporting of test measurements, rationality in construction quality control and acceptance checking, effectiveness in surface infiltration performance monitoring, and enhanced ability in implementing effective maintenance management. It is emphasized that the techniques and methods needed for measuring hydraulic conductivity of permeable pavement materials, for laboratory testing as well as on-site field testing, are already readily available and have been used by researchers and some practitioners for surface infiltration testing. Two falling-head test methods are recommended: one applies Darcy's law and determines hydraulic conductivity in the conventional way; another measures the time history of falling head and calculates hydraulic conductivity using a modified Darcy equation. It is also highlighted that the measurement of hydraulic conductivity offers a convenient platform for assessing the durability of a permeable pavement against clogging.

Analysis of vehicle skidding potential on horizontal curves.

High crash rates on horizontal curves during wet weather are a major road safety concern. Among the various causes of crashes on horizontal curves, wet-weather skidding is a major contributing factor. This study analyzed the mechanisms of three possible modes of vehicle skidding on horizontal curves based on theories of mechanics. The three modes of skidding analyzed were: (i) forward skidding of front steering wheel, (ii) sideway skidding of front steering wheel, and (iii) sideway skidding of rear wheel. The main objective was to provide useful information to researchers and practitioners in identifying the important factors that contribute to horizontal curve crashes. A computer simulation procedure was developed to evaluate the maximum safe vehicle speeds against the three modes of skidding on wet horizontal curved pavements. This offers a much improved method for skidding potential evaluation compared to the conventional approximate method using estimated coefficient of friction. The skidding potential of a vehicle is defined as the difference between its speed and the maximum safe speed against skidding. The smaller the difference, the higher is the skidding potential. The relative magnitudes of skidding potential for the three skidding modes were considered for different operating conditions. Different operating conditions were represented by different values of pavement curve radii, super-elevations, and wet-weather conditions represented by the thickness of pavement surface water-film. The analysis identified five key factors that affect the skidding potential of vehicles negotiating a horizontal curve. They are: vehicle speed, curve radius, superelevation, water film thickness and pavement skid resistance state.