Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg ; 264(5): 731-737, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27429039

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare nasojejunal early enteral nutrition (NJEEN) with total parenteral nutrition (TPN), after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), in terms of postoperative complications. BACKGROUND: Current nutritional guidelines recommend the use of enteral over parenteral nutrition in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. However, the NJEEN remains controversial in patients undergoing PD. METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was conducted between 2011 and 2014. Nine centers in France analyzed 204 patients undergoing PD to NJEEN (n = 103) or TPN (n = 101). Primary outcome was the rate of postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Successful NJEEN was defined as insertion of a nasojejunal feeding tube, delivering at least 50% of nutritional needs on PoD 5, and no TPN for more than consecutive 48 hours. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 77.5% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 68.1-85.1] patients in the NJEEN group versus 64.4% (95% CI 54.2-73.6) in TPN group (P = 0.040). NJEEN was associated with higher frequency of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (48.1% vs 27.7%, P = 0.012) and higher severity (grade B/C 29.4% vs 13.9%; P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the incidence of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, infectious complications, the grade of postoperative complications, and the length of postoperative stay. A successful NJEEN was achieved in 63% patients. In TPN group, average energy intake was significantly higher (P < 0.001) and patients had an earlier recovery of oral feeding (P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing PD, NJEEN was associated with an increased overall postoperative complications rate. The frequency and the severity of POPF were also significantly increased after NJEEN. In terms of safety and feasibility, NJEEN should not be recommended.


Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Nutrición Parenteral Total , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Transl Med ; 14: 10, 2016 Jan 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26791256

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major public concern. While conventional chemotherapeutic regimens have proved useful against advanced/metastatic diseases, progresses are to be made to effectively cure the large portion of patients not benefiting from these treatments. One direction to improve response rates is to develop chemosensitivity and resistance assays (CSRAs) efficiently assisting clinicians in treatment selection process, an already long preoccupation of oncologists and researchers. Several methods have been described to this day, none achieving yet sufficient reliability for recommended use in the clinical routine. METHODS: We led a pilot study on 19 metastatic CRC patients evaluating capacity of the Oncogramme, a standardized process using tumor ex vivo models, to provide chemosensitivity profiles and predict clinical outcome of patients receiving standard CRC chemotherapeutics. Oncogramme responses were categorized according to the method of percentiles to assess sensitivity, specificity and concordance. RESULTS: We report from a primary analysis a success rate of 97.4 %, a very good sensitivity (84.6 %), a below-average specificity (33.3 %), along with a global agreement of 63.6 % and a concordance between Oncogramme results and patients' responses (Kappa coefficient) of 0.193. A supplementary analysis, focusing on CRC patients with no treatment switch over a longer time course, demonstrated improvement in specificity and concordance. CONCLUSIONS: Results establish feasibility and usefulness of the Oncogramme, prelude to a larger-scale trial. Advantages and drawbacks of the procedure are discussed, as well as the place of CSRAs within the future arsenal of methods available to clinicians to individualize treatments and improve patient prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov database, registration number: NCT02305368.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Selección de Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Ann Surg ; 260(5): 764-70; discussion 770-1, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25379847

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) on anastomotic leakage (AL) and other postoperative outcomes after esophageal cancer (EC) resection. BACKGROUND: Conflicting data have emerged from randomized studies regarding the impact of NCRT on AL. METHODS: Among 2944 consecutive patients operated on for EC between 2000 and 2010 in 30 European centers, patients treated by NCRT after surgery (n=593) were compared with those treated by primary surgery (n=1487). Multivariable analyses and propensity score matching were used to compensate for the differences in some baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Patients in the NCRT group were younger, with a higher prevalence of male sex, malnutrition, advanced tumor stage, squamous cell carcinoma, and surgery after 2005 when compared with the primary surgery group. Postoperative AL rates were 8.8% versus 10.6% (P=0.220), and 90-day postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 9.3% versus 7.2% (P=0.110) and 33.4% versus 32.1% (P=0.564), respectively. Pulmonary complication rates did not differ between groups (24.6% vs 22.5%; P=0.291), whereas chylothorax (2.5% vs 1.2%; P=0.020), cardiovascular complications (8.6% vs 0.1%; P=0.037), and thromboembolic events (8.6% vs 6.0%; P=0.037) were higher in the NCRT group. After propensity score matching, AL rates were 8.8% versus 11.3% (P=0.228), with more chylothorax (2.5% vs 0.7%; P=0.030) and trend toward more cardiovascular and thromboembolic events in the NCRT group (P=0.069). Predictors of AL were high American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, supracarinal tumoral location, and cervical anastomosis, but not NCRT. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy does not have an impact on the AL rate after EC resection (NCT 01927016).


Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Oncogene ; 22(46): 7222-4, 2003 Oct 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14562051

RESUMEN

The lipid mediator platelet-activating factor (PAF) plays a role in cancer. We investigated its presence in human colon carcinoma by assessing the levels of tissue phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2), the key enzyme in the generation of the lyso-PAF precursor), lyso-PAF, PAF and acetylhydrolase activity (AHA, the key enzyme in PAF degradation) in colorectal cancer patients and by correlating them with Dukes' classification. The results highlighted that the tumour tissues of Dukes' A and B patients had significantly higher PLA(2), lyso-PAF, PAF and AHA levels as compared with nontumour tissues. Dukes' C patients had higher PLA(2), lyso-PAF and AHA levels but unchanged PAF. Dukes' D patients had higher AHA levels but unchanged PLA(2), lyso-PAF and PAF. A pathophysiological role for PAF is suggested in human colon carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Factor de Activación Plaquetaria/análogos & derivados , Factor de Activación Plaquetaria/metabolismo , 1-Alquil-2-acetilglicerofosfocolina Esterasa/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Fosfolipasas A/metabolismo
5.
Am J Surg ; 187(3): 440-5, 2004 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15006580

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after resection for gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients were enrolled if they underwent resection of gastric cancer but had lymph node or serosal involvement or both. Surgical resection was either total or partial gastrectomy according to the site of the tumor, and surgeons were allowed to perform either D1 or D2 gastrectomy. The subjects were random assigned in two treatment groups as follows: surgery alone as the control group, or surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Nine cycles of 5 days protocol every 4 weeks was proposed to the patients of the chemotherapy group. The protocol included a daily administration of 200 mg/m(2) of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (375 mg/m(2) during the first session increasing 25 mg by session until reaching 500 mg/m(2)) and CDDP 15 mg/m(2). Two hundred patients were required. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared according to the log-rank and the Mantel-Haenszel methods. RESULTS: In all, 205 patients were enrolled in the study; 104 had surgery alone and 101 had surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients' characteristics were similar except for the mean age, which was 4 years less in the control group. Because of toxicity, 54% of the patients stopped the protocol before the end of the nine courses, and 46% of the patients received the nine courses including 32% with a decreased dose and 14% with a full dose. The 5-year survival rate was 39% in the control group and 39% in the chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: This protocol of adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve the 5-year survival after resection for gastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Probabilidad , Medición de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol ; 26(11): 1044-6, 2002 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12483141

RESUMEN

The pancreas is an uncommon site of metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. The metastasis is generally diagnosed during the follow-up of patients who underwent nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. In our observation, duodenal bleeding led to the diagnosis of both pancreatic metastasis and renal carcinoma. The diagnosis of pancreatic metastasis should be suspected when a pancreatic mass is associated with past or synchronous renal carcinoma. The outcome after resection of pancreatic metastasis is better than after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surgical resection of pancreatic metastasis should be considered when possible.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Úlcera Duodenal/complicaciones , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Úlcera Duodenal/etiología , Embolización Terapéutica , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrectomía , Páncreas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Radiografía Abdominal , Arteria Renal , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
7.
Mediators Inflamm ; 13(1): 53-4, 2004 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15203567

RESUMEN

This clinical study reports that blood levels of the pro-inflammatory mediator platelet-activating factor (PAF) did not change in colorectal cancer patients. In contrast, plasma levels of two enzymatic activities, one implicated in PAF production (i.e. phospholipase A2) and one in PAF degradation (i.e. PAF acetylhydrolase activity) were significantly elevated.


Asunto(s)
1-Alquil-2-acetilglicerofosfocolina Esterasa/sangre , Neoplasias Colorrectales/sangre , Neoplasias Colorrectales/enzimología , Fosfolipasas A/sangre , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fosfolipasas A2 , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA