Sensitivity of plain pelvis radiography in children with blunt torso trauma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Plain anteroposterior pelvic radiographs are commonly used to screen children for pelvic fractures or dislocations after blunt torso trauma. The test sensitivity and utility, however, are unclear. We assessed the sensitivity of anteroposterior pelvic radiographs for identifying children with pelvic fractures or dislocations after blunt torso trauma. We hypothesized that anteroposterior pelvic radiographs fail to identify all children with pelvic fractures or dislocations, including patients undergoing operative intervention and those with hypotension. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter observational study of children (<18 years) with blunt torso trauma in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. We compared plain anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to the final diagnosis of pelvic fractures or dislocations as documented by the orthopedic faculty physician before emergency department (ED)/hospital discharge. We described the data with descriptive statistics, including 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of 12,044 patients enrolled in the parent study, 451 (3.7%; 95% CI 3.4% to 4.1%) had pelvic fractures or dislocations. Of these patients, 65 (14%; 95% CI 11% to 18%) underwent operative intervention and 21 (4.7%; 95% CI 2.9% to 7.0%) had age-adjusted hypotension on initial presentation. In the ED, 382 of the 451 patients underwent plain anteroposterior pelvic radiographs, with a sensitivity of 297 of 382 (78%; 95% CI 73% to 82%) for patients with pelvic fractures or dislocations, 55 of 60 (92%; 95% CI 82% to 97%) for patients undergoing operative intervention, and 14 of 17 (82%; 95% CI 57% to 96%) for patients with hypotension. CONCLUSION: Plain anteroposterior pelvic radiographs have a limited sensitivity for identifying children with pelvic fractures or dislocations after blunt trauma, including patients undergoing operative intervention and those with hypotension.

Use of Oral Contrast for Abdominal Computed Tomography in Children With Blunt Torso Trauma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We compare test characteristics of abdominal computed tomography (CT) with and without oral contrast for identifying intra-abdominal injuries. METHODS: This was a planned subanalysis of a prospective, multicenter study of children (<18 years) with blunt torso trauma. Children imaged in the emergency department with abdominal CT using intravenous contrast were eligible. Oral contrast use was based on the participating centers' guidelines and discretions. Clinical courses were followed to identify patients with intra-abdominal injuries. Abdominal CTs were considered positive for intra-abdominal injury if a specific intra-abdominal injury was identified and considered abnormal if any findings suggestive of intra-abdominal injury were identified on the CT. RESULTS: A total of 12,044 patients were enrolled, with 5,276 undergoing abdominal CT with intravenous contrast. Of the 4,987 CTs (95%) with documented use or nonuse of oral contrast, 1,010 (20%) were with and 3,977 (80%) were without oral contrast; 686 patients (14%) had intra-abdominal injuries, including 127 CTs (19%) with and 559 (81%) without oral contrast. The sensitivity in the detection of any intra-abdominal injury in the oral contrast versus no oral contrast groups was sensitivitycontrast 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 95.7% to 100.0%) versus sensitivityno contrast 97.7% (95% CI 96.1% to 98.8%), difference 1.5% (95% CI -0.4% to 3.5%). The specificity of the oral contrast versus no oral contrast groups was specificitycontrast 84.7% (95% CI 82.2% to 87.0%) versus specificityno contrast 80.8% (95% CI 79.4% to 82.1%), difference 4.0% (95% CI 1.3% to 6.7%). CONCLUSION: Oral contrast is still used in a substantial portion of children undergoing abdominal CT after blunt torso trauma. With the exception of a slightly better specificity, test characteristics for detecting intra-abdominal injury were similar between CT with and without oral contrast.

Accuracy of the abdominal examination for identifying children with blunt intra-abdominal injuries.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of complaints of abdominal pain and findings of abdominal tenderness for identifying children with intra-abdominal injury (IAI) stratified by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, multicenter observational study of children with blunt torso trauma and a GCS score ≥13. We calculated the sensitivity of abdominal findings for IAI with 95% CI stratified by GCS score. We examined the association of isolated abdominal pain or tenderness with IAI and that undergoing acute intervention (therapeutic laparotomy, angiographic embolization, blood transfusion, or ≥2 nights of intravenous fluid therapy). RESULTS: Among the 12 044 patients evaluated, 11 277 (94%) had a GCS score of ≥13 and were included in this analysis. Sensitivity of abdominal pain for IAI was 79% (95% CI, 76%-83%) for patients with a GCS score of 15, 51% (95% CI, 37%-65%) for patients with a GCS score of 14, and 32% (95% CI, 14%-55%) for patients with a GCS score of 13. Sensitivity of abdominal tenderness for IAI also decreased with decreasing GCS score: 79% (95% CI, 75%-82%) for a GCS score of 15, 57% (95% CI, 42%-70%) for a GCS score of 14, and 37% (95% CI, 19%-58%) for a GCS score of 13. Among patients with isolated abdominal pain and/or tenderness, the rate of IAI was 8% (95% CI, 6%-9%) and the rate of IAI undergoing acute intervention was 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of abdominal findings for IAI decreases as GCS score decreases. Although abdominal computed tomography is not mandatory, the risk of IAI is sufficiently high that diagnostic evaluation is warranted in children with isolated abdominal pain or tenderness.

Identifying children at very low risk of clinically important blunt abdominal injuries.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We derive a prediction rule to identify children at very low risk for intra-abdominal injuries undergoing acute intervention and for whom computed tomography (CT) could be obviated. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled children with blunt torso trauma in 20 emergency departments. We used binary recursive partitioning to create a prediction rule to identify children at very low risk of intra-abdominal injuries undergoing acute intervention (therapeutic laparotomy, angiographic embolization, blood transfusion for abdominal hemorrhage, or intravenous fluid for ≥2 nights for pancreatic/gastrointestinal injuries). We considered only historical and physical examination variables with acceptable interrater reliability. RESULTS: We enrolled 12,044 children with a median age of 11.1 years (interquartile range 5.8, 15.1 years). Of the 761 (6.3%) children with intra-abdominal injuries, 203 (26.7%) received acute interventions. The prediction rule consisted of (in descending order of importance) no evidence of abdominal wall trauma or seat belt sign, Glasgow Coma Scale score greater than 13, no abdominal tenderness, no evidence of thoracic wall trauma, no complaints of abdominal pain, no decreased breath sounds, and no vomiting. The rule had a negative predictive value of 5,028 of 5,034 (99.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 99.7% to 100%), sensitivity of 197 of 203 (97%; 95% CI 94% to 99%), specificity of 5,028 of 11,841 (42.5%; 95% CI 41.6% to 43.4%), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.07 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.15). CONCLUSION: A prediction rule consisting of 7 patient history and physical examination findings, and without laboratory or ultrasonographic information, identifies children with blunt torso trauma who are at very low risk for intra-abdominal injury undergoing acute intervention. These findings require external validation before implementation.

Sledding: how fast can they go?

BACKGROUND: Sledding, a fun and easily accessible winter sport, can potentially generate significant speed and energy posing a risk of injury. The objective of this study was to determine the speeds and potential kinetic energy generated by sledders. METHODS: Observational study conducted of single sledders at sledding hills located in Monroe County, NY during February 2007. Participant's weight, age, and sled type were recorded. Speeds were recorded using Stalker police grade radar guns. Multiple runs by each sledder were measured. The kinetic energy for each run was calculated. Investigators recorded observations about injuries, near misses, and other safety issues. RESULTS: Seventy-six participants were enrolled with ages ranging from 4 year old to adult, including 54 children (18 years) with median age 9 years (range, 4-14 years). Of the 145 runs by single riders, 54 were on inner tubes, 89 on plastic/hard foam sleds, and 2 on other. The average speed was 19 mph (range, 14-25 mph). The average kinetic energy was 1,872 J (range, 329-6,441 J). Sledders on inner tubes went faster and generated more kinetic energy than those on plastic/hard foam sleds; mean 20.3 mph (95% CI 19.5-21.0) versus 18.3 mph (95% CI 17.8-18.7), p < 0.0001 and mean 2,136 J (95% CI 1,752-2,520) versus 1,707 J (95% CI 1,478-1,936), p < 0.05, respectively. None of the sledder wore a helmet and no injuries were observed. CONCLUSION: The potential for injury with sledding increases with weight and use of inner tubes, thus safe sledding practices and helmet use should be encouraged.

Programa educativo para el control de factores de riesgo modificables asociados al embarazo en adolescentes / Educational program for the control of modifiable risk factors associated with pregnancy in adolescents

Fundamento: el embarazo en adolescentes es una preocupación a nivel mundial, sobre todo para las naciones en desarrollo. Objetivo: determinar la efectividad de un programa educativo para el control de factores de riesgo modificables asociados al embarazo en la adolescencia, en el Consultorio Médico 5 de Esperanza entre febrero 2020-febrero de 2022. Métodos: se realizó un estudio de intervención de tipo cuasi experimental sin grupo de control. Se utilizaron métodos teóricos: histórico-lógico, analítico-sintético, inductivo-deductivo y abstracto-concreto. Del nivel empírico; revisión documental y encuesta. Resultados: se constató un predominio significativo de pacientes en etapa tardía de la adolescencia, 54,2 % con nivel preuniversitario, 79,2 % con primeras relaciones sexuales, de 15 años (45,8 %) y el vínculo de parejas de concubinato (29,2 %), sin abortos (58 %), como causa de los abortos forzados las dificultades económicas (17 %), no presencia de antecedentes familiares (54,1 %), la no presencia de infecciones de trasmisión sexual (75 %). Se modificaron los factores: consumo de alcohol, función familiar y uso de anticonceptivos. Se produjeron cambios muy significativos en el nivel de información de forma positiva. Conclusiones: se verificó la efectividad del programa educativo para el control de factores de riesgo modificables asociados al embarazo en la adolescencia.

Background: early pregnancy in adolescents is a global concern, especially for developing nations. Objective: determine the effectiveness of an educational program to control modifiable risk factors associated with teenage pregnancy, at the Esperanza 5 Medical Office from February 2020 to February 2022. Methods: a quasi-experimental intervention study was carried out without a control group. Theoretical methods were used: historical-logical, analytical-synthetic, inductive-deductive and abstract-concrete. From the empirical level; documentary review and survey. Results: a significant predominance of patients in late adolescence was found, 54.2% with pre-university level, 79.2% with first sexual relations, 15 years of age (45.8%) and the bond of cohabiting couples ( 29.2%), without abortions (58%), as the cause of forced abortions: economic difficulties (17%), no family history (54.1%), no presence of sexually transmitted infections (75% ). The factors were modified: alcohol consumption, family function and contraceptive use. There were very significant changes in the level of information in a positive way. Conclusions: the effectiveness of the educational program for the control of modifiable risk factors associated with pregnancy in adolescence was verified.

Enhancing referral of sexually active adolescent females from the emergency department to family planning.

BACKGROUND: Female adolescents at high pregnancy risk frequently visit the emergency department (ED) and lack primary providers. It is unclear if current methods of ED referral are successful. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the potential effect and feasibility of a standardized, enhanced method of referral of sexually active females from an ED for family planning (FP). METHODS: We conducted an ED-based intervention study using an enhanced referral process, which included a wallet card advertising a walk-in, adolescent-friendly FP clinic and a standardized ED physician monologue. ED physicians were instructed to disseminate the enhanced process to sexually active females ages 12-19 years (intervention group). Patients receiving the intervention were prospectively enrolled. The control group consisted of patients who, on retrospective review, came to the ED during the enrollment period and were eligible but were not enrolled. We used the electronic medical record (EMR) to identify and randomly select missed eligible patients (control group) and accumulated one control for each case. The primary outcome was FP follow-up within 2 months, measured by EMR review. RESULTS: The intervention (n=101) and control groups (n=101) were similar in age, prior ED visits (54% versus 56%), and previous FP visits (28% versus 28%). The absolute difference in follow-up to a FP clinic between the enhanced referral group (7%; 7/101) compared with the nonenhanced referral group (5%; 5/101) was only 2% (95% confidence interval -5% to 9%). Feasibility of the intervention was modest, with a best-case scenario of 59/160 (37%) of eligible patients captured. CONCLUSIONS: An enhanced referral initiative relying on physician participation did not substantially increase follow-up rates to a FP clinic and showed modest feasibility. More research is required to identify effective means of ED-based referral for preventive reproductive care.

Use of the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination and its impact on abdominal computed tomography use in hemodynamically stable children with blunt torso trauma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the variability of clinician-performed Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examinations and its impact on abdominal computed tomography (AbCT) use in hemodynamically stable children with blunt torso trauma (BTT). The FAST is used with variable frequency in children with BTT. METHODS: We performed a planned secondary analysis of children (<18 years) with BTT. Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of less than 9, those with hypotension, and those taken directly to the operating suite were excluded. Clinicians documented their suspicion for intra-abdominal injury (IAI) as very low, less than 1%; low, 1% to 5%; moderate, 6% to 10%; high, 11% to 50%; or very high, greater than 50%. We determined the relative risk (RR) for AbCT use based on undergoing a FAST examination in each of these clinical suspicion strata. RESULTS: Of 6,468 (median age, 11.8 years; interquartile range, 6.3-15.5 years) children who met eligibility, 887 (13.7%) underwent FAST examination before CT scan. A total of 3,015 (46.6%) underwent AbCT scanning, and 373 (5.8%) were diagnosed with IAI. Use of the FAST increased as clinician suspicion for IAI increased, 11.0% with less than 1% suspicion for IAI, 13.5% with 1% to 5% suspicion, 20.5% with 6% to 10% suspicion, 23.2% with 11% to 50% suspicion, and 30.7% with greater than 50% suspicion. The patients in whom the clinicians had a suspicion of IAI of 1% to 5% or 6% to 10% were significantly less likely to undergo a CT scan if a FAST examination was performed: RR, 0.83 (0.67-1.03); RR, 0.81 (0.72-0.91); RR, 0.85 (0.78-0.94); RR, 0.99 (0.94-1.05); and RR, 0.97 (0.91-1.05) for patients with clinician suspicion of IAI of less than 1%, 1% to 5%, 6% to 10%, 11% to 50%, and greater than 50%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The FAST examination is used in a relatively small percentage of children with BTT. Use increases as clinician suspicion for IAI increases. Patients with a low or moderate clinician suspicion of IAI are less likely to undergo AbCT if they receive a FAST examination. A randomized controlled trial is required to more precisely determine the benefits and drawbacks of the FAST examination in the evaluation of children with BTT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiologic study, II.

Computed tomography with intravenous contrast alone: the role of intra-abdominal fat on the ability to visualize the normal appendix in children.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) with enteric contrast is frequently used to evaluate children with suspected appendicitis. The use of CT with intravenous (IV) contrast alone (CT IV) may be sufficient, however, particularly in patients with adequate intra-abdominal fat (IAF). OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed 1) to determine the ability of radiologists to visualize the normal (nondiseased) appendix with CT IV in children and to assess whether IAF adequacy affects this ability and 2) to assess the association between IAF adequacy and patient characteristics. METHODS: This was a retrospective 16-center study using a preexisting database of abdominal CT scans. Children 3 to 18 years who had CT IV scan and measured weights and for whom appendectomy history was known from medical record review were included. The sample was chosen based on age to yield a sample with and without adequate IAF. Radiologists at each center reread their site's CT IV scans to assess appendix visualization and IAF adequacy. IAF was categorized as "adequate" if there was any amount of fat completely surrounding the cecum and "inadequate" if otherwise. RESULTS: A total of 280 patients were included, with mean age of 10.6 years (range = 3.1 to 17.9 years). All 280 had no history of prior appendectomy; therefore, each patient had a presumed normal appendix. A total of 102 patients (36.4%) had adequate IAF. The proportion of normal appendices visualized with CT IV was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 67.2% to 78.0%); the proportions were 89% (95% CI = 81.5% to 94.5%) and 63% (95% CI = 56.0% to 70.6%) in those with and without adequate IAF (95% CI for difference of proportions = 16% to 36%). Greater weight and older age were strongly associated with IAF adequacy (p < 0.001), with weight appearing to be a stronger predictor, particularly in females. Although statistically associated, there was noted overlap in the weights and ages of those with and without adequate IAF. CONCLUSIONS: Protocols using CT with IV contrast alone to visualize the appendix can reasonably include weight, age, or both as considerations for determining when this approach is appropriate. However, although IAF will more frequently be adequate in older, heavier patients, highly accurate prediction of IAF adequacy appears challenging solely based on age and weight.