[Percutaneous MR-guided prostate cancer cryoablation: Predictive factors and oncologic outcomes]. / Cryothérapie totale de la prostate sous IRM par voie périnéale : résultats carcinologiques et facteurs prédictifs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pejorative predictive factors on oncologic outcomes of percutaneous MR-guided whole gland prostate cancer cryoablation (CA). METHODS: Medical records of patients treated from 2009 to 2012, to assess medium-term oncologic outcomes, were reviewed. Prostate biopsies were performed in local recurrence suspicion (biochemical failure, MR follow-up failure). RESULTS: Among 18 patients, mean age of 72.6 (61-78), 2 (11 %) and 7 (38.9 %) biological and reported biopsy-proven local recurrence respectively with our initial technic of CA. Mean follow-up and recurrence were 56.3 (±21.7) and 20.7 (±13.9) months respectively. A previous treatment of prostate cancer (P=0.5), pre-treatment PSA (P=0.2), pre-treatment Gleason/ISUP score (P=0.4), nadir PSA post-CA (P=0.22) were not associated with recurrence. Bilateral positive cores appears as a pejorative predictive factor (P=0.04). However mean pre-treatment positive cores percentage, 25 (±16.5) in responding patients versus 40.7 (±25.2) in case of recurrence, and maximum percentage of cancer extent in each positive core, 10.6 (±9.3) in responding patients versus 18.7 (±16.5) in case of recurrence, seemed associated with local recurrence after prostate CA but our analysis wasn't able to find a difference (P=0.09 and P=0.3 respectively) due to a lack of power. CONCLUSION: Bilateral positive cores appears as a pejorative predictive factor. In our experience, important tumor volume seem to be a pejorative predictive factor for oncologic outcomes after PCA whereas treatment, PSA, Gleason/ISUP score, nadir PSA are not. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Temporary urethral stents changes as an alternative treatment for neurological bladder]. / Les changements itératifs de prothèse urétrale trans-sphinctérienne chez le patient neurologique : une alternative à la sphinctérotomie ?

BACKGROUND: Patients with detrusor-sphincter dysynergia (DSD) who are unable to perform self-catheterisation can benefit from an endoscopic treatment. We chose regular urethral stent changes as an alternative to sphincterotomy in this kind of patients. The purpose of this study is to show that temporary urethral stents changes represent a treatment option with a reasonable morbidity for patients with DSD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients in our center who had been treated with urethral stents from April 2005 to September 2017. The stent changes were performed every 12 to 18 months depending on urethrovesical fibroscopy findings. The primary endpoint was treatment continuation. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were enrolled in our study and the average follow-up duration was 46 months [18.5-53.25]. Primary treatment failure was seen in 14 (32%) patients mainly due to problems related to equipment (n=3) and urinary retention (n=2). Four patients died before their first stent change. The treatment was successful in 30 (68%) patients, of whom 10 (33%) subsequently adopted a voiding mode change. We lost sight of 5 patients (11%) during follow-up. The main complications were urinary retention (29%), urinary tract infections (27%) and stent migration (18%). Fifteen (34%) experienced grade III-IV complications. CONCLUSIONS: Regular urethral stent changes represent an alternative treatment option for patients with DSD but with a significant morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[The dimethyl sulfoxide under general anesthesia: An alternative after failure without anesthesia in the painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis?] / Le diméthyl sulfoxide (DMSO) sous anesthésie générale : une alternative après échec du DMSO sans anesthésie dans le syndrome de la douleur vésicale ?

INTRODUCTION: The intravesical instillation of dimethyl sulfoxide (iDMSO), performed without anesthestic, is a therapeutic option for the painful bladder syndrome/interstial cystitis (PBS/IC). Some patients are against those iDMSO because of bad tolerance. Our study evaluates the tolerance and the outcome of the iDMSO under general anesthetic (GA) after the failure of the iDMSO without anesthetic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May 2013 to April 2016, 11 patients with a PBS, 9 women (81.8 %), have been treated by iDMSO without anesthetic, without improvement because of bad tolerance and no possibility to have a one hour contact between the bladder and the DMSO. The 11 patients were evaluated by mictional calendar and Sant O'Leary score. All the patients had a hydrodistension and a per os treatment without improvement. OUTCOMES: Six new iDMSO were performed under general anesthetic in ambulatory surgery with good tolerance for the 11 patients. The frequency and the nocturia before iDMSO without anesthetic and after iDMSO under general anesthetic were 32.2minutes [15; 60] and 6.3 per night [3; 10] and 126.9minutes [25; 240] and 3 per night [2; 6], so a variation respectively of 96.4minutes [0; 180] and of 3.75 per night [2; 6]. The symptom score and the problem index were 17.5 [13; 20] and 15.5 [13; 16] before and 13.5 [4; 20] and 12 [1; 16] after iDMSO under general anesthetic; a variation of 3.2 [0; 9] and 4 [0; 12]. CONCLUSION: The iDMSO under general anesthetic seems to improve objectively and subjectively the patients who are not improved by the instillations without anesthetic because of bad tolerance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.