The single-cell opioid responses in the context of HIV (SCORCH) consortium.

Substance use disorders (SUD) and drug addiction are major threats to public health, impacting not only the millions of individuals struggling with SUD, but also surrounding families and communities. One of the seminal challenges in treating and studying addiction in human populations is the high prevalence of co-morbid conditions, including an increased risk of contracting a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Of the ~15 million people who inject drugs globally, 17% are persons with HIV. Conversely, HIV is a risk factor for SUD because chronic pain syndromes, often encountered in persons with HIV, can lead to an increased use of opioid pain medications that in turn can increase the risk for opioid addiction. We hypothesize that SUD and HIV exert shared effects on brain cell types, including adaptations related to neuroplasticity, neurodegeneration, and neuroinflammation. Basic research is needed to refine our understanding of these affected cell types and adaptations. Studying the effects of SUD in the context of HIV at the single-cell level represents a compelling strategy to understand the reciprocal interactions among both conditions, made feasible by the availability of large, extensively-phenotyped human brain tissue collections that have been amassed by the Neuro-HIV research community. In addition, sophisticated animal models that have been developed for both conditions provide a means to precisely evaluate specific exposures and stages of disease. We propose that single-cell genomics is a uniquely powerful technology to characterize the effects of SUD and HIV in the brain, integrating data from human cohorts and animal models. We have formed the Single-Cell Opioid Responses in the Context of HIV (SCORCH) consortium to carry out this strategy.

Genetic association and machine learning improves discovery and prediction of type 1 diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) has a large genetic component, and expanded genetic studies of T1D can lead to novel biological and therapeutic discovery and improved risk prediction. In this study, we performed genetic association and fine-mapping analyses in 817,718 European ancestry samples genome-wide and 29,746 samples at the MHC locus, which identified 165 independent risk signals for T1D of which 19 were novel. We used risk variants to train a machine learning model (named T1GRS) to predict T1D, which highly differentiated T1D from non-disease and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Europeans as well as African Americans at or beyond the level of current standards. We identified extensive non-linear interactions between risk loci in T1GRS, for example between HLA-DQB1*57 and INS, coding and non-coding HLA alleles, and DEXI, INS and other beta cell loci, that provided mechanistic insight and improved risk prediction. T1D individuals formed distinct clusters based on genetic features from T1GRS which had significant differences in age of onset, HbA1c, and renal disease severity. Finally, we provided T1GRS in formats to enhance accessibility of risk prediction to any user and computing environment. Overall, the improved genetic discovery and prediction of T1D will have wide clinical, therapeutic, and research applications.

Circulating pancreatic enzyme levels are a causal biomarker of type 1 diabetes.

Novel biomarkers of type 1 diabetes (T1D) are needed for earlier detection of disease and identifying therapeutic targets. We identified biomarkers of T1D by combining plasma cis and trans protein QTLs (pQTLs) for 2,922 proteins in the UK Biobank with a T1D genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 157k samples. T1D risk variants at over 20% of known loci colocalized with cis or trans pQTLs, and distinct sets of T1D loci colocalized with immune, pancreatic secretion, or gut-related proteins. We identified 23 proteins with evidence for a causal role in using pQTLs as genetic instruments in Mendelian Randomization which included multiple sensitivity analyses. Proteins increasing T1D risk were involved in immune processes (e.g. HLA-DRA) and, more surprisingly, T1D protective proteins were enriched in pancreatic secretions (e.g. CPA1), cholesterol metabolism (e.g. APOA1), and gut homeostasis. Genetic variants associated with plasma levels of T1D-protective pancreatic enzymes such as CPA1 were enriched in cis-regulatory elements in pancreatic exocrine and gut enteroendocrine cells, and the protective effects of CPA1 and other enzymes on T1D were consistent when using instruments specific to acinar cells. Finally, pancreatic enzymes had decreased acinar expression in T1D, including CPA1 which was altered prior to onset. Together, these results reveal causal biomarkers and highlight processes in the exocrine pancreas, immune system, and gut that modulate T1D risk.

Single cell multiome profiling of pancreatic islets reveals physiological changes in cell type-specific regulation associated with diabetes risk.

Physiological variability in pancreatic cell type gene regulation and the impact on diabetes risk is poorly understood. In this study we mapped gene regulation in pancreatic cell types using single cell multiomic (joint RNA-seq and ATAC-seq) profiling in 28 non-diabetic donors in combination with single cell data from 35 non-diabetic donors in the Human Pancreas Analysis Program. We identified widespread associations with age, sex, BMI, and HbA1c, where gene regulatory responses were highly cell type- and phenotype-specific. In beta cells, donor age associated with hypoxia, apoptosis, unfolded protein response, and external signal-dependent transcriptional regulators, while HbA1c associated with inflammatory responses and gender with chromatin organization. We identified 10.8K loci where genetic variants were QTLs for cis regulatory element (cRE) accessibility, including 20% with lineage- or cell type-specific effects which disrupted distinct transcription factor motifs. Type 2 diabetes and glycemic trait associated variants were enriched in both phenotype- and QTL-associated beta cell cREs, whereas type 1 diabetes showed limited enrichment. Variants at 226 diabetes and glycemic trait loci were QTLs in beta and other cell types, including 40 that were statistically colocalized, and annotating target genes of colocalized QTLs revealed genes with putatively novel roles in disease. Our findings reveal diverse responses of pancreatic cell types to phenotype and genotype in physiology, and identify pathways, networks, and genes through which physiology impacts diabetes risk.

Single cell regulatory architecture of human pancreatic islets suggests sex differences in ß cell function and the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes.

Type 2 and type 1 diabetes (T2D, T1D) exhibit sex differences in insulin secretion, the mechanisms of which are unknown. We examined sex differences in human pancreatic islets from 52 donors with and without T2D combining single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq), single nucleus assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (snATAC-seq), hormone secretion, and bioenergetics. In nondiabetic (ND) donors, sex differences in islet cells gene accessibility and expression predominantly involved sex chromosomes. Islets from T2D donors exhibited similar sex differences in sex chromosomes differentially expressed genes (DEGs), but also exhibited sex differences in autosomal genes. Comparing ß cells from T2D vs. ND donors, gene enrichment of female ß cells showed suppression in mitochondrial respiration, while male ß cells exhibited suppressed insulin secretion. Thus, although sex differences in gene accessibility and expression of ND ß cells predominantly affect sex chromosomes, the transition to T2D reveals sex differences in autosomes highlighting mitochondrial failure in females.

Single cell regulatory architecture of human pancreatic islets suggests sex differences in ß cell function and the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes.

Biological sex affects the pathogenesis of type 2 and type 1 diabetes (T2D, T1D) including the development of ß cell failure observed more often in males. The mechanisms that drive sex differences in ß cell failure is unknown. Studying sex differences in islet regulation and function represent a unique avenue to understand the sex-specific heterogeneity in ß cell failure in diabetes. Here, we examined sex and race differences in human pancreatic islets from up to 52 donors with and without T2D (including 37 donors from the Human Pancreas Analysis Program [HPAP] dataset) using an orthogonal series of experiments including single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq), single nucleus assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (snATAC-seq), dynamic hormone secretion, and bioenergetics. In cultured islets from nondiabetic (ND) donors, in the absence of the in vivo hormonal environment, sex differences in islet cell type gene accessibility and expression predominantly involved sex chromosomes. Of particular interest were sex differences in the X-linked KDM6A and Y-linked KDM5D chromatin remodelers in female and male islet cells respectively. Islets from T2D donors exhibited similar sex differences in differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from sex chromosomes. However, in contrast to islets from ND donors, islets from T2D donors exhibited major sex differences in DEGs from autosomes. Comparing ß cells from T2D and ND donors revealed that females had more DEGs from autosomes compared to male ß cells. Gene set enrichment analysis of female ß cell DEGs showed a suppression of oxidative phosphorylation and electron transport chain pathways, while male ß cell had suppressed insulin secretion pathways. Thus, although sex-specific differences in gene accessibility and expression of cultured ND human islets predominantly affect sex chromosome genes, major differences in autosomal gene expression between sexes appear during the transition to T2D and which highlight mitochondrial failure in female ß cells.

Untangling the genetics of beta cell dysfunction and death in type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a complex multi-system disease which arises from both environmental and genetic factors, resulting in the destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells. Over the past two decades, human genetic studies have provided new insight into the etiology of T1D, including an appreciation for the role of beta cells in their own demise. SCOPE OF REVIEW: Here, we outline models supported by human genetic data for the role of beta cell dysfunction and death in T1D. We highlight the importance of strong evidence linking T1D genetic associations to bona fide candidate genes for mechanistic and therapeutic consideration. To guide rigorous interpretation of genetic associations, we describe molecular profiling approaches, genomic resources, and disease models that may be used to construct variant-to-gene links and to investigate candidate genes and their role in T1D. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: We profile advances in understanding the genetic causes of beta cell dysfunction and death at individual T1D risk loci. We discuss how genetic risk prediction models can be used to address disease heterogeneity. Further, we present areas where investment will be critical for the future use of genetics to address open questions in the development of new treatment and prevention strategies for T1D.

Multi-ancestry polygenic mechanisms of type 2 diabetes.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a multifactorial disease with substantial genetic risk, for which the underlying biological mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we identified multi-ancestry T2D genetic clusters by analyzing genetic data from diverse populations in 37 published T2D genome-wide association studies representing more than 1.4 million individuals. We implemented soft clustering with 650 T2D-associated genetic variants and 110 T2D-related traits, capturing known and novel T2D clusters with distinct cardiometabolic trait associations across two independent biobanks representing diverse genetic ancestral populations (African, n = 21,906; Admixed American, n = 14,410; East Asian, n =2,422; European, n = 90,093; and South Asian, n = 1,262). The 12 genetic clusters were enriched for specific single-cell regulatory regions. Several of the polygenic scores derived from the clusters differed in distribution among ancestry groups, including a significantly higher proportion of lipodystrophy-related polygenic risk in East Asian ancestry. T2D risk was equivalent at a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg m-2 in the European subpopulation and 24.2 (22.9-25.5) kg m-2 in the East Asian subpopulation; after adjusting for cluster-specific genetic risk, the equivalent BMI threshold increased to 28.5 (27.1-30.0) kg m-2 in the East Asian group. Thus, these multi-ancestry T2D genetic clusters encompass a broader range of biological mechanisms and provide preliminary insights to explain ancestry-associated differences in T2D risk profiles.