Health benefits of combined oral contraceptives - a narrative review.

PURPOSE: This review presents an update of the non-contraceptive health benefits of the combined oral contraceptive pill. METHODS: We conducted a literature search for (review) articles that discussed the health benefits of combined oral contraceptives (COCs), in the period from 1980 to 2023. RESULTS: We identified 21 subjective and/or objective health benefits of COCs related to (i) the reproductive tract, (ii) non-gynaecological benign disorders and (iii) malignancies. Reproductive tract benefits are related to menstrual bleeding(including anaemia and toxic shock syndrome), dysmenorrhoea, migraine, premenstrual syndrome (PMS), ovarian cysts, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), androgen related symptoms, ectopic pregnancy, hypoestrogenism, endometriosis and adenomyosis, uterine fibroids and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Non-gynaecological benefits are related to benign breast disease, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, asthma and porphyria. Health benefits of COCs related to cancer are lower risks of endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The use of combined oral contraceptives is accompanied with a range of health benefits, to be balanced against its side-effects and risks. Several health benefits of COCs are a reason for non-contraceptive COC prescription.

Oral follicle-stimulating hormone agonist tested in healthy young women of reproductive age failed to demonstrate effect on follicular development but affected thyroid function.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of MK-8389. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, ascending dose study. SETTING: Two clinical research organizations. PATIENT(S): Healthy young women. INTERVENTION(S): Once-daily oral doses of MK-8389 or placebo for 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Safety, including thyroid function tests (TFTs), pharmacokinetics, and follicular development (follicle size and number and serum E2 and inhibin B levels). RESULT(S): Treatment with MK-8389 was generally safe and well tolerated. An effect on TFTs was observed, which was transient and did not lead to clinical signs or symptoms but prevented dose escalation above 40 mg. MK-8389 was rapidly absorbed, slowly eliminated, and showed a large peak-to-trough ratio. No clinically meaningful effect was seen on follicle size and numbers, which was consistent with the low E2 levels. At doses >20 mg, inhibin B levels were increased, suggesting early follicular development at higher doses. CONCLUSION(S): Oral administration of MK-8389 demonstrated acceptable systemic exposure and was generally well tolerated. This study failed to demonstrate a clinically meaningful effect of MK-8389 on follicular development, whereas MK-8389 unexpectedly affected thyroid function. This study did not explore doses above 40 mg given the changes observed in TFTs, which may relate to high MK-8389 peak concentrations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT Number 2010-022396-57.

Pharmacokinetic profile of nomegestrol acetate and 17ß-estradiol after multiple and single dosing in healthy women.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of the monophasic oral contraceptive nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) plus 17ß-estradiol (E(2)) were investigated after a single dose and multiple dosing. STUDY DESIGN: NOMAC/E2 (2.5 mg/1.5 mg) was administered daily to healthy women (18-50 years, n=23) for 24 days; blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained on Day 24 and again, after a 10-day pill-free interval, on Day 35 after a single dose. RESULTS: NOMAC reached steady state after 5 days with mean ±standard deviation (SD) trough NOMAC concentration (C(av)) of 4.4±1.4 ng/mL. On Day 24, mean±SD peak NOMAC concentration (Cmax, 12.3±3.5 ng/mL) was reached in mean 1.5 h (t(max)); the mean±SD elimination half-life (t(½)) was 45.9±15.3 h. After a single dose, NOMAC mean±SD C(max) was 7.2±2.0 ng/mL and mean±SD t(½) was 41.9±16.2 h. On Day 24, E2 mean±SD C(av) was 50.3±25.7 pg/mL; mean±SD Cmax was 86.0±51.3 pg/mL. After a single dose, mean±SD E2 Cmax was 253±179 pg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that NOMAC/E2 has a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with once-daily dosing.

Valproate reduces the glucuronidation of asenapine without affecting asenapine plasma concentrations.

Asenapine is indicated for treatment of schizophrenia in the United States and acute treatment of manic or mixed episodes, as monotherapy (United States and European Union) or adjunct therapy (United States only), associated with bipolar I disorder. It is extensively metabolized; the 2 main metabolites are asenapine N-glucuronide and N-desmethyl-asenapine. The authors investigated the pharmacokinetic interactions between asenapine and valproate in an open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers received sublingual doses of asenapine 5 mg alone or under steady-state valproate (500 mg bid for 9 days). Blood samples collected until 72 hours postdosing were analyzed for asenapine, N-desmethyl-asenapine, and asenapine N-glucuronide. Compared with asenapine alone, valproate substantially reduced N-glucuronide formation (area under the curve from 0 to infinity [AUC(0-∞)] reduced 7.4-fold, maximum concentration [C(max)] reduced 6.6-fold) and moderately reduced N-desmethyl-asenapine formation (AUC(0-∞) reduced 30%, C(max) unchanged). Coadministration of valproate did not affect asenapine AUC(0-∞) and C(max) (confidence intervals for the ratios of asenapine AUC(0-∞) and C(max) were contained within the predefined 0.80-1.25 acceptance range). Low-dose valproate, although almost completely inhibiting glucuronidation of asenapine, did not affect the pharmacokinetics of asenapine itself, the entity primarily responsible for the pharmacologic effects of the drug.