Belonging in Surgery: A validated instrument and single institutional pilot.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument to measure Belonging in Surgery among surgical residents. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Belonging is the essential human need to maintain meaningful relationships and connections to one's community. Increased belongingness is associated with better well-being, job performance and motivation to learn. However, no tools exist to measure belonging among surgical trainees. METHODS: A panel of experts adapted a belonging instrument for use among United States surgery residents. After administration of the 28-item instrument to residents at a single institution, a Cronbach's alpha was calculated to measure internal consistency, and exploratory principal component analyses (PCA) were performed. Multiple iterations of analyses with successively smaller item samples suggested the instrument could be shortened. The expert panel was reconvened to shorten the instrument. Descriptive statistics measured demographic factors associated with Belonging in Surgery. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 52% (114 responses). The Cronbach's alpha among the 28 items was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.96). The exploratory PCA and subsequent Promax rotation yielded one dominant component with an eigenvalue of 12.84 (70% of the variance). The expert panel narrowed the final instrument to 11 items with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.92). Belonging in Surgery was significantly associated with race (Black and Asian residents scoring lower than White residents), graduating with one's original intern cohort (residents who graduated with their original class scoring higher than those that did not), and inversely correlated with resident stress level. CONCLUSIONS: An instrument to measure Belonging in Surgery was validated among surgical residents. With this instrument, Belonging in Surgery becomes a construct that may be used to investigate surgeon performance and well-being.

Defining Optimal Management of Non-metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is an aggressive, deadly malignancy. Resection remains the primary treatment; however, there is conflicting evidence regarding the optimal approach to and extent of surgery and the role of adjuvant therapy. We evaluated the impact of surgical technique and adjuvant therapies on survival in non-metastatic ACC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of subjects who underwent surgery for non-metastatic ACC between 2010 and 2019 utilizing the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was overall survival. Cox proportional hazards models were developed to identify associations between clinical and treatment characteristics and survival. RESULTS: Overall, 1175 subjects were included. Their mean age was 54 ± 15 years, and 62% of patients were female. 67% of procedures were performed via the open approach, 22% involved multi-organ resection, and 26% included lymphadenectomy. Median survival was 77.1 months. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.019; p < 0.001), advanced stage (stage III HR 2.421; p < 0.001), laparoscopic approach (HR 1.329; p = 0.010), and positive margins (HR 1.587; p < 0.001) were negatively associated with survival, while extent of resection (HR 1.189; p = 0.140) and lymphadenectomy (HR 1.039; p = 0.759) had no association. Stratified by stage, laparoscopic resection was only associated with worse survival in stage III disease (HR 1.548; p = 0.007). Chemoradiation was only associated with improved survival in patients with positive resection margins (HR 0.475; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Tumor biology and surgical margins are the primary determinants of survival in non-metastatic ACC. Surgical extent and lymphadenectomy are not associated with overall survival. In advanced disease, the open approach is associated with improved survival.

Surgical Management of Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma.

Introduction: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a notoriously aggressive cancer with a dismal prognosis, especially for patients with metastatic disease. Metastatic ACC is classically a contraindication to operative management. Here, we evaluate the impact of primary tumor resection and metastasectomy on survival in metastatic ACC. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic ACC (2010-2019) utilizing the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards models were developed to evaluate the associations between surgical management and survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to account for selection bias in receipt of surgery. Results: Of 976 subjects with metastatic ACC, 38% underwent surgical management. Median OS across all patients was 7.6 months. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, primary tumor resection alone (HR: 0.523; p<0.001) and primary resection with metastasectomy (HR: 0.372; p<0.001) were significantly associated with improved OS. Metastasectomy alone had no association with OS (HR: 0.909; p=0.740). Primary resection with metastasectomy was associated with improved OS over resection of the primary tumor alone (HR: 0.636; p=0.018). After PSM, resection of the primary tumor alone remained associated with improved OS (HR 0.593; p<0.001), and metastasectomy alone had no survival benefit (HR 0.709; p=0.196) compared with non-operative management; combined resection was associated with improved OS over primary tumor resection alone (HR 0.575, p=0.008). Conclusion: In metastatic ACC, patients may benefit from primary tumor resection alone or in combination with metastasectomy, however further research is required to facilitate appropriate patient selection.

Assessing the Frequency of Deferrable Thyroid Nodule Biopsies to De-escalate Low-Value Care.

OBJECTIVE: Thyroid nodules are common, yet fewer than 1 in 10 harbors malignancy. When present, thyroid cancer is typically indolent with excellent survival. Therefore, patients who are not candidates for thyroid cancer treatment due to comorbid disease may not require further thyroid nodule evaluation. The goal of this study was to determine the rate of deferrable thyroid nodule biopsies in patients with limited life expectancy. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) between 2015 and 2018 at our institution. The primary outcome was the number of deferrable FNAs, defined as FNAs performed in patients who died within 2 years after biopsy. Secondary outcomes included cytologic Bethesda score, procedure costs, and final diagnosis on surgical pathology. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to evaluate factors associated with FNA in patients with limited life expectancy. RESULTS: A total of 2565 FNAs were performed. Most patients were female (79%), and 37 (1.5%) patients died within 2 years. Nonthyroid specialists were significantly more likely to order deferrable FNAs (odds ratio 4.13, P < .001). Of the patients who died within 2 years, most (78%) had a concomitant diagnosis of nonthyroid cancer, and 4 went on to have thyroid surgery (Bethesda scores: 3, 4, 4, and 6). Spending associated with deferrable FNAs and subsequent surgery totaled over $98 000. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the rate of deferrable thyroid nodule biopsies was low. However, there is an opportunity to reduce low-value biopsies in patients with a concurrent nonthyroid cancer by partnering with oncology providers.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Appropriate Thyroid Cancer Treatment, Before and After the Release of the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines reduced the recommended extent of therapy for low-risk thyroid cancers. Little is known about the impact of these changes on overall treatment patterns and on previously described racial/ethnic disparities in guideline-concordant care. This study aimed to assess trends in thyroid cancer care before and after release of the 2015 guidelines, with particular attention to racial/ethnic disparities. METHODS: Patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database (2010-2018). An interrupted time series design was used to assess trends in treatment before and after the 2015 guidelines. Appropriateness of surgical and radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment was determined based on the ATA guidelines, and the likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant treatment was compared between racial/ethnic groups. RESULTS: The study identified 309,367 patients (White 74%, Black 8%, Hispanic 9%, Asian 6%). Between 2010 and 2015, the adjusted probability of appropriate surgery was lower for Black (- 2.1%; p < 0.001), Hispanic (- 1.0%; p < 0.001), and Asian (- 2.1%; p < 0.001) patients than for White patients. After 2015, only Hispanic patients had a lower probability of undergoing appropriate surgical therapy (- 2.6%; p = 0.040). Similarly, between 2010 and 2015, the adjusted probability of receiving appropriate RAI therapy was lower for the Hispanic (- 3.6%; p < 0.001) and Asian (- 2.4%; p < 0.001) patients than for White patients. After 2015, the probability of appropriate RAI therapy did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2010 and 2015, patients from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds were less likely than White patients to receive appropriate surgical and RAI therapy for thyroid cancer. After the 2015 guidelines, racial/ethnic disparities in treatment improved.

Disparities in Presentation, Treatment, and Survival in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Disparities have been previously described in the presentation, management, and outcomes of other thyroid cancer subtypes; however, it is unclear whether such disparities exist in anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). METHODS: We identified patients with ATC from the National Cancer Database (2004-2020). The primary outcomes were receipt of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. The secondary outcome was 1-year survival. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to assess the associations between sex, race/ethnicity, and the outcomes. RESULTS: Among 5359 patients included, 58% were female, and 80% were non-Hispanic white. Median tumor size was larger in males than females (6.5 vs. 6.0 cm; p < 0.001) and in patients with minority race/ethnicity than in white patients (6.5 vs. 6.0 cm; p < 0.001). After controlling for tumor size and metastatic disease, female patients were more likely to undergo surgical resection (odds ratio [OR]: 1.20; p = 0.016) but less likely to undergo chemotherapy (OR: 0.72; p < 0.001) and radiation (OR: 0.76; p < 0.001) compared with males. Additionally, patients from minority racial/ethnic backgrounds were less likely to undergo chemotherapy (OR: 0.69; p < 0.001) and radiation (OR: 0.71; p < 0.001) than white patients. Overall, unadjusted, 1-year survival was 23%, with differences in treatment receipt accounting for small but significant differences in survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There are disparities in the presentation and treatment of ATC by sex and race/ethnicity that likely reflect differences in access to care as well as patient and provider preferences. While survival is similarly poor across groups, the changing landscape of treatments for ATC warrants efforts to address the potential for exacerbation of disparities.

Insurance-Based Disparities in Guideline-Concordant Thyroid Cancer Care in the Era of De-escalation.

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have demonstrated insurance-based disparities in the treatment of well-differentiated thyroid cancer. However, it remains unclear whether these disparities have persisted in the era of the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) management guidelines. The goal of this study was to assess whether insurance type is associated with the receipt of guideline-concordant and timely thyroid cancer treatment in a modern cohort. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with well-differentiated thyroid cancer between 2016 and 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Appropriateness of surgical and radioactive iodine treatment (RAI) was determined based on the 2015 ATA guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses, stratified at age 65, were used to evaluate the associations between insurance type and appropriateness and timeliness of the treatment. RESULTS: 125,827 patients were included (private = 71%, Medicare = 19%, Medicaid = 10%). Compared to privately insured patients, patients with Medicaid more frequently presented with tumors >4 cm in size (11% versus 8%, P < 0.001) and regional metastases (29% versus 27%, P < 0.001). However, patients with Medicaid were also less likely to undergo appropriate surgical treatment (odds ratio 0.69, P < 0.001), less likely to undergo surgery within 90 d of diagnosis (hazard ratio 0.80, P < 0.001), and more likely to be undertreated with RAI (odds ratio 1.29, P < 0.001). There were no differences in the likelihood of guideline-concordant surgical or medical treatment by insurance type in patients ≥65 y old. CONCLUSIONS: In the era of the 2015 ATA guidelines, patients with Medicaid remain less likely to receive guideline-concordant, timely surgery and more likely to be undertreated with RAI compared to privately insured patients.

Disparities in the Use of Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after breast cancer diagnosis is increasingly used to improve locoregional staging, particularly among women with dense breasts, extensive ductal carcinoma in situ, and lobular histology. The goals of this study were to (1) assess whether use of preoperative MRI varies by race and insurance type; and (2) determine whether preoperative MRI is associated with downstream surgical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with stage 0-III breast cancer who were treated with surgical resection within our academic health system (2016-2019). Patients were categorized by race and insurance type. The primary outcome was receipt of preoperative MRI. Secondary outcomes included surgery extent (lumpectomy v mastectomy) and receipt of a second operation. RESULTS: A total of 1,410 women (27% Black, 73% White; 67% private insurance, 26% Medicare, 6% Medicaid) were included. Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo preoperative MRI than White patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.54 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.76]; P < .001). There was no association between insurance type and preoperative MRI (Medicare v private: OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.52 to 1.15]; P = .208; Medicaid v private: OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.36 to 1.25]; P = .210). White patients who underwent preoperative MRI were less likely to undergo lumpectomy versus those who did not (OR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.76]; P < .001). Likelihood of re-excision was lower for Black women who had undergone MRI versus those who had not (OR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.93]; P = .031). CONCLUSION: Black patients were less likely than White patients to undergo preoperative MRI, yet Black women who underwent MRI were less likely to require re-excision. Standardizing preoperative MRI use may mitigate provider- and system-level biases and promote more equitable care.

Predictive Risk Score for Postparathyroidectomy Hungry Bone Syndrome in Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism.

PURPOSE: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) frequently affects patients with end-stage renal disease. Hungry bone syndrome (HBS) is a common complication among patients who undergo parathyroidectomy for SHPT and may cause prolonged hospitalization or require intensive care. The objective of this study is to develop a scoring system to stratify patients according to their risk of developing HBS. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the US Renal Data System (2010-2021). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were developed and weighted ß-coefficients from the multivariable model were used to construct a risk score for the development of HBS. Positive and negative predictive values were assessed. RESULTS: Of 17 074 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for SHPT, 19.4% developed HBS. Intensive care unit admission was more common in patients who developed HBS (33.5% vs 24.6%, P < .001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, younger age, renal osteodystrophy, longer duration of dialysis, longer duration of kidney transplant, and higher Elixhauser score were significantly associated with HBS. A risk score based on these clinical factors was developed, with a total of 6 possible points. Rates of HBS ranged from 8% in patients with 0 points to 44% in patients with 6 points. The risk score had a poor positive predictive value (20.3%) but excellent negative predictive value (89.3%) for HBS. CONCLUSION: We developed a weighted risk score that effectively stratifies patients by risk for developing HBS after parathyroidectomy. This tool can be used to counsel patients and to identify patients who may not require postoperative hospitalization.

An acute care surgeon's dilemma: Operative vs. non-operative management of emergency general surgery conditions in patients with recent colorectal cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: This comparative effectiveness study examined outcomes of operative vs. non-operative management for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions in patients with recent cancer treatment (RT). METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries with a history of colorectal cancer hospitalized for an EGS condition (2016-2018) were identified. RT was defined as chemotherapy/radiation within 3 months prior to admission. Instrumental variable analysis assessed the impact of management on mortality and readmissions among survivors (30d, 60d, and 90d), for patients in whom there was clinical equipoise regarding optimal management strategy. RESULTS: Of 26,097 patients, 13% had undergone RT. In both the RT and non-RT groups, the optimal management strategy was uncertain in 14%. Operative management conferred increased risk of mortality but not readmission in patients with RT compared to those without (90d mortality:+43%, p â€‹= â€‹0.03; 90d readmission:+7.1%, p â€‹= â€‹0.776). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RT for whom there is clinical equipoise regarding EGS management, operative intervention increases risk of mortality.

Adrenalectomy approach and outcomes according to surgeon volume.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the relationship between surgeon volume, operative management, and resource utilization in adrenalectomy. METHODS: Isolated adrenalectomies performed within our health system were identified (2016-2021). High-volume surgeons were defined as those performing ≥6 cases/year. Outcomes included indication for surgery, perioperative outcomes, and costs. RESULTS: Of 476 adrenalectomies, high-volume surgeons (n â€‹= â€‹3) performed 394, while low-volume surgeons (n â€‹= â€‹12) performed 82. High-volume surgeons more frequently operated for pheochromocytoma (19% vs. 16%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and less frequently for metastasis (6.4% vs. 23%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001), more frequently used laparoscopy (95% vs. 80%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001), and had lower operative supply costs ($1387 vs. $1,636, p â€‹= â€‹0.037). Additionally, laparoscopic adrenalectomy was associated with shorter length of stay (-3.43 days, p â€‹< â€‹0.001), lower hospitalization costs (-$72,417, p â€‹< â€‹0.001), and increased likelihood of discharge to home (OR 17.03, p â€‹= â€‹0.008). CONCLUSIONS: High-volume surgeons more often resect primary adrenal pathology and utilize laparoscopy. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is, in turn, associated with decreased healthcare resource utilization.

Sex differences and racial/ethnic disparities in the presentation and treatment of medullary thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed for disparities in the presentation and management of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). METHODS: Patients with MTC (2010-2020) were identified from the National Cancer Database. Differences in disease presentation and likelihood of guideline-concordant surgical management (total thyroidectomy and resection of ≥1 lymph node) were assessed by sex and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Of 6154 patients, 68.2% underwent guideline-concordant surgery. Tumors >4 â€‹cm were more likely in men (vs. women: OR 2.47, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and Hispanic patients (vs. White patients: OR 1.52, p â€‹= â€‹0.001). Non-White patients were more likely to have distant metastases (Black: OR 1.63, p â€‹= â€‹0.002; Hispanic: OR 1.44, p â€‹= â€‹0.038) and experienced longer time to surgery (Black: HR 0.66, p â€‹< â€‹0.001; Hispanic: HR 0.71, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Black patients were less likely to undergo guideline-concordant surgery (OR 0.70, p â€‹= â€‹0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Male and non-White patients with MTC more frequently present with advanced disease, and Black patients are less likely to undergo guideline-concordant surgery.

Racial Disparities and Strategies for Improving Equity in Diagnostic Follow-Up for Abnormal Screening Mammograms.

PURPOSE: Black and White women undergo screening mammography at similar rates, but racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes persist. To assess potential contributors, we investigated delays in follow-up after abnormal imaging by race/ethnicity. METHODS: Women who underwent screening mammography at our urban academic center from January 2015 to February 2018 and received a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 0 assessment were included. Kaplan-Meier estimates described distributions of time between diagnostic events from (1) screening to diagnostic imaging and (2) diagnostic imaging to biopsy. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the associations between race/ethnicity and receipt of follow-up within 15 and 30 days. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred and fifty-four women were included (48.6% non-Hispanic [NH] Black, 38.2% NH White, 13.1% other/unknown). Median time between screening and diagnostic imaging varied by race/ethnicity (White: 7 days [IQR, 2-14]; Black: 12 days [IQR, 7-23]; other/unknown: 9 days [IQR, 5-21]). There were similar disparities in days between diagnostic imaging and biopsy (White: 12 [IQR, 7-24]; Black: 21 [IQR, 13-37]; other/unknown: 16 [IQR, 9-30]) and between screening and biopsy (White: 20 [IQR, 11-41]; Black: 35 [IQR, 22-63]; other/unknown: 27.5 [IQR, 17-42]). After adjustment, odds of diagnostic imaging follow-up within 15 days of screening were lower for Black versus White women (odds ratio, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.80]; P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this diverse cohort, disparities in timely diagnostic follow-up after abnormal breast screening were observed, with Black women waiting 1.75 times as long as White women to obtain a tissue diagnosis. National guidelines for time to diagnostic follow-up may facilitate more timely breast cancer care and potentially affect outcomes.

Development of a risk-prediction model for primary aldosteronism in veterans with hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Rates of screening for primary aldosteronism in patients who meet the criteria are exceedingly low (1%-3%). To help clinicians prioritize screening in patients most likely to benefit, we developed a risk-prediction model. METHODS: Using national Veterans Health Administration data, we identified patients who met the criteria for primary aldosteronism screening between 2000 and 2019. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify characteristics associated with positive primary aldosteronism testing before generating a risk-scoring system based on the coefficients (0< ß < 0.5 = 1 pt, 0.5 ≤ ß < 1 = 2 pts, 1 ≤ ß < 1.5 = 3 pts) and then tested the system performance using an internal validation cohort. RESULTS: We identified 502,190 patients who met primary aldosteronism screening criteria, of whom 1.6% were screened and 15% tested positive. Based on the regression model, we generated a risk-scoring system based on a total of 9 possible points in which age under 50, absence of smoking history, and resistant hypertension each scored 1 point; elevated serum sodium 2 points; and hypokalemia 3 points. Rates of positive screening increased with risk score, with 5.6% to 6.7% of those scoring 0 points testing positive; 7.9% to 9.0% 1 point; 8.6% to 10% 2 points; 13% to 14% 3 points; 21% 4 points; 22% to 38% 5 points; 27% to 38% 6 points; 42% to 49% 7 points; and 50% to 51% ≥8 points. CONCLUSION: In hypertensive patients who meet the criteria for primary aldosteronism screening, rates of positive screening range from 5.6% to 51%. Use of our risk-predication model incorporating these factors can identify patients most likely to benefit from testing.