Excision of the endothelial blood-brain barrier insulin receptor does not alter spatial cognition in mice fed either a chow or high-fat diet.

Insulin is transported across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) endothelium to regulate aspects of metabolism and cognition. Brain insulin resistance often results from high-fat diet (HFD) consumption and is thought to contribute to spatial cognition deficits. To target BBB insulin function, we used Cre-LoxP genetic excision of the insulin receptor (InsR) from endothelial cells in adult male mice. We hypothesized that this excision would impair spatial cognition, and that high-fat diet consumption would exacerbate these effects. Excision of the endothelial InsR did not impair performance in two spatial cognition tasks, the Y-Maze and Morris Water Maze, in tests held both before and after 14 weeks of access to high-fat (or chow control) diet. The HFD increased body weight gain and induced glucose intolerance but did not impair spatial cognition. Endothelial InsR excision tended to increase body weight and reduce sensitivity to peripheral insulin, but these metabolic effects were not associated with impairments to spatial cognition and did not interact with HFD exposure. Instead, all mice showed intact spatial cognitive performance regardless of whether they had been fed chow or a HFD, and whether the InsR had been excised or not. Overall, the results indicate that loss of the endothelial InsR does not impact spatial cognition, which is in line with pharmacological evidence that other mechanisms at the BBB facilitate insulin transport and allow it to exert its pro-cognitive effects.

High fat diet allows food-predictive stimuli to energize action performance in the absence of hunger, without distorting insulin signaling on accumbal cholinergic interneurons.

Obesity can disrupt how food-predictive stimuli control action performance and selection. These two forms of control recruit cholinergic interneurons (CIN) located in the nucleus accumbens core (NAcC) and shell (NAcS), respectively. Given that obesity is associated with insulin resistance in this region, we examined whether interfering with CIN insulin signaling disrupts how food-predictive stimuli control actions. To interfere with insulin signaling we used a high-fat diet (HFD) or genetic excision of the insulin receptor (InsR) from cholinergic cells. HFD left intact the capacity of food-predictive stimuli to energize performance of an action earning food when mice were tested hungry. However, it allowed this energizing effect to persist when the mice were tested sated. This persistence was linked to NAcC CIN activity but was not associated with distorted CIN insulin signaling. Accordingly, InsR excision had no effect on how food-predicting stimuli control action performance. Next, we found that neither HFD nor InsR excision altered the capacity of food-predictive stimuli to guide action selection. Yet, this capacity was associated with changes in NAcS CIN activity. These results indicate that insulin signaling on accumbal CINs does not modulate how food-predictive stimuli control action performance and selection. However, they show that HFD allows food-predictive stimuli to energize performance of an action earning food in the absence of hunger.

The effect of insulin receptor deletion in neuropeptide Y neurons on hippocampal dependent cognitive function in aging mice.

Insulin is known to act in the central nervous system to regulate several physiological and behavioural outcomes, including energy balance, glucose homeostasis and cognitive functioning. However, the neuronal populations through which insulin enhances cognitive performance remain unidentified. Insulin receptors are found in neuropeptide-Y (NPY) expressing neurons, which are abundant in the hypothalamus and hippocampus; regions involved in feeding behaviour and spatial memory, respectively. Here we show that mice with a tissue specific knockout of insulin receptors in NPY expressing neurons (IRl⁢o⁢x/l⁢o⁢x; NPYC⁢r⁢e⁣/+) display an impaired performance in the probe trial of the Morris Water Maze compared with control mice at both the 6 and the 12, but not at the 24 months time point, consistent with a crucial role of insulin and NPY in cognitive functioning. By 24 months of age all groups demonstrated similar reductions in spatial memory performance. Together, these data suggest that the mechanisms through which insulin influences cognitive functioning are, at least in part, via insulin receptor signaling in NPY expressing neurons. These results also highlight that cognitive impairments observed in aging may be due to impaired insulin signaling.

Stimulus-outcome associations are required for the expression of specific Pavlovian-instrumental transfer.

A series of experiments employed a specific Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (PIT) task in rats to determine the capacity of various treatments to undermine two outcome-specific stimulus-outcome (S-O) associations. Experiment 1 tested a random treatment, which involved uncorrelated presentations of the two stimuli and their predicted outcomes. This treatment disrupted the capacity of the outcome-specific S-O associations to drive specific PIT. Experiment 2 used a negative-contingency treatment during which the predicted outcomes were exclusively delivered in the absence of their associated stimulus. This treatment spared specific PIT, suggesting that it left the outcome-specific S-O associations relatively intact. The same outcome was obtained in Experiment 3, which implemented a zero-contingency treatment consisting of delivering the predicted outcomes in the presence and absence of their associated stimulus. Experiment 4 tested a mixed treatment, which distributed the predicted outcomes at an equal rate during each stimulus. This treatment disrupted the capacity of the outcome-specific S-O associations to drive specific PIT. We suggest that the mixed treatment disrupted specific PIT by generating new and competing outcome-specific S-O associations. By contrast, we propose that the random treatment disrupted specific PIT by undermining the original outcome-specific S-O associations, indicating that these associations must be retrieved to express specific PIT. We discuss how these findings inform our theoretical understanding of the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Diet and obesity effects on cue-driven food-seeking: insights from studies of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer in rodents and humans.

Our modern environment is said to be obesogenic, promoting the consumption of calorically dense foods and reducing energy expenditure. One factor thought to drive excess energy intake is the abundance of cues signaling the availability of highly palatable foods. Indeed, these cues exert powerful influences over food-related decision-making. Although obesity is associated with changes to several cognitive domains, the specific role of cues in producing this shift and on decision-making more generally, remains poorly understood. Here we review the literature examining how obesity and palatable diets affect the ability of Pavlovian cues to influence instrumental food-seeking behaviors by examining rodent and human studies incorporating Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (PIT) protocols. There are two types of PIT: (a) general PIT that tests whether cues can energize actions elicited in the pursuit of food generally, and (b) specific PIT which tests whether cues can elicit an action that earns a specific food outcome when faced with a choice. Both types of PIT have been shown to be vulnerable to alterations as a result of changes to diet and obesity. However, effects appear to be driven less by increases in body fat and more by palatable diet exposure per se. We discuss the limitations and implications of the current findings. The challenges for future research are to uncover the mechanisms underlying these alterations to PIT, which appear unrelated to excess weight itself, and to better model the complex determinants of food choice in humans.

The Effect of Intrahippocampal Insulin Infusion on Spatial Cognitive Function and Markers of Neuroinflammation in Diet-induced Obesity.

Obesity and high fat diet consumption contribute to the development of metabolic disorders, insulin resistance, neuroinflammation, and cognitive impairments. CNS administration of insulin into the brain can attenuate these cognitive impairments. The present study investigated whether hippocampal-dependent spatial memory impairments in a dietary induced mouse model of obesity could be improved by the direct administration of insulin into the hippocampus and whether this was associated with markers of hippocampal inflammation. C57Bl/6J mice consumed a low fat or high fat diet for 16 weeks and continuous intrahippocampal saline or insulin infusion for the final 4 weeks, during a period of behavioral testing, before gene expression analysis was performed. The high fat diet group demonstrated poorer spatial memory performance in the Morris water maze and Y-maze, supporting the hypothesis that high fat diet leads to hippocampal dependent cognitive impairment. Insulin infusion into the hippocampus reversed the deficit of high fat diet consumption on both of the tasks. Increased expression of inflammatory markers was detected in the hippocampus in the high fat diet group and expression of these markers was ameliorated in insulin infused mice. This demonstrates that CNS insulin can improve hippocampal-dependent memory and that hippocampal inflammation may be a factor in the development of cognitive deficits associated with diet-induced obesity. Furthermore, these data suggest that insulin may act to attenuate high fat diet induced cognitive deficits by reducing neuroinflammation.