Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

BACKGROUND: Cataract, defined as an opacity of the lens in one or both eyes, is the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Cataract may initially be treated with new spectacles, but often surgery is required, which involves removing the cataract and placing a new artificial lens, usually made from hydrophobic acrylic. Recent advancements in intraocular lens (IOL) technology have led to the emergence of a diverse array of implantable lenses that aim to minimise spectacle dependence at all distances (near, intermediate, and distance). To assess the relative merits of these lenses, measurements of visual acuity are needed. Visual acuity is a measurement of the sharpness of vision at a distance of 6 metres (or 20 feet). Normal vision is 6/6 (or 20/20). The Jaegar eye card is used to measure near visual acuity. J1 is the smallest text and J2 is considered equivalent to 6/6 (or 20/20) for near vision. OBJECTIVES: To compare visual outcomes after implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) to those of extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. To produce a brief economic commentary summarising recent economic evaluations that compare trifocal IOLs with EDOF IOLs. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), MEDLINE, Embase, and three trial registries on 15 June 2022. For our economic evaluation, we also searched MEDLINE and Embase using economic search filters to 15 June 2022, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) from 1968 up to and including 31 December 2014. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies comparing trifocal and EDOF IOLs in adults undergoing cataract surgery. We did not include studies involving people receiving IOLs for correction of refractive error alone (or refractive lens exchange in the absence of cataract). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Two review authors working independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data from the reports. We assessed the risk of bias in the studies, and we assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included five studies that compared trifocal and EDOF lenses in people undergoing cataract surgery. Three trifocal lenses (AcrySof IQ PanOptix, ATLISA Tri 839MP, FineVision Micro F) and one EDOF lens (TECNIS Symfony ZXR00) were evaluated. The studies took place in Europe and North America. Follow-up ranged from three to six months. Of the 239 enroled participants, 233 (466 eyes) completed follow-up and were included in the analyses. The mean age of participants was 68.2 years, and 64% of participants were female. In general, the risk of bias in the studies was unclear as methods for random sequence generation and allocation concealment were poorly reported, and we judged one study to be at high risk of performance and detection bias. We assessed the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes as low, downgrading for the risk of bias and for imprecision. In two studies involving a total of 254 people, there was little or no difference between trifocal and EDOF lenses for uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity worse than 6/6. Sixty per cent of participants in both groups had uncorrected distance visual acuity worse than 6/6 (risk ratio (RR) 1.06, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.88 to 1.27). Thirty-one per cent of the trifocal group and 38% of the EDOF group had corrected distance visual acuity worse than 6/6 (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.39). In one study of 60 people, there were fewer cases of uncorrected near visual acuity worse than J2 in the trifocal group (3%) compared with the EDOF group (30%) (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.65). In two studies, participants were asked about spectacle independence using subjective questionnaires. There was no evidence of either lens type being superior. One further study of 60 participants reported, "overall, 90% of patients achieved spectacle independence", but did not categorise this by lens type. All studies included postoperative patient-reported visual function, which was measured using different questionnaires. Irrespective of the questionnaire used, both types of lenses scored well, and there was little evidence of any important differences between them. Two studies included patient-reported ocular aberrations (glare and halos). The outcomes were reported in different ways and could not be pooled; individually, these studies were too small to detect meaningful differences in glare and halos between groups. One study reported no surgical complications. Three studies did not mention surgical complications. One study reported YAG capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification (PCO) in one participant (one eye) in each group. One study reported no PCO. Two studies did not report PCO. One study reported that three participants (one trifocal and two EDOF) underwent laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) to correct residual myopic refractive error or astigmatism. One study reported a subset of participants who were considering laser enhancement at the end of the study period (nine trifocal and two EDOF). Two studies did not report laser enhancement rates. No economic evaluation studies were identified for inclusion in this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Distance visual acuity after cataract surgery may be similar whether the lenses implanted are trifocal IOLs or EDOF (TECNIS Symfony) IOLs. People receiving trifocal IOLs may achieve better near vision and may be less dependent on spectacles for near vision. Both lenses were reported to have adverse subjective visual phenomena, such as glare and halos, with no meaningful difference detected between lenses.

Keratoconus in Down syndrome: Prevalence, risk factors, severity and corneal tomographic characteristics.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the prevalence, risk factors and severity of corneal tomographic features of keratoconus in Down syndrome (DS). Additionally, previous studies indicate anomalous corneal features in DS, without keratoconus, this study characterised corneal features in DS without keratoconus. METHODS: This prospective observational study included participants with DS ≥10 years old. Keratoconus diagnosis, risk factors and corneal tomographic characteristics were recorded. Participants underwent slit-lamp biomicroscopy, Scheimpflug corneal tomography, corneal topography and autorefraction. A diagnosis of keratoconus (DS-KC), suspect keratoconus (DS-SK) and non-keratoconus (DS-NK) was made based on expert review of scans by three fellowship trained anterior segment ophthalmologists. Corneal tomography parameters from one eye of each participant were analysed. RESULTS: Keratoconus affected 50 (26.3%) of 190 participants, diagnosed by corneal tomography, topography or slit-lamp signs. Corneal hydrops affected 14.0% of DS-KC participants. Eye rubbing was a significant risk factor for keratoconus (p = 0.036). 175 (92%) participants could undertake corneal tomography of which tomography assessment alone identified 47 (26.9%) DS-KC participants, 64 (36.6%) DS-SK participants and 64 (36.6%) DS-NK participants. Significant differences (p < 0.001) were identified when the DS-KC, DS-SK and DS-NK groups were compared in maximum keratometry and posterior elevation at the thinnest point respectively: median (interquartile range) 50.20 (10.30D), 47.60 (1.95D), 46.50 (2.40D); 24.0 (38.00 µm), 10.00 (13.75 µm), 8.00 (6.00 µm). The DS-SK and DS-NK cohorts had similar minimum pachymetry, however, had several significantly different parameters among which included greater maximum keratometry, posterior elevation at the thinnest point in the DS-SK group. CONCLUSIONS: Keratoconus is common in DS. Keratoconus screening with corneal tomography is recommended for early detection.

Keratoconus Management in the Community: A Survey of Optometrists.

OBJECTIVES: Defining the patterns of practice and referral criteria of optometrists within New Zealand to investigate the diagnosis and management of keratoconus. METHODS: Optometrists recruited through the New Zealand Association of Optometrists, Cornea and Contact Lens Society of New Zealand, and private practices were invited to complete an anonymous survey. RESULTS: Responses were received from 168 optometrists (representing 20.0% of the optometrist population). Half (48%) of optometrists had ≥15 years of experience, and 22% prescribed soft contact lenses daily, whereas only 6.4% prescribed rigid gas-permeable (RGP) lenses daily. The main barriers to prescribing RGPs were experience with fitting, low market demand, and patient discomfort. When referring to an ophthalmologist, 41% reported referring on progression of corneal parameters, 27% on initial diagnosis, 21% at no set time, and 10% with a reduction in visual acuity. Most optometrists (64%) would refer for possible surgery when visual acuity dropped between 6/9 and 6/12. Optometrists with greater experience were more likely to prescribe RGP lenses and co-manage patients with ophthalmologists. Ownership of a corneal imaging unit suggested an increased likelihood of prescribing RGP lenses but did not alter referral patterns. CONCLUSION: This survey provides an overview of current practice and highlights the importance of optometrists in the diagnosis and management of keratoconus. There was a significant discrepancy in keratoconus management, regarding optical correction modality and referral criteria for ophthalmology review. Further interdisciplinary work is required between optometry and ophthalmology to standardize referral guidelines and enhance visual outcomes.

Comparing Repeatability and Agreement between Commonly Used Corneal Imaging Devices in Keratoconus.

SIGNIFICANCE: Keratometry and pachymetry are important for diagnosis and monitoring of keratoconus. Many corneal imaging units exist, but comparison to determine repeatability and agreement is paramount for adequate keratoconus management in primary and secondary care. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and agreement of a Placido disc-based videokeratoscope (Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) used in primary care with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Optopol Technology, Zawiercie, Poland) and Scheimpflug corneal tomography (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) in secondary care. METHODS: This was a prospective single-center study where one eye was randomized to have central corneal thickness;thinnest corneal thickness (TCT); and maximum, mean, steep, and flat keratometry (Kmax, Kmean, Ksteep, and Kflat, respectively), measured with all three devices. Three measurements were completed per device to assess intraobserver repeatability. RESULTS: A total of 110 eyes from 110 patients with keratoconus were analyzed. Repeatability was best with the Pentacam for central corneal thickness, Kmax, Kmean, Ksteep, and Kflat parameters (precision, 9.21, 0.8, 0.38, 0.52, and 0.58). The Medmont had better repeatability than the Revo with Kmax, Kmean, Ksteep, and Kflat (precision, 1.41,1.35,1.43, and 1.59). Revo had the best repeatability with TCT (precision, 3.81). The intraclass correlation coefficient was >0.94 for all parameters in all devices. Agreement was generally poor between devices. However, there was good agreement between Pentacam and Medmont Kflat measurements ( P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Repeatability of keratometry parameters with the Pentacam and Medmont was greater than the Revo, suggesting a lower threshold for detecting change in anterior corneal parameters. The Revo had the greatest repeatability for TCT, suggesting a lower threshold for detecting thinning in disease progression and corneal-crosslinking safety. There was poor agreement between devices, and it is not recommended for them to be used interchangably.

Case Report: Acute Corneal Hydrops despite Accelerated Transepithelial Corneal Cross-linking.

SIGNIFICANCE: Corneal cross-linking is a well-established treatment to reduce or halt the progression of keratoconus. This case demonstrates that acute corneal hydrops may develop several years after corneal cross-linking even despite apparent treatment effect with corneal flattening, and patients should be monitored accordingly. PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe a case of continued progression in the form of corneal hydrops despite prior corneal cross-linking and evidence of treatment effect. CASE REPORT: A 19-year-old woman underwent bilateral accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus. At 2 years after the procedure, significant flattening of the central cornea of >3 D was measured in the left eye, indicating a significant treatment response, although continued thinning was noted on tomography. At 3.5 years after the procedure, this eye developed acute corneal hydrops with subsequent corneal scarring necessitating corneal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients should continue to be monitored for several years after corneal cross-linking, and retreatment should be considered if there is progressive corneal thinning.

Case Report: Successful Corneal Crosslinking in a Patient with Corneal Ectasia Associated with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome.

SIGNIFICANCE: Corneal ectasia can be a complication of Stevens-Johnson syndrome. When detected in a timely manner, corneal crosslinking can be a safe treatment. This is an important association to highlight that early diagnosis and treatment can prevent the need for invasive surgical procedures such as keratoplasty. PURPOSE: This study aimed to report a successful accelerated epithelium-off corneal crosslinking in a rare case of corneal ectasia secondary to Stevens-Johnson syndrome. CASE REPORT: A 25-year-old Indian man presented with a progressive visual acuity decline 5 years after an acute episode of Stevens-Johnson syndrome secondary to penicillin ingestion. Serial tomography scans confirmed the diagnosis of corneal ectasia. After the preparation of the ocular surface, which was deemed to have a mild degree of limbal stem cell deficiency, with frequent preservative-free lubrication and steroid use, accelerated epithelium-off crosslinking was performed with 4 minutes of continuous ultraviolet-A exposure at 30 mW/cm2 and a total energy dose of 7.2 J/cm2. Complete re-epithelialization was observed at 72 hours after crosslinking with no complications. Corneal tomography 15 months after treatment showed stabilization of ectasia, with improvement in visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal ectasia is a rare but important complication of Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Accelerated epithelium-off crosslinking treatment can be considered in patients with a compromised ocular surface after Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Pre-operative optimization of the ocular surface and vigilant monitoring in the early post-operative period are recommended for the prevention of complications.

Five-year results of a prospective, randomised, contralateral eye trial of corneal crosslinking for keratoconus.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated corneal crosslinking (CXL) in a prospective, randomised fashion. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of CXL to reduce the progression of keratoconus. METHODS: Prospective, unmasked, randomised, contralateral eye controlled trial at a tertiary eye centre. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with bilateral progressive keratoconus. One eye from each subject was randomised to CXL and the contralateral, untreated eye acted as the control. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: change in maximum keratometry. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: uncorrected distance visual acuity, spectacle corrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent refraction, simulated keratometry, corneal astigmatism, minimum pachymetry and complications. RESULTS: Thirty-eight individuals (mean age 21.1 ± 6.7 years) were enrolled with one eye treated with CXL. At 5 years, there was a mean decrease in maximum keratometry of treated eyes (-1.45 ± 2.25 D) compared to an increase among the controls (1.71 ± 2.46 D; p < 0.001). There were significant differences between the treated and control groups in the mean change of Steep SimK (-1.07 ± 1.22 vs. 0.96 ± 1.97 D; p < 0.001), Flat SimK (-0.61 ± 1.34 vs. 0.43 ± 1.12 D; p < 0.001), corneal astigmatism (-0.45 ± 1.31 vs. 0.63 ± 1.52 D; p < 0.01) and minimum pachymetry (-32.49 ± 26.32 vs. -13.57 ± 24.11 µm; p < 0.01). Complications included sterile infiltrates (n = 2), microbial keratitis (n = 1), persistent corneal haze/scarring at 5 years (n = 4) and loss of ≥2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: CXL is an effective and relatively safe intervention to halt or reduce the progression of keratoconus in the majority of eyes for at least 5 years.

Topographic screening reveals keratoconus to be extremely common in Down syndrome.

IMPORTANCE: Keratoconus disproportionately affects people with Down syndrome (DS). This is the first study of its kind in Australasia. BACKGROUND: To investigate the prevalence of keratoconus in DS. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Athletes with DS attending 2017 New Zealand Special Olympics National Summer Games. METHODS: Keratoconus was identified using corneal topography (TMS-4N, Tomey). Topography from both eyes was required to be included. Two independent quantitative criteria were used to indicate keratoconus. The first was keratoconus severity index ≥ 30%. The second, adapted from the literature, required at least four of eight topographic parameters to be abnormal. Data from the worse eye were analysed. Diagnosis in each group was subsequently confirmed qualitatively by three corneal fellowship-trained ophthalmologists. Those with a definitive diagnosis were grouped into Keratoconus Confirmed Group 1 (KCC1) and Keratoconus Confirmed Group 2 (KCC2), respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Keratoconus prevalence, severity, demographics. RESULTS: Of 110 athletes screened, N = 98 were included, mean age 30.0 ± 9.7 years. Using only topographic data, keratoconus was identified in 39 (39.8%) athletes by quantitative topographic criteria 1, and in 63 (64.3%) athletes by criteria 2. Keratoconus was confirmed by qualitative sub-specialist review in 30 (30.6%) (KCC1) and 38 (38.8%) (KCC2) athletes, respectively. Mean keratometry in groups KCC1 and KCC2 were 48.4 ± 3.2D and 48.2 ± 2.9D, respectively. Most were male (KCC1 63.3%, KCC2 76.3%) and of European ethnicity (KCC1 80%, KCC2 78.9%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We report keratoconus in 30.6% to 38.8% of athletes with DS; therefore, we believe keratoconus screening is indicated in DS for early management.

Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus.

IMPORTANCE: Keratoplasty is a surgical procedure to create a more regular optical surface following biomechanical weakening of the cornea in keratoconus. The ideal keratoplasty procedure should also restore corneal biomechanics to that of the healthy cornea. BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of corneas following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and predescematic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) to those of healthy eyes. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Two cohorts of post-keratoplasty eyes (42 eyes with PKP and 27 eyes with DALK) with each other, and with a cohort of 152 healthy eyes. METHODS: All eyes were examined by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, tomography, anterior segment-OCT and non-contact tonometry CorVis ST (CST). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CST biomechanical parameters, maximum corneal deformation (MCD) and corneal energy dissipation were compared between keratoplasty techniques, and with healthy eyes. RESULTS: The mean age of participants with PKP and DALK were 35 ± 13.7 and 36.1 ± 12.6 years, respectively. None of the CST parameters were significantly different between PKP and DALK eyes. However, when compared to healthy corneas, numerous parameters were significantly different for both keratoplasty techniques. Of note, MCD was significantly higher in PKP compared to DALK and healthy corneas, after controlling for co-factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Neither type of keratoplasty technique utilized in keratoconus completely restored corneal biomechanical properties to that of healthy corneas. However, PKP resulted in a greater number of parameters significantly different to healthy corneas, compared to DALK.

Microdroplet and spatter contamination during phacoemulsification cataract surgery in the era of COVID-19.

IMPORTANCE: Determine phacoemulsification cataract surgery risk in a Covid-19 era. BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) transmission via microdroplet and aerosol-generating procedures presents risk to medical professionals. As the most common elective surgical procedure performed globally; determining contamination risk from phacoemulsification cataract surgery may guide personal protection equipment use. DESIGN: Pilot study involving phacoemulsification cataract surgery on enucleated porcine eyes by experienced ophthalmologists in an ophthalmic operating theatre. PARTICIPANTS: Two ophthalmic surgical teams. METHODS: Standardized phacoemulsification of porcine eyes by two ophthalmologists accompanied by an assistant. Fluorescein incorporated into phacoemulsification irrigation fluid identifying microdroplets and spatter. Contamination documented using a single-lens reflex camera with a 532 nm narrow bandpass (fluorescein) filter, in-conjunction with a wide-field blue light and flat horizontal laser beam (wavelength 532 nm). Quantitative image analysis using Image-J software. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Microdroplet and spatter contamination from cataract phacoemulsification. RESULTS: With phacoemulsification instruments fully within the eye, spatter contamination was limited to <10 cm. Insertion and removal of the phacoemulsification needle and bimanual irrigation/aspiration, with irrigation active generated spatter on the surgeons' gloves and gown extending to >16 cm below the neckline in surgeon 1 and > 5.5 cm below the neckline of surgeon 2. A small tear in the phacoemulsification irrigation sleeve, presented a worse-case scenario the greatest spatter. No contamination above the surgeons' neckline nor contamination of assistant occurred. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Cataract phacoemulsification generates microdroplets and spatter. Until further studies on SARS-CoV-2 transmission via microdroplets or aerosolisation of ocular fluid are reported, this pilot study only supports standard personal protective equipment.

Prospective two-year study of clinical outcomes following epithelium-off pulsed versus continuous accelerated corneal crosslinking for keratoconus.

IMPORTANCE: Keratoconus is a debilitating condition with a disproportionately high impact on health resources and vision-specific quality of life. BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare 2-year outcomes of epithelium-off pulsed (p-ACXL) and epithelium-off continuous (c-ACXL) accelerated corneal crosslinking in progressive keratoconus. DESIGN: Prospective, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty eyes of 80 patients were included. METHODS: The visual, refractive and tomographic results of the two crosslinking protocols were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) and maximum keratometry (KMAX ) on corneal tomography assessment. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 22.51 ± 6.12 years (SD) and 22.08 ± 5.72 years in the p-ACXL and c-ACXL groups, respectively. The mean CDVA significantly improved from 0.30 ± 0.16 logMAR at baseline to 0.23 ± 0.17 logMAR at 24 months (P = .04) in the p-ACXL group and from 0.36 ± 0.22 logMAR to 0.26 ± 0.27 logMAR (P = .02) in the c-ACXL group. The mean induced change in MRSE (+1.79 ± 2.30 D vs +0.27 ± 3.19 D, P = .04) and KMAX (-1.75 ± 1.80 D vs -0.39 ± 1.95 D, P = .04) were superior in the c-ACXL group compared to the p-ACXL group at 24 months. No complications were encountered. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this prospective study, both p-ACXL and c-ACXL treatments were safe methods to halt the progression of keratoconus within a follow-up period of 24 months. c-ACXL appeared to offer superior refractive and tomographic outcomes when compared to p-ACXL but this did not translate into better visual outcomes.

Advanced anterior segment imaging in keratoconus: a review.

Advances in anterior segment imaging have enhanced our ability to detect keratoconus in its early stages and characterize the pathologic changes that occur. Computerized corneal tomography has elucidated the alterations in shape of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces and alterations in thickness as the disease progresses. Automated screening indices such as the keratoconus screening index were developed to assist in detecting keratoconus in suspicious cases. In vivo assessment of keratoconic corneas has revealed that compromised corneal biomechanics can now be measured clinically. Optical coherence tomography has demonstrated alterations in corneal epithelial thickness and distribution in keratoconus, has a role in assessing Descemet's membrane detachment in acute corneal hydrops (ACH) and the depth of the demarcation line following corneal collagen cross-linking. In vivo confocal microscopy has exhibited cellular changes that occur in keratoconus and provided insight into cellular events that may be related to the development of neovascularization in ACH.

Assessment of Health Disparities and Barriers to Accessing Keratoconus and Crosslinking at a Tertiary Referral Center.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the barriers to accessing the crosslinking service in Auckland, New Zealand. METHODS: This was a prospective 1-year study of patients at Auckland District Health Board. Studied parameters included age, sex, body mass index, ethnicity, New Zealand Deprivation (NZDep; an area-based measure of socioeconomic status, 1 = low deprivation-10 = high deprivation) score of residence, disease severity (maximum keratometry and thinnest corneal thickness), attendance, distance travelled, car ownership, employment status, and visual outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t tests, Pearson correlation, independent samples ANOVA, MANCOVA, and binomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-four patients with keratoconus were analyzed and had a mean age of 24.1 ± 0.8 years, mean body mass index of 33.0 ± 9.7 kg/m 2 , and 43% were female. Pacific Peoples consisted 40.2% of the population; Maori 27.2%; Europeans 21.2%; Asian 9.9%; and Middle Eastern, Latin American, and African (MELAA) 1.3%. The mean distance travelled was 12.5 ± 9.5 km, NZDep score was 6.8 ± 2.6, and attendance was 69.0 ± 42.5%. The lowest attendance was observed in Pacific Peoples (58.9%) and the highest was in Asians (90%) ( P = 0.019). The mean worst-eye visual acuity at attendance was 0.75 ± 0.47 logMAR (6/35). Unemployment was associated with worse best-eye visual acuity at FSA ( P = 0.01) and follow-up ( P < 0.05). Maori and Pacific Peoples had the highest NZDep ( P < 0.001), were younger at presentation ( P = 0.019), had higher disease severity ( P < 0.001), and worse visual acuity ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Poor attendance was seen in this cohort. Pacific Peoples and Maori presented younger with worse disease severity and visual acuity but also had the highest nonattendance. These results suggest that deprivation, factors associated with ethnicity, and unemployment are potential barriers to attendance.

An optimized 3T MRI scan protocol to assess iris melanoma with subsequent histopathological verification - A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has demonstrated high levels of tissue contrast, accuracy and reproducibility in evaluating posterior uveal melanoma. Owing to smaller size, the role of MRI in detecting and characterising iris melanoma has not yet been explored. AIMS: To develop a protocol to image iris melanoma and describe the MRI characteristics of histopathological-confirmed iris melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An optimised MRI protocol, using a 3T MRI scanner and a 32-channel head coil, was developed to image iris tumours. A prospective, single-centre, 12-month study was conducted on all patients with lesions suspicious for iris melanoma. All patients were offered an MRI scan in addition to the standardised clinical procedures. Image quality comparison was made with existing clinical investigations. Iris melanoma characteristics on MRI are described. RESULTS: A successful optimised MRI scan protocol was developed that was able to detect and characterise iris melanoma. One normal participant and five patients with subsequent histopathological-confirmed iris melanoma (n = 6) were recruited. Four patients completed the full MRI sequence. All iris melanoma were detected on at least one T1- or T2-weighted images. When compared to the vitreous, all iris melanomas demonstrated hyper-intensity on T1-weighted images and hypo-intensity on T2-weighted images. On T1-mapping, T1-values of iris melanoma demonstrated an inverse relationship with the degree of tumour pigmentation. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights an optimised, easily reproducible MRI scan protocol to image iris melanoma. Numerous MR imaging characteristics of iris melanoma are reported for the first time and a potential non-invasive tumour biomarker is described.

Progression of keratoconus in children and adolescents.

AIMS: To evaluate the rates of keratoconus progression and associated factors in eyes of children and adolescents. METHODS: Retrospective, cohort study of individuals ≤18 years old at the time of keratoconus diagnosis and with at least 6 months of follow-up. Corneal tomography was performed using an Orbscan tomographer (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA) to determine whether progression occurred. Tomographic progression of keratoconus was defined as a change in any of the investigated parameters (keratometry values, KMAX, maximum anterior or posterior elevation, central pachymetry, thinnest pachymetry) beyond the limits of repeatability. RESULTS: 148 eyes of 106 patients with a mean age of 15.2±2.5 years were studied over a mean follow-up period of 2.9±2.2 years. The overall rate of tomographic progression was 77.0% (114/148 eyes). Eyes that progressed had more advanced disease at presentation with higher anterior curvature (KMAX55.4±6.3 vs 52.2±5.4 dioptres; p<0.01), posterior elevation (108.2±40.9 vs 86.3±35.6 µm; p<0.01) and lower central pachymetry measurements (442.1±56.7 vs 454.4±47.5 µm; p=0.01). Age at presentation, gender, atopy, documented eye rubbing, ethnicity and duration of follow-up were not significantly associated with progression in the multivariate analyses. There was a higher rate of bilateral progression if at least one eye had severe keratoconus (73.9%) compared with no severe keratoconus in either eye (36.8%; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: A high rate of progression was identified in keratoconic eyes of children and adolescents. More advanced disease at initial presentation may increase the risk of further keratoconus progression.

Ocular Antibiotic Utilisation across Aotearoa/New Zealand.

Ocular antibiotics are integral to the prevention and treatment of bacterial ocular infections. This study aimed to describe their utilisation across New Zealand according to patient and healthcare factors. Every subsidy-eligible community dispensing of ocular chloramphenicol, fusidic acid and ciprofloxacin in New Zealand, between 2010 and 2019, was included in this analysis. Number of dispensings/1000 population/year was quantified, stratified by patient age and urban/non-urban health districts. Dispensing rates by ethnicity were determined and were age adjusted. The proportion of dispensings by socioeconomic deprivation quintile was also determined. Chloramphenicol was the most commonly dispensed antibiotic; however, its utilisation decreased over time. Ciprofloxacin use was higher in children, while chloramphenicol use was higher in older patients. Ciprofloxacin usage was higher among Maori and Pasifika ethnicities, while fusidic acid use was lower. Chloramphenicol usage was higher among Pasifika. Antibiotic utilisation was higher in urban health districts, and in the most deprived quintile; both were most marked with ciprofloxacin. The utilisation of publicly funded ocular antibiotics across New Zealand varied between patient subgroups. These findings will help improve the prevention, management and outcomes of bacterial ocular infections, and support wider initiatives in antibiotic stewardship and medicine access equity.

Therapeutic non-ectasia applications of cornea cross-linking.

Corneal cross-linking is a photopolymerization technique traditionally used to strengthen corneal tissue. Corneal cross-linking utilizes riboflavin (vitamin B2) as a photosensitizer and ultraviolet-A light (UVA) to create strong covalent bonds within the corneal stroma, increasing tissue stiffness. Multiple studies have demonstrated corneal cross-linking's effectiveness in treating corneal ectasia, a progressive, degenerative, and non-inflammatory thinning disorder, as quantified by key tomographic, refractive, and visual parameters. Since its introduction two decades ago, corneal cross-linking has surpassed its original application in halting corneal ectatic disease and its application has expanded into several other areas. Corneal cross-linking also possesses antibacterial, antienzymolytic and antioedematous properties, and has since become a tool in treating microbial keratitis, correcting refractive error, preventing iatrogenic ectasia, stabilising bullous keratopathy and controlling post keratoplasty ametropia. This review provides an overview of the current evidence base for the therapeutic non-ectasia applications of cornea cross-linking and looks at future developments in the field.

Comparison of Ectasia Detection in Early Keratoconus Using Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the detection of keratoconus using corneal biomechanical parameters only, a corneal tomographic parameter only, and a parameter that combines corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices. METHODS: The discriminatory power of the Pentacam Random Forest Index (PRFI), Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display (BAD-D) index, Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI), and Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI) to differentiate between normal eyes (n = 84), eyes with very asymmetric corneal ectasia (VAE-E, n = 21), and the fellow eyes without apparent ectasia based on normal tomography (VAE-NT, n = 21) was assessed. Statistical analyses were completed with R software using t -tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The DeLong test was used to compare the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). RESULTS: The TBI and PRFI had the highest AUROC when distinguishing between normal and VAE-E corneas (AUROC = 1.00, 95% CI = 1.00-1.00); however, they were not statistically superior to the CBI (AUROC = 0.97, P = 0.27) or BAD-D (AUROC = 1.00, P = 0.34). The TBI (AUROC = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.86-0.98) was superior to CBI (AUROC = 0.78, P = 0.02) and BAD-D (AUROC = 0.81, P = 0.02) when distinguishing between healthy and VAE-NT corneas. At a threshold of 0.72, the TBI had 99% sensitivity, 67% specificity, and 92% accuracy in distinguishing normal and VAE-NT corneas. CONCLUSIONS: The TBI is a useful parameter for the screening of subclinical and frank keratoconus in tomographically normal eyes.

Confocal and Electron Microscopic Structure of the Cornea from Three Species of Penguin.

Corneal confocal microscopy has not previously been performed in penguins, despite recognition of its unusually flat shape. To identify features that the penguin shares with other birds and or mammals and those specific to penguins, we undertook confocal microscopic examination of two little (Eudyptula minor), four gentoo (Pygoscelis papua) and five king (Aptenodytes patagonicus) penguin corneas. Transmission electron microscopy was performed on one gentoo and one king penguin, for finer details. Features shared with other higher vertebrates included a five-layered cornea and a similar limbus. Typically avian were a lower density of stromal cells, a more regular arrangement of collagen bands and an absent basal nerve plexus. Features unique to penguins included a flattened superficial epithelium (king penguin), stromal myofibroblasts (all) and an irregular endothelium (little penguin). Other features uniquely identified by confocal microscopy in birds include epithelial and stromal nerves, guttata and stromal imprints on Descemet's membrane. Transmission electron microscopy identified a lack of wing cells (king penguin), greater posterior collagen lamellae thickness (gentoo penguin) and significantly less interlacing of collagen lamellae in the central cornea (king and gentoo). Most of these unique features are yet to be explained, but some could be adaptations to diving.