Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 44
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transplant ; 38(5): e15329, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722085

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression reduction for BK polyoma virus (BKV) must be balanced against risk of adverse alloimmune outcomes. We sought to characterize risk of alloimmune events after BKV within context of HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch (mMM) risk score. METHODS: This single-center study evaluated 460 kidney transplant patients on tacrolimus-mycophenolate-prednisone from 2010-2021. BKV status was classified at 6-months post-transplant as "BKV" or "no BKV" in landmark analysis. Primary outcome was T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR). Secondary outcomes included all-cause graft failure (ACGF), death-censored graft failure (DCGF), de novo donor specific antibody (dnDSA), and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Predictors of outcomes were assessed in Cox proportional hazards models including BKV status and alloimmune risk defined by recipient age and molecular mismatch (RAMM) groups. RESULTS: At 6-months post-transplant, 72 patients had BKV and 388 had no BKV. TCMR occurred in 86 recipients, including 27.8% with BKV and 17% with no BKV (p = .05). TCMR risk was increased in recipients with BKV (HR 1.90, (95% CI 1.14, 3.17); p = .01) and high vs. low-risk RAMM group risk (HR 2.26 (95% CI 1.02, 4.98); p = .02) in multivariable analyses; but not HLA serological MM in sensitivity analysis. Recipients with BKV experienced increased dnDSA in univariable analysis, and there was no association with ABMR, DCGF, or ACGF. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients with BKV had increased risk of TCMR independent of induction immunosuppression and conventional alloimmune risk measures. Recipients with high-risk RAMM experienced increased TCMR risk. Future studies on optimizing immunosuppression for BKV should explore nuanced risk stratification and may consider novel measures of alloimmune risk.


Asunto(s)
Virus BK , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Pruebas de Función Renal , Trasplante de Riñón , Infecciones por Polyomavirus , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus , Viremia , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Virus BK/inmunología , Virus BK/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Masculino , Infecciones por Polyomavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Polyomavirus/virología , Infecciones por Polyomavirus/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus/inmunología , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus/virología , Viremia/inmunología , Viremia/virología , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Fallo Renal Crónico/inmunología , Enfermedades Renales/virología , Enfermedades Renales/inmunología , Enfermedades Renales/cirugía , Receptores de Trasplantes
2.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(5): e14823, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39030950

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Caregivers of children and young people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) face challenging circumstances on a daily basis; however, the difficulties they experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as potentially positive experiences, are not yet fully understood. The aim of this study was to explore the pandemic-related experiences of these caregivers. METHODS: Twelve caregivers were recruited from a hospital-based pediatric renal program; eight families were posttransplant. Caregivers participated in virtual semistructured interviews conducted between March 2021 and November 2022. They provided responses to open-ended questions concerning how the pandemic affected their child with CKD, their family, and themselves. Interviews were transcribed and coded using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified: (1) Family Life, which included disruptions in routine, reduced social supports, and changes in the quality of family relationships; (2) Mental Health and Coping, which included increased anxiety and positive coping strategies; (3) Work and School Life, which included changes to work and school; and (4) Health and Health Care Systems, which included virtual health care and public health restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite facing profound challenges, caregivers identified both positive and negative aspects of their pandemic experiences. Their coping strategies highlighted individual and family resilience characteristics. Implications for health care providers, including future pandemic planning, support for the transition from in-person to virtual care, and strategies to better address barriers to resources for families of children with chronic kidney disease were discussed.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , COVID-19 , Cuidadores , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Cuidadores/psicología , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/psicología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Preescolar , Apoyo Social , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , SARS-CoV-2 , Investigación Cualitativa
3.
Med Teach ; 46(1): 82-101, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37405740

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Studies have demonstrated poor mental health in medical students. However, there is wide variation in study design and metric use, impairing comparability. The authors aimed to examine the metrics and methods used to measure medical student wellbeing across multiple timepoints and identify where guidance is necessary. METHODS: Five databases were searched between May and June 2021 for studies using survey-based metrics among medical students at multiple timepoints. Screening and data extraction were done independently by two reviewers. Data regarding the manuscript, methodology, and metrics were analyzed. RESULTS: 221 studies were included, with 109 observational and 112 interventional studies. There were limited studies (15.4%) focused on clinical students. Stress management interventions were the most common (40.2%). Few (3.57%) interventional studies followed participants longer than 12 months, and 38.4% had no control group. There were 140 unique metrics measuring 13 constructs. 52.1% of metrics were used only once. CONCLUSIONS: Unique guidance is needed to address gaps in study design as well as unique challenges surrounding medical student wellbeing surveys. Metric use is highly variable and future research is necessary to identify metrics specifically validated in medical student samples that reflect the diversity of today's students.


Asunto(s)
Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Benchmarking , Salud Mental
4.
Am J Transplant ; 23(12): 1882-1892, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37543094

RESUMEN

De novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) after renal transplantation has been shown to correlate with antibody-mediated rejection and allograft loss. However, the lack of proven interventions and the time and cost associated with annual screening for dnDSA are difficult to justify for all recipients. We studied a well-characterized consecutive cohort (n = 949) with over 15 years of prospective dnDSA surveillance to identify risk factors that would help institute a resource-responsible surveillance strategy. Younger recipient age and HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch were independent predictors of dnDSA development. Combining both risk factors into recipient age molecular mismatch categories, we found that 52% of recipients could be categorized as low-risk for dnDSA development (median subclinical dnDSA-free survival at 5 and 10 years, 98% and 97%, respectively). After adjustment, multivariate correlates of dnDSA development included tacrolimus versus cyclosporin maintenance immunosuppression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6; P < .0001) and recipient age molecular mismatch category: intermediate versus low (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.5-4.2; P = .0007), high versus intermediate (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.6-4.2; P = .0002), and high versus low (HR, 6.36; 95% CI, 3.7-10.8; P < .00001). When combined, recipient age and HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch provide a novel data-driven approach to reduce testing by >50% while selecting those most likely to benefit from dnDSA surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Tacrolimus , Humanos , Preescolar , Niño , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios Prospectivos , Anticuerpos , Antígenos HLA , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Factores de Riesgo , Antígenos HLA-DR , Isoanticuerpos/efectos adversos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 38(4): 1275-1289, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35816202

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Disparities in pediatric kidney transplantation (KT) result in reduced access and worse outcomes for minority children. We assessed the impact of recent systems changes on these disparities. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients utilizing data from the US Renal Data System (n = 7547) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (n = 6567 waitlisted and n = 6848 transplanted patients). We compared access to transplantation, time to deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT), and allograft failure (ACGF) in the 5 years preceding implementation of the Kidney Allocation System (KAS) to the 5 years post-KAS implementation 2010-2014 vs. 2015-2019, respectively. RESULTS: Compared to the pre-KAS era, post-KAS candidates were more likely to be pre-emptively listed (26.8% vs. 38.1%, p < 0.001), pre-emptively transplanted (23.8% vs. 28.0%, p < 0.001), and less likely to have private insurance (35.6% vs. 32.3%, p = 0.01), but these were not uniform across racial groups. Compared to white children, Black and Hispanic children had a lower likelihood of transplant listing within 2 years of first dialysis service (aHR 0.590.670.76 and 0.730.820.92, respectively) in the post-KAS era. Time to DDKT was comparable across all racial groups in the post-KAS era. Compared to white children, Black DDKT recipients have more 5-year ACGF (aHR 1.001.432.06 p = 0.05) while there was no difference in 3- or 5-year ACGF among LDKT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: After KAS implementation, there is equity in time to DDKT. Pre-KAS increased hazard of ACGF among Black children has decreased in the post-KAS era; however, persistent disparities exist in time to transplant listing among Black and Hispanic children when compared to white children. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.


Asunto(s)
Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos , Grupos Raciales , Riñón
6.
Am J Transplant ; 22(3): 761-771, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34717048

RESUMEN

The prevalence and long-term impact of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is poorly defined in the modern era of tacrolimus/mycophenolate-based maintenance therapy. This observational study evaluated 775 kidney transplant recipients with serial histology and correlated TCMR events with the risk of graft loss. After a ~30% incidence of a first Banff Borderline or greater TCMR detected on for-cause (17%) or surveillance (13%) biopsies, persistent (37.4%) or subsequent (26.3%) TCMR occurred in 64% of recipients on follow-up biopsies. Alloimmune risk categories based on the HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet molecular mismatch correlated with the number of TCMR events (p = .002) and Banff TCMR grade (p = .007). Both a first and second TCMR event correlated with death-censored and all-cause graft loss when adjusted for baseline covariates and other significant time-dependent covariates such as DGF and ABMR. Therefore, a substantial portion of kidney transplant recipients, especially those with intermediate and high HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch scores, remain under-immunosuppressed, which in turn identifies the need for novel agents that can more effectively prevent or treat TCMR.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Aloinjertos , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Antígenos HLA , Antígenos HLA-DR , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Linfocitos T
7.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 37(11): 2559-2569, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35333972

RESUMEN

The world continues to face the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective in protecting recipients, decreasing the risk of COVID-19 acquisition, transmission, hospitalization, and death. Transplant recipients may be at greater risk for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. As a result, transplant programs have begun instituting mandates for COVID-19 vaccine for transplant candidacy. While the question of mandating COVID-19 vaccine for adult transplant candidates has garnered attention in the lay and academic press, these discussions have not explicitly addressed children who may be otherwise eligible for kidney transplants. In this paper we seek to examine the potential ethical justifications of a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for pediatric kidney transplant candidacy through an examination of relevant ethical principles, analogous cases of the use of mandates, differences between adult and pediatric kidney transplant candidates, and the role of gatekeeping in transplant vaccine mandates. At present, it does not appear that pediatric kidney transplant centers are justified to institute a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for candidates. Finally, we will offer suggestions to be considered prior to the implementation of a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Receptores de Trasplantes , Vacunación , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/ética , Programas Obligatorios/ética
8.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 37(12): 3019-3029, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35507144

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their families deal with challenging circumstances. While numerous studies have shown that both patients and parents in these families can experience a variety of challenges and concerns, the experience of siblings is less well understood. The focus of this scoping review was on research addressing the experiences and well-being of siblings of children with CKD. METHODS: Following scoping review methodology, five databases were searched for peer-reviewed research or graduate theses published in English that addressed the experience or well-being of siblings aged 25 years or younger (biological, step or foster) of children with CKD; studies from any year or location were included. Two independent coders identified relevant studies. Findings were summarized and synthesized. RESULTS: Of the 2990 studies identified, 19 were chosen for full text review and eight fit the inclusion criteria. Five of the selected studies were qualitative, two were quantitative and one used mixed-methods. Four broad themes across studies were identified including family functioning, significant relationships, psychological well-being, and coping strategies. While there was some convergence between qualitative and quantitative findings, these linkages were weak. CONCLUSIONS: Several unmet needs of siblings were uncovered by this review. Sibling perceptions of differential parental treatment and desire for information about CKD emerged as priorities for practice. Using a strength-based approach in order to better understand sibling experiences and well-being was also recommended for future research. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Hermanos , Niño , Humanos , Hermanos/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Padres/psicología
9.
Pediatr Transplant ; 25(3): e13908, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33155737

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children are at high risk for subclinical rejection, and kidney biopsy is currently used for surveillance. Our objective was to test how novel rejection biomarkers such as urinary CXCL10 may influence clinical decision-making to indicate need for a biopsy. METHODS: A minimum dataset for standard decision-making to indicate a biopsy was established by an expert panel and used to design clinical vignettes for use in a survey. Pediatric nephrologists were recruited to review the vignettes and A) estimate rejection risk and B) decide whether to biopsy; first without and then with urinary CXCL10/Cr level. Accuracy of biopsy decisions was then tested against the biopsy results. IRA was assessed by Fleiss Kappa (κ) for binary choice and ICC for probabilities. RESULTS: Eleven pediatric nephrologists reviewed 15 vignettes each. ICC of probability assessment for rejection improved from poor (0.28, P < .01) to fair (0.48, P < .01) with addition of CXCL10/Cr data. It did not, however, improve the IRA for decision to biopsy (K = 0.48 and K = 0.43, for the comparison). Change in clinician estimated probability of rejection with additional CXCL10/Cr data was correlated with CXCL10/Cr level (r2  = 0.7756, P < .0001). Decision accuracy went from 8/15 (53.3%) cases to 11/15 (73.3%) with CXCL10/Cr, although improvement did not achieve statistical significance. Using CXCL10/Cr alone would have been accurate in 12/15 cases (80%). CONCLUSION: There is high variability in decision-making on biopsy indication. Urinary CXCL10/Cr improves probability estimates for risk of rejection. Training may be needed to assist nephrologists in better integrate biomarker information into clinical decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Quimiocina CXCL10/orina , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Rechazo de Injerto/patología , Rechazo de Injerto/orina , Trasplante de Riñón , Adolescente , Biomarcadores/orina , Biopsia , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo
10.
Qual Life Res ; 30(5): 1355-1364, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33447959

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized instruments used to collect data about the subjective assessment of medical care from the patient perspective. Implementing PROMs within pediatric clinical settings has gained increasing importance as health services prioritize patient-centred pediatric care. This study explores the perspectives of pediatric solid organ transplant patients, caregivers, and healthcare practitioners (HCPs) on implementing PROMs into clinical practice. METHODS: Qualitative description methods were used to elicit stakeholder perspectives. Semi-structured interviews were conducted across five Canadian transplant centres. Purposive sampling was used to obtain maximum variation across age, gender, and transplant program for all participants, as well as discipline for HCPs. RESULTS: The study included a total of 63 participants [patients (n = 20), caregivers (n = 22) and HCPs (n = 21)]. Nearly all participants endorsed the implementation of PROMs to enhance pediatric transplant clinical care. Three primary roles for PROMs emerged: (1) to bring a transplant patient's overall well-being into the clinical care conversation; (2) to improve patient communication and engagement; and, (3) to inform the practice of clinical pediatric transplant care. Insights for effective implementation included completing electronic PROMs remotely and prior to clinical appointments by patients who are eight to 10 years of age or older. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to current research that supports the use of PROMs in clinical pediatric care and guides their effective implementation into practice. Future directions include the development, usability testing, and evaluation of a proposed electronic PROM platform that will inform future research initiatives.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Órganos/métodos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Investigación Cualitativa , Participación de los Interesados
11.
BMC Med Ethics ; 22(1): 142, 2021 10 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34674700

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the health system worldwide. The organ and tissue donation and transplantation (OTDT) system is no exception and has had to face ethical challenges related to the pandemic, such as risks of infection and resource allocation. In this setting, many Canadian transplant programs halted their activities during the first wave of the pandemic. METHOD: To inform future ethical guidelines related to the COVID-19 pandemic or other public health emergencies of international concern, we conducted a literature review to summarize the ethical issues. RESULTS: This literature review identified three categories of ethical challenges. The first one describes the general ethical issues and challenges reported by OTDT organizations and transplantation programs, such as risks of COVID-19 transmission and infection to transplant recipients and healthcare professionals during the transplant process, risk of patient waitlist mortality or further resource strain where transplant procedures have been delayed or halted, and resource allocation. The second category describes ethical challenges related to informed consent in the context of uncertainty and virtual consent. Finally, the third category describes ethical issues related to organ allocation, such as social considerations in selecting transplant candidates. CONCLUSION: This literature review highlights the salient ethical issues related to OTDT during the current COVID-19 pandemic. As medical and scientific knowledge about COVID-19 increases, the uncertainties related to this disease will decrease and the associated ethical issues will continue to evolve.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Órganos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Canadá , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Am J Transplant ; 20(9): 2499-2508, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32185878

RESUMEN

Prognostic biomarkers of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) have not been adequately studied in the modern era. We evaluated 803 renal transplant recipients and correlated HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch alloimmune risk categories (low, intermediate, high) with the severity, frequency, and persistence of TCMR. Allograft survival was reduced in recipients with Banff Borderline (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4, P = .003) and Banff ≥ IA TCMR (HR 4.3, P < .0001) including a subset who never developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (P = .002). HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch alloimmune risk categories were multivariate correlates of Banff Borderline and Banff ≥ IA TCMR and correlated with the severity and frequency of rejection episodes. Recipient age, HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch category, and cyclosporin vs tacrolimus immunosuppression were independent correlates of Banff Borderline and Banff ≥ IA TCMR. In the subset treated with tacrolimus (720/803) recipient age, HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch category, and tacrolimus coefficient of variation were independent correlates of TCMR. The correlation of HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch category with TCMR, including Borderline, provides evidence for their alloimmune basis. HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch may represent a precise prognostic biomarker that can be applied to tailor immunosuppression or design clinical trials based on individual patient risk.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Linfocitos T
13.
Am J Transplant ; 19(6): 1708-1719, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30414349

RESUMEN

Alloimmune risk stratification in renal transplantation has lacked the necessary prognostic biomarkers to personalize recipient care or optimize clinical trials. HLA molecular mismatch improves precision compared to traditional antigen mismatch but has not been studied in detail at the individual molecule level. This study evaluated 664 renal transplant recipients and correlated HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet mismatch with serologic, histologic, and clinical outcomes. Compared to traditional HLA-DR/DQ whole antigen mismatch, HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet mismatch improved the correlation with de novo donor-specific antibody development (area under the curve 0.54 vs 0.84) and allowed recipients to be stratified into low, intermediate, and high alloimmune risk categories. These risk categories were significantly correlated with primary alloimmune events including Banff ≥1A T cell-mediated rejection (P = .0006), HLA-DR/DQ de novo donor-specific antibody development (P < .0001), antibody-mediated rejection (P < .0001), as well as all-cause graft loss (P = .0012) and each of these correlations persisted in multivariate models. Thus, HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet mismatch may represent a precise, reproducible, and widely available prognostic biomarker that can be applied to tailor immunosuppression or design clinical trials based on individual patient risk.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos HLA-DQ/inmunología , Antígenos HLA-DR/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón , Inmunología del Trasplante , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Niño , Epítopos/química , Epítopos/genética , Epítopos/inmunología , Femenino , Antígenos HLA-DQ/química , Antígenos HLA-DQ/genética , Antígenos HLA-DR/química , Antígenos HLA-DR/genética , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Isoantígenos/química , Isoantígenos/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Moleculares , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Donantes de Tejidos
15.
Pediatr Transplant ; 22(1)2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29218833

RESUMEN

Children with intellectual disability were historically excluded from consideration as recipients of solid organ transplants. In light of an evolution in provider practices, this commentary will define intellectual disability and review the relevant provider attitudes and guidelines and known outcomes of solid organ transplant in this population.


Asunto(s)
Discapacidad Intelectual , Trasplante de Órganos , Selección de Paciente , Adolescente , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Niño , Humanos , Discapacidad Intelectual/diagnóstico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
16.
Pediatr Transplant ; 22(5): e13228, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29785805

RESUMEN

Children with severe intellectual disability have historically been excluded from solid organ transplantation. The purpose of this article was to review the arguments for excluding this population, including claims of poorer recipient and graft survival, a lower QoL as pediatric recipients become adults, and poorer outcomes for other, more deserving pediatric transplant candidates, and make the case that these arguments are no longer persuasive. We will argue that pediatric transplant centers for reasons of social justice, value of relationships, power differential, and fairness should generally not consider intellectual ability or disability as a criterion when making decisions regarding organ transplant eligibility.


Asunto(s)
Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/ética , Discapacidad Intelectual , Trasplante de Órganos/ética , Selección de Paciente/ética , Justicia Social/ética , Niño , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Trasplante de Órganos/métodos , Trasplante de Órganos/psicología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Poder Psicológico , Justicia Social/psicología
17.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 28(11): 3353-3362, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28729289

RESUMEN

Despite more than two decades of use, the optimal maintenance dose of tacrolimus for kidney transplant recipients is unknown. We hypothesized that HLA class II de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development correlates with tacrolimus trough levels and the recipient's individualized alloimmune risk determined by HLA-DR/DQ epitope mismatch. A cohort of 596 renal transplant recipients with 50,011 serial tacrolimus trough levels had HLA-DR/DQ eplet mismatch determined using HLAMatchmaker software. We analyzed the frequency of tacrolimus trough levels below a series of thresholds <6 ng/ml and the mean tacrolimus levels before dnDSA development in the context of HLA-DR/DQ eplet mismatch. HLA-DR/DQ eplet mismatch was a significant multivariate predictor of dnDSA development. Recipients treated with a cyclosporin regimen had a 2.7-fold higher incidence of dnDSA development than recipients on a tacrolimus regimen. Recipients treated with tacrolimus who developed HLA-DR/DQ dnDSA had a higher proportion of tacrolimus trough levels <5 ng/ml, which continued to be significant after adjustment for HLA-DR/DQ eplet mismatch. Mean tacrolimus trough levels in the 6 months before dnDSA development were significantly lower than the levels >6 months before dnDSA development in the same patients. Recipients with a high-risk HLA eplet mismatch score were less likely to tolerate low tacrolimus levels without developing dnDSA. We conclude that HLA-DR/DQ eplet mismatch and tacrolimus trough levels are independent predictors of dnDSA development. Recipients with high HLA alloimmune risk should not target tacrolimus levels <5 ng/ml unless essential, and monitoring for dnDSA may be advisable in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Antígenos HLA-D/inmunología , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/sangre , Trasplante de Riñón , Tacrolimus/administración & dosificación , Tacrolimus/sangre , Adulto , Rechazo de Injerto/sangre , Humanos , Inmunología del Trasplante
18.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 18(11): 1035-1046, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28925929

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Create trustworthy, rigorous, national clinical practice guidelines for the practice of pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death in Canada. METHODS: We followed a process of clinical practice guideline development based on World Health Organization and Canadian Medical Association methods. This included application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Questions requiring recommendations were generated based on 1) 2006 Canadian donation after circulatory determination of death guidelines (not pediatric specific), 2) a multidisciplinary symposium of national and international pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death leaders, and 3) a scoping review of the pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death literature. Input from these sources drove drafting of actionable questions and Good Practice Statements, as defined by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation group. We performed additional literature reviews for all actionable questions. Evidence was assessed for quality using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation and then formulated into evidence profiles that informed recommendations through the evidence-to-decision framework. Recommendations were revised through consensus among members of seven topic-specific working groups and finalized during meetings of working group leads and the planning committee. External review was provided by pediatric, critical care, and critical care nursing professional societies and patient partners. RESULTS: We generated 63 Good Practice Statements and seven Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation recommendations covering 1) ethics, consent, and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, 2) eligibility, 3) withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy practices, 4) ante and postmortem interventions, 5) death determination, 6) neonatal pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death, 7) cardiac and innovative pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death, and 8) implementation. For brevity, 48 Good Practice Statement and truncated justification are included in this summary report. The remaining recommendations, detailed methodology, full Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tables, and expanded justifications are available in the full text report. CONCLUSIONS: This process showed that rigorous, transparent clinical practice guideline development is possible in the domain of pediatric deceased donation. Application of these recommendations will increase access to pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death across Canada and may serve as a model for future clinical practice guideline development in deceased donation.


Asunto(s)
Muerte , Donantes de Tejidos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/normas , Adolescente , Canadá , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Consentimiento Informado , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/ética , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Privación de Tratamiento/normas
20.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 30(1): 5-13, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24452328

RESUMEN

Children with multiple comorbidities, including neurodevelopmental delay, can develop end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). When and if these children should be eligible for kidney transplantation is an area of debate within the pediatric nephrology community and the public. Discussions focus on expected survival and quality of life posttransplant, as well as resource allocation decisions, as donor kidneys remain a limited resource. This paper focuses on the evidence available regarding outcomes in this population and the ethical issues that should be considered. The authors offer a framework for transplant teams evaluating children with comorbidities for kidney transplant, focusing on the benefits and burdens that transplantation can be expected to achieve.


Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Trasplante de Riñón , Selección de Paciente , Receptores de Trasplantes , Niño , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA