What matters most: Randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery conversation aids across socioeconomic strata.

BACKGROUND: Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with early-stage breast cancer are more likely to report poorer physician-patient communication, lower satisfaction with surgery, lower involvement in decision making, and higher decision regret compared to women of higher SES. The objective of this study was to understand how to support women across socioeconomic strata in making breast cancer surgery choices. METHODS: We conducted a 3-arm (Option Grid, Picture Option Grid, and usual care), multisite, randomized controlled superiority trial with surgeon-level randomization. The Option Grid (text only) and Picture Option Grid (pictures plus text) conversation aids were evidence-based summaries of available breast cancer surgery options on paper. Decision quality (primary outcome), treatment choice, treatment intention, shared decision making (SDM), anxiety, quality of life, decision regret, and coordination of care were measured from T0 (pre-consultation) to T5 (1-year after surgery. RESULTS: Sixteen surgeons saw 571 of 622 consented patients. Patients in the Picture Option Grid arm (n = 248) had higher knowledge (immediately after the visit [T2] and 1 week after surgery or within 2 weeks of the first postoperative visit [T3]), an improved decision process (T2 and T3), lower decision regret (T3), and more SDM (observed and self-reported) compared to usual care (n = 257). Patients in the Option Grid arm (n = 66) had higher decision process scores (T2 and T3), better coordination of care (12 weeks after surgery or within 2 weeks of the second postoperative visit [T4]), and more observed SDM (during the surgical visit [T1]) compared to usual care arm. Subgroup analyses suggested that the Picture Option Grid had more impact among women of lower SES and health literacy. Neither intervention affected concordance, treatment choice, or anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Paper-based conversation aids improved key outcomes over usual care. The Picture Option Grid had more impact among disadvantaged patients. LAY SUMMARY: The objective of this study was to understand how to help women with lower incomes or less formal education to make breast cancer surgery choices. Compared with usual care, a conversation aid with pictures and text led to higher knowledge. It improved the decision process and shared decision making (SDM) and lowered decision regret. A text-only conversation aid led to an improved decision process, more coordinated care, and higher SDM compared to usual care. The conversation aid with pictures was more helpful for women with lower income or less formal education. Conversation aids with pictures and text helped women make better breast cancer surgery choices.

Improving Cancer Patients' Insurance Choices (I Can PIC): A Randomized Trial of a Personalized Health Insurance Decision Aid.

BACKGROUND: Many cancer survivors struggle to choose a health insurance plan that meets their needs because of high costs, limited health insurance literacy, and lack of decision support. We developed a web-based decision aid, Improving Cancer Patients' Insurance Choices (I Can PIC), and evaluated it in a randomized trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible individuals (18-64 years, diagnosed with cancer for ≤5 years, English-speaking, not Medicaid or Medicare eligible) were randomized to I Can PIC or an attention control health insurance worksheet. Primary outcomes included health insurance knowledge, decisional conflict, and decision self-efficacy after completing I Can PIC or the control. Secondary outcomes included knowledge, decisional conflict, decision self-efficacy, health insurance literacy, financial toxicity, and delayed care at a 3-6-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 263 of 335 eligible participants (79%) consented and were randomized; 206 (73%) completed the initial survey (106 in I Can PIC; 100 in the control), and 180 (87%) completed a 3-6 month follow-up. After viewing I Can PIC or the control, health insurance knowledge and a health insurance literacy item assessing confidence understanding health insurance were higher in the I Can PIC group. At follow-up, the I Can PIC group retained higher knowledge than the control; confidence understanding health insurance was not reassessed. There were no significant differences between groups in other outcomes. Results did not change when controlling for health literacy and employment. Both groups reported having limited health insurance options. CONCLUSION: I Can PIC can improve cancer survivors' health insurance knowledge and confidence using health insurance. System-level interventions are needed to lower financial toxicity and help patients manage care costs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Inadequate health insurance compromises cancer treatment and impacts overall and cancer-specific mortality. Uninsured or underinsured survivors report fewer recommended cancer screenings and may delay or avoid needed follow-up cancer care because of costs. Even those with adequate insurance report difficulty managing care costs. Health insurance decision support and resources to help manage care costs are thus paramount to cancer survivors' health and care management. We developed a web-based decision aid, Improving Cancer Patients' Insurance Choices (I Can PIC), and evaluated it in a randomized trial. I Can PIC provides health insurance information, supports patients through managing care costs, offers a list of financial and emotional support resources, and provides a personalized cost estimate of annual health care expenses across plan types.

Implementing an Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool Into Routine Care: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Perceptions of a Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction Tool.

Objective. To explore barriers and facilitators to implementing an evidence-based clinical decision support (CDS) tool (BREASTChoice) about post-mastectomy breast reconstruction into routine care. Materials and Methods. A stakeholder advisory group of cancer survivors, clinicians who discuss and/or perform breast reconstruction in women with cancer, and informatics professionals helped design and review the interview guide. Based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted qualitative semistructured interviews with key stakeholders (patients, clinicians, informatics professionals) to explore intervention, setting characteristics, and process-level variables that can impact implementation. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed based on the CFIR framework using both inductive and deductive methods. Results. Fifty-seven potential participants were contacted; 49 (85.9%) were eligible, and 35 (71.4%) were enrolled, continuing until thematic saturation was reached. Participants consisted of 13 patients, 13 clinicians, and 9 informatics professionals. Stakeholders thought that BREASTChoice was useful and provided patients with an evidence-based source of information about post-mastectomy breast reconstruction, including their personalized risks. They felt that BREASTChoice could support shared decision making, improve workflow, and possibly save consultation time, but were uncertain about the best time to deliver BREASTChoice to patients. Some worried about cost, data availability, and security of integrating the tool into an electronic health record. Most acknowledged the importance of showing clinical utility to gain institutional buy-in and encourage routine adoption. Discussion and Conclusion. Stakeholders felt that BREASTChoice could support shared decision making, improve workflow, and reduce consultation time. Addressing key questions such as cost, data integration, and timing of delivering BREASTChoice could build institutional buy-in for CDS implementation. Results can guide future CDS implementation studies.

Palliative Care Use for Critically Ill Patients With Brain Metastases.

CONTEXT: Critically ill patients with brain metastases (BM) face significant uncertainty regarding prognosis and survival and can benefit from Palliative care (PC). However, research regarding the role of PC in this population is lacking. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare BM patients admitted to an intensive care unit who received an inpatient PC consult (PC cohort) to those who did not (Usual Care, UC cohort). METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective cohort analysis. Our outcome variables were mortality, time from intensive care unit admission to death, disposition, and change in code status. We also evaluated PC's role in complex medical decision making, symptom management and hospice education. RESULTS: PC consult was placed in 31 of 118 (28%) of patients. The overall mortality rates were not statistically different (78.8% vs. 90.3%, P= 0.15, UC vs. PC cohort). Patients in the PC cohort had a shorter time to death, higher rate of death within 30 days of admission, increased rate of discharge to hospice, and increase percentage of code status change to "do not attempt resuscitation" during the admission. The primary services provided by PC were symptom management (n = 21, 67.7%) and assistance in complex medical decision making (n = 20, 64.5%). CONCLUSION: In our patient cohort, PC is an underutilized service that can assist in complex medical decision making and symptom management of critically ill BM patients. Further prospective studies surveying patient, family and provider experiences could better inform the qualitative impact of PC in this unique patient population.

Implementation and sustainability factors of two early-stage breast cancer conversation aids in diverse practices.

BACKGROUND: Conversation aids can facilitate shared decision-making and improve patient-centered outcomes. However, few examples exist of sustained use of conversation aids in routine care due to numerous barriers at clinical and organizational levels. We explored factors that will promote the sustained use of two early-stage breast cancer conversation aids. We examined differences in opinions between the two conversation aids and across socioeconomic strata. METHODS: We nested this study within a randomized controlled trial that demonstrated the effectiveness of two early-stage breast cancer surgery conversation aids, one text-based and one picture-based. These conversation aids facilitated more shared decision-making and improved the decision process, among other outcomes, across four health systems with socioeconomically diverse patient populations. We conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of patient participants across conversation aid assignment and socioeconomic status (SES) and collected observations and field notes. We interviewed trial surgeons and other stakeholders. Two independent coders conducted framework analysis using the NOrmalization MeAsure Development through Normalization Process Theory. We also conducted an inductive analysis. We conducted additional sub-analyses based on conversation aid assignment and patient SES. RESULTS: We conducted 73 semi-structured interviews with 43 patients, 16 surgeons, and 14 stakeholders like nurses, cancer center directors, and electronic health record (EHR) experts. Patients and surgeons felt the conversation aids should be used in breast cancer care in the future and were open to various methods of giving and receiving the conversation aid (EHR, email, patient portal, before consultation). Patients of higher SES were more likely to note the conversation aids influenced their treatment discussion, while patients of lower SES noted more influence on their decision-making. Intervention surgeons reported using the conversation aids did not lengthen their typical consultation time. Most intervention surgeons felt using the conversation aids enhanced their usual care after using it a few times, and most patients felt it appeared part of their normal routine. CONCLUSIONS: Key factors that will guide the future sustained implementation of the conversation aids include adapting to existing clinical workflows, flexibility of use, patient characteristics, and communication preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03136367 , registered on May 2, 2017.

How Do Subjective Health Literacy Measures Work in Young Adults? Specifying "Online" or "Paper-Based" Forms Impacts Results.

Purpose. There is no gold-standard health literacy measure. The Single Item Literacy Screener (SILS) and Subjective Literacy Screener (SLS) ask people to self-report ability to understand health information. They were developed in older adults, before common use of electronic health information. This study explored whether the SILS and SLS related to objective literacy, numeracy, and comprehension among young adults, and whether specifying "online" or "paper-based" wording affected these relationships. Methods. Eligible individuals (18-35 years of age, English-speaking, US residents) from an online survey company were randomized to 1) original measures; 2) measures adding "paper-based" to describe health information/forms; or 3) measures adding "online" to describe health information/forms. We examined how each measure related to e-Health Literacy (eHEALS), subjective numeracy (SNS), objective numeracy (ONS), and comprehension of a short passage. Results. A total of 848/1342 respondents correctly answered attention-checks and were analyzed. The validated SILS related to comprehension (P = 0.003), eHEALS (P = 0.04), and ONS (P < 0.001) but not SNS (P = 0.44). When adding "paper-based," SILS related to eHEALS (P < 0.001) and ONS (P = 0.003) but did not relate to comprehension (P = 0.25) or SNS (P = 0.35). When adding "online," SILS related to comprehension (P < 0.001), eHEALS (P < 0.001), ONS (P = 0.005), and SNS (P = 0.03). The validated SLS related to comprehension (P < 0.001), eHEALS (P < 0.001), ONS (P < 0.001), and SNS (P < 0.001). When adding "paper-based," the SLS only related to eHEALS (P = <0.001) and comprehension (P = 0.03) but did not relate to ONS (P = 0.13) or SNS (P = 0.33). When adding "online," the SLS related to comprehension (P < 0.001), eHEALS (P < 0.001), and SNS (P = 0.03) but not ONS (P = 0.06). Conclusions. Young adults might interpret subjective health literacy measures differently when prompted to think about electronic or paper-based information. Researchers should consider clearer instructions or modified wording when using these measures in this population.

Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic leak (PL) remains a major cause of postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreatic resection. We sought to evaluate the incidence of and identify risk factors for the development of PL in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP) at a single high-volume institution. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary open DP (excluding completion pancreatectomy and debridement) between January 1, 1984 and July 1, 2006 were identified, and their medical records were reviewed. chi and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for PL. RESULTS: In a cohort of 704 patients undergoing primary DP, the indications for DP were benign pancreatic neoplasm (34%), malignant pancreatic neoplasm (31%), other neoplasm (15%), chronic pancreatitis (14%), pseudocyst (3%), and trauma (3%). The pancreatic remnant was sutured alone in 83%, stapled alone in 5%, and both stapled and sutured in 9% of cases. Ligation of the pancreatic duct was performed in 22% of cases. Perioperative mortality was <1%, but overall morbidity was 33%, most commonly PL (12% clinically significant, 21% biochemical). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that neither the method of closure of the pancreatic remnant (P = 0.41) nor ligation of the pancreatic duct (P > 0.05) affected the risk of clinically significant PL. CONCLUSIONS: This largest reported series of DP demonstrates that this procedure can be performed with low mortality but still carries a substantial risk of morbidity, particularly PL. In contrast to some previous studies, this analysis found that surgical management of the pancreatic remnant has no effect on the incidence of clinically significant PL.

Camptothecin and Fas receptor agonists synergistically induce medulloblastoma cell death: ROS-dependent mechanisms.

Medulloblastoma, a common malignant pediatric brain tumor, is highly resistant to death receptor-mediated apoptosis despite death receptor expression by tumor cells. Developing new strategies to overcome this resistance to death receptor activation could positively impact therapeutic outcomes. We explored the modulation of death receptor-induced medulloblastoma cell death by the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin (CPT). CPT significantly increased the human medulloblastoma DAOY cell death response to agonistic anti-Fas antibody (CH-11). Cell death after CPT, CH-11, and CPT+CH-11 treatment was 9, 7, and 33%, respectively. Isobologram analysis showed that CH-11 and CPT act synergistically to induce cell death in DAOY cells. A similar pattern of synergism between CPT and CH-11 was found in ONS-76 medulloblastoma cells. Synergistic cell death was found to be predominantly apoptotic involving both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways as evidenced by annexin V staining, cleavage of caspases (3, 8, and 9), Bid and PARP, and cytoprotection by caspase inhibitors. Flow cytometric analyses showed that expression of cell surface Fas or Fas ligand did not change with drug treatment. Western blot analyses showed that the combination of CH-11+CPT induced a significant decrease in XIAP levels. Furthermore, reactive oxygen species, especially O2, were elevated after CPT treatment, and even more so by the CH-11+CPT treatment. The antioxidants glutathione and N-acetyl-cysteine prevented cell death induced by CPT+CH-11. Moreover, the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I inhibitor rotenone potentiated CH-11-induced apoptosis in DAOY cells. Taken together, these findings show that CPT synergizes with Fas activation to induce medulloblastoma apoptosis through a mechanism involving reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress pathways.

Genetic Predisposition to Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Case-control whole-genome sequencing analysis of a highly select, young cohort with symptomatic lumbar disk herniation (LDH) compared with the standard variation in a large reference population. OBJECTIVE: To assess genetic influences predisposing pediatric and young adult patients to symptomatic LDH. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: LDH has traditionally been attributed to natural weakening or mechanical insult, but recent literature supports a potential genetic influence. METHODS: Young patients with symptomatic, clinically confirmed LDH who underwent surgical treatment were included. Patients were younger than the average age of presentation, limiting the influence of environmental risks. DNA collected from these patients was compared with a reference genome (1000 Genomes Project). A genome-wide association study using whole-genome sequencing was used to characterize genetic mutations potentially associated with LDH. RESULTS: Among the 61 candidate genes flagged, 20 had missense mutations in 2 or more LDH cases. Missense mutations in collagen-encoding genes were observed in 12 of 15 patients (80%). A potential association with clinical presentation was indicated by odds ratios of key single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants in genes that encode collagen. Relative to the reference population, the LDH cohort demonstrated two statistically significant SNP variants in the gene encoding for aggrecan, a protein that facilitates load-bearing properties in the cartilaginous end plate. Aggrecan genes SNPs rs3817428 and rs11638262 were significantly associated with decreased odds of symptomatic LDH: odds ratio 0.05 (0.02-0.11) and 0.04 (0-0.26), respectively (P < 1 × 10 for both). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that collagen-encoding variants may be a genetic risk factor for LDH. They also shed new light on the role of variants that impact aggrecan, which sustains the cartilaginous end plate. Genetic predisposition to LDH may therefore be related to a multimodal combination of mutations that affect the nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and the cartilaginous end plates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Management of extranodal lymphoma of the spine: a study of 30 patients.

Extranodal lymphoma of the spine is often a late manifestation of systemic disease, and may result in symptoms of pain, neurologic compromise or spinal instability. Symptomatic relief is generally achieved by radiotherapy alone, but is not sufficient in addressing spinal instability. The indications for surgery remain controversial, but may be required for spinal stabilization, or refractory disease. Currently, there is a lack of studies that compare the indications and clinical outcomes of patients receiving surgical and nonsurgical management of spinal extranodal lymphoma. Medical records of 30 patients seen from March 2006 to August 2015, with histologically confirmed spinal lymphoma, were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, clinical factors, imaging, treatment and clinical outcomes were recorded. 19 patients were treated surgically and 11 nonsurgically (i.e., chemotherapy, radiation or combination). Surgery was performed for emergent neurological deterioration, mechanical stabilization, refractoriness to medical management or to perform an open biopsy for pathological diagnosis. Among those treated surgically, significantly fewer patients could carry on normal activities (KPS <70) at baseline, compared with those treated nonsurgically. However, there were no significant differences regarding pain medication use, functional status at 1 year, or mean survival (87.6 months) between groups. Surgery for extranodal lymphoma may be required in specific cases, resulting in favorable and similar outcomes compared with nonsurgical management.

Predictors of complications and readmission following spinal stereotactic radiosurgery.

AIM: to identify preoperative factors associated with morbidity/mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission and operation rates following spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for spinal tumors. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program was queried from 2012 to 2014 to identify patients undergoing SRS for spinal tumors. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors. RESULTS: 2714 patients were identified; 6.8% had major morbidity or mortality, 6.9% were readmitted within 30 days and 4.3% had a subsequent operation within 30 days. Age, BMI and American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class were predictive of LOS. Major morbidity was predicted by age >80, BMI >35, high ASA, pretreatment functional dependence and baseline comorbidities. Predictors of operation within 30 days included preoperative steroid use, renal failure, BMI >35 and if the treatment was nonelective. DISCUSSION: 4-7% of patients undergoing SRS for spinal tumors have morbidity following the procedure. Factors predictive of morbidity, LOS, and subsequent operation included age, BMI, baseline comorbidities and functional status. CONCLUSION: Identification of preoperative patient-specific factors that are predictive of post-treatment outcome will aid in patient selection and patient counseling leading to greater patient satisfaction and hospital efficiency.

Impact of Smoking on 30-day Morbidity and Mortality in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected surgical database. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of smoking on 30-day morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is conflicting evidence regarding the impact of smoking on short-term outcomes after spinal fusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of the prospectively collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database was performed for the years 2007 to 2013. Patients who underwent spinal fusion for ASD were identified. Thirty-day morbidity and mortality were compared between current smokers and nonsmokers. The independent effect of smoking was investigated via multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1368 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in this study. Of the 1368 patients, 15.9% were smokers and 84.1% nonsmokers. The proportion of smokers who developed at least one complication was 9.7% versus 13.6% for nonsmokers (P = 0.119). Major complication rates (including 30-day mortality) were 6.5% for smokers and 8.4% for nonsmokers (P = 0.328). Current smoking status was not associated with increased odds of developing any complication [odds ratio (OR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.47-1.71; P = 0.752] or major complications (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.64-2.70; P = 0.447) after multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Smoking was not associated with higher 30-day complications or mortality after corrective surgery for ASD in this study. However, given the negative effects of smoking on overall health and spine surgery outcomes in the long term, smoking cessation before spinal fusion is still recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Metastatic human breast cancer to the spine produces mechanical hyperalgesia and gait deficits in rodents.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Metastases to the spine are a common source of severe pain in cancer patients. The secondary effects of spinal metastases include pain, bone fractures, hypercalcemia, and neurological deficits. As the disease progresses, pain severity can increase until it becomes refractory to medical treatments and leads to a decreased quality of life for patients. A key obstacle in the study of pain-induced spinal cancer is the lack of reliable and reproducible spine cancer animal models. In the present study, we developed a reproducible and reliable rat model of spinal cancer using human-derived tumor tissue to evaluate neurological decline using imaging and behavioral techniques. PURPOSE: The present study outlines the development and characterization of an orthotopic model of human breast cancer to the spine in immunocompromised rats. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a basic science study. METHODS: Female immunocompromised rats were randomized into three groups: tumor (n=8), RBC3 mammary adenocarcinoma tissue engrafted in the L5 vertebra body; sham (n=6), surgery performed but not tumor engrafted; and control (n=6), naive rats, no surgery performed. To evaluate the neurological impairment due to tumor invasion, functional assessment was done in all rodents at day 40 after tumor engraftment using locomotion gait analysis and pain response to a mechanical stimulus (Randall-Selitto test). Bioluminescence (BLI) was used to evaluate tumor growth in vivo and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed to evaluate bone changes due to tumor invasion. The animals were euthanized at day 45 and their spines were harvested and processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. RESULTS: Tumor growth in the spine was confirmed by BLI imaging and corroborated by histological analysis. Cone beam computed tomography images were characterized by a decrease in the bone intensity in the lumbar spine consistent with tumor location on BLI. On H&E staining of tumor-engrafted animals, there was a near-complete ablation of the ventral and posterior elements of the L5 vertebra with severe tumor invasion in the bony components displacing the spinal cord. Locomotion gait analysis of tumor-engrafted rats showed a disruption in the normal gait pattern with asignificant reduction in length (p=.02), duration (p=.002), and velocity (p=.002) of right leg strides and only in duration (p=.0006) and velocity (p=.001) of left leg strides, as compared with control and sham rats. Tumor-engrafted animals were hypersensitive to pain stimulus shown as a significantly reduced response in time (p=.02) and pressure (p=.01) applied when compared with control groups. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a system for the quantitative analysis of pain and locomotion in an animal model of metastatic human breast cancer of the spine. Tumor-engrafted animals showed locomotor and sensory deficits that are in accordance with clinical manifestation in patients with spine metastasis. Pain response and locomotion gait analysis were performed during follow-up. The Randall-Selitto test was a sensitive method to evaluate pain in the rat's spine. We present a model for the study of bone-associated cancer pain secondary to cancer metastasis to the spine, as well as for the study of new therapies and treatments to lessen pain from metastatic cancer to the neuroaxis.

The biomechanics of pedicle screw augmentation with cement.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A persistent challenge in spine surgery is improving screw fixation in patients with poor bone quality. Augmenting pedicle screw fixation with cement appears to be a promising approach. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to survey the literature and assess the previous biomechanical studies on pedicle screw augmentation with cement to provide in-depth discussions of the biomechanical benefits of multiple parameters in screw augmentation. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a systematic literature review. METHODS: A search of Medline was performed, combining search terms of pedicle screw, augmentation, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, polymethylmethacrylate, calcium phosphate, or calcium sulfate. The retrieved articles and their references were reviewed, and articles dealing with biomechanical testing were included in this article. RESULTS: Polymethylmethacrylate is an effective material for enhancing pedicle screw fixation in both osteoporosis and revision spine surgery models. Several other calcium ceramics also appear promising, although further work is needed in material development. Although fenestrated screw delivery appears to have some benefits, it results in similar screw fixation to prefilling the cement with a solid screw. Some differences in screw biomechanics were noted with varying cement volume and curing time, and some benefits from a kyphoplasty approach over a vertebroplasty approach have been noted. Additionally, in cadaveric models, cemented-augmented screws were able to be removed, albeit at higher extraction torques, without catastrophic damage to the vertebral body. However, there is a risk of cement extravasation leading to potentially neurological or cardiovascular complications with cement use. A major limitation of these reviewed studies is that biomechanical tests were generally performed at screw implantation or after a limited cyclic loading cycle; thus, the results may not be entirely clinically applicable. This is particularly true in the case of the bioactive calcium ceramics, as these biomechanical studies would not have measured the effects of osseointegration. CONCLUSIONS: Polymethylmethacrylate and various calcium ceramics appear promising for the augmentation of pedicle screw fixation biomechanically in both osteoporosis and revision spine surgery models. Further translational studies should be performed, and the results summarized in this review will need to be correlated with the clinical outcomes.