Slow and deep respiration suppresses steady-state sympathetic nerve activity in patients with chronic heart failure: from modeling to clinical application.

Influences of slow and deep respiration on steady-state sympathetic nerve activity remain controversial in humans and could vary depending on disease conditions and basal sympathetic nerve activity. To elucidate the respiratory modulation of steady-state sympathetic nerve activity, we modeled the dynamic nature of the relationship between lung inflation and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in 11 heart failure patients with exaggerated sympathetic outflow at rest. An autoregressive exogenous input model was utilized to simulate entire responses of MSNA to variable respiratory patterns. In another 18 patients, we determined the influence of increasing tidal volume and slowing respiratory frequency on MSNA; 10 patients underwent a 15-min device-guided slow respiration and the remaining 8 had no respiratory modification. The model predicted that a 1-liter, step increase of lung volume decreased MSNA dynamically; its nadir (-33 ± 22%) occurred at 2.4 s; and steady-state decrease (-15 ± 5%), at 6 s. Actually, in patients with the device-guided slow and deep respiration, respiratory frequency effectively fell from 16.4 ± 3.9 to 6.7 ± 2.8/min (P < 0.0001) with a concomitant increase in tidal volume from 499 ± 206 to 1,177 ± 497 ml (P < 0.001). Consequently, steady-state MSNA was decreased by 31% (P < 0.005). In patients without respiratory modulation, there were no significant changes in respiratory frequency, tidal volume, and steady-state MSNA. Thus slow and deep respiration suppresses steady-state sympathetic nerve activity in patients with high levels of resting sympathetic tone as in heart failure.

Independent prognostic importance of respiratory instability and sympathetic nerve activity in patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory instability in chronic heart failure (CHF) is characterized by irregularly rapid respiration or non-periodic breathing rather than by Cheyne-Stokes respiration. We developed a new quantitative measure of respiratory instability (RSI) and examined its independent prognostic impact upon CHF. METHODS: In 87 patients with stable CHF, respiratory flow and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were simultaneously recorded. RSI was calculated from the frequency distribution of respiratory spectral components and very low frequency components. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 85±38 months, 24 patients died. Sixteen patients who died of cardiac causes had a lower RSI (16±6 vs. 30±21, p<0.01), a lower specific activity scale (4.3±1.4 Mets vs. 5.7±1.4 Mets, p<0.005), a higher MSNA burst area (16±5% vs. 11±4%, p<0.001), and a higher brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level (514±559pg/ml vs. 234±311pg/ml, p<0.05) than 71 patients who did not die of cardiac causes. Multivariate analysis revealed that RSI (p=0.015), followed by MSNA burst area (p=0.033), was an independent predictor of subsequent all-cause deaths and that RSI (p=0.026), MSNA burst area (p=0.001), and BNP (p=0.048) were independent predictors of cardiac deaths. Patients at very high risk of fatal outcome could be identified by an RSI<20. CONCLUSIONS: The daytime respiratory instability quantified by a new measure of RSI has prognostic importance independent of sympathetic nerve activation in patients with clinically stable CHF. An RSI of <20 identifies patients at very high risk for subsequent all-cause and cardiovascular death.