RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare new mental health diagnoses (NMHD) in children after a firearm injury versus following a motor vehicle collision (MVC). BACKGROUND: A knowledge gap exists regarding childhood mental health diagnoses following firearm injuries, notably in comparison to other forms of traumatic injury. METHODS: We utilized Medicaid MarketScan claims (2010-2016) to conduct a matched case-control study of children ages 3 to 17 years. Children with firearm injuries were matched with up to 3 children with MVC injuries. Severity was determined by injury severity score and emergency department disposition. We used multivariable logistic regression to measure the association of acquiring a NMHD diagnosis in the year postinjury after firearm and MVC mechanisms. RESULTS: We matched 1450 children with firearm injuries to 3691 children with MVC injuries. Compared to MVC injuries, children with firearm injuries were more likely to be black, have higher injury severity score, and receive hospital admission from the emergency department ( P <0.001). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of NMHD diagnosis was 1.55 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.33-1.80] greater after firearm injuries compared to MVC injuries. The odds of a NMHD were higher among children admitted to the hospital compared to those discharged. The increased odds of NMHD after firearm injuries was driven by increases in substance-related and addictive disorders (aOR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.63-2.64) and trauma and stressor-related disorders (aOR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.55-2.76). CONCLUSIONS: Children were found to have 50% increased odds of having a NMHD in the year following a firearm injury as compared to MVC. Programmatic interventions are needed to address children's mental health following firearm injuries.
Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Salud Mental , Vehículos a Motor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between the Child Opportunity Index (COI) and food insecurity. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a comprehensive screening instrument for social determinants of health and behavioral health risks. It was administered in 2 urban pediatric emergency departments to adolescents aged 13-21 years and caregivers of children aged 0-17 years. Food insecurity was assessed using the 2-item Hunger Vital Sign. Residential addresses were geocoded and linked with COI data. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were developed to measure the relationship between COI and food insecurity. RESULTS: Of the 954 participants (384 adolescents, 570 caregivers) who underwent screening, 15.7% identified food insecurity (14.3% of adolescent and 16.7% of caregiver participants). The majority of participants were non-Hispanic Black (overall, 62.3%; food secure, 60.9%; food insecure, 72.0%), were publicly insured (overall, 56.6%; food secure, 53.1%; food insecure, 73.3%), and lived in neighborhoods of low/very low opportunity (overall, 76.9%; food secure, 74.7%; food insecure, 88.3%). In adjusted analyses, participants living in neighborhoods of low/very low child opportunity had 3-fold greater odds of being food insecure compared with children living in neighborhoods of high child opportunity (aOR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.4-6.3). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that food insecurity is associated with lower neighborhood opportunity. Our results could inform future screening initiatives and support the development of novel, place-based interventions to tackle the complex issue of food insecurity.
Asunto(s)
Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Hambre , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Inseguridad Alimentaria , Humanos , Modelos LogísticosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about prescription filling of pain medicine for children. In adult populations, race and insurance type are associated with differences in opioid prescription fill rate. We hypothesize that known disparities in pain management for children are exacerbated by the differential rates of opioid prescription filling between patients based on age and race. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there are demographic or clinical factors associated with differences in opioid prescription fill rates after discharge from the pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of all patients younger than 19 years discharged with an opioid prescription from either of two pediatric EDs in 2018. We performed multivariable logistic regression to measure associations between prescription filling and demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: There were 287 patient visits in which opioids were prescribed. Forty percent of prescriptions were filled. The majority of patients were male (53%), black (69%), and had public insurance (55%). There were no significant associations between prescription filling and age, insurance status, or race/ethnicity. Patients with sickle cell disease were more likely to fill prescriptions (odds ratio 3.87, 95% confidence interval 2.33-6.43) and patients without an identified primary care provider were less likely to fill prescriptions (odds ratio 0.16, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.84). CONCLUSION: Less than half of opioid prescriptions prescribed at discharge from a pediatric emergency department are filled. Patient age, insurance status, and race/ethnicity are not associated with opioid prescription filling. Patients with sickle cell disease and those with a primary care provider are more likely to fill their opioid prescriptions.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Anemia de Células Falciformes , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Prescripciones , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure racial/ethnic differences in prescription filling among children prescribed with outpatient antibiotics from the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort study of ED visits among children (0-21 years) from January 1 to March 31, 2018, during which oral antibiotics were prescribed. We measured the proportion of filled prescriptions in aggregate and by patient race/ethnicity. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify patient and visit-level factors associated with prescription filling. Secondarily, we measured differences in ED revisits by prescription filling. RESULTS: A total of 2881 participants were enrolled. A total of 66.3% (95% confidence interval, 64.5-68.0) of prescriptions were filled. Prescription filling varied by race/ethnicity; these are as follows: 77.3% non-Hispanic (NH) white, 73.5% NH black, 51.5% Hispanic, and 51.3% others (P < 0.0001). After adjustment for patient and visit-level characteristics, Hispanic children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.5 [0.3-0.9]) and children of other racial/ethnic groups (aOR, 0.5 [0.3-0.8]) had lower odds of prescription filling in comparison to NH white children. Interpreter use (aOR, 0.5 [0.4-0.6]) and uninsured status (aOR, 0.4 [0.3-0.5]) were additional independent risk factors associated with lower odds of prescription filling. There were no differences in the 72-hour revisit rates between those who filled their prescriptions and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: A third of antibiotic prescriptions for bacterial infections in the ED are unfilled. Hispanic children and children of other racial/ethnic groups have lower rates of prescription filling compared with NH white children. Interpreter use and uninsured status also have lower rates of prescription filling. Barriers to prescription filling should be explored further to help reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the provision of health care.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Alta del Paciente , Niño , Etnicidad , Humanos , Prescripciones , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Firearm injuries are a leading cause of serious injury and death in childhood. The accuracy of International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes to assign intent is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of documented ICD codes for firearm injury intent compared with chart review. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of children (<= 18 years) presenting to a tertiary care level 1 pediatric trauma center with firearm injuries between 2006 and 2017. We compared agreement between ICD codes and intent of injury determined by medical record review using Cohen κ. Intent for medical record review was assigned via the injury spectrum of intentionality (suicide attempt, accidental firing, mistaken target, firearm assault and unknown). For comparison with ICD codes, all medical record review cases marked as mistaken target were classified as accidental. A sensitivity analysis was then performed, coding all mistaken targets as assault. RESULTS: There were 122 cases identified over the study period. The most common intent by ICD code was assault (n = 80, 65.6%). Medical record review categorized most injuries as mistaken targets. When mistaken target was categorized as accidental, most firearm injuries were coded as accidental (n = 89, 72.9%) Similar results were seen when mistaken target was categorized as assault, most injuries were categorized as assault (n = 79, 79.5%) Cohen κ was 0.15 when mistaken targets were categorized as accident and 0.30 when categorized as assault. CONCLUSIONS: The ICD codes do not fully describe the intent of firearm injury. Revising ICD codes to account for mistaken targets could help to improve the validity of ICD codes for intent.
Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Accidentes , Niño , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess whether bullying experience among youths is associated with firearm access and to evaluate assault perpetration risk factors between bullied and nonbullied adolescents. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey designed to measure self-reported social determinants of health and behavioral health risks among adolescents (13-21 years) in a pediatric emergency department between July 2017 and August 2019. Participants were included in this subanalysis if they responded to a survey item that assessed bullying. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the association of firearm access, weapon carriage, and assault perpetration factors (violence, mental health, substance abuse, and justice involvement) with bullying after adjustment for sex, race/ethnicity, and insurance status. RESULTS: Of the 369 participants meeting inclusion criteria, 147 adolescents (40.5%) reported experiencing bullying. Bullied teenagers had higher odds of a gun in the home (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-7.8]), weapon carriage (aOR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.6-18.8), witnessing an assault (aOR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.6), negative experience with law enforcement (aOR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.2-9.2), mental health diagnosis (aOR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.3-6.7), and marijuana use (aOR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-7.0]). CONCLUSIONS: More than 1 in 3 adolescents presenting to the emergency department report having ever experienced bullying. Bullied teenagers have a higher likelihood of firearm access, weapon carriage, and violent injury perpetration risk factors compared with nonbullied youths. Further studies are needed to understand the relationship between bullying and assault perpetration.
Asunto(s)
Acoso Escolar , Uso de la Marihuana , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Depresión , Humanos , Uso de la Marihuana/epidemiología , Justicia SocialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypotheses that (1) rates of mental health-related concerns presenting to pediatric emergency departments (ED) have increased (2) rates are increasing more in minority than nonminority youth. METHODS: We performed a 5-year retrospective cohort study of youth with mental health-related ED visits using the Pediatric Health Information System. We calculated rates of mental health-related visits, in aggregate and by race/ethnicity. The Poisson model was used to generate incidence rate ratios of unique mental health-related visits each year using census data as the population denominator. RESULTS: There were 242,036 mental health-related visits that met the inclusion criteria, representing 160,656 unique patients. Approximately 7% of unique patients had 3 or more mental health-related visits, differing by race/ethnicity (8.75% non-Hispanic [NH]-Black vs 7.01% NH-White; adjusted odds ratio 1.14 [1.03, 1.26]). Overall, there were 42.8 mental health-related ED visits per 100,000 US children. The NH-Black children had higher rates of visits per 100,000 children compared with NH-Whites (66.1 vs 41.5; adjusted relative risk, 1.54 [1.50-1.59]). Mental health-related visits increased from 2012 to 2016 (33.31 [32.92-33.70] to 49.94 [49.46-50.41]). Every racial/ethnic group experienced an increase in rate of presentation over the study period; Hispanics experienced a significantly larger increase compared with NH-White children (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Mental health-related ED visits among children are increasing overall, disproportionally affecting minority children. The NH-Black children have the highest visit rates, and rates among Hispanics are increasing at a significantly higher rate when compared with NH-Whites. These results indicate need for increased capacity of EDs to manage mental health-related complaints, especially among minority populations.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Salud Mental , Adolescente , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although recent health care reform efforts have focused on minimizing high cost health care utilization, the relationship between acute care use and health care expenditures among certain vulnerable populations such as Medicaid-insured children remains poorly understood. We sought to evaluate the association between acute care utilization and health care expenditures and to identify characteristics associated with high spending. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicaid-enrolled children 1-21 years old from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2016. Children were categorized by acute care use (including emergency department and urgent care visits) as 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 or more visits. Our main outcomes were annualized spending, total per-member-per-year spending, and acute care-related per-member-per-year spending. RESULTS: There were 5.1 million Medicaid-enrolled children that comprised the study cohort, accounting for US $32.6 billion in total spending. Children with 4 or more acute care visits were more likely to be younger than 2 years or older than 14 years, female, and have a chronic condition. Children with 4 or more acute care visits consisted of only 4% of the cohort but accounted for 15% (US $4.7 billion) of the total spending. Increasing acute care visits were associated with increasing total annualized spending in adjusted analyses (P < 0.001). This association was disproportionately observed in older age groups and children without chronic medical conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid spending for children increases with increasing acute care use; this trend was disproportionately observed in older age groups and children without chronic medical conditions. Improved understanding of factors contributing to frequent acute care utilization and disproportionate spending is needed to potentially reduce unnecessary health care costs in these pediatric populations.
Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud , Medicaid , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify predictors of high unmet social needs among pediatric emergency department (ED) patients. We hypothesized that obesity, frequent nonurgent visits, reported food insecurity, or an at-risk chief complaint (CC) would predict elevated social risk. METHODS: We administered a tablet-based survey assessing unmet social needs in 13 domains to caregivers of patients aged 0 to 17 years presenting to an urban pediatric ED. Responses were used to tabulate a social risk score (SRS). We performed multivariable logistic regression to measure associations between a high SRS (≥3) and obesity, frequent nonurgent visits, food insecurity, or an at-risk CC (physical abuse, sexual abuse, assault, mammalian bites, reproductive/sexual health complaints, intoxication, ingestion/poisoning, psychiatric/behavioral complaints, or any complaint triaged as "least urgent"). RESULTS: Five hundred seventy caregivers completed the survey. Eighty-one percent reported at least one unmet social need, and 33% identified ≥3 social needs. Caregivers of patients with an at-risk CC had twice the odds of a high SRS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-3.3). Caregivers of patients reporting food insecurity had 4 times the odds of a high SRS (aOR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.5-7.3). Neither obesity (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.9-2.6) nor frequent nonurgent visits (aOR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4-1.9) were predictive of a high SRS. CONCLUSIONS: Unmet social needs are prevalent among caregivers of pediatric ED patients, supporting universal screening in this population. Patients with an at-risk CC or reported food insecurity might benefit from proactive intervention. Future studies should examine optimal methods for ED-based interventions that address social determinants of health.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Triaje , Cuidadores , Niño , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Wait time for emergency care is a quality measure that affects clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. It is unknown if there is racial/ethnic variability in this quality measure in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). We aim to determine whether racial/ethnic differences exist in wait times for children presenting to PEDs and examine between-site and within-site differences. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study for PED encounters in 2016 using the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Registry, an aggregated deidentified electronic health registry comprising 7 PEDs. Patient encounters were included among all patients 18 years or younger at the time of the ED visit. We evaluated differences in emergency department wait time (time from arrival to first medical evaluation) considering patient race/ethnicity as the exposure. RESULTS: Of 448,563 visits, median wait time was 35 minutes (interquartile range, 17-71 minutes). Compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) children, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and other race children waited 27%, 33%, and 12% longer, respectively. These differences were attenuated after adjusting for triage acuity level, mode of arrival, sex, age, insurance, time of day, and month [adjusted median wait time ratios (95% confidence intervals): 1.11 (1.10-1.12) for NHB, 1.12 (1.11-1.13) for Hispanic, and 1.05 (1.03-1.06) for other race children compared with NHW children]. Differences in wait time for NHB and other race children were no longer significant after adjusting for clinical site. Fully adjusted median wait times among Hispanic children were longer compared with NHW children [1.04 (1.03-1.05)]. CONCLUSIONS: In unadjusted analyses, non-White children experienced longer PED wait times than NHW children. After adjusting for illness severity, patient demographics, and overcrowding measures, wait times for NHB and other race children were largely determined by site of care. Hispanic children experienced longer within-site and between-site wait times compared with NHW children. Additional research is needed to understand structures and processes of care contributing to wait time differences between sites that disproportionately impact non-White patients.
Asunto(s)
Listas de Espera , Población Blanca , Negro o Afroamericano , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Assault-injured youth have an increased risk of future violence. Identifying firearm access among youth in the emergency department (ED) creates an opportunity for interventions aimed at reducing future violent events. We performed this study to determine the extent to which children with assault-related injuries are screened for access to firearms in the ED. We performed a retrospective chart review of all medical records from adolescent ED visits to an academic, tertiary care pediatric hospital in Washington DC with ICD-10 codes related to assault in a 3-month period. We found that among 252 assault-related encounters, none had any documentation of firearm access in the provider note, social work note, or psychiatry consultant note. Therefore, we concluded that firearm access screening is rarely documented in ED visits among patients who present for an assault, highlighting an important missed opportunity for firearm access screening among this high-risk group.
Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Adolescente , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Documentación , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/diagnóstico , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics, clinical features, and test results of children referred from their primary provider for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the community setting. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study of children ≤22 years of age who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 at a community-based specimen collection site in Washington, DC, affiliated with a large children's hospital between March 21 and May 16, 2020. RESULTS: Of the 1445 patients tested at the specimen collection site for SARS-CoV-2 virus, 408 (28.2%) had a positive polymerase chain reaction test. The daily positivity rate increased over the study period, from 5.4% during the first week to a peak of 47.4% (Ptrend < .001). Patients with fever (aOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.3) or cough (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9) and those with known contact with someone with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4.) were more likely have a positive test, but these features were not highly discriminating. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of mildly symptomatic or well children and adolescents referred to a community drive-through/walk-up SARS-CoV-2 testing site because of risk of exposure or clinical illness, 1 in 4 patients had a positive test. Children and young adults represent a considerable burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Assessment of their role in transmission is essential to implementing appropriate control measures.
Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Adolescente , COVID-19/complicaciones , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , District of Columbia , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: From 2009 to 2016, >21,000 children died and an estimated 118,000 suffered non-fatal injuries from firearms in the United States. Limited data is available on resource utilization by injury intent. We use hospital charges as a proxy for resource use and sought to: 1) estimate mean charges for initial ED and inpatient care for acute firearm injuries among children in the U.S.; 2) compare differences in charges by firearm injury intent among children; and 3) evaluate trends in charges for pediatric firearm injuries over time, including within intent subgroups. METHODS: In this repeated cross-sectional analysis of the 2009-2016 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, we identified firearm injury cases among children aged ≤19 years using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM external cause of injury codes (e-codes). Injury intent was categorized using e-codes as unintentional, assault-related, self-inflicted, or undetermined. Linear regressions utilizing survey weighting were used to examine associations between injury intent and healthcare charges, and to evaluate trends in mean charges over time. RESULTS: Among 21,951 unweighted cases representing 102,072 pediatric firearm-related injuries, mean age was 16.6 years, and a majority were male (88.2%) and publicly insured (51.5%). Injuries were 53.9% assault-related, 37.7% unintentional, 1.8% self-inflicted, and 6.7% undetermined. Self-inflicted injuries had higher mean charges ($98,988) than assault-related ($52,496) and unintentional ($28,618) injuries (p < 0.001). Self-inflicted injuries remained associated with higher mean charges relative to unintentional injuries, after adjusting for patient demographics, hospital characteristics, and injury severity (p = 0.015). Mean charges for assault-related injuries also remained significantly higher than charges for unintentional injuries in multivariable models (p < 0.001). After adjusting for inflation, mean charges for pediatric firearm-related injuries increased over time (p-trend = 0.018) and were 23.1% higher in 2016 versus 2009. Mean charges increased over time among unintentional injuries (p-trend = 0.002), but not among cases with assault-related or self-inflicted injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Self-inflicted and assault-related firearm injuries are associated with higher mean healthcare charges than unintentional firearm injuries among children. Mean charges for pediatric firearm injuries have also increased over time. These findings can help guide prevention interventions aimed at reducing the substantial burden of firearm injuries among children.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/economía , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Intención , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidadRESUMEN
Background: There are known racial and socioeconomic disparities in the use of epinephrine autoinjectors (EAI) for anaphylaxis. Objective: To measure the rates of EAI prescription filling and identify patient demographic factors associated with filling rates among patients discharged from the pediatric emergency department. Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study of all patients discharged from a pediatric emergency department who received an outpatient prescription for an EAI between January 1, 2018, and October 31, 2019. The rates of prescription filling were calculated, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify sociodemographic factors associated with prescription filling. Results: Of 717 patients included in the analysis, 54.8% (95% confidence interval {CI}, 51.1%-58.5%) filled their prescription. There were no significant associations between EAI fill rates and patient age or sex. In bivariable analysis, non-Hispanic white patients were more likely to fill EAI prescriptions compared with non-Hispanic Black patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.89 [95% CI, 1.11-3.20]), and patients with in-state Medicaid were significantly less likely to fill EAI prescriptions compared with those patients with private insurance (OR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.98]). However, after multivariable adjustment, there was no significant difference in filling by age, insurance status, or race or ethnicity. Conclusions: Only approximately half the patients had their EAI prescriptions filled after discharge. Filling rates did not vary by sociodemographic characteristics.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/tratamiento farmacológico , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Alta del Paciente , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etnología , Antialérgicos/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Epinefrina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones , Masculino , Factores Raciales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We sought to understand the burden of pediatric poisonings on the health care system by characterizing poisoning-related emergency department (ED) visits among children on a national level. METHODS: This was a repeated cross-sectional analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2001 to 2011 of children 21 years or younger who presented to an ED. We measured annual rates of visits, trends over time, and patient and visit characteristics associated with poisoning-related ED visits using multivariable logistic regression. We also compared accidental to intentional poisonings. RESULTS: There were an estimated 713,345 ED visits per year for poisoning in children, and intentional poisoning-related visits increased over the study period (P trend < 0.001). Compared with all other ED visits, poisoning-related ED visits were more common among males (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.64) and uninsured patients (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.05-1.51). Poisoned children were more likely to arrive by ambulance (aOR, 3.38; 95% CI, 2.85-4.01) and be admitted (aOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.12-1.61). Compared with accidental poisonings, intentional poisonings were more common as age increased (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.13-1.92) and in children of non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity (aOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.12-2.93) and more likely to be associated with ambulance arrival (aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.08) and hospital admission (aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.25-2.48). CONCLUSIONS: Poisoning-related ED visits among children have remained stable, with significant increase in intentional ingestions from 2001 to 2011. Poisoned children, and particularly those with intentional poisonings, require more health care resources than children with other health concerns. More study is needed on circumstances leading to pediatric poisonings, so that preventive efforts can be targeted appropriately.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Intoxicación/epidemiología , Ambulancias , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Adolescents account for nearly half of all newly diagnosed sexually transmitted infection (STI) cases in the United States and frequently access health care via emergency departments (EDs). However, there are many barriers to ED-based STI screening. Electronic sexual health assessments may overcome some of these ED-specific barriers. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess adolescent attitudes toward electronic sexual health assessments to guide STI screening in the ED. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data from 2 cross-sectional studies evaluating acceptability of electronic sexual health assessments in the pediatric ED. Study participants completed an electronic questionnaire that elicited sexual behavior information and attitudes toward electronic sexual health assessments. We interrogated the electronic health record to determine if sexual histories were documented, and if so, we assessed patient preference for mode of assessment. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify demographic factors associated with acceptance of electronic sexual health assessments. RESULTS: Of the 1159 adolescents surveyed, 935 (80.7%; 95% confidence interval, 78.3-82.9) found electronic assessments an acceptable method by which to provide sexual health information. The majority (n = 874 [75.4%]; 72.8-77.9) reported a preference for electronic assessments over other modes of assessment. Acceptance of electronic assessments was associated with STI-related chief complaint (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 1.0-2.7) and private insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 1.8; 1.2-2.7). CONCLUSIONS: Electronic sexual health assessments are acceptable to adolescents and are an efficient alternative to face-to-face sexual health assessments. Future studies should focus on how best to integrate electronic assessments into the ED workflow.
Asunto(s)
Salud Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Adolescente , Actitud , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Electrónica , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Conducta Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe regional and temporal trends in pediatric firearm-related emergency department (ED) visits and investigate association with regional firearm legislation. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample from 2009 to 2013 for children aged 21 years or younger. We calculated national estimates of firearm-related visits using annual census data and measured trends. We used state-level gun law scores to derive regional scores to measure strictness of firearm legislation. We used multivariable logistic and linear regression to measure regional differences in visits and their association with regional gun law scores, respectively. RESULTS: There were 111,839 (95% confidence interval, 101,248-122,431) ED visits for pediatric firearm-related injuries. Rates of visits varied by region, with the lowest rate in the Northeast and highest rate in the South (40.0 [34-45]; 70.8 [63.7-76.9] per 100,000 ED visits, respectively). Compared with the Northeast, odds of firearm-related ED visits were higher in the Midwest (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.8; 1.4-2.3), West (aOR, 2.5; 2.0-3.2), and South (aOR, 1.9; 1.5-2.4). Firearm-related visits remained consistent over time. A higher (stricter) regional median Brady gun law score was associated with a lower rate of firearm-related visits (ß = -0.8; R2 = 0.9; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of pediatric firearm-related ED visits vary by region. Stricter regional gun laws were associated with lower rates of ED visits for pediatric firearm-related injuries. Further study of the social and cultural regional differences in gun ownership and the role of legislation in the prevention of pediatric firearm-related morbidity and mortality is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Because a goal of the Affordable Care Act was to increase preventive care and reduce high-cost care, the objective of this study was to evaluate current health care use and reliance on acute care settings among Medicaid-enrolled children. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of the 2015 Truven Marketscan Medicaid claims database among children 0 to 21 years old with at least 11 months of continuous enrollment. We calculated adjusted probabilities of health care use (any health care use and ≥1 health maintenance visit) and high acute care reliance (ratio of emergency department or urgent care visits to all health care visits >0.33) by age and compared use between adolescents and younger children using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 5,182,540 Medicaid-enrolled children, 18.9% had no health care visits and 47.3% had 1 or more health maintenance visit in 2015. Both health care use and health maintenance visits decreased with increasing age (P < 0.001). Compared with younger children (0-10 years old), adolescents were more likely to have no interaction with the health care system [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.19-2.21] and less likely to have health maintenance visits (aOR, 0.40; 0.39-0.40). High acute care reliance was associated with increasing age, with adolescents having greater odds of high acute care reliance (aOR, 1.08; 1.08-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid-enrolled adolescents have low rates of health care use and have high reliance on acute care settings. Further investigation into adolescent-specific barriers to health maintenance care and drivers for acute care is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Medicaid , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Adolescente , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To measure the variability in discharge opioid prescription practices for children discharged from the emergency department (ED) with a long-bone fracture. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of pediatric ED visits in 2015. SETTING: Four pediatric EDs. SUBJECTS: Children aged four to 18 years with a long-bone fracture discharged from the ED. METHODS: A multisite registry of electronic health record data (PECARN Registry) was analyzed to determine the proportion of children receiving an opioid prescription on ED discharge. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine characteristics associated with receipt of an opioid prescription. RESULTS: There were 5,916 visits with long-bone fractures; 79% involved the upper extremity, and 27% required reduction. Overall, 15% of children were prescribed an opioid at discharge, with variation between the four EDs: A = 8.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.9-9.7%), B = 12.1% (95% CI = 10.5-14.0%), C = 16.9% (95% CI = 15.2-18.8%), D = 23.8% (95% CI = 21.7-26.1%). Oxycodone was the most frequently prescribed opioid. In the regression analysis, in addition to variation by ED site of care, age 12-18 years, white non-Hispanic, private insurance status, reduced fracture, and severe pain documented during the ED visit were associated with increased opioid prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: For children with a long-bone fracture, discharge opioid prescription varied widely by ED site of care. In addition, black patients, Hispanic patients, and patients with government insurance were less likely to be prescribed opioids. This variability in opioid prescribing was not accounted for by patient- or injury-related factors that are associated with increased pain. Therefore, opioid prescribing may be modifiable, but evidence to support improved outcomes with specific treatment regimens is lacking.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Fracturas Óseas , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fracturas Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Prescripciones , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Adolescents who seek care in emergency departments (EDs) are often at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The objective of this study was to assess adolescent attitudes toward ED-based STI screening. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study that evaluated STI screening acceptability and prevalence when STI testing was universally offered to asymptomatic adolescents presenting to the ED for care. Adolescents 14 to 21 years old completed a computerized survey and answered questions regarding attitudes toward ED-based STI screening and sexual behavior. We performed multivariable logistic regression to compare differences in attitudes toward ED-based STI screening among patients who agreed versus declined STI testing. RESULTS: Of 553 adolescents, 326 (59.0%) agreed to be tested for STIs. Most (72.1%) believed the ED was an appropriate place for STI screening. Patients who agreed to be tested for STIs were more likely to positively endorse ED-based STI screening than those who declined STI testing [77.0% vs 64.8%; adjusted odds ratios, 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-2.4]. Most (82.6%) patients stated they would feel comfortable getting tested for STIs in the ED. There was no difference in the comfort level of ED-based STI testing between those who agreed and declined STI testing (83.5% vs 81.4%; adjusted odds ratios, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that adolescents view the ED as an acceptable location for STI screening. Therefore, the ED may serve a role in increasing the accessibility of STI detection and prevention resources for adolescents.