Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 173(1): 123-7, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25708878

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: One significant risk factor for recurrence after Mohs surgery is misinterpretation of slides. OBJECTIVES: To determine how often pathologists detected incompletely excised basal cell carcinoma (BCC) on Mohs slides and to determine risk factors for incompletely excised BCCs. METHODS: This retrospective study included 1653 BCCs treated with Mohs surgery in a university hospital between 2007 and 2011. For routine quality assurance, all slides were additionally reviewed by a pathologist within 1 week of the procedure. For this study, all cases that had divergent interpretations were re-evaluated by a Mohs surgeon and a pathologist. Mixed-effects logistic regression models with Mohs surgeon effects as random effects were used to determine risk factors for incompletely excised BCC. RESULTS: Incompletely excised BCCs were detected in 31 cases (2%), in which defects > 20 mm in diameter were an independent risk factor (odds ratio 3.58, 95% confidence interval 1.55-8.28). Other studied variables (i.e. aggressive subtype, previously treated BCC, location on nose and > 2 Mohs stages) did not affect the risk of incompletely excised BCCs. CONCLUSIONS: The additional review of Mohs slides might increase accurate interpretation, especially in large BCCs.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular/cirugía , Cirugía de Mohs/normas , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Anciano , Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Competencia Clínica/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasia Residual , Patología Clínica/normas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA