Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 66
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Radiol ; 33(1): 699-710, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35864348

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a new artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction (Precise Image; AI-DLR) algorithm on image quality against a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm in abdominal CT for different clinical indications. METHODS: Acquisitions on phantoms were performed at 5 dose levels (CTDIvol: 13/11/9/6/1.8 mGy). Raw data were reconstructed using level 4 of iDose4 (i4) and 3 levels of AI-DLR (Smoother/Smooth/Standard). Noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF) and detectability index (d') were computed: d' modelled detection of a liver metastasis (LM) and hepatocellular carcinoma at portal (HCCp) and arterial (HCCa) phases. Image quality was subjectively assessed on an anthropomorphic phantom by 2 radiologists. RESULTS: From Standard to Smoother levels, noise magnitude and average NPS spatial frequency decreased and the detectability (d') of all simulated lesions increased. For both inserts, TTF values were similar for all three AI-DLR levels from 13 to 6 mGy but decreased from Standard to Smoother levels at 1.8 mGy. Compared to the i4 used in clinical practice, d' values were higher using the Smoother and Smooth levels and close for the Standard level. For all dose levels, except at 1.8 mGy, radiologists considered images satisfactory for clinical use for the 3 levels of AI-DLR, but rated images too smooth using the Smoother level. CONCLUSION: Use of the Smooth and Smoother levels of AI-DLR reduces the image noise and improves the detectability of lesions and spatial resolution for standard and low-dose levels. Using the Smooth level is apparently the best compromise between the lowest dose level and adequate image quality. KEY POINTS: • Evaluation of the impact of a new artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction (AI-DLR) on image quality and dose compared to a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm. • The Smooth and Smoother levels of AI-DLR reduced the image noise and improved the detectability of lesions and spatial resolution for standard and low-dose levels. • The Smooth level seems the best compromise between the lowest dose level and adequate image quality.


Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Dosis de Radiación , Reducción Gradual de Medicamentos , Inteligencia Artificial , Fantasmas de Imagen , Algoritmos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
2.
Eur Radiol ; 33(8): 5476-5488, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36920517

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) from spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) and two energy-integrating detector dual-energy CT (EID-DECT) scanners from the same manufacturer, for the coronary lumen. METHODS: A 21-cm section of the Mercury v4.0 phantom was scanned using a cardiac CT protocol. VMIs from 40 to 90 keV were reconstructed using high-resolution (HR) parameters for EID-DECT and SPCCT (CB and HRB kernels at 0.67 mm slice thickness, respectively). Ultra-high-resolution (UHR) parameters were used in addition to SPCCT (detailed-2 kernel, 0.43 mm slice thickness). Noise-power-spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d') were computed for 2-mm-diameter lumen detection. In consensus, two radiologists analyzed the quality of the images from 8 patients who underwent coronary CTA on both CT systems. RESULTS: For all keV images, fpeak, f50, and d' were higher with SPCCT. The fpeak and f50 were higher with UHR-SPCCT with greater noise and lower d' compared to those of the HR-SPCCT images. Noise magnitude was constant for all energy levels (keV) with both systems, and lower with HR images, and d' decreased as keV decreased. Subjective analysis showed greater lumen sharpness and overall quality for HR and UHR-SPCCT images using all keV, with a greater difference at low keV compared to HR-EID-DECT images. CONCLUSION: HR and UHR-SPCCT images gave greater detectability of the coronary lumen for 40 to 90 keV VMIs compared to two EID-DECT systems, with benefits of higher lumen sharpness and overall quality. KEY POINTS: • Compared with 2 dual-energy CT systems, spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) improved spatial resolution, noise texture, noise magnitude, and detectability of the coronary lumen. • Use of ultra-high-resolution parameters with SPCCT improved spatial resolution and noise texture and provided high detectability of the coronary lumen, despite an increase in noise magnitude. • In eight patients, radiologists found greater overall image quality with SPCCT for all virtual monochromatic images with a greater difference at low keV, compared with dual-energy CT systems.


Asunto(s)
Vasos Coronarios , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Corazón , Fotones
3.
Radiology ; 303(2): 303-313, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35166583

RESUMEN

Background Spatial resolution, soft-tissue contrast, and dose-efficient capabilities of photon-counting CT (PCCT) potentially allow a better quality and diagnostic confidence of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in comparison to conventional CT. Purpose To compare the quality of CCTA scans obtained with a clinical prototype PCCT system and an energy-integrating detector (EID) dual-layer CT (DLCT) system. Materials and Methods In this prospective board-approved study with informed consent, participants with coronary artery disease underwent retrospective electrocardiographically gated CCTA with both systems after injection of 65-75 mL of 400 mg/mL iodinated contrast agent at 5 mL/sec. A prior phantom task-based quality assessment of the detectability index of coronary lesions was performed. Ultra-high-resolution parameters were used for PCCT (1024 matrix, 0.25-mm section thickness) and EID DLCT (512 matrix, 0.67-mm section thickness). Three cardiac radiologists independently performed a blinded analysis using a five-point quality score (1 = insufficient, 5 = excellent) for overall image quality, diagnostic confidence, and diagnostic quality of calcifications, stents, and noncalcified plaques. A logistic regression model, adjusted for radiologists, was used to evaluate the proportion of improvement in scores with the best method. Results Fourteen consecutive participants (12 men; mean age, 61 years ± 17) were enrolled. Scores of overall quality and diagnostic confidence were higher with PCCT images with a median of 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 2) and 5 (IQR, 1) versus 4 (IQR, 1) and 4 (IQR, 3) with EID DLCT images, using a mean tube current of 255 mAs ± 0 versus 349 mAs ± 111 for EID DLCT images (P < .01). Proportions of improvement with PCCT images for quality of calcification, stent, and noncalcified plaque were 100%, 92% (95% CI: 71, 98), and 45% (95% CI: 28, 63), respectively. In the phantom study, detectability indexes were 2.3-fold higher for lumen and 2.9-fold higher for noncalcified plaques with PCCT images. Conclusion Coronary CT angiography with a photon-counting CT system demonstrated in humans an improved image quality and diagnostic confidence compared with an energy-integrating dual-layer CT. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sandfort and Bluemke in this issue.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Fotones , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
4.
Eur Radiol ; 32(1): 524-532, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34185147

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality (IQ) of a spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) using filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms (iDose4), in comparison with a dual-layer CT (DLCT) system, and to choose the best image quality according to the IR level for SPCCT. METHODS: Two phantoms were scanned using a standard lung protocol (120 kVp, 40 mAs) with SPCCT and DLCT systems. Raw data were reconstructed using FBP and 9 iDose4 levels (i1/i2/i3/i4/i5/i6/i7/i9/i11) for SPCCT and 7 for DLCT (i1/i2/i3/i4/i5/i6/i7). Noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed. Detectability index (d') was computed for detection of 4 mm ground-glass nodule (GGN) and solid nodule. Two chest radiologists performed an IQ evaluation (noise/nodule sharpness/nodule conspicuity/overall IQ) in consensus, and chose the best image for SPCCT. RESULTS: Noise magnitude was -47% ± 2% lower on average with SPCCT than with DLCT for iDose4 range from i1 to i6. Average NPS spatial frequencies increased for SPCCT in comparison with DLCT. TTF also increased, except for the air insert with FBP, and i1/i2/i3. Higher detectability was found for SPCCT for both GGN and solid nodules. IQ for both types of nodule was rated consistently higher with SPCCT than with DLCT for the same iDose4 level. For SPCCT and both nodules, the scores for noise and conspicuity improved with increasing iDose4 level. iDose4 level 6 provided the best subjective IQ for both types of nodule. CONCLUSIONS: Higher IQ for GGN and solid nodules was demonstrated with SPCCT compared with DLCT with better detectability using iDose4. KEY POINTS: Using spectral photon-counting CT compared with dual-layer CT, noise magnitude was reduced with improvements in spatial resolution and detectability of ground-glass nodules and solid lung nodules. As the iDose4 level increased, noise magnitude was reduced and detectability of ground-glass and solid lung nodules was better for both CT systems. For spectral photon-counting CT imaging, two chest radiologists determined iDose4 level 6 as the best image quality for detecting ground-glass nodules and solid lung nodules.


Asunto(s)
Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Algoritmos , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Fantasmas de Imagen , Dosis de Radiación
5.
Sensors (Basel) ; 22(11)2022 May 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35684594

RESUMEN

Microwave ablation systems allow for performing tumoral destruction in oncology. The objective of this study was to assess the early response and reliability of the microwave ablation zone size at one month for liver, kidney and lung lesions, as compared to the manufacturer's charts. Patients who underwent microwave ablation with the EmprintTM ablation system for liver, kidney and lung lesions between June 2016 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Local response and ablation zone size (major, L, and minor, l, axes) were evaluated on the one-month follow-up imaging. Results were compared to the manufacturers' charts using the Bland-Altman analysis. Fifty-five patients (mean age 68 ± 11 years; 95 lesions) were included. The one-month complete response was 94%. Liver ablations showed a good agreement with subtle, smaller ablation zones (L: -2 ± 5.7 mm; l: -5.2 ± 5.6 mm). Kidney ablations showed a moderate agreement with larger ablations for L (L: 8.69 ± 7.94 mm; l: 0.36 ± 4.77 mm). Lung ablations showed a moderate agreement, with smaller ablations for l (L: -5.45 ± 4.5 mm; l: -9.32 ± 4.72 mm). With 94% of early complete responses, the system showed reliable ablations for liver lesions, but larger ablations for kidney lesions, and smaller for lung lesions.


Asunto(s)
Hígado , Microondas , Anciano , Humanos , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Riñón/cirugía , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/cirugía , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/cirugía , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Eur Radiol ; 31(4): 2621-2633, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33034747

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare diagnosis performance and effective dose of ultra-low-dose CT (ULD CT) versus radiographs in suspected spinal or pelvic ring or hip fracture for minor trauma. METHODS: ULD CT, in addition to radiography, was prospectively performed in consecutive patients admitted to the emergency department for minor traumas, during working hours over 2 months. Presence of a recent fracture was assessed by two blind radiologists independently. Sensitivities and specificities were estimated using the best valuable comparator (BVC) as a reference and using a latent class model in Bayesian inference (BLCM). Dosimetric indicators were recorded and effective doses (E) were calculated using conversion coefficient. RESULTS: Eighty areas were analyzed in 69 patients, including 22 dorsal spine, 28 lumbar spine, and 30 pelvic ring/hip. Thirty-six fractures (45%) were observed. Applying the BVC method, depending on location, ULD CT sensitivity was 80 to 100% for reader 1 and 85 to 100% for reader 2, whereas radiographic sensitivity was 60 to 85% for reader 1 and 50 to 92% for reader 2. With BLCM approach for reader 2, ULD CT sensitivity for all locations/dorsal spine/lumbar spine and pelvic ring-hip was 87.1/75.9/84.2/76.9% respectively. Corresponding radiograph sensitivity was 73.8, 54.8, 80.4, and 68.7%. Effective doses of ULD CT were similar to radiographs for dorsal and hip locations whereas for lumbar spine, ULD CT effective dose was 1.83 ± 0.59 mSv compared with 0.96 ± 0.59 mSv (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sensitivity for fracture detection was higher for ULD CT compared with radiographs with an effective dose comparable to radiographs. KEY POINTS: • Ultra-low-dose spine and pelvis CT demonstrates better fracture detection when compared with radiographs. • The effective dose of ultra-low-dose spine and pelvis CT scan and radiographs is comparable. • Replacement of radiographs by ULD CT in daily practice for trauma patients is an option to consider and should be evaluated by a randomized trial.


Asunto(s)
Pelvis , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Teorema de Bayes , Humanos , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
7.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 32(2): 247-255, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33248919

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of prostatic artery embolization in patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PC) under active surveillance (AS). METHODS: This monocentric prospective pilot study, running from June 2018 to June 2019, included 10 patients with low-risk PC under AS, median age 72 years (range, 62-77 years), with a unilateral focal lesion visible on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 score ≥3/5 confirmed by multiparametric MR imaging-targeted biopsy and Gleason score 6. The patients underwent unilateral prostatic artery embolization with 300-500 µm Embospheres in the affected prostatic lobe. The primary endpoint was technical feasibility (prostate and no off-target ischemia in the imaging). The secondary endpoints included safety, negative biopsies/MR imaging response/functional outcomes at 6 months, and oncologic efficacy at 1 year. RESULTS: Embolization was successfully achieved in all patients; prostate ischemia was confirmed on multiparametric MR imaging, and no off-target ischemia was reported. No major complications were reported. Four patients (40%) presented with both negative targeted and systematic biopsies at 6 months. No lesions were seen on the MR imaging in 30% of patients. The mean International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function score were 7 and 19 and 5 and 20 at baseline and 6 months, respectively, with no significant difference. Nine patients (90%) were still under AS at 1 year. One patient (10%) had PC progression outside the target lesion and was switched over to curative radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatic artery embolization is feasible and appears safe for prostate cancer patients under AS, with no impact on erectile function or continence status. These results justify the pursuit of further studies.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Próstata/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias de la Próstata/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Espera Vigilante , Anciano , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 22(8): 243-254, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34312979

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the spectral performance of four combinations of kVp available in a third generation dual-source CT (DSCT) on abdominal imaging. METHODS: An image-quality phantom was scanned with a DSCT using four kVp pairs (tube "A" voltage/tube "B" voltage): 100/Sn150 kVp, 90/Sn150 kVp, 80/Sn150 kVp, and 70/Sn150 kVp, classic parameters and dose level for abdomen examination (CTDIvol : 11 mGy). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and the task-based transfer function (TTF) of two inserts were computed on virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) at 40/50/60/70 keV and for mixed, low-, and high-kVp images. Detectability index (d') was computed on VMIs and mixed images to model the detection task of liver metastasis (LM) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Iodine quantification accuracy was assessed using the Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSDiodine ) and the iodine bias (IB). RESULTS: Noise magnitude decreased by -55%± 0% between 40 and 70 keV for all kVp pairs. Compared to 70/Sn150 kVp, noise magnitude was increased by 9% ± 0% with 80/Sn150 kVp, by 16% ± 1% with 90/Sn150 kVp and by 24%± 1% with 100/Sn150 kVp. The average NPS spatial frequency (fav ) shifted toward higher frequencies as energy level increased for all kVp pairs. Lowest fav values were found for 70/Sn150 kVp and highest for 100/Sn150 kVp. The value of TTF at 50% (f50 ) shifted toward lower frequencies with increasing energy level. The highest f50  values occurred for 100/Sn150 kVp and the lowest for 80/Sn150 kVp. For both lesions, d' was highest for 70/Sn150 kVp and lowest for 100/Sn150 kVp. Compared to 70/Sn150 kVp, d' decreased by -6% ± 3% with 80/Sn150 kVp, by -11% ± 2% with 90/Sn150 kVp and by -13%± 2% with 100/Sn150 kVp. For all acquisitions, the RSMDiodine and IB were the lowest for 100/Sn150 kVp (0.29 ± 0.10 mg/ml and 0.88 ± 0.30 mg/ml, respectively) and increased when the tube "A" voltage decreased (2.34 ± 0.29 mg/ml for 70/Sn150 kVp and 7.42 ± 0.51 mg/ml respectively). CONCLUSION: 70/Sn150 kVp presented the lowest image noise and highest detectability in VMIs of two small focal liver lesions. 100/Sn150 kVp presented the lowest image noise on mixed images and highest accuracy of iodine quantification in iodine images.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Abdomen/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fantasmas de Imagen , Relación Señal-Ruido , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
9.
Eur Radiol ; 30(7): 3951-3959, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32100091

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact on image quality and dose reduction of a new deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm compared with a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm. METHODS: Data acquisitions were performed at seven dose levels (CTDIvol : 15/10/7.5/5/2.5/1/0.5 mGy) using a standard phantom designed for image quality assessment. Raw data were reconstructed using the filtered back projection (FBP), two levels of IR (ASiR-V50% (AV50); ASiR-V100% (AV100)), and three levels of DLIR (TrueFidelity™ low, medium, high). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed. Detectability index (d') was computed to model a large mass in the liver, a small calcification, and a small subtle lesion with low contrast. RESULTS: NPS peaks were higher with AV50 than with all DLIR levels and only higher with DLIR-H than with AV100. The average NPS spatial frequencies were higher with DLIR than with IR. For all DLIR levels, TTF50% obtained with DLIR was higher than that with IR. d' was higher with DLIR than with AV50 but lower with DLIR-L and DLIR-M than with AV100. d' values were higher with DLIR-H than with AV100 for the small low-contrast lesion (10 ± 4%) and in the same range for the other simulated lesions. CONCLUSIONS: New DLIR algorithm reduced noise and improved spatial resolution and detectability without changing the noise texture. Images obtained with DLIR seem to indicate a greater potential for dose optimization than those with hybrid IR. KEY POINTS: • This study assessed the impact on image quality and radiation dose of a new deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm as compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm. • The new DLIR algorithm reduced noise and improved spatial resolution and detectability without perceived alteration of the texture, commonly reported with IR. • As compared with IR, DLIR seems to open further possibility of dose optimization.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Aprendizaje Profundo , Fantasmas de Imagen , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Humanos , Dosis de Radiación
10.
Eur Radiol ; 30(9): 5071-5081, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32333144

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To validate the performance of an automatic tool to estimate a patient's peak skin dose (PSD) and a skin dose map from data collected by a radiation dose management system (RDMS) during interventional procedures. METHODS: In total, 288 eligible consecutive patients undergoing abdominopelvic embolisation or planned coronary angioplasty using radiochromic films were screened between June 2018 and March 2019. For 98 included patients, PSD was measured using radiochromic films (PSDFilm) and computed by RDMS (PSDRDMS) using one flat and two anthropomorphic phantoms. Statistical concordance between PSDFilm and PSDRDMS was computed with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and clinical concordance with the Bland and Altman graphic; values were compared using the paired Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: In total, 190/288 patients were excluded and 98 patients were analysed (69 men, mean age 66 ± 14 years). The PSDFilm median (1st; 3rd quartile) was 0.59 Gy (0.40; 1.08). PSDRDMS was 0.62 Gy (0.43; 1.22) for the flat phantom and 0.62 Gy (0.42; 1.19) for anthropomorphic phantoms. The concordance between PSDFilm and PSDRDMS was good for both phantoms (flat: 0.94 [0.91; 0.95]; anthropomorphic 0.94 [0.91; 0.96]). Compared with the values of PSDFilm, the values of PSDRDMS were significantly increased by 5% (- 4%; 16%) for flat phantom (p = 0.001) and 7% (- 6%; 22%) for anthropomorphic phantoms (p = 0.002) for vascular procedures and 9% (- 4%; 26%, p = 0.01) and 6% (- 4%; 23%, p = 0.02) for cardiac procedures, respectively. Dose map representations matched for most patients. The gaps identified were due to table displacement during fluoroscopy events and the use of a wedge filter. CONCLUSIONS: The RDMS skin dose map tool allowed the computation of the PSD and skin dose distribution for all patients with fewer constraints than radiochromic films. However, the computed PSD was overestimated, increasing the number of patients requiring follow-up. KEY POINTS: • A good concordance correlation was identified between the peak skin dose (PSD) values measured with radiochromic films and estimated with the radiation dose management system (RDMS) skin dose map tool. • Differences were related to table displacement during fluoroscopy events and the use of a wedge filter, which are not accounted in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine Radiation Dose Structured Reports. • For all procedures, the estimated PSDs were significantly higher than the measured PSDs by 5% (- 4%; 18%) for flat phantom (p < 0.001) and 6% (- 5%; 22%) for anthropomorphic phantoms (p < 0.001).


Asunto(s)
Fluoroscopía/métodos , Dosis de Radiación , Radiometría/métodos , Piel , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía Coronaria , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Dosímetros de Radiación
11.
Eur Radiol ; 30(10): 5690-5701, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32361774

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To establish national reference levels (RLs) in interventional procedures under CT guidance as required by the 2013/59/Euratom European Directive. METHODS: Seventeen categories of interventional procedures in thoracic, abdominopelvic, and osteoarticular specialties (percutaneous infiltration, vertebroplasty, biopsy, drainage, tumor destruction) were analyzed. Total dose length product (DLP), number of helical acquisitions (NH), and total DLP for helical, sequential, or fluoroscopic acquisitions were recorded for 10 to 20 patients per procedure at each center. RLs were calculated as the 3rd quartiles of the distributions and target values for optimization process (TVOs) as the median. RLs and TVOs were compared with previously published studies. RESULTS: Results on 5001 procedures from 49 centers confirmed the great variability in patient dose for the same category of procedures. RLs were proposed for the DLPs and NHs in the seventeen categories. RLs in terms of DLP and NH were 375 mGy.cm and 2 NH for spinal or peri-spinal infiltration, 1630 mGy.cm and 3 NH for vertebroplasty, 845 mGy.cm and 4 NH for biopsy, 1950 mGy.cm and 8 NH for destruction of tumors, and 1090 mGy.cm and 5 NH for drainage. DLP and NH increased with the complexity of procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first nationwide multicentric survey to propose RLs for interventional procedures under CT guidance. Heterogeneity of practice in centers were found with different levels of patient doses for the same procedure. The proposed RLs will allow imaging departments to benchmark their practice with others and optimize their protocols. KEY POINTS: • National reference levels are proposed for 17 categories of interventional procedures under CT guidance. • Reference levels are useful for benchmarking practices and optimizing protocols. • Reference levels are proposed for dose length product and the number of helical acquisitions.


Asunto(s)
Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Intervencional/normas , Valores de Referencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Columna Vertebral , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Vertebroplastia , Adulto Joven
13.
Ann Emerg Med ; 73(6): 665-670, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30665773

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest ultralow-dose computed tomography (CT) compared with chest radiograph for minor blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: One hundred sixty patients with minor blunt thoracic trauma were evaluated first by chest radiograph and subsequently with a double-acquisition nonenhanced chest CT protocol: reference CT and ultralow-dose CT with iterative reconstruction. Two study radiologists independently assessed injuries with a structured report and subjective image quality and calculated certainty of diagnostic confidence level. RESULTS: Ultralow-dose CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% compared with reference CT in the detection of injuries (187 lesions) in 104 patients. Chest radiograph detected abnormalities in 82 patients (79% of the population), with lower sensitivity and specificity compared with ultralow-dose CT (P<.05). Despite an only fair interobserver agreement for ultralow-dose CT image quality (κ=0.26), the diagnostic confidence level was certain for 95.6% of patients (chest radiograph=79.3%). Ultralow-dose CT effective dose (0.203 mSv [SD 0.029 mSv]) was similar (P=.14) to that of chest radiograph (0.175 mSv [SD 0.155 mSv]) and significantly less (P<.001) than that of reference CT (1.193 mSv [SD 0.459 mSv]). CONCLUSION: Ultralow-dose CT with iterative reconstruction conveyed a radiation dose similar to that of chest radiograph and was more reliable than a radiographic study for minor blunt thoracic trauma assessment. Radiologists, regardless of experience with ultralow-dose CT, were more confident with chest ultralow-dose CT than chest radiograph.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Radiografía Torácica , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Dosis de Radiación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
15.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 19(6): 133-139, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30338922

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the efficiency of combined use of ArcCheck® detector (AC) and portal dosimetry (PDIP) for delivery quality assurance of head and neck and prostate volumetric-modulated arc therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurement processes were studied with the Gamma index method according to three analysis protocols. The detection sensitivity to technical errors of each individual or combined measurement processes was studied by inserting collimator, dose and MLC opening error into five head and neck and five prostate initial treatment plans. A total of 220 plans were created and 660 analyses were conducted by comparing measurements to error free planned dose matrix. RESULTS: For head and neck localization, collimator errors could be detected from 2° for AC and 3° for PDIP. Dose and MLC errors could be detected from 2% and 0.5 mm for AC and PDIP. Depending on the analysis protocol, the detection sensitivity of total simulated errors ranged from 54% to 88% for AC vs 40% to 74% for PDIP and 58% to 92% for the combined process. For the prostate localization, collimator errors could be detected from 4° for AC while they could not be detected by PDIP. Dose and MLC errors could be detected from 3% and 0.5 mm for AC and PDIP. The detection sensitivity of total simulated errors ranged from 30% to 56% for AC vs 16% to 38% for PDIP and 30% to 58% for combined process. CONCLUSION: The combined use of the two measurement processes did not statistically improve the detectability of technical errors compared to use of single process.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Radiometría/normas , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Radiometría/instrumentación , Radiometría/métodos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/instrumentación
16.
Eur Radiol ; 27(10): 4281-4290, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28289939

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A national retrospective survey on patient doses was performed by the French Society of Medical physicists to assess reference levels (RLs) in interventional radiology as required by the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom. METHODS: Fifteen interventional procedures in neuroradiology, vascular radiology and osteoarticular procedures were analysed. Kerma area product (KAP), fluoroscopy time (FT), reference air kerma and number of images were recorded for 10 to 30 patients per procedure. RLs were calculated as the 3rd quartiles of the distributions. RESULTS: Results on 4600 procedures from 36 departments confirmed the large variability in patient dose for the same procedure. RLs were proposed for the four dosimetric estimators and the 15 procedures. RLs in terms of KAP and FT were 90 Gm.cm2 and 11 mins for cerebral angiography, 35 Gy.cm2 and 16 mins for biliary drainage, 75 Gy.cm2 and 6 mins for lower limbs arteriography and 70 Gy.cm2 and 11 mins for vertebroplasty. For these four procedures, RLs were defined according to the complexity of the procedure. For all the procedures, the results were lower than most of those already published. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports RLs in interventional radiology based on a national survey. Continual evolution of practices and technologies requires regular updates of RLs. KEY POINTS: • Delivered dose in interventional radiology depends on procedure, practice and patient. • National RLs are proposed for 15 interventional procedures. • Reference levels (RLs) are useful to benchmark practices and optimize protocols. • RLs are proposed for kerma area product, air kerma, fluoroscopy time and number of images. • RLs should be adapted to the procedure complexity and updated regularly.


Asunto(s)
Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Radiología Intervencionista/métodos , Francia , Humanos , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Diagn Interv Imaging ; 2024 Feb 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429207

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess image quality and dose level using a photon-counting CT (PCCT) scanner by comparison with a dual-source CT (DSCT) scanner on virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at low energy levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom was scanned using a DSCT and a PCCT with a volume CT dose index of 11 mGy, and additionally at 6 mGy and 1.8 mGy for PCCT. Noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function were evaluated from 40 to 70 keV on VMIs to assess noise magnitude and noise texture (fav) and spatial resolution on two iodine inserts (f50), respectively. A detectability index (d') was computed to assess the detection of two contrast-enhanced lesions according to the energy level used. RESULTS: For all energy levels, noise magnitude values were lower with PCCT than with DSCT at 11 and 6 mGy, but greater at 1.8 mGy. fav values were higher with PCCT than with DSCT at 11 mGy (8.6 ± 1.5 [standard deviation [SD]%), similar at 6 mGy (1.6 ± 1.5 [SD]%) and lower at 1.8 mGy (-17.8 ± 2.2 [SD]%). For both inserts, f50 values were higher with PCCT than DSCT at 11- and 6 mGy for all keV levels, except at 6 mGy and 40 keV. d' values were higher with PCCT than with DSCT at 11- and 6 mGy for all keV and both simulated lesions. Similar d' values to those of the DSCT at 11 mGy, were obtained at 2.25 mGy for iodine insert at 2 mg/mL and at 0.96 mGy for iodine insert at 4 mg/mL at 40 keV. CONCLUSION: Compared to DSCT, PCCT reduces noise magnitude and improves noise texture, spatial resolution and detectability on VMIs for all low-keV levels.

18.
Diagn Interv Imaging ; 105(3): 110-117, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37949769

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of Precise IQ Engine (PIQE) and Advanced intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE) algorithms on image-quality according to the dose level in a cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acquisitions were performed using the CT ACR 464 phantom at three dose levels (volume CT dose indexes: 7.1/5.2/3.1 mGy) using a prospective cardiac CT protocol. Raw data were reconstructed using the three levels of AiCE and PIQE (Mild, Standard and Strong). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) for bone and acrylic inserts were computed. The detectability index (d') was computed to model the detectability of the coronary lumen (350 Hounsfield units and 4-mm diameter) and non-calcified plaque (40 Hounsfield units and 2-mm diameter). RESULTS: Noise magnitude values were lower with PIQE than with AiCE (-13.4 ± 6.0 [standard deviation (SD)] % for Mild, -20.4 ± 4.0 [SD] % for Standard and -32.6 ± 2.6 [SD] % for Strong levels). The average NPS spatial frequencies shifted towards higher frequencies with PIQE than with AiCE (21.9 ± 3.5 [SD] % for Mild, 20.1 ± 3.0 [SD] % for Standard and 12.5 ± 3.5 [SD] % for Strong levels). The TTF values at fifty percent (f50) values shifted towards higher frequencies with PIQE than with AiCE for acrylic inserts but, for bone inserts, f50 values were found to be close. Whatever the dose and DLR level, d' values of both simulated cardiac lesions were higher with PIQE than with AiCE. For the simulated coronary lumen, d' values were better by 35.1 ± 9.3 (SD) % on average for all dose levels for Mild, 43.2 ± 5.0 (SD) % for Standard, and 62.6 ± 1.2 (SD) % for Strong levels. CONCLUSION: Compared to AiCE, PIQE reduced noise, improved spatial resolution, noise texture and detectability of simulated cardiac lesions. PIQE seems to have a greater potential for dose reduction in cardiac CT acquisition.


Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Dosis de Radiación , Algoritmos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Fantasmas de Imagen
19.
Diagn Interv Imaging ; 2024 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760277

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess image-quality and dose reduction potential using a photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system by comparison with two different dual-source CT (DSCT) systems using two phantoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acquisitions on phantoms were performed using two DSCT systems (DSCT1 [Somatom Force] and DSCT2 [Somatom Pro.Pulse]) and one PCCT system (Naeotom Alpha) at four dose levels (13/6/3.4/1.8 mGy). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed to assess noise magnitude and noise texture and spatial resolution (f50), respectively. Detectability indexes (d') were computed to model the detection of abdominal lesions: one unenhanced high-contrast task, one contrast-enhanced high-contrast task and one unenhanced low-contrast task. Image quality was subjectively assessed on an anthropomorphic phantom by two radiologists. RESULTS: For all dose levels, noise magnitude values were lower with PCCT than with DSCTs. For all CT systems, similar noise texture values were found at 13 and 6 mGy, but the greatest noise texture values were found for DSCT2 and the lowest for PCCT at 3.4 and 1.8 mGy. For high-contrast inserts, similar or lower f50 values were found with PCCT than with DSCT1 and the opposite pattern was found for the low-contrast insert. For the three simulated lesions, d' values were greater with PCCT than with DSCTs. Abdominal images were rated satisfactory for clinical use by the radiologists for all dose levels with PCCT and for 13 and 6 mGy with DSCTs. CONCLUSION: By comparison with DSCTs, PCCT reduces image-noise and improves detectability of simulated abdominal lesions without altering the spatial resolution and image texture. Image-quality obtained with PCCT seem to indicate greater potential for dose optimization than those obtained with DSCTs.

20.
Diagn Interv Imaging ; 2024 Apr 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604894

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare ultra-low dose (ULD) and standard low-dose (SLD) chest computed tomography (CT) in terms of radiation exposure, image quality and diagnostic value for diagnosing pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective board-approved study consecutive patients with HHT referred to a reference center for screening and/or follow-up chest CT examination were prospectively included from December 2020 to January 2022. Patients underwent two consecutive non-contrast chest CTs without dose modulation (i.e., one ULD protocol [80 kVp or 100 kVp, CTDIvol of 0.3 mGy or 0.6 mGy] and one SLD protocol [140 kVp, CTDIvol of 1.3 mGy]). Objective image noises measured at the level of tracheal carina were compared between the two protocols. Overall image quality and diagnostic confidence were scored on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = insufficient to 4 = excellent). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ULD CT for diagnosing pulmonary AVM with a feeding artery of over 2 mm in diameter were calculated along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) using SLD images as the standard of reference. RESULTS: A total of 44 consecutive patients with HHT (31 women; mean age, 42 ± 16 [standard deviation (SD)] years; body mass index, 23.2 ± 4.5 [SD] kg/m2) were included. Thirty-four pulmonary AVMs with a feeding artery of over 2 mm in diameter were found with SLD images versus 35 with ULD images. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value, and predictive negative value of ULD CT for the diagnosis of PAVM were 100% (34/34; 95% CI: 90-100), 96% (18/19; 95% CI: 74-100), 97% (34/35; 95% CI: 85-100) and 100% (18/18; 95% CI: 81-100), respectively. A significant difference in diagnostic confidence scores was found between ULD (3.8 ± 0.4 [SD]) and SLD (3.9 ± 0.1 [SD]) CT images (P = 0.03). No differences in overall image quality scores were found between ULD CT examinations (3.9 ± 0.2 [SD]) and SLD (4 ± 0 [SD]) CT examinations (P = 0.77). Effective radiation dose decreased significantly by 78.8% with ULD protocol, with no significant differences in noise values between ULD CT images (16.7 ± 5.0 [SD] HU) and SLD images (17.7 ± 6.6 [SD] HU) (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: ULD chest CT provides 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity for the diagnosis of treatable pulmonary AVM with a feeding artery of over 2 mm in diameter, leading to a 78.8% dose-saving compared with a standard low-dose protocol.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA