Predictors of durable electrical isolation in the setting of second-generation cryoballoon ablation: A comparison between left superior, left inferior, right superior, and right inferior pulmonary veins.

AIM: The aim of this study is to assess specific per-vein procedural predictors of pulmonary vein (PV) late reconnection in cryoballoon ablation (CbA) METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 148 consecutive patients undergoing a redo procedure after a previous index CbA in our center. A reconnection in at least one PV was found in 80 patients (54.1%) and the most frequently reconnected PV was the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV). Overall, pulmonary vein reconnection (PVr) was associated with longer time to -40°C (Tt-40°C) (54.4 ± 21.7 vs 67.6 ± 27.6 seconds; P < .001), warmer nadir temperature (NT) (-49.7°C ± 5.4°C vs -46.5°C ± 5.8°C; P < .001) and temperature at 60 seconds (-41.8°C ± 4.5°C vs -39.8°C ± 4.2°C; P < .001). The performance of these predictors differed between the veins. In particular, a comparable behavior was observed for left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) and right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV), where NT ≤ -48°C showed a sensibility and a specificity, respectively, of 62% and 65% and 71% and 72% in predicting durable PV isolation. For RIPV, NT ≤ -48°C showed a sensitivity of 74% but low specificity (53%). Tt -40°C less than 60 seconds showed good negative predictive values, respectively, 83.9% for LSPV, 94.9% for left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV), 90.2% for RSPV, and 82.7% for RIPV. Previous predictors cannot be used for LIPV. CONCLUSIONS: Freezing behavior and reconnection rates differ significantly among the four PVs. Freezing temperature parameters strongly predict late PVr in superior PVs and are slightly different in RIPV but can be applied as well. LIPV freezing behavior is the most different. Its reconnection is uncommon even in the subset of worse freezing temperatures and specific CB predictors cannot be identified.

Correction to: Two-year follow-up of one-stage left unilateral thoracoscopic epicardial and transcatheter endocardial ablation for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

Owing to a type error during final correction and proof data submission to the journal, there were mistakes introduced into the legends of Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 as well as into the Y-axis title of the plot of Fig. 4.

Two-year follow-up of one-stage left unilateral thoracoscopic epicardial and transcatheter endocardial ablation for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy and complication rates of a one-stage left unilateral thoracoscopic hybrid procedure in a series of patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in a 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients (34 males, 65.7 ± 8 years) having undergone hybrid isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) and posterior wall of left atrium (LA) by means of left unilateral hybrid thoracoscopic ablation for symptomatic persistent (n = 22, 43%) and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (n = 29, 57%) were analyzed. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 24.9 ± 11.8 months (median 24), the success rate without antiarrhythmic therapy was achieved in 68.6% of patients. Procedure-related major complications were observed in 2 patients (4%) including diaphragmatic perforation and late pericardial tamponade requiring mini left-sided thoracotomy and pericardial drainage, respectively. The success rate did not significantly differ between persistent and long-standing persistent AF (respectively, 68.2 and 69%; P = 0.89). Patients with AF relapse during the blanking period were 3.8 times more likely to have AF recurrence after 3 months from the ablation procedure. CONCLUSION: The hybrid one-stage left unilateral thoracoscopic procedure exhibits encouraging results in the setting of both persistent and long-standing persistent AF after a 2-year follow-up, at a low rate of adverse events.

Hybrid thoracoscopic epicardial ablation of right ventricular outflow tract in patients with Brugada syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal delayed electrograms (EGMs) from the anterior wall of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) epicardium have become the ablation target in Brugada syndrome (BrS). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of a novel hybrid thoracoscopic approach to perform epicardial RVOT radiofrequency ablation in BrS. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with BrS (26 men (72.2%); mean age 36.6±15.8 years; range 3-63 years) who underwent hybrid thoracoscopic epicardial ablation of RVOT from January 2016 to April 2018 were included in this study. Two expert electrophysiologists analyzed the EGMs during ajmaline challenge and guided the surgeon to perform ablation. Ajmaline challenge was repeated after 1 month to assess the absence of the BrS electrocardiographic pattern. Patients were followed by remote monitoring and outpatient visits every 6 months. RESULTS: The elimination of all abnormal EGMs was achieved in 94.4% of patients. After a mean follow-up of 16 ± 8 months (range 6-30 months), freedom from ventricular arrhythmias was obtained in 7 (77.8%) patients in secondary prevention 9/36 (25%) and in 24 (100%) patients in primary prevention 24/36 (75%). Major complications were observed in 1 patient (2.8%), who experienced late cardiac tamponade. CONCLUSION: Hybrid thoracoscopic epicardial RVOT ablation in BrS is a safe and feasible approach, allowing direct visualization of ablation during radiofrequency delivery. Because of ventricular arrhythmia recurrences, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is still mandatory in patients treated in secondary prevention and with high risk.